Literature DB >> 34970703

Sleep position, patient comfort, and technical performance with two established procedures for home sleep testing.

C Emika Mueller1, Hansen Li2, Sophia M Begasse2, J Ulrich Sommer3, Boris A Stuck2, Richard Birk2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In patients with a high pre-test probability of suffering from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), (cardio)-respiratory polygraphy (RP; level 3) is commonly used for home sleep testing (HST); however, testing based on peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) is increasingly recognized as an alternative method. The aim of the study was to compare sleep position, patients' comfort, and technical failure rates of HST with RP and PAT in patients with suspected OSA.
METHODS: Sleep position, patients' comfort, and technical failure rates of RP and PAT were compared in 56 patients receiving two nights of HST with either RP or PAT in a randomized fashion.
RESULTS: Time in supine position with PAT was significantly lower (173.7±88 min) compared to RP (181.7±103.7 min; p < 0.001), although the absolute mean difference was not clinically significant. Patients reported to sleep better, feeling less disturbed when falling asleep, losing less sensors, and fewer nightly awakenings with PAT, but experienced more pain at the side of the finger probe. Forty-five out of 56 patients (80%) rated PAT as being the superior sleep test and 49 out of 56 (88%) would prefer PAT for further investigations (p<0.001). PAT testing was associated with less technical failures.
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that HST with PAT leads to less time in supine sleep positioning, which may be clinically relevant in selected patients. Moreover, PAT is associated with less technical failures and is perceived with less discomfort during testing and a reduced number of nocturnal awakenings in patient self-reports.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obstructive sleep apnea; Peripheral arterial tonometry; Polygraphy; Positional sleep apnea; Sleep position; Sleep-disordered breathing

Year:  2021        PMID: 34970703     DOI: 10.1007/s11325-021-02530-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Breath        ISSN: 1520-9512            Impact factor:   2.816


  5 in total

Review 1.  International classification of sleep disorders-third edition: highlights and modifications.

Authors:  Michael J Sateia
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  PRO: sliding into home: portable sleep testing is effective for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Douglas B Kirsch
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of level 3 portable sleep tests versus level 1 polysomnography for sleep-disordered breathing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed El Shayeb; Leigh-Ann Topfer; Tania Stafinski; Lawrence Pawluk; Devidas Menon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Validating the Watch-PAT for Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adolescents.

Authors:  Ji Ho Choi; Bora Lee; Jae Yong Lee; Hyun Jun Kim
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Overnight polysomnography versus respiratory polygraphy in the diagnosis of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Hui-Leng Tan; David Gozal; Helena Molero Ramirez; Hari P R Bandla; Leila Kheirandish-Gozal
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.849

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Head-Of-Bed Elevation (HOBE) for Improving Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea (POSA): An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Giannicola Iannella; Giovanni Cammaroto; Giuseppe Meccariello; Angelo Cannavicci; Riccardo Gobbi; Jerome Rene Lechien; Christian Calvo-Henríquez; Ahmed Bahgat; Giuseppe Di Prinzio; Luca Cerritelli; Antonino Maniaci; Salvatore Cocuzza; Antonella Polimeni; Giuseppe Magliulo; Antonio Greco; Marco de Vincentiis; Massimo Ralli; Annalisa Pace; Roberta Polimeni; Federica Lo Re; Laura Morciano; Antonio Moffa; Manuele Casale; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.