Literature DB >> 34975193

THE PROSTATE CENTER: MULTIDISCIPLINARITY, ORGANIZATION OF DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER.

Tomislav Kuliš1, Luka Penezić1, Marija Gamulin1, Ivica Mokos1, Marjan Marić1, Vladimir Ferenčak1, Eleonora Goluža1, Tvrtko Hudolin1, Željko Kaštelan1.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show the results of prostate cancer treatment in Prostate Center of Department of Urology at the University Hospital Center Zagreb. The answer to growing demands for prostate cancer treatment due to increasing incidence is the formation of specialized, multidisciplinary units/centers that deal mainly with prostate cancer. The need was recognized by European School of Oncology and European Association of Urology, who have proposed their concepts of validating such centers with the aim of promoting high-quality prostate cancer treatment. Following these trends, the Department of Urology at the University Hospital Center Zagreb has established the Prostate Center. This new unit offers specialized and individualized approach to workup, treatment and follow up for prostate cancer patients based on multidisciplinarity. The Prostate Center was also established as a platform for education and research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer Care Facility; Medical Oncology; Patient Care Team; Prostate cancer; Radiation Oncology; Urology

Year:  2019        PMID: 34975193      PMCID: PMC8693558          DOI: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s2.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Clin Croat        ISSN: 0353-9466            Impact factor:   0.780


Introduction

Incidence of prostate cancer has been increasing in Europe during the last decades () and it is now the most common cancer diagnosed in men (). Despite the increase in incidence, the mortality of prostate cancer has been decreasing in the developed countries of Western Europe (). Croatia’s prostate cancer incidence is also following global trends () and, according to the last annual epidemiological report, in 2016 it has become the most commonly diagnosed male cancer in Croatia (). On the other hand, prostate cancer mortality has an increasing trend (, ). The reasons behind that could be socio-economic: the availability of the latest and most advanced diagnostic and therapeutic tools is reduced in developing countries. These countries are usually a few years behind in following trends that arise in developed countries. While some are tough to follow due to lack of financial abilities, some are merely organizational in nature and thus, easier to implement. Multidisciplinarity is the key to successful cancer treatment (). Following the results of the European breast cancer units that produced better outcomes in treatment of breast cancer in women, European School of Oncology proposed formation of Prostate Cancer Units (PCU) in 2011 (). After that, in 2012 a Prostate Cancer Units Initiative in Europe was launched with a gathering of a multi-professional Task Force to set standards for quality comprehensive prostate cancer care and designate care pathways in PCUs (). Following these trends and recommendations, in 2016 we have established a new organizational unit called The Prostate Center. The aim was to provide patients with diseases of the prostate – prostate cancer, BPH and prostatitis, a focused and specialized care based on individual approach. Along with basic urologic workup for patients with LUTS, its core functioning unit is multidisciplinary team (MDT) consisting of urologists, medical and radiation oncologists, radiologist and pathologists. Multidisciplinarity in cancer care is not new in our hospital since we have a 40-year long tradition of uro-oncological multidisciplinary team. Formation of the Prostate Center gave our team wider public recognition which increased the number of patients. Prostate Center encompasses the most important elements of prostate cancer treatment. Initial work-up is organized as an ambulatory care center where patients get the basic urologic workup with basic laboratory tests and urinalysis, PSA, uroflow, urinary tract ultrasound, and urologic examination. In case of prostate cancer suspicion, prostate biopsy is performed. All biopsies are under the auspices of the Prostate Center, and in case of suspicious MRI finding, a targeted biopsy is performed. Furthermore, once the diagnosis of prostate cancer is made, the decision-making process of the best treatment modality is given by our multidisciplinary team for all newly diagnosed patients. Besides that, our MDT also plays a vital role during follow up in case of any recurrence and relapse. All patients that are diagnosed with prostate cancer in our institution must be presented to our multidisciplinary team. The added workload are also patients that are referred from other hospitals, usually smaller centers. The aim of this paper is to present the results of prostate cancer treatment in the Prostate Center.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of database of patients treated in the Prostate Center was performed. The data from medical history, biopsy, operative protocols and histopathological findings were analyzed. We also performed an analysis of basic demographic, diagnostic and therapeutic data for patients with prostate cancer that were evaluated by our multidisciplinary team during a one-year period in 2018. All the decisions regarding further diagnostic or therapeutic procedures were divided into groups accordingly. Results are presented using descriptive statistics.

