| Literature DB >> 34970627 |
Ming Xue1, Rui Wang1,2, Chongyuan Zhang1, Weiwei Wang1,3, Fengtao Zhang1, Di Chen1, Sen Ren1, Zhang Manman1, Jumei Hou1, Tong Liu1,2.
Abstract
Trichoderma spp. are widely distributed in natural habitats and have been evaluated as a potential biocontrol agent (BCA) for disease control and plant growth promotion. In this study, 1308 Trichoderma strains were obtained from the plant rhizosphere soil, above-ground plants, and decaying wood from natural habitats in China. Among them, 49 Trichoderma strains showed a good inhibitory effect, especially against Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides with inhibition rate above 85% in the dual culture test. Among these 49 strains, the 13 strains with broad-spectrum inhibitory effects also significantly promoted the seed germination of five crops (rice, cucumber, tomato, melon, and pakchoi) and root growth of four crop seedlings (watermelon, tomato, eggplant, and chili). Furthermore, these strains showed effective colonization in the rhizosphere and root of cucumber. Trichoderma strains SC012 and NX043 showed the highest chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activity among all strains. Based on the morphological characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and translation elongation factor 1 (tef1), twelve Trichoderma strains were identified as Trichoderma asperellum and one as Trichoderma afroharzianum. This study suggests that the 13 Trichoderma strains are promising BCAs and could be developed as biofertilizers and biological pesticides for agricultural applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34970627 PMCID: PMC8714372 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7913950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
The region of the isolates which were screened in dual culture and its PI to three pathogens.
| Code | Region | PI (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOC | CG | BC | ||
| HL003 | Hegang, Heilongjiang | 85.13 ± 2.35 | 86.15 ± 1.54 | 90.56 ± 0.96 |
| HN071 | Ledong, Hainan | 89.23 ± 1.54 | 88.72 ± 2.35 | 89.74 ± 1.18 |
| SC006 | Panzhihua, Sichuan | 86.15 ± 6.71 | 97.95 ± 0.89 | 89.33 ± 6.11 |
| SC017 | Panzhihua, Sichuan | 86.67 ± 2.35 | 93.85 ± 1.54 | 89.33 ± 2.31 |
| HN059 | Ledong, Hainan | 85.13 ± 2.35 | 91.28 ± 0.89 | 88.89 ± 1.48 |
| JX013 | Pingxiang, Jiangxi | 85.13 ± 3.20 | 88.21 ± 3.55 | 88.51 ± 5.27 |
| HL007 | Hegang, Heilongjiang | 86.15 ± 1.54 | 91.28 ± 1.78 | 88.33 ± 0.22 |
| HL101 | Jiamusi, Heilongjiang | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 88.21 ± 0.89 | 88.33 ± 3.89 |
| HN046 | Danzhou, Hainan | 86.67 ± 0.89 | 89.74 ± 0.89 | 88.03 ± 1.48 |
| HL008 | Hailun, Heilongjiang | 90.51 ± 0.44 | 95.49 ± 0.18 | 88.00 ± 0.92 |
| JX002 | Pingxiang, Jiangxi | 85.64 ± 4.95 | 91.28 ± 0.89 | 87.03 ± 2.25 |
| GX004 | Guilin, Guangxi | 88.21 ± 0.89 | 93.33 ± 0.89 | 87.03 ± 5.94 |
| HL137 | Hailun, Heilongjiang | 86.15 ± 1.54 | 90.26 ± 3.20 | 87.03 ± 2.25 |
| NM023 | Chifeng, Neimeng | 85.13 ± 2.35 | 91.28 ± 3.55 | 85.06 ± 1.99 |
| HL119 | Yichun, Heilongjiang | 85.13 ± 3.87 | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 86.67 ± 2.31 |
