| Literature DB >> 34970169 |
Fabien Renaud1, Louise Jakubiec1,2, Joel Swendsen2,3, Melina Fatseas1,2.
Abstract
The frequent co-occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUDs) leads to manifestations of both conditions that are more severe and more resistance to treatment than single disorders. One hypothesis to explain this synergy is the impact of intrusive memories on craving which, in turn, increases the risk of relapse among patients with substance use disorders. The aim of this systematic review is to examine this possibility by assessing the impact of PTSD and its symptoms on craving among dual disorder patients. Using PRISMA criteria, four databases were comprehensively searched up to June, 2021, in order to identify all candidate studies based on broad key words. Resulting studies were then selected if they examined the impact of PTSD or PTSD symptoms on craving, and if they used standardized assessments of PTSD, SUD, and craving. Twenty-seven articles matched the selection criteria and were included in this review. PTSD was found to be significantly associated with increased craving levels among patients with alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, tobacco, and other substance use disorders. Exposition to traumatic cues among dual disorder patients was also shown to trigger craving, with an additive effect on craving intensity when exposure to substance-related cues occurred. In addition, certain studies observed a correlation between PTSD symptom severity and craving intensity. Concerning mechanisms underlying these associations, some findings suggest that negative emotional states or emotion dysregulation may play a role in eliciting craving after traumatic exposure. Moreover, these studies suggest that PTSD symptoms may, independently of emotions, act as powerful cues that trigger craving. These findings argue for the need of dual disorder treatment programs that integrate PTSD-focused approaches and emotion regulation strategies, in addition to more traditional interventions for craving management.Entities:
Keywords: craving; dual disorder (DD); integrated treatment; post-traumatic stress disorder (PSTD); substance use disorder; systematic (literature) review
Year: 2021 PMID: 34970169 PMCID: PMC8712572 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.786664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Data items extracted from the selected studies.
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| Retrospective, prospective or cross-sectional observational studies. (Or) experimental studies: comparative or not, exposure to stimuli (substance-related cues, trauma, and stress) (Or) systematic review or meta-analysis |
|
| Socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, employment status, income, and education level), treatment (inpatient, outpatient, no treatment), type of SUD, and comorbidity |
|
| DSM diagnostic criteria and/or evaluation scales for the different variables of interest: diagnosis and level of severity of SUD and PTSD, craving (frequency and intensity) |
|
| Presented according to substance type |
Figure 1PRISMA flowchart of selected abstracts and articles.
Overall quality rating of the included studies using the The National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coffey et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | NA | Y | Good |
| Saladin et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | NA | Y | Good |
| Brady et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Good |
| Schumacher et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | N | N | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | Poor |
| Coffey et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | Good |
| Beckham et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Good |
| Driessen et al. ( | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | NA | N | NA | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | Y | Fair |
| Coffey et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | NA | Y | Good |
| Drapkin et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | Y | NA | NA | N | Poor |
| Jayawickreme et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | Y | NA | Y | N | NA | N | Poor |
| Nosen et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | NA | N | Good |
| Simpson et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | N | N | Y | Y | NA | Y | Y | Y | NA | Y | N | Fair |
| Dedert et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | NA | N | Fair |
| Boden et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | NA | NA | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | Y | Fair |
| Tull et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | N | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | NA | Y | Fair |
| Dedert et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | NA | Y | Y | Y | NA | N | N | Fair |
| Kwako et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | N | Y | Good |
| Heinz et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | NA | NA | Y | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | N | Poor |
| Kaczkurkin et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Good |
| Ralevski et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | NA | NA | N | Good |
| McHugh et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | NA | N | Poor |
| Peck et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | N | N | Y | Y | NA | Y | N | Y | NA | N | N | Poor |
| Somohano et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | NA | NA | N | Y | NA | Y | N | Y | N | Poor |
| Lyons et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | N | N | NA | NA | NA | Y | NA | Y | NA | NA | Y | Poor |
| Rosenblum et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | Y | NA | Y | N | NA | N | Poor |
| Vogel et al. ( | Y | Y | NR | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | NA | N | Y | Good |
Y, Yes; N, No; NR, Not Reported; NA, Not Applicable.
