| Literature DB >> 34970671 |
Scott L Weiss1, Joseph A Carcillo2, Francis Leclerc3, Stephane Leteurtre3, Luregn J Schlapbach4,5, Pierre Tissieres6, James L Wynn7,8, Jacques Lacroix9.
Abstract
Since its introduction into the medical literature in the 1970s, the term multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (or some variant) has been applied broadly to any patient with >1 concurrent organ dysfunction. However, the epidemiology, mechanisms, time course, and outcomes among children with multiple organ dysfunction vary substantially. We posit that the term pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (or MODS) should be reserved for patients with a systemic pathologic state resulting from a common mechanism (or mechanisms) that affects numerous organ systems simultaneously. In contrast, children in whom organ injuries are attributable to distinct mechanisms should be considered to have additive organ system dysfunctions but not the syndrome of MODS. Although such differentiation may not always be possible with current scientific knowledge, we make the case for how attempts to differentiate multiple organ dysfunction from other states of additive organ dysfunctions can help to evolve clinical and research priorities in diagnosis, monitoring, and therapy from largely organ-specific to more holistic strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34970671 PMCID: PMC9084565 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-052888C
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatrics ISSN: 0031-4005 Impact factor: 9.703