Joseane Silva1, Madalena Lucia Pinheiro Dias Engler2, Rodrigo Baumgardt Barbosa Lima2, Maria Jesús Suarez3, Jean-Pierre Guy Oliver Salomon4, Claudia Angela Maziero Volpato5. 1. PhD student, Center for Education and Research on Dental Implants, Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Electronic address: joseanesv@gmail.com. 2. PhD student, Center for Education and Research on Dental Implants, Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Buccofacial Prosthesis, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Dental Biomaterials, University of Lorraine (UL), Metz, France. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Whether color changes in resin nanoceramic (RNC) restorations can occur because of material and adhesive interface degradation is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the color of RNCs submitted to surface treatments, cementation, and aging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RNC specimens (N=120) were produced with a thickness of 0.5 mm. The No Treatment-High/Low Translucency (NT-HT/LT) groups did not receive treatments; the Airborne-particle Abrasion-High/Low Translucency (AA-HT/LT) groups were airborne-particle abraded, and the Airborne-particle Abrasion Silane-High/Low Translucency (AASIL-HT/LT) groups received airborne-particle abrasion and a silane agent. Single specimens (n=60) were measured on a spectrophotometer before and after aging (50 000 cycles). The other half was mounted on composite resin bases and measured. The cleaned specimens were cemented (C) on the bases and measured (T0 and T1). ΔE00, ΔL', ΔC', and ΔH' were obtained by using the CIEDE2000 formula and analyzed by using ANOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were made by using the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS: For single specimens, the greatest ΔE00 values were observed in the AA-T1-LT resin (5.87). For mounted and cemented conditions, the greatest ΔE00 values were found in the AA-C-T1-LT resin (1.74), and the ΔE00 ranged from 0.75 (NT-OL) to 1.44 (AASIL-C-T1) for the HT resin (P<.001). The mounted and cemented specimens tended toward red and yellow, whereas lighter specimens were observed after cementation. CONCLUSIONS: Aging affected the color of the RNCs evaluated. The single specimens showed greater color differences than the cemented specimens, reinforcing the importance of the adhesive cement in the optical behavior of thin restorations.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Whether color changes in resin nanoceramic (RNC) restorations can occur because of material and adhesive interface degradation is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the color of RNCs submitted to surface treatments, cementation, and aging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RNC specimens (N=120) were produced with a thickness of 0.5 mm. The No Treatment-High/Low Translucency (NT-HT/LT) groups did not receive treatments; the Airborne-particle Abrasion-High/Low Translucency (AA-HT/LT) groups were airborne-particle abraded, and the Airborne-particle Abrasion Silane-High/Low Translucency (AASIL-HT/LT) groups received airborne-particle abrasion and a silane agent. Single specimens (n=60) were measured on a spectrophotometer before and after aging (50 000 cycles). The other half was mounted on composite resin bases and measured. The cleaned specimens were cemented (C) on the bases and measured (T0 and T1). ΔE00, ΔL', ΔC', and ΔH' were obtained by using the CIEDE2000 formula and analyzed by using ANOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were made by using the Tukey HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS: For single specimens, the greatest ΔE00 values were observed in the AA-T1-LT resin (5.87). For mounted and cemented conditions, the greatest ΔE00 values were found in the AA-C-T1-LT resin (1.74), and the ΔE00 ranged from 0.75 (NT-OL) to 1.44 (AASIL-C-T1) for the HT resin (P<.001). The mounted and cemented specimens tended toward red and yellow, whereas lighter specimens were observed after cementation. CONCLUSIONS: Aging affected the color of the RNCs evaluated. The single specimens showed greater color differences than the cemented specimens, reinforcing the importance of the adhesive cement in the optical behavior of thin restorations.