| Literature DB >> 34970508 |
Qian Jiang1,2,3, Xing Liu1,2,3, Qifen Yang1,2,3, Liang Chen1,2,3, Deqin Yang1,2,3.
Abstract
Microorganisms are confirmed to be closely related to the occurrence and development of cancers in human beings. However, there has been no published report detailing relationships between the oral microbiota and salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC). In this study, unstimulated saliva was collected from 13 SACC patients and 10 healthy controls. The microbial diversities, compositions and functions were comprehensively analyzed after 16S rRNA sequencing and whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing. The alpha diversity showed no significant difference between SACC patients and healthy controls, while beta diversity showed a separation trend. The SACC patients showed higher abundances of Streptococcus and Rothia, while Prevotella and Alloprevotella were more abundant in healthy controls. The prevalent KEGG pathways, carbohydrate-active enzymes, antibiotic resistances and virulence factors as well as the biomarkers in SACC were determined by functional gene analysis. Our study preliminarily investigated the salivary microbiome of SACC patients compared with healthy controls and might be the basis for further studies on novel diagnostic and treatment strategies.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; bioinformatics; metagenomics; microbiota; oral cancer; salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34970508 PMCID: PMC8712576 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.774453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
The demographic data of subjects.
| Variable | Group S | Group H | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 57.00 ± 1.53 | 57.60 ± 1.81 | 0.802 |
|
| >0.999 | ||
| Male | 7 | 5 | |
| Female | 6 | 5 | |
|
| |||
| Parotid | 6 | ||
| Submandibular | 2 | ||
| Sublingual | 2 | ||
| Palate | 3 | ||
|
| |||
| T2 N0 M0 | 5 | >0.999 | |
| T3 N0 M0 | 6 | ||
| T4 N0 M0 | 2 | ||
|
| |||
| Yes | 7 | 5 | |
| No | 6 | 5 | |
|
| 0.685 | ||
| Yes | 8 | 5 | |
| No | 5 | 5 |
Alpha diversity indices.
| Group | Shannon | Simpson | ACE | Chao |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.08 ± 0.44 | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 193.18 ± 27.52 | 191.41 ± 34.00 |
|
| 3.21 ± 0.39 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 197.30 ± 38.76 | 199.59 ± 40.66 |
|
| 0.49 | 0.27 | 0.76 | 0.60 |
Each applicable value is mean ± Sd. Richness estimators (Chao and ACE) and diversity estimators (Shannon and Simpson) were calculated. Differences between the two groups were examined by Student’s t test.
Figure 1Beta diversity by PCoA. Each sample is represented by a dot, and different colors represent different groups. As for each sample, the first two main coordinates, namely PC1 and PC2 were depicted. PC1 explained 28.26% of the variation observed, and PC2 explained 19.88% of the variation.
Figure 2Taxonomic composition of the salivary microbiome. (A) The predominant taxa (relative abundance >1% on average) in each group are shown. (B) Heatmap analysis. Each column represents a sample and each row represents a genus. The cluster trees of genera and samples are shown on the left and upper sides respectively. Different colors represent different relative abundances.
Figure 3(A) Wilcoxon rank-sum test bar plot. Relative abundances of the ten most prevalent genera are compared between group S and (H) * represents a significant difference (P < 0.05) and ** represents a highly significant difference (P < 0.01). (B) Correlations of prevalent genera. Ten richest genera were shown by co-occurrence analysis. The size of the node is proportional to the genera abundance. Node color corresponds to phylum taxonomic classification. (C) Potential biomarkers defined by LEfSe. Cladogram for taxonomic representation of significant differences between group S and H were shown. The colored nodes from the inner to the outer circles represent taxa from the phylum to genus level. The significantly different bacteria are signified by different colors representing the two groups.
Figure 4Functional genes of the salivary microbiome. (A) Genes related to KEGG pathways. Each branch represents a KEGG pathway on level 2, and different colors represent different KEGG level 1 functions. (B) Genes related to specific functions. The predominant taxa (relative abundance>2% on average) of CAZyme class genes, genes related to antibiotic resistance on class level, and genes related to virulence factors on level 2 are shown. (C) Potential biomarkers defined by LDA scores. Differentially abundant KEGG pathways on level 2 and level 3 (LDA > 2.5, P < 0.05) and differentially abundant CAZyme families, AROs, and virulence factors (LDA > 3, P < 0.05) were shown.
Figure 5Relationships of microbiota and functions. (A) The microbial and functional regression analysis. The microbial community diversity was based on genus level and the functional diversity was based on KEGG pathway level 3. (B) Relative contribution of different genera to identified the enriched functional attributes in the two groups.