Results

Since the establishment of the Prostate Center in December 2016, there were 2830 examinations which included male patients with LUTS of any cause, but mostly BPH, prostatitis and prostate cancer. Systematic biopsies are performed in the case of prostate cancer suspicion. Targeted biopsies are performed in case of prior negative biopsies and a multiparametric MRI finding of PIRADS ≥3 lesion. The number of procedures during the last five years has an increasing trend and is shown in Figure 1. In 2018 there were 731 systematic and 67 targeted prostate biopsies. Overall, prostate cancer was diagnosed in 45,1% of prostate biopsies. In case of patients with PSA for 4-10 ng/ml prostate cancer was diagnosed in 41,7% biopsies. The proportion of positive targeted biopsies is 65,7%. The mean age of patients that undergo prostate biopsy is 67,7 (range 41-90 years of age). The median PSA value is 7,3 ng/ml (range 0,6-1269 ng/ml). The proportion of Gleason scores for positive systematic and targeted biopsies is shown in Figure 2. A more detailed analysis of radical prostatectomies was performed for year 2018 and is presented in Table 1. A more detailed analysis of patients’ characteristics and treatment decisions was performed for 2018 and for newly diagnosed patients is shown in Table 2.
Figure 1

Number of prostate biopsies, radical prostatectomies and patients at multidisciplinary prostate team during the last 5 years.

Figure 2

Proportion of Gleason scores for positive systematic and targeted biopsies.

Table 1

Pathological staging for radical prostatectomies performed in 2018.

T stage
pT279%
pT3a 12%
pT3a 8%
Schwannoma & Phyloddes tumor 1%
N stage
pN0 95%
pN1 5%
Surgical margins
R0 76%
R1 24%
Table 2

Proportion of metastatic disease and treatment decision for newly diagnosed patients presented at multidisciplinary prostate team in 2018. (N=459).

Metastatic disease
Yes 10%
No 90%
Decision
Radical prostatectomy 37.9%
Radiotherapy 26.6%
Active surveillance 8.1%
Androgen deprivation therapy 7.6%
Further diagnostics 19.8%
Number of prostate biopsies, radical prostatectomies and patients at multidisciplinary prostate team during the last 5 years. Proportion of Gleason scores for positive systematic and targeted biopsies.

Discussion

Formation of the Prostate Center at the Department of Urology at the University Hospital Center Zagreb had a clear effect on the number of prostate cancer cases treated in our hospital. First the number of biopsies has almost doubled, and we started performing targeted biopsies for patients with prior negative biopsies and prostate cancer suspicion. We perform cognitive fusion and our results of 65,7% positive findings are comparable to other series (). Recently published results of FUTURE Trial showed that the technique of targeted biopsy doesn’t impact the outcomes (). Even though cognitive fusion has a relatively short learning curve, still it requires a certain volume of patients. Low volume centers are less likely to collect adequate quantity of these procedures to justify routine performance. Secondly, the number of radical prostatectomies has increased, nearly triple the number of procedures we performed five years ago. That is a direct effect of prostate biopsies increase and the number of patients that come to our multidisciplinary meetings from other hospitals. We have also recently started performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomies with 50 procedures performed from February 2019. This reflects the most significant impact of the Prostate Center: impact on the quality of provided care to our patients. Modern treatment and diagnostic workup of prostate cancer are rapidly progressing every year and it is hard to keep up with ever-changing guidelines. That is why it is of utmost importance to form such specialized centers where patients can be provided with the best of care. In the last few years a lot of attention was given, and focus directed towards formation of such specialized prostate cancer centers throughout Europe. First Prostate Cancer Units emerged, and a certification process was proposed in order to improve standards of management of prostate cancer (). The authors proposed a set of minimum and mandatory requirements revolving around the volume of the center, data collection, core team, additional services personnel, multidisciplinary approach, availability of treatment options, organizational details and equipment. A project was established that aims to develop the concept of “European Prostate Cancer Centers of Excellence“(EPPCE) (). These require four distinct steps for defining such a center of excellence: clinical step, research step, educational step and quality assurance/control procedures. The importance of Prostate Cancer Units is also related to a need for smaller, less equipped and staffed hospitals which do not have the men power to provide patients with state-of-the-art prostate cancer care. It is their need for referral of such patients to Prostate Cancer Units that also justifies their formation. In order to treat patients better, there is a need to follow-up on results of treatment, data management and analysis. Database buildup is paramount for quality assessment. Such centers must provide a broad spectrum of available diagnostic procedures including PET CT with PSMA, multiparametric MRI, fusion biopsies, etc. They must be able to provide a broad spectrum of treatment options including all forms of surgical management, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Multimodality is the key to the best individualized treatment of prostate cancer patients. We must not forget the importance of such centers in education and research. With the establishment of a good prostate cancer patients’ database, regular follow-up and analysis of treatment results, they can form their own protocols and share experience through education of other urological and oncological specialists, residents and other medical personnel included in the care for prostate cancer patients. Fulfilling the requirements is a plan for the future of the Prostate Center.
  10 in total

