| Literature DB >> 34973140 |
Xuhui Zhang1, Zhiyuan Sun2, Yuheng Wang2, Yindi Cao3, Guibin Wang1, Fuliang Cao4.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of dietary Flos populi extract (FPE) on the growth, antioxidation capability, innate immune response, and disease resistance in gibel carp. A total of 480 fish were fed with five different diets containing 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 g kg-1 FPE (designated as control, D0.5, D1.0, D1.5, or D2.0 groups) for 45 days. The fish were challenged with A. hydrophila after the feeding trial. Compared with the control, the feed efficiency (FE), weight gain (WG), final body weight (FBW), and specific growth rate (SGR) were significantly improved in groups D1.0 and D1.5. Dietary FPE significantly increased serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase (CAT) activities, as well as glutathione (GSH) content. The contents of protein carbonyl (PCC) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in serum decreased significantly. Additionally, FPE supplementation in diets resulted in significant improvement in serum lysozyme (LZM) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activities, as well as immunoglobulin M (IgM) and complement 3 (C3) concentrations. The hepatic antioxidant enzymes (CAT and SOD) activities increased, whereas content of MDA decreased in fish treated with dietary FPE than those of control both pre- and post-challenged. After 12 h-challenge, an obvious downregulation of hepatic Kelch-like-ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1), splenic tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-8, IL-1β, and toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) mRNA levels was observed in fish treated with dietary FPE, whereas hepatic Nrf2 transcription level was upregulated compared to the control. Furthermore, compared to group D0.5, higher relative percent survival (RPS) was observed in gibel carp fed dietary 1.0-2.0 g/kg FPE. Our results reveal that FPE supplemented diet has a stimulatory effect on antioxidant capacity and nonspecific immune response, along with improved growth performance and enhanced resistance against A. hydrophila infection in juvenile gibel carp.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Flos populi extract; Gibel carp; Growth; Immune responses; Pro-inflammatory cytokine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34973140 PMCID: PMC8844170 DOI: 10.1007/s10695-021-00992-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fish Physiol Biochem ISSN: 0920-1742 Impact factor: 2.794
Chemical compositions and formulation of the basal diets (% dry matter)
| Raw materials (%) | Percentage | Proximate analysis (% dry weight) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean meal | 20.40 | Dry matter | 89.76 |
| Rapeseed meal | 26.00 | Moisture | 8.69 |
| Cottonseed meal | 18.00 | Crude protein | 35.064 |
| Fish meal | 10.00 | Crude lipid | 5.00 |
| Maize starch | 18.90 | Ash | 6.75 |
| Salt | 0.30 | ||
| Soybean oil | 3.60 | ||
| Ca(H2PO4)2 | 1.80 | ||
| Vitamin-mineral mixa | 1.00 | ||
| Total | 100.00 | ||
aComposition of vitamin-mineral mix (PREMIX PLUS) (quantity kg−1): vitamin: vitamin A (110 mg); vitamin D3 (20 mg); vitamin E (50 mg); vitamin K3 (20 mg); vitamin B1 (20 mg); vitamin B2 (20 mg); vitamin B3 (100 mg); vitamin B6 (20 mg); vitamin B12 (0.02 mg); folic acid (5 mg); d-calcium pantothenate (50 mg); inositol (100 mg); biotin (0.16 mg); vitamin C (140 mg); choline chloride (10 g); mineral: MgSO4·7H2O (4575 mg); FeSO4·7H2O (1250 mg); C6H10CaO6·5H2O (1750.0 mg); ZnSO4·7H2O (1110 mg); MnSO4·H2O (61.4 mg); CuSO4·5H2O (15.5 mg); CoSO4·7H2O (0.91 mg); KI (1.5 mg); Na2SeO3 (0.60 mg)
Accession numbers and sequences of primers used for real-time PCR
| Genes | Sequences of primers (5′ ‐3′) | Accession No | Amplicon Size (pb) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACGTTTCTGCAAGCTACGGA | KC816575.1 | 171 | |
| CGGGCTTCTGCTCCTTTTCT | |||
| TTTGTGAAGATGCGCTGCTC | AB757758.1 | 133 | |
| CCAATCTCGACCTTCCTGGTG | |||
| TGAAGGAATGAGTCTTAGA | KC184490.1 | 99 | |
| AGCTCCACACTCTCTATGTG | |||
| CGCTACTCTGATTCCTATGGC | KF500408.1 | 199 | |