| FJ090 | Ningde, Fujian | 86.15 ± 1.54 | 95.90 ± 0.89 | 86.67 ± 2.31 |
| HL092 | Daqing, Heilongjiang | 90.82 ± 0.09 | 93.33 ± 0.89 | 86.67 ± 2.31 |
| ZJ019 | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | 88.72 ± 3.87 | 88.21 ± 3.20 | 86.50 ± 2.34 |
| HN027 | Danzhou, Hainan | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 91.28 ± 0.89 | 86.32 ± 3.92 |
| SX001 | Changzhi, Shanxi | 86.15 ± 1.54 | 88.72 ± 1.78 | 85.47 ± 1.48 |
| HL144 | Hegang, Heilongjiang | 87.69 ± 1.54 | 92.82 ± 2.35 | 85.73 ± 4.49 |
| HL018 | Jiamusi, Heilongjiang | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 91.79 ± 0.89 | 85.73 ± 5.94 |
| HL132 | Hegang, Heilongjiang | 86.67 ± 4.70 | 89.74 ± 1.78 | 85.73 ± 5.94 |
| HL131 | Hegang, Heilongjiang | 88.72 ± 0.89 | 91.28 ± 2.35 | 85.73 ± 5.94 |
| FJ065 | Ningde, Fujian | 87.18 ± 3.87 | 91.28 ± 2.35 | 85.73 ± 4.49 |
| SC011 | Panzhihua, Sichuan | 90.77 ± 3.08 | 93.85 ± 1.54 | 85.33 ± 2.31 |
| SC018 | Panzhihua, Sichuan | 86.15 ± 1.54 | 96.41 ± 3.55 | 85.33 ± 2.31 |
| SC013 | Panzhihua, Sichuan | 89.74 ± 3.20 | 91.79 ± 0.89 | 85.33 ± 6.11 |
| FJ058 | Ningde, Fujian | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 94.36 ± 1.78 | 85.33 ± 2.31 |
| HL015 | Daqing, Heilongjiang | 85.64 ± 0.89 | 91.79 ± 0.89 | 85.33 ± 2.31 |
| HL100 | Hailun, Heilongjiang | 90.26 ± 3.20 | 95.90 ± 0.89 | 85.33 ± 4.62 |
| FJ034 | Fuzhou, Fujian | 85.13 ± 1.78 | 85.64 ± 4.95 | 85.16 ± 4.67 |
| LN005 | Dalian, Liaoning | 86.67 ± 1.78 | 87.18 ± 0.89 | 85.06 ± 3.98 |
| XM002-21 | Danzhou, Hainan | 86.10 ± 0.09 | 86.15 ± 1.54 | 85.06 ± 5.27 |
| HL048 | Daqing, Heilongjiang | 92.82 ± 0.89 | 96.41 ± 0.89 | 85.20 ± 2.08 |
| SC010 | Panzhihua, Sichuan | 87.69 ± 2.66 | 90.77 ± 1.54 | 86.13 ± 3.70 |
| HL135 | Hegang, Heilongjiang | 90.77 ± 1.54 | 90.26 ± 3.20 | 85.20 ± 2.12 |
| SC012 | Chengdu, Sichuan | 90.21 ± 0.98 | 94.87 ± 3.20 | 85.33 ± 6.11 |
| HN018 | Danzhou, Hainan | 90.26 ± 2.35 | 89.23 ± 1.54 | 85.21 ± 3.39 |
| GZ070 | Guiyang, Guizhou | 90.15 ± 2.32 | 92.31 ± 1.54 | 86.50 ± 4.67 |
| FJ087 | Fuzhou, Fujian | 88.72 ± 2.35 | 94.97 ± 0.71 | 85.33 ± 3.06 |
| SC019 | Panzhihua, Sichuan | 89.74 ± 0.89 | 96.92 ± 2.66 | 85.33 ± 7.02 |
| JS016 | Xuzhou, Jiangsu | 85.08 ± 0.80 | 89.74 ± 2.35 | 91.11 ± 1.92 |
| BJ006 | Haidian, Beijing | 85.13 ± 2.35 | 86.67 ± 9.40 | 90.00 ± 3.33 |
| QH060 | Haixi, Qinghai | 87.79 ± 0.18 | 87.69 ± 1.54 | 85.13 ± 2.35 |
| SC101 | Guangyuan, Sichuan | 86.26 ± 0.18 | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 85.13 ± 0.89 |
| NX043 | Qinghai, Ningxia | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 85.12 ± 0.89 | 89.23 ± 1.54 |
| XJ035 | Yili, Xinjiang | 89.38 ± 0.27 | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 86.67 ± 1.78 |
| SC098 | Guangyuan, Sichuan | 87.74 ± 0.09 | 85.17 ± 2.35 | 86.15 ± 0.27 |
| XJ087 | Kuerle, Xinjiang | 86.15 ± 0.27 | 85.13 ± 0.89 | 85.13 ± 0.89 |
Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). FOC: Fusarium oxysporum; CG: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; BC: Botrytis cinerea; PI (%): percentage of growth inhibition.
