| Literature DB >> 34966685 |
Seo Young Kang1,2, Eun Ji Lee2,3, Jung Woo Byun3,4, Dohyun Han5,6, Yoori Choi3, Do Won Hwang3,7, Dong Soo Lee2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aerobic glycolysis is a hallmark of glucose metabolism in cancer. Previous studies have suggested that cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) can modulate glucose metabolism in adjacent cells and promote disease progression. We hypothesized that EVs originating from cancer cells can modulate glucose metabolism in recipient cancer cells to induce cell proliferation and an aggressive cancer phenotype.Entities:
Keywords: PKM2 phosphorylation; aerobic glycolysis; breast cancer cells; extracellular vesicles; glucose metabolism modulation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34966685 PMCID: PMC8710663 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.785450
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1The change of glucose uptake in the MCF7 cells after coculture with MDA-MB-231 cells: (A) Two different breast cancer cell lines with different glycolytic activity, MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells; (B) A schematic figure of a 24-well Transwell insert with a 0.4-μm pore size for indirect coculture; (C) Baseline FDG uptake of various cancer cell lines, MCF7, MDA-MB-231, HepG2, Hep3B, HT-1080, and SK-OV-3, cultured up to 60 min. It can be seen that there are different levels of FDG uptake among several cancer cells within a limited time; (D) Baseline FDG uptake of two breast cancer cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 cells, cultured up to 180 min. Over time, the FDG uptake of MDA-MB-231 cells increases significantly, but in MCF7 cells, it tends to rise and fall little by little; (E) FDG uptake in MCF7 cells increased after coculture with MDA-MB-231 cells; (F) After coculture with MDA-MB-231 cells, the amount of lactate in the culture medium was significantly increased in MCF7 cells, which implies the increase in FDG uptake by activation of aerobic glycolysis; (G) The increase of FDG uptake in MCF7 cells was dose-dependent suppressed by heparin administration known to inhibit EV uptake in recipient cells. MCF7, human luminal type breast cancer cell; MDA-MB-231, human triple negative breast cancer cell, HepG2, human hepatocellular carcinoma; Hep3B, human hepatocellular carcinoma; HT-1080, human fibrosarcoma cell; SK-OV-3, human ovarian cancer cell. FDG, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, which is a glucose analog; Bars with standard deviation (n = 3, biologically independent samples) indicate average FDG uptake of each cell. Asterisks indicate P values *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, and ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 2MDA-MB-231 cell–derived EVs impacts for activation of glucose uptake in MCF7 cells: (A) Confocal microscopy images of the microfluidic chip show tdTomato-labeled EVs signals inside MCF7 cells; (B) Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) of isolated EVs from MDA-MB-231. The main peaks are located between 80-150nm; (C) Western blotting of EV-specific proteins, CD63, CD81, and TSG101. For verification of the isolated EVs, western blots were conducted in cell lysate and EV pellets; (D) FDG uptake of MCF7 cells increased in proportion to the dose after administration of the isolated EVs. Although there was no significant change until 20 µg/mL, it showed a significant increase in more than 100 µg/mL; (E) CCK8 assay shows increased cell proliferation of MCF7 cells after administration of the isolated EVs from MDA-MB-231; (F) The effect of MDA-MB-231-mediated EVs compared to control groups, EV-deprived conditioned medium and HFF-derived EVs. EVs of concentration of 100 ug/ml was used for the comparison. HFF-derived EVs failed to induce a significant increase of FDG uptake in MCF7 cells. Both EV-deprived conditioned media increased FDG uptake, but it was judged that there was a high possibility of change due to non-specific factors; EV_MDA, EVs isolated from MDA-MB-231; EV_HFF, EVs isolated from HFF; CM_MDA, EV-depleted conditioned media from MDA-MB-231; CM_HFF, EV-depleted conditioned media. Bars with standard deviation (n = 3, biologically independent samples) indicate average FDG uptake or absorbance of each sample. Asterisks indicate P values *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3Increased phosphorylation of PKM2 in MCF7 cells following coculture with MDA-MB-231 cells: (A) Phosphorylation of PKM2 S37 increased in the cocultured MCF7 cells compared to single-cultured cells. S37 Phosphorylated PKM2 is mainly located in the nucleus. (B) Inhibition of PKM2 phosphorylation by heparin that blocks EV uptake in the cocultured MCF7 cells. The images show that the cell proliferation of MCF7 cells compared to untreated cells was also suppressed. (C) Western blotting of PKM2, phosphorylated PKM2, GLUT1 and GAPDH; (D) Quantification of western blotting shows increased expression of GLUT1 and increased Y105 phosphorylation of PKM2 related to the activation of aerobic glycolysis; (E) The increase in the ratio of pPKM2 to PKM2 means an increase in Y105 phosphorylation of PKM2 compared to the PKM2 expression itself. Bars with standard deviation (n = 3, biologically independent samples) indicate average FDG uptake or absorbance of each sample. Asterisks indicate P values (P< 0.05). ns, not significant.