| GCTTTCGCTGTTGCCTTTCT | |||
| CTCACCCCCAACTTCCTGCAG | MG759382 | 150 | |
| GATGAGCTGCGGCACCTTGGG | |||
| CCCTTCACCAAAGACAAGCA | MG759384 | 128 | |
| TTGAAGTCATCCACAGGCAG | |||
| TTGAGCAGGAGATGGGAACCG | JQ619774 | 115 | |
| AGAGCCTCAGGGCAACGGAAA |
The effects of dietary Flos populi extract on feed utilization and growth performance of gibel carp
| Items | Dietary treatments1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | D0.5 | D1.0 | D1.5 | D2.0 | |
| IBW (g/fish) | 19.98 ± 0.13 | 20.13 ± 0.16 | 20.04 ± 0.18 | 20.07 ± 0.17 | 19.98 ± 0.15 |
| FBW (g/fish) | 40.62 ± 0.37b | 41.74 ± 0.53b | 43.26 ± 0.44a | 43.43 ± 0.42a | 41.27 ± 0.39b |
| WGR (%) | 103.30 ± 7.48c | 108.27 ± 4.83bc | 115.54 ± 5.03a | 117.34 ± 4.91ab | 106.53 ± 4.69bc |
| SGR (%/d) | 1.27 ± 0.22b | 1.31 ± 0.28ab | 1.37 ± 0.19a | 1.40 ± 0.28a | 1.30 ± 0.17ab |
| FI (g/d/ ind.) | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.02 |
| FE (%) | 64.66 ± 4.34b | 68.90 ± 4.01ab | 72.73 ± 3.05a | 75.83 ± 5.20a | 67.87 ± 5.32ab |
| PRE (%) | 30.14 ± 0.41 | 31.59 ± 0.52 | 32.43 ± 0.45 | 31.98 ± 0.53 | 31.59 ± 0.66 |
| SR (%) | 96.00 ± 0.03b | 100.00a | 100.00a | 100.00a | 100.00a |
Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 4) and in the same row no sharing the same letter denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
IBW, initial mean body weight; FBW, final mean body weight; WGR, weight gain rate; SGR, specific growth rate; FI, feed intake; FE, feed efficiency; PRE, protein retention efficiency; SR, survival rate
Effects of dietary Flos populi extract on biochemical parameters in serum of gibel carp
| Items | Dietary treatments1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | D0.5 | D1.0 | D1.5 | D2.0 | |
| ALT (U/L) | 22.05 ± 0.48a | 20.40 ± 0.32ab | 18.05 ± 0.14b | 17.95 ± 0.21b | 18.62 ± 0.19b |
| AST (U/L) | 146.73 ± 3.54a | 118.04 ± 5.60b | 116.62 ± 3.30b | 106.53 ± 6.73b | 112.32 ± 2.55b |
| AKP (U/L) | 104.88 ± 5.98b | 110.13 ± 6.44b | 128.20 ± 3.83a | 126.79 ± 5.02a | 124.97 ± 3.28a |
Values were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 8) and in the same row no sharing the same letter denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
ALB, albumin; AKP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HSI, hepatosomatic index
Fig. 1Influences of dietary Flos populi extract on serum GPx (A), SOD (B), and CAT (C) activities, and PCC (D), MDA (E), and GSH (F) contents in serum of gibel carp. Values are presented by mean ± SEM (n = 8). The bars marked with different lower letter denote significant difference between treatments (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2The activities of LZM (A) and MPO (B) activities and C3 (C) and IgM (D) contents in the serum of gibel carp fed dietary Flos populi extract for 45 days. Values are presented by mean ± SEM (n = 8). Bars not sharing a common superscript denote significant difference between treatments (P < 0.05)
Fig. 3The activities of SOD (A), CAT (B) and contents of MDA (C) in the liver of gibel carp fed dieatry Flos populi extract pre-challenge or 12-h post-challenge. The values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 8). Different lowercases above the bars denote significant differences between treatments in the pre-challenge test (P < 0.05). Different capital letters above the bars denote significant differences between treatments in 12-h post-challenge (P < 0.05). * means that there are significant differences between pre-bacterial challenge and 12-h post- bacterial challenge (P < 0.05)
Fig. 4The transcriptional levels of Nrf2 (A), Keap1 (B) in the liver, and TLR2 (C), IL-1β (D), TNF-α (E), IL-8(F) in the spleen of gibel carp fed dietary Flos populi extract pre- the challenge or 12-h post-challenge. The values are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 8). * means that there are significant differences between pre-bacterial injection and 12-h post-challenge (P < 0.05). The bars with different lowercases are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Fig. 5Effect of dietary Flos populi extract on the cumulative survival rate of gibel carp 96 h after injection with A. hydrophila