| Literature DB >> 34975726 |
Shaozhi Zhao1,2, Qi Zhao2, Yuming Jiao1,2, Hao Li1,2, Jiancong Weng1,2, Ran Huo1,2, Jie Wang1,2, Hongyuan Xu1,2, Junze Zhang1,2, Yan Li2, Zhenzhou Wu2, Shuo Wang1,2, Yong Cao1,2, Jizong Zhao1,2.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the association between radiomics features and epilepsy in patients with unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) and to develop a prediction model based on radiomics features and clinical characteristics for bAVM-related epilepsy.Entities:
Keywords: brain arteriovenous malformations; epilepsy; machine learning; radiomics analysis; time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975726 PMCID: PMC8714660 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.767165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1The workflow of the study.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, (mean ± SD, years) | 26.6 ± 11.6 | 30.7 ± 11.9 | 0.023 |
| Male, no. (%) | 72 (72.0) | 45 (59.2) | 0.075 |
| Size (mean ± SD, mm) | 46.6 ± 12.6 | 40.8 ± 12.1 | 0.003 |
| Deep venous drainage, no. (%) | 13 (13.0) | 12 (15.8) | 0.600 |
| Left side, no. (%) | 52 (52.0) | 45 (59.2) | 0.341 |
|
| |||
| Frontal | 55 (55.0) | 20 (26.3) | <0.001 |
| Temporal | 31 (31.0) | 20 (26.3) | 0.497 |
| Parietal | 26 (26.0) | 27 (35.5) | 0.172 |
| Occipital | 14 (14.0) | 18 (23.7) | 0.099 |
| Insula | 5 (5.0) | 4 (5.3) | 1.000 |
|
| 0.072 | ||
| I | 10 (10.0) | 12 (15.8) | |
| II | 33 (33.0) | 31 (40.8) | |
| III | 44 (44.0) | 26 (34.2) | |
| IV | 11 (11.0) | 5 (6.6) | |
| V | 2 (2.0) | 2 (2.6) |
S-M Grading, Spetzler-Martin Grading.
BAVMs involving more than one brain lobe were counted repeatedly.
t-test.
Chi-square test.
Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
P-value <0.05.
Figure 2Comparison of ROC curves based on 5-fold cross-validation among the three models. The clinical model is marked with an orange curve, and the AUC is 0.71 (95% CI 0.62–0.80). The radiomics model is marked with a blue curve, and the AUC is 0.78 (95% CI 0.71–0.85). The combined model is marked with a green curve, and the AUC is 0.82 (95% CI 0.74–0.90).
Diagnostic accuracy of prediction models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical model | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.72 |
| Radiomics model | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| Combined model | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
ACC, accuracy; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SE, sensibility; SP, specificity.
Figure 3The radiomics-clinical nomogram derived from the combined model. The nomogram was built based on patient age, lesion size, involvement of the frontal lobe, and radiomics score. With the nomogram, the probability of epilepsy for each patient could be calculated on the basis of a logistic regression formula using the total points.
Figure 4Calibration curve for the nomogram and decision curve analysis for the three models. (A) The calibration curve indicates the goodness-of-fit of the nomogram. The 45° gray dotted line represents the ideal prediction, and the green curve represents the predictive performance of the nomogram. The closer the green curve is to the ideal prediction line, the better the predictive efficacy of the nomogram. (B) Decision curve analysis of the three models in the whole cohort. The green curve, the blue curve, and the orange curve represent the net benefits of the combined model, the radiomics model, and the clinical model, respectively. The combined model had a higher net benefit than the other two models and simple diagnoses, such as all epilepsy patients (gray curve) or no epilepsy patients (black curve), across a large range of threshold probabilities at which a patient would be diagnosed with epilepsy.