| Literature DB >> 34970375 |
Jie Xiao Li1, Xi Meng Zhang1, Yun Xiao Xiao1, Zi Mei Tang1, Tao Huang1, Jie Ming1.
Abstract
Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the breast, a rare malignancy that makes up less than 0.1% of all breast malignancies, is much rarer in males than in females. Due to the rarity of this disease, an optimal treatment strategy for male breast ACC has not been established, and therapy for male patients is currently based on guidelines for female patients. According to previous reported cases, some authors believe that male breast ACC may have higher invasive potential than female breast ACC and the prognoses in male patients may be worse than those in female patients. Therefore, a more proactive diagnosis and treatment regimen may be required. However, the clinical feature of our case is inconsistent with this view. Herein we report the case of a 24-year-old male without any antecedent medical or family history who presented with a slow-growing lump on his left chest wall for 5 years. The patient initially underwent lumpectomy, and the mass was pathologically diagnosed as breast ACC. Systemic examination was performed, and no evidence of distant metastasis was found. Then, he received modified radical mastectomy and ipsilateral axillary lymph node dissection. The mastectomy pathological examination revealed that no cancerous tissue was detected around the primary tumor bed, and all 22 axillary lymph nodes were negative. The patient did not receive postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy or endocrine therapy and remained well after 28 months of follow-up. In this study, we review the literature and summarize the clinical manifestations, imaging and histopathological characteristics, treatments and outcomes of male breast ACC. We share our experience in the hopes that this evidence will aid in the development of better therapeutics. Copyright 2021, Li et al.Entities:
Keywords: Adenoid cystic carcinoma; Breast; Case report; Male; Prognosis; Treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34970375 PMCID: PMC8683108 DOI: 10.14740/jmc3790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Cases ISSN: 1923-4155
Figure 1Breast adenoid cystic carcinoma ultrasound and postoperative findings. (a) Ultrasonography revealed a well-defined oval hypoechoic mass in the retroareolar region of the left breast. (b) The subareolar mass progressively enlarged over the course of 2 years. (c) Ultrasonography showed a hypoechoic area after lumpectomy. (d) Ultrasonography of an enlarged axillary lymph node with a clear boundary.
Figure 2Microscopic pathology of breast adenoid cystic carcinoma. (a) H&E staining showing an cribriform growth pattern. (b) H&E staining showing tubular and solid growth patterns. (c) IHC staining for CD117. (d) IHC staining for P63. H&E: hematoxylin and eosin stain; IHC: immunohistochemistry.
Figure 3Whole-body evaluation by 18F-FDG PET/CT. The 18F-FDG PET/CT MIP (a) shows uptake (SUVmax 2.5) in the left breast lesion (b and d, red arrows), with a disordered tissue structure (c, red arrow). Small lymph nodes were found in the bilateral neck and bilateral axillary regions (e-g, red arrows, SUVmax 1.65). 18F-FDG PET/CT: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography; MIP: maximum intensity projection; SUVmax: maximum standardized uptake value.
Summary of Male Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Breast
| References | Year | Age | Diameter | Node | Surgery | Adjuvant treatment | Outcome of follow up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presenting case | 2021 | 23 | 1.3 cm | Neg | LM → MRM + ALND | None | Remain well after 24 months of follow-up |
| Hogan and Fan [ | 2020 | 60 | 2.1 cm | NR | LM | Radiotherapy | Lung metastasis |
| Pang et al [ | 2019 | 44 | 1.2 cm | Neg | LM → MRM + ALND | Postoperative chemotherapy | Remain well after 26 months of follow-up |
| Douglas and Mackenzie [ | 2019 | 21 | 5.0 cm | Neg | ScM → SM + SNB | None | Remain well after 12 months of follow-up |
| Zadeh et al [ | 2017 | 42 | 4.0 cm | Neg | MRM + ALND | None | Remain well after 12 months of follow-up |
| Tang et al [ | 2015 | 19 | 3.0 cm | Neg | RM + ALND | Endocrine therapy | Remain well after 67 months of follow-up |
| Yoo et al [ | 2013 | 41 | 1.7 cm | Pos | NR | None | Bone and lung metastasis |
| Sahan et al [ | 2012 | 60 | 1.3 cm | NR | LM → RM | None | NR |
| Liu et al [ | 2012 | 20 | 2.1 cm | Neg | SM + SNB | None | NR |
| Kshirsagar et al [ | 2006 | 82 | NR | 3/5 Pos | MRM + ALND | Radiotherapy | Recurrence at 2 years |
| Maciag et al [ | 2006 | 80 | 4 cm | 1/10 Pos | LM → SM + ALND | Radiotherapy + endocrine therapy | Remain well after 5 years of follow-up |
| Miliauskas et al [ | 1991 | 13 | 3.8 cm | Neg | LM → ScM | None | Remain well after 30 months of follow-up |
| Hjorth et al [ | 1977 | 21 | NR | Neg | SM | None | Remain well after 2 years of follow-up |
| Ferlito et al [ | 1974 | 60 | NR | Neg | SM | None | NR |
| Verani et al [ | 1973 | 78 | 3.5 cm | Neg | MRM + ALND | None | Lung metastasis |
| Woyke et al [ | 1970 | 37 | NR | Neg | LM | None | Recurrence at 5 and 7 years |
| Ferlito [ | 1969 | Middle aged | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Neg: negative; Pos: positive; NR: no report; LM: lumpectomy; MRM: modified radical mastectomy; ALND: axillary lymph node dissection; ScM: subcutaneous mastectomy; SM: simple mastectomy; SNB: sentinel node biopsy; RM: radical mastectomy.