| Literature DB >> 34975252 |
Dinesh P Sharma1, Amitkumar Maheshwari1, Chandan Chakrabarti2, Darshan J Patel1.
Abstract
Aim Iodine deficiency disorder (IDD) is the cause of preventable brain damage, mental retardation, and stunted growth and development in children. This study aimed to detect the prevalence of IDD in Kachchh district, Gujarat, by testing urinary iodine excretion levels and iodine intake of salts in school-going children. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted and the level of iodine deficiency was assessed in 223 school children of both sexes, aged 6 to 12 years from four taluka s, that is, subdivisions, of the Kachchh district by estimating urinary iodine using Sandell-Kolthoff reaction along with iodine content in edible salt samples by MBI kit (STK-Spot testing kit, MBI Kits International, Chennai, TN, India). Results The median urinary iodine level was found to be 194 μg/L, indicating no biochemical iodine deficiency in the region. In the study areas, 1% of the population showed a level of urinary iodine excretion < 50 μg/L. About 83% salt samples had iodine level more than 15 ppm and the iodine content in salt samples less than 15 ppm was only about 17%, indicating the salt samples at households contain iodine in adequate level. Conclusion There is a need of periodic surveys to assess the change in magnitude of IDD with respect to impact of iodized salt intervention. Furthermore, to strengthen National Iodine Deficiency Disorders Control Program, factors should be identified. There is also a need to prevent and reimpose the ban on the sale of noniodized salts in Gujarat. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Entities:
Keywords: iodine deficiency disorders (IDD); iodized salts; prevalence of goitre; school children; urine iodine excretion
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975252 PMCID: PMC8714303 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lab Physicians ISSN: 0974-2727
Epidemiological criteria based on the World Health Organization/United Nations Children’s Fund/International Council for Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorder guidelines
| Urine iodine in children (μg/L) | Iodine intake | Iodine status |
|---|---|---|
| < 20 | Insufficient | Severe deficiency |
| 20–49 | Insufficient | Moderate deficiency |
| 50–99 | Insufficient | Mild deficiency |
| 100–199 | Adequate | Optimal |
| 200–299 | More than adequate | Risk of iodine-induced hyperthyroidism |
| ≥ 300 | Excessive | Risk of hyperthyroidism and autoimmune thyroid disease |
Distribution of urinary iodine ( n = 223)
| Urinary Iodine (μg/L) | % (percentage) | |
|---|---|---|
| Note: Out of the 223 urine samples collected, 99% samples were found with urinary iodine excretion (UIE) level 100 μg/L or more, while 1% showed less than 100 μg/L. | ||
| < 100 | 2 | 1 |
| 100–200 | 108 | 48 |
| 200–490 | 102 | 46 |
| 500–990 | 11 | 5 |
| < 1,000 | 0 | 100 |
| ≥ 1,000 | 0 | 0 |
Median urinary iodine excretion (UIE) level in Kachchh district (μg/L)
|
| Median UIC (μg/L) |
|---|---|
| Note: The median urinary iodine level was 194 μg/L, indicating no biochemical iodine deficiency in the region. | |
| Bhuj | 185 |
| Nakhatrana | 192 |
| Khothara | 196 |
| Anjar | 225 |
| Median | 194 |
Urinary iodine excretion (UIE) level in rural areas of Kachchh district
|
|
| Urinary iodine excretion (UIE) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 50 μg/L (%) | > 50 μg/L (%) | ||
| Note: 1% showed urinary iodine excretion (UIE) level < 50 μg/L, while 99% showed a level ≥ 50 μg/L. | |||
| Anjar | 50 | 1 (2) | 49 (98) |
| Nakhatrana | 50 | 0 | 50 (100) |
| Kothara | 53 | 0 | 53 (100) |
| Bhuj | 70 | 0 | 70 (100) |
| Total | 223 | 1 | 222 (99) |
Salt Iodization level in rural areas of Kachchh district
|
| No. of salt samples tested | Iodization of salt (ppm) (MBI kit) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 ppm | < 15 ppm | > 15 ppm | Percentage (%) of salt samples adequately iodized | ||
| Note: The iodine content of 223 salt samples was assessed by the MBI kit method provided by UNICEF, out of which 82% salt samples showed adequate iodine (> 15 ppm) and 17% showed < 15 ppm iodine. | |||||
| Anjar | 50 | 0 | 8 | 42 | 84 |
| Nakhatrana | 50 | 0 | 8 | 42 | 84 |
| Kothara | 53 | 0 | 12 | 41 | 77 |
| Bhuj | 70 | 0 | 10 | 60 | 86 |
| Total | 17% | 82% | |||
Goitre prevalence rate in various talukas of Kachchh district
|
| Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Total cases | Total children examined | Prevalence rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anjar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 2 |
| Nakhatrana | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50 | 4 |
| Kothara | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 53 | 1.88 |
| Bhuj | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 70 | 1.42 |
Criteria for monitoring progress toward eliminating iodine deficiency disorder (IDD) as a public health problem 14
| Indicator | Goal |
|---|---|
| Urinary iodine* | |
| Proportion below 100 μg/L | < 50% |
| Proportion below 50 μg/L | < 20% |
| Salt iodization | |
| Proportion of households consuming effectively iodized salts | > 90% |
Age-wise analysis of urinary iodine excretion
| [A] | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age-wise distribution of urinary iodine (
| ||||||||||||||
| Age (y) |
| < 200 μg/L | 200–490 μg/L | 500–990 μg/L | < 1,000 μg/L | > 1,000 μg/L | ||||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | |||||
| 6 | 10 | 6 | 60 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 7 | 27 | 14 | 52 | 12 | 44 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 8 | 19 | 11 | 58 | 7 | 37 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 9 | 34 | 14 | 41 | 19 | 56 | 1 | 3 | 34 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 10 | 32 | 14 | 44 | 16 | 50 | 2 | 6 | 32 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 11 | 53 | 26 | 49 | 25 | 47 | 2 | 4 | 53 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 12 | 48 | 25 | 52 | 20 | 42 | 3 | 6 | 48 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| 6 | 10 (100) | 0 | 10 | |||||||||||
| 7 | 27 (100) | 0 | 27 | |||||||||||
| 8 | 19 (100) | 0 | 19 | |||||||||||
| 9 | 34 (100) | 0 | 34 | |||||||||||
| 10 | 32 (100) | 0 | 32 | |||||||||||
| 11 | 52 (98.11) | 1 (1.92) | 53 | |||||||||||
| 12 | 47 (97.91) | 1 (2.0) | 48 | |||||||||||
| Total | 221 (99.10) | 2 (0.89) | 223 | |||||||||||