The germination rate of 5 kinds of seeds after Trichoderma treatment.
| Code | Seed germination rates (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice | Cucumber | Tomato | Melon | Pakchoi | |
| GZ070 | 83.14 ± 1.97a | 85.56 ± 10.18a | 44.00 ± 14.37d,e | 83.33 ± 10.00a | 71.99 ± 4.41b |
| HL100 | 94.06 ± 3.98a | 90.56 ± 7.97a | 49.91 ± 15.25b,c,d,e | 80.83 ± 0.72a | 99.48 ± 0.90a |
| HL119 | 89.62 ± 4.36a | 89.64 ± 7.50a | 43.31 ± 1.30d,e | 85.29 ± 7.50a | 97.68 ± 0.86a |
| HL135 | 93.39 ± 3.26a | 87.30 ± 10.13a | 48.72 ± 15.06c,d,e | 78.89 ± 8.67a | 98.93 ± 0.93a |
| HN059 | 89.70 ± 3.14a | 79.21 ± 7.40a | 45.93 ± 8.41d,e | 80.43 ± 3.25a | 94.88 ± 2.46a |
| JX013 | 89.59 ± 7.09a | 78.92 ± 13.81a | 48.03 ± 5.85c,d,e | 77.14 ± 8.51a | 71.96 ± 5.24b |
| SC012 | 92.81 ± 3.92a | 88.80 ± 4.74a | 43.99 ± 18.12d,e | 86.59 ± 11.48a | 99.00 ± 1.72a |
| XJ035 | 83.78 ± 19.05a | 82.22 ± 16.44a | 72.00 ± 16.00a,b,c | 76.81 ± 9.77a | 78.67 ± 13.32b |
| NX043 | 82.33 ± 15.53a | 80.00 ± 15.28a | 74.67 ± 2.15a,b | 82.22 ± 10.09a | 81.11 ± 7.37b |
| QH060 | 87.00 ± 7.55a | 85.56 ± 6.94a | 88.00 ± 2.00a | 77.78 ± 13.47a | 83.33 ± 3.06b |
| XJ087 | 87.75 ± 8.49a | 82.22 ± 5.09a | 83.33 ± 5.77a | 81.11 ± 1.92a | 80.00 ± 3.46b |
| SC098 | 87.33 ± 7.02a | 85.56 ± 8.39a | 66.11 ± 10.46a,b,c,d,e | 79.33 ± 4.62a | 76.00 ± 10.58b |
| SC101 | 82.34 ± 12.17a | 79.56 ± 1.92a | 69.33 ± 1.15a,b,c,d | 82.22 ± 11.71a | 73.67 ± 11.72b |
| CK | 81.91 ± 17.41a | 77.33 ± 8.03a | 41.39 ± 12.41e | 76.34 ± 4.93a | 71.94 ± 7.25b |
Germination rates of seed were measured at 7 days, where seeds were treated by 105 spore mL–1 suspension in 2 hours. “CK” means to treat seeds with sterile water. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate that the differences are significant (P < 0.05) using Duncan's multiple range test.
Root length of different crops treated with a spore suspension at 15 days.
| Code | Length of roots (cm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Watermelon | Chili | Eggplant | Tomato | |
| GZ070 | 11.71 ± 0.18a,b,c | 9.56 ± 0.54b,c,d | 12.88 ± 2.55a | 3.74 ± 0.49e,f,g,h |
| HL100 | 12.26 ± 0.73a,b,c | 11.85 ± 0.83a,b | 10.48 ± 1.06a,b,c,d,e | 3.60 ± 0.37g,h |
| HL119 | 9.36 ± 1.00h | 11.08 ± 0.82a,b,c | 9.47 ± 2.13i,j | 5.03 ± 0.71a,b,c,d |
| HL135 | 11.20 ± 0.57c,d,e,f,g | 9.72 ± 0.74b,c,d | 9.54 ± 1.29h,i,j | 2.98 ± 0.16h |
