| Literature DB >> 34970012 |
Abstract
The counterfactual and regularity theories are universal accounts of causation. I argue that these should be generalized to produce local accounts of causation. A hallmark of universal accounts of causation is the assumption that apparent variation in causation between locations must be explained by differences in background causal conditions, by features of the causal-nexus or causing-complex. The local account of causation presented here rejects this assumption, allowing for genuine variation in causation to be explained by differences in location. I argue that local accounts of causation are plausible, and have pragmatic, empirical and theoretical advantages over universal accounts. I then report on the use of presheaves as models of local causation. The use of presheaves as models of local variation has precedents in algebraic geometry, category theory and physics; they are here used as models of local causal variation. The paper presents this idea as stemming from an approach using presheaves as models of local truth. Finally, I argue that a proper balance between universal and local causation can be assuaged by moving from presheaves to fully-fledged sheaf models.Entities:
Keywords: Causation; Counterfactuals; Locality; Regularities; Sheaf models
Year: 2021 PMID: 34970012 PMCID: PMC8668861 DOI: 10.1007/s11229-021-03272-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Synthese ISSN: 0039-7857 Impact factor: 2.908