| Literature DB >> 34976027 |
Yuxiang Zhang1,2, Peng Li1,2, Nachuan Liu1,2, Tao Jing1,2, Zhiyong Ji3, Chao Yang1,2, Liangyu Zhao1,2, Ruhui Tian1,2, Huixing Chen1,2, Yuhua Huang1,2, Erlei Zhi1,2, Ningjing Ou3, Haowei Bai1,2, Yuchuan Zhou4, Zheng Li1,2, Chencheng Yao1,2.
Abstract
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is the most severe disease in male infertility, but the genetic causes for the majority of NOA remain unknown. FANCM is a member of Fanconi Anemia (FA) core complex, whose defects are associated with cell hypersensitivity to DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL)-inducing agents. It was reported that variants in FANCM (MIM: 609644) might cause azoospermia or oligospermia. However, there is still a lack of evidence to explain the association between different FANCM variants and male infertility phenotypes. Herein, we identified compound heterozygous variants in FANCM in two NOA-affected brothers (c. 1778delG:p. R593Qfs*76 and c. 1663G > T:p. V555F), and a homozygous variant in FANCM (c. 1972C > T:p. R658X) in a sporadic case with NOA, respectively. H&E staining and immunohistochemistry showed Sertoli cell-only Syndrome (SCOS) in the three patients with NOA. Collectively, our study expands the knowledge of variants in FANCM, and provides a new insight to understand the genetic etiology of NOA.Entities:
Keywords: FANCM; Sertoli cell-only syndrome; gene mutation; male infertility; non-obstructive azoospermia
Year: 2021 PMID: 34976027 PMCID: PMC8714797 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.799886
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Pedigree of the affected family with FANCM variants. Family pedigree with black fill denoting NOA-affected patient P6649 (Ⅲ-1) and his elder brother (Ⅲ-2). The arrowheads indicate the probands.
Clinical and semen characteristics in patients with bi-allelic FANCM variants.
| Characteristics | Subject | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P6649 | P6649-B | P6612 | Reference | |
| Age (years) | 31 | 34 | 23 | — |
| Testicular Volume (Left) (ml) | 10 | 8 | 12 | 12–15 |
| Testicular Volume (Right) (ml) | 10 | 8 | 12 | 12–15 |
| FSH (IU/L) | 14.29 | 12.85 | 24.95 | 1.27–19.26 |
| LH (IU/L) | 8.12 | 7.99 | 12.77 | 1.24–8.62 |
| T (μg/L) | 4 | 4.73 | 1.75 | 1.75–7.81 |
| Karyotype | 46,XY | 46,XY | 46,XY | 46,XY |
| Y Chromosome Microdeletions | N | N | N | N |
| Semen parameters | ||||
| Semen volume (ml) | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.6 | ≥1.5 |
| Sperm concentration (106/ml) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ≥15 |
| PR (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ≥32 |
| NP (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| IM (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Centrifuged spermatozoa number (/ejaculate) | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; T, testosterone; PR, progressive; NP, non-progressive; IM, immotility; N, normal phenotype.
FIGURE 2Structure of the FANCM protein and the genetic context of the FANCM variants detected in three cases diagnosed with NOA. (A) The positions of FANCM variants are shown and the conservation of the FANCM variants was analyzed. (B–D) Validation of FANCM variants identified by WES using Sanger sequencing in two brothers from the same family [(B,C), P6649, and P6649-B] and a sporadic patient [(D), P6612].
Bi-allelic FANCM variants identified in the three NOA-effected cases.
| Gene | Subject | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P6649 and P6649-B | P6612 | ||
|
|
|
| |
| DNA change | c. 1663G > T | c. 1778delG | c. 1972C > T |
| Amino acid alteration | p. V555F | p. R593Qfs*76 | p. R658X |
| Mutation type | compound heterozygous | compound heterozygous | homozygous |
| Allele Frequency in Human Populations | |||
| East Asians in ExAC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1,000 Genomes Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Functional Prediction | |||
| SIFT | damaging | damaging | damaging |
| Polyphen-2 | damaging | damaging | damaging |
| Mutation Taster | damaging | damaging | damaging |
FIGURE 3H&E staining of cross-sections of testis in NOA-affected patients. (A–C) H&E staining of cross-sections of testicular biopsy in the patient with NOA (A), P6649; (B), P6649-B; (C), P6612). (D) H&E staining of cross-sections of seminiferous tubule in the OA-affected patient as the positive control. Scale bars = 20 μm in (A–D).
FIGURE 4Expression of the markers of germ cells and somatic cells respectively in the testis of NOA-affected patients and patients with OA as the positive control. (A–D) IF staining results showed that there were no expressions of UCHL1 (a marker of spermatogonia) and DDX4 (hallmark of germ cells) in the testis of the proband (A,B) and his elder brother (C,D), whereas all of the cells in seminiferous tubules were positive for AR or SOX9 (markers of Sertoli cells-affected). (E,F) IF staining results showed that there was normal spermatogenesis in the OA patients. Scale bars = 20 μm in (A–E).