Q1: Was the research question or objective in this paper clearly stated?; Q2: Was the study population clearly specified and defined?; Q3: Was the participation rate of eligible persons at least 50%?; Q4: Were all the subjects selected or recruited from the same or similar populations (including the same time period)? Were inclusion and exclusion criteria for being in the study prespecified and applied uniformly to all participants?; Q5: Was a sample size justification, power description, or variance and effect estimates provided?; Q6: For the analyses in this paper, were the exposure(s) of interest measured prior to the outcome(s) being measured?; Q7: Was the timeframe sufficient so that one could reasonably expect to see an association between exposure and outcome if it existed?; Q8: For exposures that can vary in amount or level, did the study examine different levels of the exposure as related to the outcome (e.g., categories of exposure, or exposure measured as continuous variable)?; Q9: Were the exposure measures (independent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants?; Q10: Was the exposure(s) assessed more than once over time?; Q11: Were the outcome measures (dependent variables) clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants?; Q12: Were the outcome assessors blinded to the exposure status of participants?; Q13:Was loss to follow-up after baseline 20% or less?; Q14: Were key potential confounding variables measured and adjusted statistically for their impact on the relationship between exposure(s) and outcome(s)?.
Details of experimental studies included in the review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 adults (35 men, 28 women), with AUD alone ( | Experimental non-randomized study. Exposure to a stressor with craving evaluation, stress level, biological stress response (ACTH and cortisol), right before and after test, and after 5, 30, 60, and 120 min. | Current PTSD assessed with the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation: Within Session Rating Scale: WSRS (craving analog visual scale). | No significant difference between subjects with AUD with and without PTSD concerning craving and stress level before and after exposition. | |
| 42 adults (13 males, 29 females) aged 25–56 years, meeting DSM-IV criteria for AUD and PTSD, with a criterion A traumatic event <18 years. Participants were recruited from two addiction treatment programs in the Northeast USA. | Experimental study. Participants were exposed to traumatic script and alcohol-related cues, then craving was assessed. | PTSD diagnosis with CAPS according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with analog visual scale (0–10) | 86% of participants had their first trauma <13 years old, and 71% had their first episode of drunkenness ≥13 years old. There was no correlation between age of first trauma and first drunkenness. | |
| 43 subjects (67% women) with comorbidity AUD and PTSD according to DSM-IV who had consumed alcohol in the past 60 days. They were recruited in two outpatient addiction treatment centers in New York. Non-inclusion criteria: psychotic disorder, current manic episode, current severe depressive episode, military trauma, exposure therapy. | Randomized experimental study. | PTSD diagnosis with CAPS according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with analog visual scale (0–10) | No difference in PTSD symptom severity (CAPS or IES-R) between the two groups (expo and relaxation) before randomization. Participants had increased alcohol craving and emotional distress after exposure to trauma script and alcohol cues. | |
| 40 adults (63% women) with AUD and PTSD according to DSM-IV, who used alcohol in last 60 days. Participants were recruited in a residential care clinic. | Experimental non-controlled study, non-randomized. Subjects are exposed to four exposition combinations (script related to traumatic events, alcohol cues, neutral cues) | PTSD diagnosis with CAPS according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with analog visual scale from 0 to 10 | Exposure to traumatic script and to alcohol cues led to significantly superior responses (more craving, emotional distress, salivation, and arousal), from neutral expositions. | |
| 108 adults (58 men and 50 women) with DSM-IV criteria for AUD and PTSD and with at least one day of massive use during last 60 days. Subjects were recruited in a community addiction care center. Non-inclusion criteria: psychotic disorder, current manic episode, benzodiazepine use, or any other medication that could affect craving or salivation. Another use disorder was not considered as non-inclusion criterion. | Similar method as Coffey et al. with exposition combination, and measures after each combination: | Identical measures from Coffey et al. | Self-evaluation with 3 Likert Scales (0–10) | Combination of traumatic script followed by alcohol cue exposure led to more intense craving. | |
