Eden R Brauer1, Elisa F Long2, Laura Petersen3, Patricia A Ganz4. 1. School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA. ebrauer@ucla.edu. 2. Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. David Geffen School of Medicine and Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer-specific survivorship care guidelines for the more than 3.8 million survivors in the U.S. are available, but implementation in clinical practice remains challenging. We examined current practice patterns and factors associated with guideline-concordant survivorship care among oncologists. METHODS: A national sample of medical oncologists, recruited using two databases, participated in a survey focused on practice patterns for breast cancer survivorship care. A "survivorship care composite score" was calculated for each respondent based on provision of services recommended in the survivorship guidelines. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression analyses examined associations between physician and practice characteristics and composite scores. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 217 medical oncologists, with an overall response rate of 17.9% and eligibility rate of 56.9% for those who responded. Oncologists reported high engagement in evaluation of disease recurrence (78%). Performed less frequently were the provision of survivorship care plans (46%), assessment of psychosocial long-term and late effects (34%), and screening for subsequent cancers (34%). Lack of survivorship care training (p = 0.038) and not routinely informing patients about potential late effects (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with poorer survivorship care composite scores. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of disease-specific survivorship care guidelines, adherence to their recommendations in clinical practice is suboptimal. Survey results identified key gaps in survivorship care for breast cancer survivors, particularly related to subsequent primary cancers and psychosocial long-term and late effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Improving the delivery of comprehensive survivorship care for the growing population of breast cancer survivors is a high priority. Disease-specific clinical guidelines for cancer survivorship provide valuable recommendations, but innovative strategies are needed to integrate them into the care of long-term breast cancer survivors.
PURPOSE: Breast cancer-specific survivorship care guidelines for the more than 3.8 million survivors in the U.S. are available, but implementation in clinical practice remains challenging. We examined current practice patterns and factors associated with guideline-concordant survivorship care among oncologists. METHODS: A national sample of medical oncologists, recruited using two databases, participated in a survey focused on practice patterns for breast cancer survivorship care. A "survivorship care composite score" was calculated for each respondent based on provision of services recommended in the survivorship guidelines. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression analyses examined associations between physician and practice characteristics and composite scores. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 217 medical oncologists, with an overall response rate of 17.9% and eligibility rate of 56.9% for those who responded. Oncologists reported high engagement in evaluation of disease recurrence (78%). Performed less frequently were the provision of survivorship care plans (46%), assessment of psychosocial long-term and late effects (34%), and screening for subsequent cancers (34%). Lack of survivorship care training (p = 0.038) and not routinely informing patients about potential late effects (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with poorer survivorship care composite scores. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of disease-specific survivorship care guidelines, adherence to their recommendations in clinical practice is suboptimal. Survey results identified key gaps in survivorship care for breast cancer survivors, particularly related to subsequent primary cancers and psychosocial long-term and late effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Improving the delivery of comprehensive survivorship care for the growing population of breast cancer survivors is a high priority. Disease-specific clinical guidelines for cancer survivorship provide valuable recommendations, but innovative strategies are needed to integrate them into the care of long-term breast cancer survivors.
Authors: Catherine M DesRoches; Kirsten A Barrett; Bonnie E Harvey; Rachel Kogan; James D Reschovsky; Bruce E Landon; Lawrence P Casalino; Stephen M Shortell; Eugene C Rich Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Laura P Forsythe; Catherine M Alfano; Tenbroeck Smith; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Patricia A Ganz; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Corinne R Leach; Kathryn E Weaver; Noreen M Aziz; Catherine M Alfano; Keith M Bellizzi; Erin E Kent; Laura P Forsythe; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.442