| Literature DB >> 34975793 |
Wenrui Zhen1,2, Yuchen Liu3, Yujing Shao4, Yanbo Ma1, Yuanyuan Wu2, Fangshen Guo2, Waseem Abbas2, Yuming Guo2, Zhong Wang2.
Abstract
The prebiotics- and probiotics-mediated positive modulation of the gut microbiota composition is considered a useful approach to improve gut health and food safety in chickens. This study explored the effects of yeast β-glucan (YG) supplementation on intestinal microbiome and metabolites profiles as well as mucosal immunity in older hens. A total of 256 43-week-old hens were randomly assigned to two treatments, with 0 and 200 mg/kg of YG. Results revealed YG-induced downregulation of toll-like receptors (TLRs) and cytokine gene expression in the ileum without any effect on the intestinal barrier. 16S rRNA analysis claimed that YG altered α- and β-diversity and enriched the relative abundance of class Bacilli, orders Lactobacillales and Enterobacteriales, families Lactobacillaceae and Enterobacteriaceae, genera Lactobacillus and Escherichia-Shigella, and species uncultured bacterium-Lactobacillus. Significant downregulation of cutin and suberin, wax biosynthesis, atrazine degradation, vitamin B6 metabolism, phosphotransferase system (PTS), steroid degradation, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, aminobenzoate degradation and quorum sensing and upregulation of ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, C5-branched dibasic acid metabolism, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, pentose and glucuronate interconversions, steroid biosynthesis, carotenoid biosynthesis, porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, sesquiterpenoid and triterpenoid biosynthesis, lysine degradation, and ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosyntheses were observed in YG-treated hens, as substantiated by the findings of untargeted metabolomics analysis. Overall, YG manifests prebiotic properties by altering gut microbiome and metabolite profiles and can downregulate the intestinal mucosal immune response of breeder hens.Entities:
Keywords: gut metabolome; gut microbiome; hens; intestinal mucosal immune responses; yeast β-glucan
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975793 PMCID: PMC8718749 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.766878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Sequences of the oligonucleotide primers used for quantitative real-time PCR.
| Name | Primer sequence | GenBank accession number |
|---|---|---|
| TLR2 | F: ACCTTCTGCACTCTGCCATT | NM_204278.1 |
| R: TGTGAATGAAGCACCGGTAA | ||
| TLR4 | F: CCACTATTCGGTTGGTGGAC | NM_001030693.1 |
| R: ACAGCTTCTCAGCAGGCAAT | ||
| TLR6 | F: CCAGAAGACTTGAGCGGAACACAG | NM_001081709 |
| R: TCTCCTCTTCGTCTGCGTCCAC | ||
| MyD88 | F: TGCAAGACCATGAAGAACGA | NM_001030962.3 |
| R: TCACGGCAGCAAGAGAGATT | ||
| NF-κB | F: TGGAGAAGGCTATGCAGCTT | NM_205134.1 |
| R: CATCCTGGACAGCAGTGAGA | ||
| TNF-α | F: GAGCGTTGACTTGGCTGTC | NM_204267.1 |
| R: AAGCAACAACCAGCTATGCAC | ||
| IL-1β | F: TCATCTTCTACCGCCTGGAC | NM_204524.1 |
| R: GTAGGTGGCGATGTTGACCT | ||
| IFN-γ | F: CTTCCTGATGGCGTGAAGA | NM_205149.1 |
| R: GAGGATCCACCAGCTTCTGT | ||
| IL-2 | F: GAGTGCACCCAGCAAACTCT | NM_204153.1 |
| R: CCGGTGTGATTTAGACCCGT | ||
| IL-6 | F: GATCCGGCAGATGGTGATAA | NM_204628.1 |
| R: AGGATGAGGTGCATGGTGAT | ||
| IL-8 | F: GGCTTGCTAGGGGAAATGA | NM_205498.1 |
| R: AGCTGACTCTGACTAGGAAACTGT | ||
| IL-10 | F: CGCTGTCACCGCTTCTTCA | NM_001004414.2 |
| R: TCCCGTTCTCATCCATCTTCTC | ||
| IL-12 | F: TACTTTCCTTTGCTGCCCTTCT | NM_213571.1 |
| R: CAGTTCCTTTCAGTTCTGTTCCCT | ||
| TGF-β3 | F: CATCGAGCTCTTCCAGATCC | NM_205454.1 |
| R: GACATCGAAGGACAGCCACT | ||
| CLDN1 | F: AAGTGCATGGAGGATGACCA | NM_001013611.2 |
| R: GCCACTCTGTTGCCATACCA | ||
| FABP2 | F: GAAGCAATGGGCGTGAATGTGATG | NM_001007923.1 |
| R: TTCGATGTCGATGGTACGGAAGTTG | ||
| ZO-1 | F: ACAGCTCATCACAGCCTCCT | XM_040706827.1 |
| R: TGAAGGGCTTACAGGAATGG | ||
| Occludin | F: AGTTCGACACCGACCTGAAG | NM_205128.1 |
| R: TCCTGGTATTGAGGGCTGTC | ||
| β-actin | F: GAGAAATTGTGCGTGACATCA | NM_205518.1 |
| R: CCTGAACCTCTCATTGCCA |
Primers were designed through a primer designing tool and synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd;
F, forward; R, reverse; TLR, toll-like receptor; MyD88, myeloid differential protein 88; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; IL, interleukin; IFN-γ, interferon γ; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β; CLDN1, claudin 1; FABP2, fatty acid-binding protein 2; and ZO-1, zona occludens 1.