| 52 subjects (55% male) aged 21–50 years, with comorbid AUD and PTSD according to DSM-IV criteria, participating in a study of the efficacy of NK1 antagonists in comorbid subjects. Recruitment was done through a newspaper advertisement. SCID-IV was used for diagnosis of AUD. The severity of addiction was measured by the ADS and alcohol consumption was assessed subjectively (TLFB) and objectively (breath test). Finally, the consequences of alcohol consumption were investigated with the Addiction Severity Score (ASI). | Experimental study. Comparison of two methods of craving induction by stress (Trier test or traumatic script) or by alcohol-related cues, in subjects with PTSD and AUD. | Current PTSD diagnosed with the SCID-IV, according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the AUQ. | Both the traumatic and alcohol-related scripts induced significantly higher craving for alcohol than the neutral script. The peak craving induced by exposure to the traumatic script was significantly greater than that induced by the Trier test, which was itself greater than that obtained after exposure to a neutral script. | |
| 25 subjects (92% male) aged 21–65 with comorbid AUD and PTSD according to DSM-IV. Data came from a 12-week double-blind randomized trial comparing Prazosin vs. placebo. Subjects were required to have ≥1 day of heavy drinking (five standard drinks for men, four drinks for women) in the past 14 days. | Experimental study. Exposure to three scripts (traumatic, non-specific stress, and neutral), with several measures taken before and after each exposure: | Diagnosis of current PTSD by the SCID-IV according to DSM-IV. Severity of PTSD assessed by the CAPS | Self-evaluation by the AUQ | Craving, heart rate and blood pressure measured after exposure to the traumatic script were significantly higher than the other two exposures. | |
| 129 smoking adults with ( | Experimental study. Participants were exposed randomly to one of three types of personalized scripts (traumatic, stressful, neutral), then received randomly two types of cigarettes (with and without nicotine). | PTSD diagnosis with the CAPS according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU) | Expositions to traumatic scripts and to a lesser extent stressful script led to significant craving, negative affect, and traumatic symptoms severity increase. Effects were more important among smoking patients with PTSD. | |
| 47 smokers (68% men) smoking at least 15 cigarettes a day, with expired carbon monoxide: CO ≥ 15 ppm, with ( | Experimental study: participants were assigned randomly to one of the three groups (regular cigarette, low nicotine cigarette, no cigarette), then exposed to a neutral script. | PTSD Diagnosis with CAPS according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation of craving with QSU-Brief. | PTSD diagnosis or traumatic symptoms severity did not influence initial smoking level. After one night abstinence, subjects with PTSD had more craving and behavioral withdrawal symptoms. They smoked in anticipation of pleasure and of a decrease in negative affect. | |
| 60 subjects (55% male) aged 20–58, with cocaine use disorder according to DSM-IV and a history of trauma exposure, admitted for treatment in a residential addiction treatment facility. Subjects were required to have a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 24. Diagnosis of cocaine use disorder made by the SCID-IV, severity of cocaine use over the past year by a Likert scale (0–5). Non-inclusion criteria: current psychotic disorder (determined by SCID-IV). | Experimental study. Participants were exposed to traumatic and neutral scripts with pre- and post-test measures: | Current PTSD diagnosed with CAPS according to DSM-IV | Self-evaluation with Likert Scale (0–10) | After exposure to the traumatic (but not neutral) script, subjects with PTSD had significantly higher craving for cocaine than other participants. | |
| 75 participants: 30 subjects (87% women) with PTSD + cocaine use disorder according to DSM-IV and 45 subjects (46% women) with PTSD + AUD according to DSM-IV. All had used alcohol and/or cocaine at least once in the last 60 days. Participants were recruited from outpatient or inpatient treatment programs at the Medical University of South Carolina and local treatment facilities in the Charleston area. | Experimental study. | PTSD diagnosis with the CAPS and NWS PTSD Module, according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the Cocaine Craving Questionnaire (CCQ) for cocaine, Alcohol Craving Questionnaire (ACQ) for alcohol and analog visual scale for both. | No difference between alcohol and cocaine use disorder groups regarding PTSD and depressive symptoms. For all participants, initial craving was not correlated with post-exposure craving. Craving, and negative affect after TD and TN exposures was higher than after ND and NN exposures. Post-exposure craving in AUD group was higher than cocaine disorder group. | |
| 124 subjects among which 70 had AUD, 54 crack use disorder according to DSM-IV criteria, who used during last 60 days. Subjects were recruited in addictology service in Medical University of South Carolina or in regional addictology center. Every participant must have suffered from physical and/or sexual violence concordant with DSM-IV A PTSD criterion. | Experimental non-controlled, non-randomized study. Subjects were exposed to traumatic, alcohol, crack, or neutral cues. After each exposition, subjects reported their craving level. | PTSD diagnosis with CAPS according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with analog visual scale in 21 points | Exposition to traumatic script or substance cue led to craving significatively superior from exposition to neutral scripts and cues. | |
