OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to measure the success rate of pre-hospital tracheal intubation (TI) and supraglottic airway devices (SADs) performed by paramedics for adult patients and to assess the perception of paramedics of advanced airway management. METHOD: The study consisted of two phases: phase 1 was a retrospective analysis to assess the TI and SADs' success rates when applied by paramedics for adult patients aged >14 years from 2012 to 2017, and phase 2 was a distributed questionnaire to assess paramedics' perception of advanced airway management. RESULT: In phase 1, 24 patients met our inclusion criteria. Sixteen (67%) patients had TI, of whom five had failed TI but then were successfully managed using SADs. The TI success rate was 69% from the first two attempts compared to SADs (100% from first attempt). In phase 2, 63/90 (70%) paramedics responded to the questionnaire, of whom 60 (95%) completed it. Forty-eight (80%) paramedics classified themselves to be moderately or very competent with advanced airway management. However, most of them (80%) performed only 1-5 TIs or SADs a year. CONCLUSION: Hospital-based paramedics (i.e. paramedics who are working at hospitals and not in the ambulance service, and who mostly respond to small restricted areas in Saudi Arabia) handled few patients requiring advanced airway management and had a higher competency level with SADs than with TI. The study findings could be impacted by the low sample size. Future research is needed on the success rate and impact on outcomes of using pre-hospital advanced airway management, and on the challenges of mechanical ventilation use during interfacility transfer.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to measure the success rate of pre-hospital tracheal intubation (TI) and supraglottic airway devices (SADs) performed by paramedics for adult patients and to assess the perception of paramedics of advanced airway management. METHOD: The study consisted of two phases: phase 1 was a retrospective analysis to assess the TI and SADs' success rates when applied by paramedics for adult patients aged >14 years from 2012 to 2017, and phase 2 was a distributed questionnaire to assess paramedics' perception of advanced airway management. RESULT: In phase 1, 24 patients met our inclusion criteria. Sixteen (67%) patients had TI, of whom five had failed TI but then were successfully managed using SADs. The TI success rate was 69% from the first two attempts compared to SADs (100% from first attempt). In phase 2, 63/90 (70%) paramedics responded to the questionnaire, of whom 60 (95%) completed it. Forty-eight (80%) paramedics classified themselves to be moderately or very competent with advanced airway management. However, most of them (80%) performed only 1-5 TIs or SADs a year. CONCLUSION: Hospital-based paramedics (i.e. paramedics who are working at hospitals and not in the ambulance service, and who mostly respond to small restricted areas in Saudi Arabia) handled few patients requiring advanced airway management and had a higher competency level with SADs than with TI. The study findings could be impacted by the low sample size. Future research is needed on the success rate and impact on outcomes of using pre-hospital advanced airway management, and on the challenges of mechanical ventilation use during interfacility transfer.
Authors: Kylie Dyson; Janet E Bray; Karen Smith; Stephen Bernard; Lahn Straney; Resmi Nair; Judith Finn Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-03-25 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jonathan R Benger; Kim Kirby; Sarah Black; Stephen J Brett; Madeleine Clout; Michelle J Lazaroo; Jerry P Nolan; Barnaby C Reeves; Maria Robinson; Lauren J Scott; Helena Smartt; Adrian South; Elizabeth A Stokes; Jodi Taylor; Matthew Thomas; Sarah Voss; Sarah Wordsworth; Chris A Rogers Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ling Tiah; Kentaro Kajino; Omer Alsakaf; Dianne Carrol Tan Bautista; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Desiree Lie; Ghulam Yasin Naroo; Nausheen Edwin Doctor; Michael Y C Chia; Han Nee Gan Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2014-10-28
Authors: Sebastiaan M Bossers; Lothar A Schwarte; Stephan A Loer; Jos W R Twisk; Christa Boer; Patrick Schober Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240