1.  The requirements of a specialist Prostate Cancer Unit: a discussion paper from the European School of Oncology.

Authors:  Riccardo Valdagni; Peter Albers; Chris Bangma; Lawrence Drudge-Coates; Tiziana Magnani; Clare Moynihan; Chris Parker; Kathy Redmond; Cora N Sternberg; Louis Denis; Alberto Costa
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008.

Authors:  J Ferlay; D M Parkin; E Steliarova-Foucher
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Enhancing prostate cancer care through the multidisciplinary clinic approach: a 15-year experience.

Authors:  Leonard G Gomella; Jianqing Lin; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Patricia Dugan; Fran Guiles; Costas D Lallas; Jaspreet Singh; Peter McCue; Timothy Showalter; Richard K Valicenti; Adam Dicker; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.

Authors:  Olivier Wegelin; Leonie Exterkate; Marloes van der Leest; Jean A Kummer; Willem Vreuls; Peter C de Bruin; J L H Ruud Bosch; Jelle O Barentsz; Diederik M Somford; Harm H E van Melick
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Prostate Cancer Unit Initiative in Europe: A position paper by the European School of Oncology.

Authors:  Riccardo Valdagni; Hendrik Van Poppel; Michael Aitchison; Peter Albers; Dominik Berthold; Alberto Bossi; Maurizio Brausi; Louis Denis; Lawrence Drudge-Coates; Maria De Santis; Günther Feick; Chris Harrison; Karin Haustermans; Donal Hollywood; Morton Hoyer; Henk Hummel; Malcolm Mason; Vincenzo Mirone; Stefan C Müller; Chris Parker; Mahasti Saghatchian; Cora N Sternberg; Bertrand Tombal; Erik van Muilekom; Maggie Watson; Simone Wesselmann; Thomas Wiegel; Tiziana Magnani; Alberto Costa
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo G Schoots; Monique J Roobol; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  The epidemiology of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter Boyle; Gianluca Severi; Graham G Giles
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.241

8.  Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer in Croatia - Situation and Perspectives.

Authors:  Ante Reljić; Petra Čukelj; Igor Tomašković; Boris Ružić; Mario Šekerija
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.780

9.  Trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Croatia, 1988-2008.

Authors:  Tomislav Kulis; Ivan Krhen; Zeljko Kastelan; Ariana Znaor
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.351

10.  The European Prostate Cancer Centres of Excellence: A Novel Proposal from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Centre Consensus Meeting.

Authors:  Manfred Wirth; Nicola Fossati; Peter Albers; Chris Bangma; Maurizio Brausi; Eva Comperat; Sara Faithfull; Silke Gillessen; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Ken Mastris; Nicolas Mottet; Stefan C Müller; Bradley Pieters; Maria J Ribal; Vijay Sangar; Ivo G Schoots; Vitaly Smelov; Luzia Travado; Riccardo Valdagni; Simone Wesselmann; Thomas Wiegel; Hendrik van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.