| 194 adults (50% women) aged 18 to 65, with a history of traumatic exposure according to criterion A PTSD in DSM-IV (27.3% had PTSD), and a current alcohol and/or cocaine use disorder according to DSM-IV. They were recruited in a residential addiction treatment center. 26.3% had cocaine use disorder, 33% had alcohol use disorder and 40.7% had both. Non-inclusion criteria: cognitive impairment (MMSE < 24)/psychotic disorder. | Experimental study. | PTSD diagnosis with the CAPS according to DSM-IV | Self-evaluation with a Likert Scale (0–10). | There was a positive correlation between anxiety sensitivity and PTSD severity. Subjects with PTSD had higher anxiety sensitivity. |
Details of observational and interventional studies included in the review.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 512 subjects aged 19–81 years: 167 subjects seeking care for comorbid AUD and PTSD; 105 subjects seeking care for PTSD alone; and 240 subjects seeking care for AUD alone. The three groups came from three randomized controlled trials. Recruitment was made in general population through advertisements in local newspapers. | Cross-sectional study. Comparison of psychosocial variables between subjects with comorbid AUD and PTSD, and subjects with PTSD or AUD alone. | PTSD diagnosis with the PSS-I and the Structured Interview For PTSD (SIP) according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS). | Comorbid subjects had less employment, less college education, and lived alone more often than PTSD or AUD group and had lower income than PTSD group. | |
| 167 subjects (34% female) seeking care for comorbid PTSD and AUD according to DSM-IV criteria. | Cross-sectional study. Analysis of correlations between sex, traumatic cognitions, craving, and addiction consequences. | PTSD diagnosis with the PSS-I. Posttraumatic cognitions assessed with the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI). | Self-evaluation with the PACS. | In men only, traumatic cognitions (specifically self-depreciation) were correlated with craving. Traumatic cognitions (self-deprecation and guilt) were correlated with negative consequences related to addiction. | |
| 29 subjects (93% men) with AUD according to DSM-IV criteria, who used alcohol during last 30 days. 89, 7% of participants had PTSD. Subjects were recruited in a veteran medical center ( | Evaluation of interactions between traumatic symptoms and craving. | PTSD diagnosed with the PTSD Check List (PCL-C) according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the PACS. | Initial PTSD severity was correlated with craving and alcohol use. | |
| 68 military veterans (90% male) with AUD according to DSM-IV, wanting to stop or reduce their alcohol consumption and having been exposed to a traumatic event during their life. The participants came from a randomized controlled trial concerning Topiramate. They were recruited from the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. | Cross-sectional observational study. Assessment of cognitive functions (processing speed, executive functions, risk-taking/impulsivity, verbal learning, and memory), and analysis of correlations with different variables (alcohol consumption, craving, and severity of PTSD symptoms). | PTSD diagnosed with the PCL-C according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS). | Severity of PTSD symptoms was positively correlated with craving and alcohol consumption in the past 3 months. | |
| 165 subjects (65.5% male) seeking care for comorbid PTSD and AUD according to DSM-IV-TR. Recruitment at the University of Pennsylvania's Center for the treatment and Anxiety Studies and the Philadelphia Veteran's Affairs Hospital. | Randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomized to four treatment groups (Naltrexone + Prolonged exposure, Naltrexone alone, placebo + Prolonged exposure, placebo alone). Different measures were collected every four weeks, before, during and after the treatment (PTSD symptoms, percentage days drinking, craving). | Current PTSD diagnosis with PSS-I according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the PACS. | ||
| 136 veterans (90% male), with full or subthreshold (one missing symptom) PTSD, and alcohol abuse or dependence, seeking treatment, enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. The participants had at least 20 days of massive use (four drinks for females and five drinks for males) over the past 90 days. Alcohol consumption over the past 90 days was assessed by the TLFB. | Cross-sectional observational study, using data collected from a randomized controlled trial. | PTSD diagnosis with the CAPS according to DSM-5. | Self-evaluation with PACS. | Alcohol craving was positively correlated with the number of massive drinking days, severity of PTSD symptoms, negative affect, and trauma-related cognitions. Negative emotions mediated relationship between trauma-related cognitions and alcohol craving. | |
| 52 adult smokers (18–65 year olds) with PTSD who smoked at least 10 cigarettes a day. Recruitment took place in the general population or in a veteran medical care center using flyers or brochure from previous study. | Observational everyday life study using EMA method. Subjects were followed over 2 weeks (1 week smoking freely then 1 week after stopping smoking). | PTSD diagnosis using CAPS according to DSM-IV | Self-evaluation of craving with a scale (1–5) | Compared to free use period, abstinence period was marked by decrease of PTSD and mean craving levels, but not negative affect. | |
