| Literature DB >> 34975567 |
Xiang-Jie Guo1, Peng Wu1, Xiao-Hong Cui2,3, Jiao Jia2,3, Shuang Bao2,3, Fei Yu2,3, Li-Na Ma2,3, Xiang-Xin Cao2,3, Yan Ren2,3.
Abstract
Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a serious mental disease with complex clinical manifestations and high recurrence rate. The purpose of this study was to detect metabolites related to the diagnosis and efficacy evaluation of bipolar depression in plasma samples by metabolomics.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; bipolar depression; bipolar disorder (BD); efficacy evaluation; metabolomics; pre- and post-treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975567 PMCID: PMC8718604 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.747595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
General characteristics of the subjects, including BD patients at baseline and after 8 weeks medication, and healthy controls.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | 30.26 ± 12.695 | — | 30.66 ± 8.231 | — | 0.867 |
| Gender(male/female) | 13/18 | — | 23/24 | — | 0.644 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.42 ± 3.766 | — | 22.31 ± 3.041 | — | 0.177 |
| Spouse (with/without) | 19/12 | — | 23/24 | — | 0.355 |
| HAMD-24 total score | 21.42 ± 7.86 | 9.13 ± 7.293 | — | 0.000 | — |
|
| |||||
| Anxiety/somatization | 5.45 ± 2.474 | 2.68 ± 1.759 | — | 0.000 | — |
| Weigh reduction | 0.16 ± 0.374 | 0.06 ± 0.250 | — | 0.235 | — |
| Cognitive impairment | 3.94 ± 2.351 | 2.03 ± 2.008 | — | 0.001 | — |
| Diurnal variation | 0.71 ± 1.039 | 0.29 ± 0.643 | — | 0.419 | — |
| Slowness | 4.61 ± 2.108 | 2.29 ± 1.736 | — | 0.000 | — |
| Sleep disorder | 2.23 ± 1.687 | 1.03 ± 0.875 | — | 0.001 | — |
| Despair sense | 4.16 ± 1.791 | 1.32 ± 1.720 | — | 0.000 | — |
| HAMA-14 total score | 16.58 ± 6.076 | 8.00 ± 5.373 | — | 0.000 | — |
|
| |||||
| Anxiety of somatization | 10.45 ± 4.146 | 5.55 ± 3.641 | — | 0.000 | — |
| Mental anxiety | 5.48 ± 2.839 | 2.65 ± 2.229 | — | 0.000 | — |
| CGI score | 4.55 ± 0.888 | 2.90 ± 0.790 | — | 0.000 | — |
|
| |||||
| Mood stabilizers | 28 (90.32%) | — | — | — | — |
| Lithium | 17 (54.84%) | — | — | — | — |
| Lamotrigine | 9 (29.03%) | — | — | — | — |
| Sodium valproate | 2 (6.45%) | — | — | — | — |
| Antipsychotics | 22 (70.97%) | — | — | — | — |
| Antidepressants | 7 (22.58%) | — | — | — | — |
HAMD-24, 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HAMA-14, 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; CGI, Clinical global impression scale; BMI, Body mass index.
Values expressed as the mean ± SD (range).
p-value represent BD patients at baseline vs. BD patients after 8 weeks medication, and p-value.
“–” Means that the data are not shown.
Figure 1The typical 1H NMR spectra of the three groups of plasma samples.
Peak attribution in the typical 1H-NMR spectra of plasma samples.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lipid | 0.86 (t), 1.28 (m), 1.58 (m), 2.01 (m), |
| 2 | Isoleucine | 0.93 (t, |
| 3 | Leucine | 0.96 (t, |
| 4 | Valine | 0.99 (d, |
| 5 | Lactate | 1.33 (d, |
| 6 | Alanine | 1.48 (d, |
| 7 | Lysine | 1.72 (m),1.90 (m) |
| 8 | N-acetyl glycoprotein | 2.04 (s) |
| 9 | Glutamate | 2.08 (m), 2.35 (m), 3.75 (m) |
| 10 | β-hydroxybutyric | 2.34 (dd) |
| 11 | Pyroracemic | 2.37 (s) |
| 12 | Glutamine | 2.45 (m) |
| 13 | Citrate | 2.53(d, |
| 14 | Creatine | 3.02 (s) |
| 15 | Creatinine | 3.04 (s), 3.91 (s) |
| 16 | Choline | 3.21 (s), 3.51 (t, |
| 17 | Trimethylamine oxide | 3.26 (s) |
| 18 | Glycine | 3.56 (s) |
| 19 | Threonine | 3.60 (d, |
| 20 | Aspartic | 3.90 (dd) |
| 21 | β- glucose | 4.65 (d, |
| 22 | α- glucose | 5.24 (d, |
Figure 2PLS-DA model of all three groups of plasma spectra, (A) PLS-DA score plots of 1H NMR spectra, in which each point represented a plasma metabolome of one subject, and the distance between data points reflected the scale of their metabolic differences; (B) 200-iteration permutation test map of the PLS-DA model.
Figure 3OPLS-DA scores plots of plasma samples (A,C,E), the permutation test maps (B,D) and the corresponding S-plots (F), (A,B): healthy controls vs. bipolar depression patients at baseline; (C,D,F): bipolar depression patients at baseline vs. bipolar depression patients after 8 weeks medication; (E): healthy controls vs. bipolar depression patients after 8 weeks medication.
Figure 4The concentration variation diagram of the 7 different metabolites among healthy controls, bipolar depression patients at baseline and bipolar depression patients after 8 weeks medication. n.s., non-significant *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 5Metabolic pathways analysis map of the metabolites related to the efficacy of medication for bipolar depression. Color intensity (white to red) reflects increasing statistical significance, while circle diameter covaries with pathway impact.