Literature DB >> 34974249

Diagnostic performance of neuroimaging in suspected idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Michael T M Wang1, Zak J Prime1, William Xu1, James McKelvie1, Taras Papchenko1, Tanyatuth Padungkiatsagul2, Heather E Moss3, Helen V Danesh-Meyer4.   

Abstract

The diagnostic utility of neuroradiologic signs associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) for the evaluation of patients presenting with papilloedema remains yet to be elucidated. This multicentre retrospective cohort study assessed consecutive patients presenting with suspected papilloedema to Auckland District Health Board (NZ) and Stanford University Medical Centre (US), between 2005 and 2019, undergoing magnetic resonance imaging and venography (MRI/MRV) or computed tomography and venography (CT/CTV) prior to lumbar puncture assessment for diagnostic suspicion of IIH. Data were collected regarding demographic, clinical, radiologic, and lumbar puncture parameters, and the diagnosis of IIH was determined according to the Friedman criteria for primary pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. A total of 204 participants (174 females; mean ± SD age 29.9 ± 12.2 years) were included, and 156 (76.5%) participants fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for IIH. The presence of any IIH-associated radiologic sign on MRI/MRV demonstrated a sensitivity (95% CI) of 74.8% (65.8%-82.0%) and specificity (95% CI) of 94.7% (82.7%-98.5%), while radiologic signs on CT/CTV exhibited a sensitivity (95% CI) of 61.0% (49.9%-71.2%) and specificity (95% CI) of 100.0% (83.2%-100.0%). In summary, the modest sensitivities of radiologic signs of IIH would support the routine use of lumbar puncture assessment following neuroimaging to secure the diagnosis. However, the high specificities might lend limited support for the judicious deferment of lumbar puncture assessment among typical IIH demographic patients who consent to the inherent small risk of missed pathology, which has been proposed by some clinicians.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Diagnosis; Imaging; Intracranial hypertension; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pseudotumor cerebri; Radiology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34974249      PMCID: PMC9159900          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   2.116


  32 in total

1.  The idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial: clinical profile at baseline.

Authors:  Michael Wall; Mark J Kupersmith; Karl D Kieburtz; James J Corbett; Steven E Feldon; Deborah I Friedman; David M Katz; John L Keltner; Eleanor B Schron; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 18.302

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI signs for diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Transverse Sinus Stenosis Is the Most Sensitive MR Imaging Correlate of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  P P Morris; D F Black; J Port; N Campeau
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  MR imaging findings in children with pseudotumor cerebri and comparison with healthy controls.

Authors:  Süreyya Burcu Görkem; Selim Doğanay; Mehmet Canpolat; Gonca Koc; Mehmet S Dogan; Hüseyin Per; Abdülhakim Coşkun
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the validity of cross-sectional neuroimaging signs.

Authors:  R Agid; R I Farb; R A Willinsky; D J Mikulis; G Tomlinson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  A new index for the assessment of transverse sinus stenosis for diagnosing idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Gustavo Balthazar da Silveira Carvalho; Sandro Luiz de Andrade Matas; Marcos Hideki Idagawa; Luiz Antônio Tobaru Tibana; Renato Sartori de Carvalho; Matheus Luis Souza Silva; Hugo Cogo-Moreira; Andrea Parolin Jackowski; Nitamar Abdala
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Diagnostic Accuracy of the Transverse Dural Venous Sinus Attenuation on CT Scans.

Authors:  Yosra Abdelzaher Ibrahim; Oleg Mironov; Ahmed Deif; Rajiv Mangla; Jeevak Almast
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging finding of empty sella in obesity related idiopathic intracranial hypertension is associated with enlarged sella turcica.

Authors:  Sudarshan Ranganathan; Sang H Lee; Adam Checkver; Evelyn Sklar; Byron L Lam; Gary H Danton; Noam Alperin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: consensus guidelines on management.

Authors:  Susan P Mollan; Brendan Davies; Nick C Silver; Simon Shaw; Conor L Mallucci; Benjamin R Wakerley; Anita Krishnan; Swarupsinh V Chavda; Satheesh Ramalingam; Julie Edwards; Krystal Hemmings; Michelle Williamson; Michael A Burdon; Ghaniah Hassan-Smith; Kathleen Digre; Grant T Liu; Rigmor Højland Jensen; Alexandra J Sinclair
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  The expanding burden of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Susan P Mollan; Magda Aguiar; Felicity Evison; Emma Frew; Alexandra J Sinclair
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Should Lumbar Puncture Be Required to Diagnose Every Patient With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension?

Authors:  Heather E Moss; Edward A Margolin; Andrew G Lee; Gregory P Van Stavern
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.415

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.