N M Borren1,2, T J Gerritse1, J P Ottervanger3, M Mouden2, J R Timmer2, J A van Dalen4, P L Jager1, J D van Dijk1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Cardiology, Isala, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Cardiology, Isala, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. j.p.ottervanger@isala.nl. 4. Department of Medical Physics, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Semi-quantitative scores can be used as an adjunct to visual assessment in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (82Rb PET). The semi-quantitative cut-off values used in 82Rb PET are derived from single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). It is unknown whether these cut-off values can be extrapolated to 82Rb PET. We compared the semi-quantitative with the visual assessment of ischemia and determined which summed difference score (SDS) score predicts ischemia best. METHODS: We included 108 patients who underwent 82Rb PET imaging and performed visual and semi-quantitative assessment. A scan with a SDS ≥ 2 and a summed stress score (SSS) ≥ 4 was considered to demonstrate ischemia. We compared the semi-quantitative with the visual assessment. RESULTS: 41 (38%) Normal scans, and 67 (62%) scans with ischemia and/or an irreversible defect were included. The semi-quantitative assessment showed ischemia more often than the visual assessment (51% vs 29%, P < .001). Patients with a low or intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) and a SDS < 4 did not demonstrate ischemia by visual assessment. CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative assessment in 82Rb PET imaging clearly demonstrates the presence of ischemia. Ischemia is unlikely in patients with low and intermediate pre-test probability of CAD and a SDS < 4.
PURPOSE: Semi-quantitative scores can be used as an adjunct to visual assessment in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (82Rb PET). The semi-quantitative cut-off values used in 82Rb PET are derived from single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). It is unknown whether these cut-off values can be extrapolated to 82Rb PET. We compared the semi-quantitative with the visual assessment of ischemia and determined which summed difference score (SDS) score predicts ischemia best. METHODS: We included 108 patients who underwent 82Rb PET imaging and performed visual and semi-quantitative assessment. A scan with a SDS ≥ 2 and a summed stress score (SSS) ≥ 4 was considered to demonstrate ischemia. We compared the semi-quantitative with the visual assessment. RESULTS: 41 (38%) Normal scans, and 67 (62%) scans with ischemia and/or an irreversible defect were included. The semi-quantitative assessment showed ischemia more often than the visual assessment (51% vs 29%, P < .001). Patients with a low or intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) and a SDS < 4 did not demonstrate ischemia by visual assessment. CONCLUSION: Semi-quantitative assessment in 82Rb PET imaging clearly demonstrates the presence of ischemia. Ischemia is unlikely in patients with low and intermediate pre-test probability of CAD and a SDS < 4.
Authors: Maria C Ziadi; Robert A Dekemp; Kathryn A Williams; Ann Guo; Benjamin J W Chow; Jennifer M Renaud; Terrence D Ruddy; Niroshi Sarveswaran; Rebecca E Tee; Rob S B Beanlands Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Timothy M Bateman; Vasken Dilsizian; Rob S Beanlands; E Gordon DePuey; Gary V Heller; David A Wolinsky Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 5.952