| 162 US Army veterans (6.4% female) aged 18–65 years, smoking at least 10 cigarettes a day, with expired CO ≥ 8 ppm, with or without PTSD or current depressive episode. Subjects were recruited by flyers from a veterans affairs hospital in Wisconsin. | Cross-sectional observational study assessing motivational processes influencing tobacco addiction in smokers with PTSD or depressive episode. | Current PTSD diagnosis using CAPS according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the Brief WISDM. | Subjects with PTSD had higher mean Fagerstrom scores than other participants. | |
| 94 US military veterans (94% men), with cannabis use disorder according to DSM-IV-TR (with DSM 5 withdrawal criteria), asking for care. Subjects were recruited using advertisements in an outpatient PTSD clinic among veterans during previous study. Non-inclusion criteria: intellectual deficit, already have decreased daily cannabis use from at least 25% during last month, pregnancy, breast feeding, suicidal thoughts. Another use disorder was not considered as non-inclusion criterion. | Cross-sectional observational study comparing subjects with cannabis use disorder with and without PTSD on their cannabis use and its consequences. | PTSD diagnosis using CAPS according to DSM-IV, Self-evaluation of traumatic symptoms severity with PCL-M | Self-evaluation with the Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ) | Subjects with PTSD used more often cannabis as coping strategy. | |
| 459 subjects aged 15–60 years, treated in addictology in Germany (73% inpatients, 10% followed in a day clinic, 17% outpatients) for a SUD (alcohol: 66% and/or other substance 60%). Participants had to be abstinent from all psychoactive substances for at least 2 weeks. Diagnosis of SUD with International Diagnostic Checklist (IDCL) according to DSM-IV, assessment of addiction severity with the ASI, objective measurement of substance use with urine and breath tests. | Cross-sectional observational study. Analysis of the relationship between PTSD diagnosis, type of addiction (alcohol or other substances), addiction severity, and craving intensity. | Diagnosis of current PTSD according to DSM-IV by IDCL and Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS). | Assessed with ASI | Prevalence of PTSD in groups AD and D was significantly higher than group A. | |
| 297 Dutch subjects, aged 17–73 years (72% male) followed between 2012 and 2014 for SUD according to DSM-IV criteria. Assessment of past 30 days and lifetime substance use by the MATE substance use Inventory. Non-inclusion criteria: severe psychiatric or somatic disorder. | Prospective study, assessing efficacy of standard, non-integrated SUD treatment in subjects with higher or lower PTSD symptoms. | Diagnosis of current PTSD by SRIP according to DSM-IV. | Self-evaluation with the OCDS. | ||
| 72 military veterans (71 men and 1 woman) with PTSD and SUD according to DSM-IV-TR, in treatment in veterans medical center of South-East USA. Subjects were recruited during inscription to cognitive processing therapy program of 6 weeks proposed by the medical center. | Prospective study. Subjects participated in PTSD-specific treatment (cognitive processing therapy) during 6 weeks. Evaluations were performed before and after treatment: | PTSD diagnosis with the MINI according to DSM-IV-TR. Self-evaluation of PTSD symptoms with PCL-S. Evaluation of erroneous cognitions linked to PTSD with the PTCI. | Self-evaluation with the Craving Questionnaire—Short Form Revised (CQSFR) | Traumatic initial dysfunctional cognitions were correlated with initial craving level. There was no correlation between PTSD symptoms severity and craving. The therapy allowed a significant decrease of craving, PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms and erroneous traumatic cognitions. | |
| 257 adults with SUD who were abstinent after outpatient or inpatient treatment, waiting for rehabilitation care as part of a randomized controlled trial from 2014. Recruitment was performed with advertisements in addictology treatment centers. Non-inclusion criteria: dementia syndrome, psychotic disorder, suicidal thoughts, subjects who already benefited mindfulness therapy. Use disorder severity was assessed with the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS). | Cross-sectional observational study, using from data collected previously in a randomized controlled trial during rehab treatment. | Diagnosis with the PCL-C according to the DSM-IV-TR. | Self-evaluation with PACS adapted for other substances. | For alcohol ( | |
| 108 adults (25% female) with SUD and comorbid PTSD, beginning inpatient detoxification. Non-inclusion criteria: severe cognitive deficit, symptoms of psychotic disorder. | Observational study, Evaluation of correlation between PTSD symptoms and craving level. | PTSD assessed with the PCL-5 according to the DSM-5. Screening for life trauma event with the Life Events Checklist (LEC-5). | Self-evaluation with the Mannheimer Craving Scale (MaCs) | PTSD symptoms were positively associated with craving level but were not predictors of craving level the following day. |