Literature DB >> 34966951

Positive end-expiratory pressure individualization guided by continuous end-expiratory lung volume monitoring during laparoscopic surgery.

Gerardo Tusman1, Mats Wallin2,3, Cecilia Acosta4, Bruno Santanera4, Facundo Portela4, Federico Viotti4, Nora Fuentes4, Magnus Hallbäck3, Fernando Suarez-Sipmann5,6,7.   

Abstract

To determine whether end-expiratory lung volume measured with volumetric capnography (EELVCO2) can individualize positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting during laparoscopic surgery. We studied patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery subjected to Fowler (F-group; n = 20) or Trendelenburg (T-group; n = 20) positions. EELVCO2 was measured at 0° supine (baseline), during capnoperitoneum (CP) at 0° supine, during CP with Fowler (head up + 20°) or Trendelenburg (head down - 30°) positions and after CP back to 0° supine. PEEP was adjusted to preserve baseline EELVCO2 during and after CP. Baseline EELVCO2 was statistically similar to predicted FRC in both groups. At supine and CP, EELVCO2 decreased from baseline values in F-group [median and IQR 2079 (768) to 1545 (725) mL; p = 0.0001] and in T-group [2164 (789) to 1870 (940) mL; p = 0.0001]. Change in body position maintained EELVCO2 unchanged in both groups. PEEP adjustments from 5.6 (1.1) to 10.0 (2.5) cmH2O in the F-group (p = 0.0001) and from 5.6 (0.9) to 10.0 (2.6) cmH2O in T-group (p = 0.0001) were necessary to reach baseline EELVCO2 values. EELVCO2 increased close to baseline with PEEP in the F-group [1984 (600) mL; p = 0.073] and in the T-group [2175 (703) mL; p = 0.167]. After capnoperitoneum and back to 0° supine, PEEP needed to maintain EELVCO2 was similar to baseline PEEP in F-group [5.9 (1.8) cmH2O; p = 0.179] but slightly higher in the T-group [6.5 (2.2) cmH2O; p = 0.006]. Those new PEEP values gave EELVCO2 similar to baseline in the F-group [2039 (980) mL; p = 0.370] and in the T-group [2150 (715) mL; p = 0.881]. Breath-by-breath noninvasive EELVCO2 detected changes in lung volume induced by capnoperitoneum and body position and was useful to individualize the level of PEEP during laparoscopy.Trial registry: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03693352. Protocol started 1st October 2018.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atelectasis; EELV; FRC; Laparoscopy; Lung recruitment; PEEP; Protective ventilation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34966951     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00800-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  36 in total

Review 1.  Perioperative functional residual capacity.

Authors:  R W Wahba
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Effects of anesthesia on the respiratory system.

Authors:  Göran Hedenstierna; Lennart Edmark
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 3.  Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Sabrine N T Hemmes; Carmen S V Barbas; Martin Beiderlinden; Michelle Biehl; Jan M Binnekade; Jaume Canet; Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Emmanuel Futier; Ognjen Gajic; Göran Hedenstierna; Markus W Hollmann; Samir Jaber; Alf Kozian; Marc Licker; Wen-Qian Lin; Andrew D Maslow; Stavros G Memtsoudis; Dinis Reis Miranda; Pierre Moine; Thomas Ng; Domenico Paparella; Christian Putensen; Marco Ranieri; Federica Scavonetto; Thomas Schilling; Werner Schmid; Gabriele Selmo; Paolo Severgnini; Juraj Sprung; Sugantha Sundar; Daniel Talmor; Tanja Treschan; Carmen Unzueta; Toby N Weingarten; Esther K Wolthuis; Hermann Wrigge; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications.

Authors:  T E F Abbott; A J Fowler; P Pelosi; M Gama de Abreu; A M Møller; J Canet; B Creagh-Brown; M Mythen; T Gin; M M Lalu; E Futier; M P Grocott; M J Schultz; R M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  The effects of increased abdominal pressure on lung and chest wall mechanics during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  B G Fahy; G M Barnas; J L Flowers; S E Nagle; M J Njoku
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Airway closure and closing pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  G Hedenstierna; G S McCarthy
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Pulmonary densities during anesthesia with muscular relaxation--a proposal of atelectasis.

Authors:  B Brismar; G Hedenstierna; H Lundquist; A Strandberg; L Svensson; L Tokics
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 8.  Driving Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure: How Do We Guide Safe Mechanical Ventilation?

Authors:  Elizabeth C Williams; Gabriel C Motta-Ribeiro; Marcos F Vidal Melo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Postoperative pulmonary complications.

Authors:  A Miskovic; A B Lumb
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 10.  Perioperative lung protective ventilation.

Authors:  Brian O'Gara; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-09-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Capnodynamic monitoring of lung volume and blood flow in response to increased positive end-expiratory pressure in moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia: an observational study.

Authors:  Luis Schulz; Antony Stewart; William O'Regan; Peter McCanny; Danielle Austin; Magnus Hallback; Mats Wallin; Anders Aneman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 19.334

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.