Literature DB >> 34969073

Individual participant data meta-analysis with mixed-effects transformation models.

Bálint Tamási1, Michael Crowther2, Milo Alan Puhan3, Ewout W Steyerberg4, Torsten Hothorn1.   

Abstract

One-stage meta-analysis of individual participant data (IPD) poses several statistical and computational challenges. For time-to-event outcomes, the approach requires the estimation of complicated nonlinear mixed-effects models that are flexible enough to realistically capture the most important characteristics of the IPD. We present a model class that incorporates general normally distributed random effects into linear transformation models. We discuss extensions to model between-study heterogeneity in baseline risks and covariate effects and also relax the assumption of proportional hazards. Within the proposed framework, data with arbitrary random censoring patterns can be handled. The accompanying $\textsf{R}$ package tramME utilizes the Laplace approximation and automatic differentiation to perform efficient maximum likelihood estimation and inference in mixed-effects transformation models. We compare several variants of our model to predict the survival of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a large data set of prognostic studies. Finally, a simulation study is presented that verifies the correctness of the implementation and highlights its efficiency compared to an alternative approach.
© The Author 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individual participant data; Meta-analysis; Mixed-effects model; Prognostic modeling; Regression; Time-to-event outcomes; Transformation model

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34969073      PMCID: PMC9566326          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxab045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.279


  22 in total

1.  Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Construction and validation of a prognostic model across several studies, with an application in superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A new strategy for meta-analysis of continuous covariates in observational studies.

Authors:  Willi Sauerbrei; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A framework for developing, implementing, and evaluating clinical prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas P A Debray; Karel G M Moons; Ikhlaaq Ahmed; Hendrik Koffijberg; Richard David Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Parametric and penalized generalized survival models.

Authors:  Xing-Rong Liu; Yudi Pawitan; Mark Clements
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies.

Authors:  Robert F Wolff; Karel G M Moons; Richard D Riley; Penny F Whiting; Marie Westwood; Gary S Collins; Johannes B Reitsma; Jos Kleijnen; Sue Mallett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  A general framework for parametric survival analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Crowther; Paul C Lambert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Multilevel mixed effects parametric survival models using adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature with application to recurrent events and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Crowther; Maxime P Look; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.

Authors:  Danielle L Burke; Joie Ensor; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-10-16       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Meta-analysis of non-linear exposure-outcome relationships using individual participant data: A comparison of two methods.

Authors:  Ian R White; Stephen Kaptoge; Patrick Royston; Willi Sauerbrei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.