| HN059 | 13.03 ± 1.51a | 11.28 ± 1.38a,b | 10.16 ± 0.55c,d,e,f,g | 4.10 ± 0.29e,f,g,h |
| JX013 | 9.71 ± 0.54h | 10.33 ± 0.57a,b,c,d | 10.91 ± 1.02a,b,c,d | 3.73 ± 0.46f,g,h |
| SC012 | 11.33 ± 1.10b,c,d,e,f | 10.19 ± 0.95a,b,c,d | 9.24 ± 0.66h,i,j | 5.02 ± 0.54a,b |
| XJ035 | 10.69 ± 0.49c,d,e,f,g | 10.96 ± 0.90a,b,c,d | 8.24 ± 0.70h,i,j | 4.76 ± 0.54b,c,d |
| NX043 | 11.65 ± 1.66b,c,d,e,f,g | 10.51 ± 0.68a,b,c,d | 9.39 ± 1.58e,f,g,h,i,j | 3.37 ± 0.38h |
| QH060 | 11.50 ± 0.99c,d,e,f,g | 9.20 ± 0.51a,b,c,d | 8.45 ± 0.57h,i,j | 3.43 ± 0.61f,g,h |
| XJ087 | 10.25 ± 0.58g,h | 9.79 ± 0.78a,b,c,d | 11.33 ± 0.38a,b,c,d,e | 3.35 ± 0.33f,g,h |
| SC098 | 10.18 ± 0.88e,f,g,h | 8.96 ± 0.76b,c,d | 8.45 ± 0.87i,j | 5.40 ± 0.46a |
| SC101 | 9.99 ± 0.83f,g,h | 9.88 ± 0.65a,b | 7.00 ± 0.32k | 4.42 ± 0.37d,e,g,f |
| CK | 11.26 ± 0.18a,b | 9.34 ± 0.38d | 9.63 ± 0.15f,g,h,i,j | 3.93 ± 0.14f,g,h |
The concentration of the conidial suspension was 105 spores mL–1. “CK” means to treat seeds with sterile water. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate that the differences are significant (P < 0.05) using Duncan's multiple range test.
Figure 1Determination of colonization ability of Trichoderma on cucumber seedlings. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate that the differences are significant (P < 0.05) using Duncan's multiple range test.
Chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activity of Trichoderma isolates at 3 days in enzyme synthetic medium.
| Code | Chitinase (U mL–1) |
|
|---|---|---|
| GZ070 | 0.069 ± 0.018g,h,i | 0.398 ± 0.044b,c |
| HL100 | 0.105 ± 0.017b,c,d,e,f | 0.319 ± 0.042b,c,d |
| HL119 | 0.112 ± 0.018b,c,d,e | 0.397 ± 0.022b,c |
| HL135 | 0.081 ± 0.006e,f,g,h | 0.488 ± 0002b |
| HN059 | 0.068 ± 0.016g,h,i | 0.340 ± 0.002b,c,d |
| JX013 | 0.082 ± 0.001e,f,g,h | 0.489 ± 0.05b |
| SC012 | 0.154 ± 0.013a | 0.3744 ± 0.062b,c,d |
| XJ035 | 0.087 ± 0.009d,e,f,g,h | 0.1765 ± 0.038c,d |
| NX043 | 0.108 ± 0.028b,c,d,e | 0.8162 ± 0.172a |
| QH060 | 0.126 ± 0.009b | 0.2258 ± 0.070b,c,d |
| XJ087 | 0.104 ± 0.039b,c,d,e,f | 0.7993 ± 0.199a |
| SC098 | 0.047 ± 0.015i | 0.3814 ± 0.048b,c,d |
| SC101 | 0.095 ± 0.006c,d,e,f,g | 0.3170 ± 0.08b,c,d |
Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate that the differences are significant (P < 0.05) using Duncan's multiple range test.
Inhibition spectrum of Trichoderma isolates, the PI of isolates against 9 pathogens in dual culture.