Figure 4Proteomics analysis: (A) A hierarchical clustering analysis was performed with proteins extracted from single-cultured MCF7 cells and co-cultured ones during 24 and 48 hours. The analysis represented five clusters, and we noted, among them, that two major clusters (#379 and #381) had a consistent direction in expression. Cluster #379 consisted of proteins that consistently increased in expression over time, and cluster #381 consisted of proteins that consistently decreased in expression over time. As shown in the figure, more than a majority of proteins tend to decrease in expression, which can be thought of as mainly transmitting suppression signals. (B–E) Protein-protein interactions of the differentially expressed proteins in MCF7 cells were visualized using STRING analysis. The clusters of upregulation visualized: (B) Positive regulation of metabolic process; (C) Nucleobase containing compound biosynthetic process. The clusters of downregulation visualized: (D) Cell morphogenesis; (E) Regulation of cell differentiation. Lines represent interactions between proteins, and line thickness denotes the confidence level associated with each interaction. (F) Volcano plot describes differentially expressed proteins in the MCF7 cells co-cultured with MDA-MB-231 (-log p-value > 1.3 and fold change ≥ 1.15). Thirty-two differentially expressed proteins after co-culture for 24 h, and 74 proteins for 48 h were identified; (G) Several proteins associated with the EMT were expressed differentially in the MCF7 cells co-cultured for 48 h compared to single-cultured MCF7 cells.
GO term analysis using IPA reveals distinct protein groups related to biosynthesis and differentiation.
| GO Term | P-value | Genes | Fold Enrichment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Protein modification by small protein conjugation | 0.008839 | CDCA8, NMI, N4BP1, BTRC, UBA7, BIRC5, FKBP1A, CBFB, SPOP, TRAF3 | 2.760462 |
| Positive regulation of metabolic process | 0.014763 | SREBF1, RET, MYO6, NMI, BTRC, ADCY5, TPX2, FKBP1A, WHSC1, CBFB, ARHGEF11, NRIP1, NOTCH3, ITGA6, IRF7, NFAT5, AKAP5, CCS, FOXC1, ABL2, NCOR2 | 1.684768 | |
| Nucleobase-containing compound biosynthetic process | 0.015722 | SREBF1, RET, NMI, MYO6, ADCY5, BTRC, ZNF48, UBA7, WHSC1, BIRC5, CBFB, ARHGEF11, NRIP1, NOTCH3, NOTCH2, ITGA6, IRF7, PARP14, TOP3A, NFAT5, AKAP5, THOC7, FOXC1, GUK1, NCOR2, TRAF3, ZNF768 | 1.517335 | |
| Positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated | 0.018126 | NOTCH3, SREBF1, RET, MYO6, ITGA6, BTRC, IRF7, NFAT5, FOXC1, CBFB, NRIP1, ARHGEF11 | 2.178084 | |
|
| Cell morphogenesis involved in differentiation | 2.82E-06 | COBL, HRAS, ACTN4, PDLIM5, PREX1, BAIAP2, ACTN1, BASP1, PALLD, LATS2, FOXP1, FLNA, NUMBL, TGFB2, CORO1C, GLIPR2, CDC42, UNC13D, MACF1, SIPA1L1, CAMK2B, BCL9L, ZFPM1, RAPGEF2, OLFM1, GBP1 | 2.918276 |
| Regulation of cell differentiation | 0.004287 | XRCC5, COBL, PDLIM7, PDLIM5, PREX1, IL18, PDCD4, TGFB2, CDC42, GLIPR2, MACF1, PER2, BCL9L, CAMK2B, RAPGEF2, EHD2, OLFM1, ACTN4, BAIAP2, PTBP1, ARNTL, FOXP1, FLNA, NUMBL, CORO1C, UFL1, UNC13D, SIPA1L1, ZFPM1, KDM4A, GBP1 | 1.696924 | |
| Regulation of apoptotic process | 0.039927 | TXNIP, HRAS, HTATIP2, AIFM2, ACTN4, ERBB3, VIL1, FHL2, ACTN1, PAWR, PDCD4, LATS2, FOXP1, FLNA, TGFB2, ATF6, FIS1, CDC42, SON, AKT1S1, SOS2, CAMK2D, DEPTOR, RAPGEF2, PDCD6 | 1.509246 | |
| Signal transduction involved in mitotic cell cycle checkpoint | 0.038111 | CNOT8, RBL2, PPP2R5C, TFDP2 | 5.366207 |
Figure 5Transcriptomic analysis: (A) Hierarchical clustering analysis of transcriptomic data showed differentially ex-pressed mRNAs in the co-cultured MCF7 cells with MDA-MB-231 for 24 h. This analysis represented that many genes in MCF7 cells were differentially transcribed after co-culture with MDA-MB-231 cells; (B) Volcano plots describe 452 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the MCF7 cells co-cultured with MDA-MB-231 (-log p-value > 1.3 and fold change ≥ 1.5); (C) Gene category analysis revealed that the DEGs were mainly related to glucose metabolism, apoptosis, cell cycle, cell differentiation, and cell proliferation; (D) An independent heat map of glucose metabolism-related genes. It represents several key genes showing increased expression: ALDOC (fold change, 2.824), ENO2 (2.077), HK2 (1.435), LDHA (1.738), and PGM1 (1.511); (E) The graphs shows up-regulated genes related to glucose metabolism and their fold changes; (F) Biological process analysis showed that genes were highly related to hypoxia response, nucleotide phosphorylation, purine metabolic process and glycolysis; (G), The extracellular exosome component was shown to be significant in the cell component analysis; (H) KEGG pathway analysis also showed significant changes in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis.
Figure 6EVs as carriers for the transfer of aggressive phenotypes. The cargo proteins of EVs, EGFR, ERBB2, and MAPK1, induce phosphorylation of PKM2 and result in activated glycolysis and cell proliferation and cause transition to the aggressive phenotype of the MCF7 cell.