Effect of dietary yeast β-glucan supplementation on ileal mucosa gene expression in laying hens (n = 8).
| Items | Control | Yeast β-glucan | SEM |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLR2 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.046 | 0.021 |
| TLR4 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.055 | 0.004 |
| TLR6 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 0.074 | 0.569 |
| MyD88 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.059 | 0.207 |
| NF-κB | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.061 | 0.601 |
| IL-1β | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.052 | 0.352 |
| IL-2 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.076 | 0.964 |
| IL-6 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.093 | 0.039 |
| IL-8 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.086 | 0.000 |
| IL-10 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.053 | 0.048 |
| IL-12 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.077 | 0.039 |
| TGF-β3 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.037 | 0.013 |
| IFN-γ | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.111 | 0.030 |
| TNF-α | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.050 | 0.008 |
| CLDN1 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.090 | 0.462 |
| FABP2 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.155 | 0.859 |
| ZO-1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.076 | 0.979 |
| Occludin | 1.00 | 1.29 | 0.120 | 0.240 |
SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 1Differences in bacterial community diversity, richness, and structures in the ileum of breeder laying hens fed with or without dietary Glu200. (A) Community diversity and richness between Control and Glu200 groups. (B) PCoA of bacterial community structure between Control and Glu200 groups. Each symbol represents each gut microbiota. Red symbols represent the Control group, and blue symbols represent the Glu200 group. Control: the basal diet; Glu200: the basal diet supplemented with 200 mg/kg yeast β-glucan. *means significant difference between groups.
Figure 2Changes of microbial composition in the ileum of breeder laying hens fed with or without dietary Glu200. (A) Venn diagram for bacterial OTU compositions in two groups. (B) Microbial composition at the phylum level. (C) Microbial composition at the genus level; each bar represented the average relative abundance of each bacterial taxon within a group. (D) Difference of the relative abundances of Lactobacillus between Control and Glu200 groups. LEfSe was used to explore differences between Control and Glu200 groups. (E) Cladogram plot of LEfSe analysis. (F) Histogram of LDA value distribution between Control and Glu200 groups. *means significant difference between groups.
Figure 3Microbial function prediction in the ileum of breeder laying hens fed with or without dietary Glu200. The second level of the KEGG pathway is shown in the extended error bar. The value of p are shown to the right. Control: the basal diet; Glu200: the basal diet supplemented with 200 mg/kg yeast β-glucan.
Figure 4Principal components analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plots of identified metabolites in the ileum contents of chickens (n = 6) fed an un-supplemented control diet (Control) (red) or a basal diet supplemented with yeast β-glucan (Glu200) (blue). PCA and PLS-DA models demonstrating a separation between Control and Glu200 groups. Each dot on the plot represents the scores of the biological replicates. (A) PCA-positive ion; (B) PCA-negative ion; (C) PLS-DA-positive ion (R2 = 0.998, Q2 = 0.883); (D) PLS-DA-negative ion (R2 = 0.999, Q2 = 0.816).
Figure 5Volcano plot of differential metabolites between the control and the Glu200 groups. The abscissa axis represents the multiple of difference of metabolites (log2), and the vertical axis represents the q-value (−log10). Each point represents a kind of metabolite; the scatter color represents the final screening result. Significant upregulated metabolites are indicated in red (up), downregulated metabolites are indicated in green (down), and nonsignificant differences in metabolites are gray (none). (A) Represents positive ion modes and (B) represents negative ion modes.
Figure 6Buddle diagram of KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites. The x axis (Rich Factor) represents the ratio of the number of differential metabolites annotated to the pathway to all the metabolites annotated to the pathway. The higher the value, the higher the degree of enrichment of differential metabolites in this pathway. The color of the point represents the value of p value of the hypergeometric test, and the smaller the value is, the greater the reliability of the test and the more statistically significant it is. The size of the dots represents the number of differential metabolites annotated to the pathway, and the larger the point, the more differential metabolites in the pathway. (A) Positive ion pattern analysis and (B) negative ion pattern analysis.