Literature DB >> 3497409

Coronary artery bypass graft patency: noninvasive evaluation with MR imaging.

R D White, G R Caputo, A S Mark, G W Modin, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

A noninvasive means of determining coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency in symptomatic patients would be an important clinical asset. The accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was evaluated for this purpose. Multiphasic electrocardiographically gated MR imaging examinations were performed in 25 patients with a total of 72 grafts. Transverse images of the heart at ten anatomic levels were obtained at five or six phases of the cardiac cycle. The MR images were read blindly to determine CABG patency versus occlusion, and these results were compared with those of coronary angiography performed within 2 months before the MR imaging. MR imaging correctly disclosed 43 patent grafts and 13 occluded grafts (predictive accuracy, 78%). Patency and occlusion were incorrectly diagnosed from MR imaging findings in five and four CABGs, respectively. CABG status could not be determined in seven (10%) grafts because the grafts were visualized at only one anatomic level. Thus, the accuracy of a definitive MR imaging evaluation was 91% (43 of 47 grafts) for patency determination and 72% (13 of 18 grafts) for occlusion determination. MR imaging appears to be a useful method for the noninvasive evaluation of CABGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3497409     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.164.3.3497409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging of coronary bypass grafts. comparison of the haste- and navigator techniques with conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Th Wittlinger; T Voigtländer; K F Kreitner; P Kalden; M Thelen; J Meyer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts: clinical reality?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; S E Langerak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Magnetic resonance coronary artery imaging.

Authors:  C B Paschal; E M Haacke; L P Adler; D A Finelli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs. ultrafast computed tomography for cardiac diagnosis.

Authors:  R M MacMillan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

5.  Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Riccardo Marano; Maria Luigia Storto; Nicola Maddestra; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Oblique reformatting of multislice magnetic resonance images for improved visualization of coronary arteries.

Authors:  N M Hylton; W S Chung; E H Botvinick; N B Schiller; P Sheldon; L Kaufman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Identification of coronary artery by-pass grafts: reliability of MRI in clinical practice.

Authors:  P Di Renzi; F Fedele; E Di Cesare; P Pavone; F Fabietti; S Sciomer; D C Vizza; A Dagianti; R Passariello
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

Review 10.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sumeesh Dhawan; Kodlipet C Dharmashankar; Tahir Tak
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2004-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.