| Literature DB >> 34975269 |
Wisut Sittichaya1, Sarah M Smith2, Roger A Beaver3, Narit Thaochan1.
Abstract
Microperus Wood, 1980 ambrosia beetles in Thailand are reviewed. Four species, M.bidentatus sp. nov., M.bucolicus sp. nov., M.globodeclivis sp. nov., and M.serratus sp. nov. are described. Four new combinations are given: Microperusarmaticeps (Schedl, 1942) comb. nov., Microperusexsculptus (Eggers, 1927) comb. nov., Microperuspedellus (Schedl, 1969) comb. nov., and Microperusspicatulus (Browne, 1986) comb. nov., stat. res., all from Xyleborus. Two new synonyms are proposed: Microperuscruralis (Schedl, 1975) (= Xyleborusmyllus Browne, 1986 syn. nov.), Microperusexsculptus (Eggers, 1927) (= Xyleborusdentipennis Browne, 1983 syn. nov.). Four species are reported from Thailand for the first time: Microperuschrysophylli (Eggers, 1930), Microperusexsculptus, Microperusnanus (Browne, 1949) and Microperusquercicola (Eggers, 1926). With the inclusion of the Microperus species described and recorded herein, the diversity of Microperus is increased to 35 species, of which 18 are recorded in Thailand. An updated key to the Microperus of the Indochinese Peninsula and China is provided. The taxonomy, diagnostic characters, and distribution of species are briefly discussed. Wisut Sittichaya, Sarah Smith, Roger A. Beaver, Narit Thaochan.Entities:
Keywords: Key; Microperus; Oriental region; Thailand; new combinations; new records; new species; new synonymy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975269 PMCID: PMC8671307 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1074.76235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figure 1.Insect survey localities in Thailand, red stars indicate surveyed areas, blue stars indicate locations where new species and newly recorded species were captured. Source: the map was modified from a Royal Forest Department of Thailand map.
Figure 2.sp. nov. holotype A lateral view, B dorsal view, C posterolateral view, D front, E head ventral view, F declivity.
Figure 3.sp. nov. holotype A lateral view B dorsal view C posterolateral view D head ventral view E front F declivity.
Figure 4.sp. nov. holotype A lateral view B dorsal view C posterolateral view D head ventral view E front F declivity.
Figure 5.sp. nov. holotype A lateral view B dorsal view C posterolateral view D head ventral view E front F declivity.
Figure 6.(Eggers, 1927) comb. nov. A dorsal view B lateral view.
Figure 7.(Eggers, 1930) A dorsal view B lateral view.
Figure 8.(Browne, 1949) A dorsal view B lateral view.
Figure 9.(Eggers, 1926) A dorsal view B lateral view.
Synoptic list of the fauna of Thailand.
| Species | First Record | Thai distribution |
|---|---|---|
|
| C: Nakhon Nayok; N:Chiang Mai, Phetchabun; N-E: Chaiyaphum, Nakhon Ratchasima, Sakhon Nakhon | |
| This publication | S: Songkhla, Trang | |
| This publication | S: Nakhon Sri Thammarat | |
| New record | N: Chiangmai | |
| Sittichaya et al. (2012) | S: Chumphon, Nakhon Sri Thammarat | |
|
| S: Nakhon Sri Thammarat | |
| New record | S: Narathiwat | |
| This publication | N: Phayao | |
| New record | S: Narathawat | |
|
| C: Suphanburi; N: Chiang Mai; N-E: Chaiyaphum; S: Nakhon Sri Thammarat, Surat Thani | |
|
| C: Chanthaburi; S: Chumphon, Nakhon Sri Thammarat, Surat Thani | |
|
| C: Nakhon Nayok; N: Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son, Nan, Phetchabun, Phitsanulok; N-E: Chaiyaphum, Loei; S: Nakhon Sri Thammarat, Surat Thani | |
|
| N: Chiang Mai | |
| New record | S: Songkhla, Narathiwat | |
|
| C: Phetchaburi; N: Chiang Mai, Nan; S: Chumphon, Nakhon Sri Thammarat | |
|
| S: Chumphon, Nakhon Sri Thammarat, Songkhla, Surat Thani | |
| This publication | S: Songkhla, Narathiwat | |
|
| C: Prachuab Khiri Khan, Uthaithani; N: Chiang Mai; N-E: Chaiyaphum; S: Chumphon, Nakhon Sri Thammarat, Songkhla, Surat Thani, Trang |
| 1 | Elytral disc broadly, deeply transversely impressed with a saddle-like depression from scutellum to declivital base; declivity deeply sulcate, its margins costate; elytral bases slightly emarginated to accommodate a prominent and dense mycangial tuft |
|
| – | Elytral disc either medially impressed and appearing humped, or flat, or broadly convex; declivity round or flat or convex; elytral bases not emarginated and mycangial tuft minute, either not readily apparent or lightly setose |
|
| 2 | Elytral base emargination broadly recurved; elytral disc shallowly depressed; declivital summit armed with a pair of large tubercles at interstriae 1; punctures on declivity distinct and broad; larger species, 3.0–3.1 mm |
|
| – | Elytral base emargination broadly V-shaped; elytral disc deeply depressed, more deeper posteriorly; interstriae 1 on declivital summit without a pair of large tubercles; punctures on declivital face small and indistinct; smaller species, 2.12 mm |
|