| Code | PI (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SR | FT | BD | MO | BT | FG | RC | SC | RS | |
| GZ070 | 78.97 ± 1.78a | 87.50 ± 1.33a | 83.61 ± 4.09a,b | 83.62 ± 1.49a | 67.69 ± 1.54a | 83.08 ± 1.54a | 83.97 ± 1.11c | 78.09 ± 1.65a,b | 85.29 ± 3.23a,b |
| HL100 | 75.38 ± 4.07b | 87.50 ± 2.80a | 86.34 ± 2.37a,b | 87.50 ± 1.98a | 62.50 ± 2.35a | 81.03 ± 0.89a,b | 85.58 ± 0.96b,c | 79.17 ± 0.62a,b | 76.31 ± 1.41b |
| HL119 | 79.49 ± 0.89a | 88.08 ± 0.50a | 90.44 ± 4.73a | 86.64 ± 0.75a | 68.72 ± 0.89a | 82.05 ± 0.89a,b | 85.90 ± 1.11b,c | 79.17 ± 2.49a,b | 85.70 ± 4.64a |
| HL135 | 78.46 ± 2.66a | 86.34 ± 0.50c | 78.14 ± 4.73b,c | 84.05 ± 1.98a | 65.64 ± 1.78a | 84.36 ± 1.18a | 85.26 ± 1.11b,c | 78.09 ± 0.62a,b | 84.89 ± 3.08a,b |
| HN059 | 78.56 ± 0.18a | 86.63 ± 0.50a | 87.70 ± 4.10a,b | 86.21 ± 3.73a | 65.64 ± 9.01a | 81.28 ± 1.94a,b | 81.41 ± 1.11b,c | 78.45 ± 2.85a,b | 82.84 ± 4.42a,b |
| JX013 | 80.00 ± 5.33a | 86.45 ± 1.31a | 81.56 ± 2.05a,b,c | 85.78 ± 2.59a | 64.10 ± 0.89a | 83.85 ± 2.77a | 83.33 ± 1.06c | 82.04 ± 5.42a,b | 85.70 ± 3.54a |
| SC012 | 78.97 ± 3.55a | 86.05 ± 0.87a | 84.29 ± 1.18a,b | 86.64 ± 1.49a | 70.26 ± 8.75a | 82.15 ± 2.51a,b | 87.82 ± 1.11a,b | 79.89 ± 3.29a,b | 83.66 ± 3.54a,b |
| XJ035 | 76.92 ± 2.66a | 86.92 ± 0.87a | 86.34 ± 4.27a,b | 84.91 ± 0.75a | 69.23 ± 7.99a | 82.05 ± 0.44a,b | 83.97 ± 1.11c | 81.68 ± 5.39a,b | 88.15 ± 3.54a |
| NX043 | 79.74 ± 0.44a | 88.37 ± 1.01a | 82.24 ± 4.27a,b,c | 86.64 ± 0.75a | 61.03 ± 1.78a | 83.13 ± 0.09a | 89.42 ± 0.96a | 76.65 ± 0.62a,b | 86.11 ± 3.94a |
| QH060 | 79.49 ± 0.89a | 80.81 ± 1.74b,c | 80.19 ± 1.18a,b,c | 85.78 ± 2.24a | 64.62 ± 11.99a | 83.08 ± 1.54a | 84.94 ± 1.47b,c | 75.57 ± 1.24b | 81.21 ± 2.83a,b |
| XJ087 | 78.46 ± 1.54a | 84.88 ± 1.82b | 81.56 ± 2.05a,b,c | 84.05 ± 1.49a | 69.23 ± 6.15a | 82.05 ± 1.78a,b | 83.97 ± 1.11c | 78.45 ± 3.73a,b | 87.75 ± 2.45a |
| SC098 | 76.92 ± 4.07a | 88.08 ± 1.33a | 72.68 ± 6.26c | 82.76 ± 1.49a | 66.67 ± 6.22a | 78.97 ± 0.89b | 79.49 ± 2.94d | 73.42 ± 1.24a,b | 87.13 ± 0.87a |
| SC101 | 76.41 ± 5.40b | 84.59 ± 3.30b | 89.07 ± 6.26a | 83.19 ± 1.29a | 59.49 ± 4.44a | 82.31 ± 1.33a,b | 84.29 ± 1.47c | 85.27 ± 5.53a | 81.62 ± 6.13a,b |
Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters indicate that the differences are significant (P < 0.05) using Duncan's multiple range test. SR: Sclerotium rolfsii; FT: Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. tracheiphilum; BD: Botryosphaeria dothidea; MO: Magnaporthe oryzae; BT: B. theobromae; FG: F. graminearum; RC: Rhizoctonia cerealis; SC: Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum; RS: R. solani; PI: percentage of growth inhibition.
Figure 2Morphological identification of JX013 (Trichoderma asperellum). (a–c) Cultures of JX013 that were grown on PDA, CMD, and SNA medium. (d, e) Conidial pustules. (f) Conidia. (g, h) Conidiophore. (i) Chlamydospores. PDA: potato dextrose agar medium; CMD: corn meal dextrose agar medium; SNA: synthetic low nutrient agar medium.
Figure 3Morphological identification of SC098 (Trichoderma afroharzianum). (a–c) Cultures of JX013 which grew on PDA, CMD, and SNA medium. (d, e) Conidial pustules. (f) Conidia. (g, h) Conidiophore. (i) Chlamydospore. PDA: potato dextrose agar medium; CMD: corn meal dextrose agar medium; SNA: synthetic low nutrient agar medium.
Figure 4Phylogenetic analysis based on the tef-1 gene and ITS region from the strains screened. GenBank accession numbers of 13 Trichoderma strains shown in Supplementary Table 2.