| Literature DB >> 34972115 |
Sarah Fahmy1, Pui-Fong Kan2, Jen Walentas Lewon2.
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of a theatre-based vocal empowerment program on the vocal and language characteristics and the self-perceptions of young bilingual Egyptian women. The program used applied theatre, a dramatic practice that promotes civic action by utilizing improvisational techniques to engage participants in exploring solutions to self-identified community concerns. These techniques supported participants' pursuit of vocal empowerment: the ability to comfortably express their intended content with a clear audible voice, accompanied by the belief that what they had to say was worthwhile. The program was implemented in Alexandria and Aswan, two Egyptian cities in different regions of the country, with distinct socio-economic profiles. Thirty-six young women from Aswan and nineteen from Alexandria participated. The program was facilitated in Arabic, for 90 minutes per day over twelve consecutive days in 2018. Participants in both groups spoke Arabic as a home language and studied English in school settings but differed in their educational experiences and English proficiency. The vocal and language characteristics of each participant were tested in Arabic and English pre- and post- program using a spontaneous speech task and a reading aloud task. Their self-perceptions were evaluated through a vocal self-perception survey. Results indicated that participants responded differently in each city. In Alexandria, participants showed significant improvement in language skills (e.g., mean length of utterance). In contrast, participants in Aswan showed a significant change in fundamental frequency. Overall, the self-surveys indicated that all participants experienced an increased sense of confidence, a stronger belief in self-authorship, and an increased desire to voice their opinions clearly in public; however, there were subtle differences between the groups. In analyzing these results, we conclude that to design effective vocal empowerment outreach programs internationally, it is necessary to consider participants' cultural backgrounds, language diversity, and socio-economic status.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34972115 PMCID: PMC8719750 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Means and standard deviations (in parentheses) of the language characteristics of the spontaneous speech of the participants from Aswan and Alexandria.
| Aswan (n = 36) | ||||
| Parameter | Arabic (L1) | English | ||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| Fundamental Frequency (F0) | 248.94 (22.21) | 233.79 (19.90) | 246.56 (23.91) | 230.80 (19.76) |
| Mean length of utterance (MLU) | 9.44 (4.05) | 9.45 (2.77) | 9.5 (3.7) | 12.1 (5.1) |
| Number of Total words (NTW) | 38.33 (16.18) | 38.36 (13.62) | 36.5 (20.5) | 48.1 (20.9) |
| Number of Different words (NDW) | 32.39 (9.86) | 33.92 (9.28) | 30.6 (12.1) | 37.9 (13.3) |
| Word Per Minute (WPM) | 94.19 (19.98) | 123.66 (14.88) | 80.8 (4.1) | 100.6 (21.5) |
| Alexandria (n = 19) | ||||
| Parameter | Arabic (L1) | English | ||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| Fundamental Frequency (F0) | 224.27 (35.52) | 221.12 (30.60) | 219.38 (34.76) | 221.16 (33.68) |
| Mean length of utterance (MLU) | 7.78 (2.91) | 7.65 (3.04) | 10.3 | 14.5 (4.5) |
| Number of Total words (NTW) | 21.20 (14.9) | 22.56 (18.68) | 35.3 | 58.7 (21.7) |
| Number of Different words (NDW) | 15.23 (8.98) | 16.17 (11.76) | 24.4 | 39.4 (13.7) |
| Word Per Minute (WPM) | 83.88 (23.2) | 108.77 (16.78) | 110.27 (23.5) | 156.21 (27.22) |
Summary of the MANOVA results of the fundamental frequency (F0) for the spontaneous speech and reading aloud tasks.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spontaneous speech | Reading | |||
| η2 | η2 | |||
| Language | 3.26 | .06 | 1.29 | .00 |
| Group | 7.89 | .13 | 35.46 | .41 |
| Vocal empowerment program | 7.36 | .12 | 1.60 | .03 |
| Language x Group | 0.02 | .00 | 0.61 | .00 |
| Vocal empowerment program x Group | 6.13 | .11 | 5.76 | .10 |
| Language x Vocal empowerment program | 0.69 | .01 | 0.22 | .00 |
| Language x Vocal empowerment program x Group | 1.22 | .02 | 1.71 | .03 |
*p < .05 **p < .01
***p < .001.
Fig 1Means and standard deviations (error bands) of the fundamental frequency (F0; in Hz) across the spontaneous speech tasks and reading tasks in Arabic and English for Aswan (left) and Alexandria (right) group before and after the theatre-based vocal empowerment program.
Summary of the MANOVA results of the language measures for the spontaneous speech task.
| MLU-W | Number of Different Words | Number of Total Words | Words Per Minute | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| η2 | η2 | η2 | η2 | |||||
| Language | .05 | .00 | 51.54 | .5 | 7.4 | .12 | 51.54 | .5 |
| Group | 22.59 | .26 | 16.15 | .23 | 16.46 | .24 | 16.15 | .23 |
| Vocal empowerment program | 10.55 | .17 | 16.26 | .24 | 13.69 | .21 | 16.26 | .24 |
| Language x Group | 14.87 | .20 | 30.09 | .37 | 23.49 | .31 | 30.09 | .37 |
| Vocal empowerment program x Group | 11.35 | .07 | 10.54 | .17 | 11.71 | .18 | 10.54 | .17 |
| Language x Vocal empowerment program | 1.28 | .02 | 3.25 | .06 | 4.46 | .08 | 3.25 | .06 |
| Language x Vocal empowerment program x Group | 1.33 | .00 | 4 | .07 | 2.54 | .05 | 4 | .07 |
*p < .05
**p < .01
***p < .001.
Fig 2Means and standard deviations (error bands) of the mean length of utterance (MLU), number of total words (NTW), number of different words (NDW), Words per minute (WPM) of the spontaneous speech tasks in Arabic and English for Aswan (left) and Alexandria (right) group before and after the theatre-based vocal empowerment program.
Summary of the vocal self perception survey results from Aswan and Alexandria.
| Items | Aswan (n = 36) | Alexandria (n = 19) |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| 1. People can easily hear and understand my voice. | 1.56 | 2.33 |
| 2. I use various parts of my body when I express myself. (Example: I gesture with my hands) | 3.62 | 2.64 |
| 3. I understand what parts of my body produce my voice. | 3.11 | 1.40 |
| 4. I feel good about my voice. | 2.17 | 2.72 |
| 5. I feel my voice is mine and belongs to me. | 2.67 | 1.41 |
| 6. I feel safe using my voice to share my feelings and ideas. | 1.90 | 1.51 |
| 7. I am not ashamed to speak. | 2.65 | 2.22 |
| 8. I feel my voice has the power to make a positive impact for my life and others. | 0.84 | 1.58 |
| 9. I listen to and consider what other people say. | 1.49 | 1.47 |
| 10. I use my voice to share my feelings and ideas. | 1.35 | 2.89 |
| 11. I use my voice to help myself and others. |
| 0.30 |
| 12. I use my voice with responsibility and courage. |
| 1.59 |
| 13a. I am heard and understood at my home | 2.15 | 2.07 |
| 13b. I am heard and understood at my school | 2.30 | 2.35 |
| 13c. I am heard and understood in public |
| 1.89 |
Note.
*p < .05 **p < .01
***p < .001.
The p values of the Z values underlined were .05.