| 3 | Posterolateral margin of elytra smoothly rounded, without any indication of a costa or carina |
|
| – | Posterolateral margin of elytra marked by an elevated costa or carina |
|
| 4 | Elytral lateral margin tapering posteriorly from the middle to apex; elytral apex acute; minute species, 1.12–1.24 mm |
|
| – | Elytral lateral margin subparallel, broadly tapering posteriorly; apex broadly rounded, not acute; larger species, 1.60 mm |
|
| 5 | Declivity obliquely truncate; posterolateral declivital margin rounded and denticulate |
|
| – | Declivity rounded; posterolateral declivital margin costate or carinate, with or without granules |
|
| 6 | Declivital interstriae 2 and 3 strongly laterally broadened from base to declivital midpoint and then narrowing towards apex |
|
| – | Declivital interstriae parallel from base to apex, never laterally broadened |
|
| 7 | Denticles on declivital summit and margins larger and more sharply acute than those on declivital face |
|
| – | Denticles on declivital summit of equal size and shape as those on declivital face |
|
| 8 | Denticles on declivital summit as dense as those on declivital face; declivital face opalescent, subshiny |
|
| – | Denticles on declivital summit denser than those on declivital face; declivital face shagreened, dull |
|
| 9 | Larger, 2.55–2.95 mm |
|
| – | Smaller, 1.2–2.1 mm |
|
| 10 | Stout, 1.93–2.19× as long as wide; elytral posterolateral margin strongly carinate and unarmed |
|
| – | Elongate, 2.5–2.9× as long as wide; elytral posterolateral margin costate and granulate |
|
| 11 | Declivital strial punctures very large, distinct |
|
| – | Declivital strial punctures small, indistinct |
|
| 12 | Declivity with granules, denticles or tubercles distinctly less abundant than strial punctures |
|
| – | Declivity with abundant granules or denticles, at least as abundant as strial punctures |
|
| 13 | Elytral disc shallowly transversely impressed with a saddle-like impression |
|
| – | Elytral disc without a depression |
|
| 14 | Discal impression deeper, antero-posteriorly narrower, with steeper anterior and posterior slopes, strial punctures on impression with rounded granules; interstrial spines on disc behind impression stronger and backwardly hooked |
|
| – | Discal impression shallower, antero-posteriorly broader, with gentler anterior and posterior slopes, strial punctures on impression without granules; interstrial tubercles on disc behind impression moderate with rounded apices pointing dorsally |
|
| 15 | Declivital tubercles uniformly sized |
|
| – | Declivital tubercles not uniformly sized, 1–2 pairs of larger tubercles on declivital interstriae 3 |
|
| 16 | Posterolateral declivital margin carinate, unarmed |
|
| – | Posterolateral declivital margin costate and denticulate |
|
| 17 | Declivity steeply rounded, declivital interstriae 1 bearing 1–2 small tubercles on declivital face; larger, 1.9–2.0 mm |
|
| – | Declivity gradually rounded, declivital interstriae 1 unarmed on declivital face; smaller, 1.66–1.76 mm |
|
| 18 | Declivital interstriae 3 with two pairs of prominent denticles; posterior half of elytral disc rugose with deeply impressed striae and costate interstriae, interstriae bearing strong incurved spines that become more prominent toward declivital summit |
|
| – | Declivital interstriae 3 with one pair of prominent tubercles; posterior half of elytral disc smooth, striae and interstriae flush, interstriae with a few small tubercles at summit |
|
| 19 | Elytral disc convex on basal 1/3, appearing humped in lateral view |
|
| – | Elytral disc flat, never appearing humped |
|
| 20 | Declivital interstriae densely covered with short semi-erect scales |
|
| – | Declivital interstriae densely covered with long fine, erect hair-like setae |
|
| 21 | Antennal club flat, type 3 with two sutures visible on apical 1/3 of posterior face; larger, declivity smooth, shiny; larger, 1.95–2.0 mm and more elongate, 2.79–2.86× as long as wide |
|
| – | Antennal club obliquely truncate, type 2 with segment 1 almost covering posterior face (Fig. |
|
| 22 | Antennal club flat, type 3 with two sutures visible on apical 1/3 of posterior face (Fig. |
|
| – | Antennal club obliquely truncate, type 2 with segment 1 almost covering posterior face; one suture visible on posterior face near apex |
|
| 23 | Declivital interstrial granules dispersed, separated by the width of at least three granules; posterolateral margin of declivity weakly carinate and granulate; interstrial vestiture consisting of short semi-erect bristles, shorter in length than the width of an interstria; smaller, 1.2–1.7 mm |
|
| – | Declivital interstrial granules dense, separated by the width of one granule; posterolateral margin of declivity strongly carinate; interstrial vestiture consisting of long semi-erect hair-like setae, longer in length than the width of an interstria (easily abraded); larger, 1.8–2.0 mm |
|