| Literature DB >> 34966666 |
Xiaoqi Li1, Junting Huang1, Ji Chen1, Yating Zhan1, Rongrong Zhang1, Enze Lu1, Chunxue Li1, Yuxiao Zhang1, Yajing Wang1, Yeping Li2, Jianjian Zheng1, Wujun Geng3,4.
Abstract
Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma (BLCA) is the major subtype of bladder cancer, and the prognosis prediction of BLCA is difficult. Ferroptosis is a newly discovered iron-dependent cell death pathway. However, the clinical value of ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) on the prediction of BLCA prognosis is still uncertain. In this study, we aimed to construct a novel prognostic signature to improve the prognosis prediction of advanced BLCA based on FRGs. In the TCGA cohort, we identified 23 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with overall survival (OS) via univariate Cox analysis (all P < 0.05). 8 optimal DEGs were finally screened to generate the prognostic risk signature through LASSO regression analysis. Patients were divided into two risk groups based on the median risk score. Survival analyses revealed that the OS rate in the high-risk group was significantly lower than that in the low-risk group. Moreover, the risk score was determined as an independent predictor of OS by the multivariate Cox regression analysis (Hazard ratio > 1, 95% CI = 1.724-2.943, P < 0.05). Many potential ferroptosis-related pathways were identified in the enrichment analysis in BLCA. With the aid of an external FAHWMU cohort (n = 180), the clinical predication value of the signature was further verified. In conclusion, the prognosis of advanced BLCA could be accurately predicted by this novel FRG-signature.Entities:
Keywords: bladder urothelial carcinoma; ferroptosis; function analyses; immune status; prognostic signature
Year: 2021 PMID: 34966666 PMCID: PMC8710446 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.726486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Flowchart of data collection and analysis.
The clinical features of TCGA cohort and the FAHWMU cohort.
| TCGA cohort | FAHWMU cohort | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 406 | 180 |
|
| ||
| female | 106 (26.1%) | 47 (26.1%) |
| male | 300 (73.9%) | 133 (73.9%) |
|
| ||
| >65 | 245 (60.3%) | 107 (59.4%) |
| ≤65 | 161 (39.7%) | 73 (40.5%) |
|
| ||
| alive | 227 (55.9%) | 93 (51.7%) |
| dead | 179 (44.1%) | 87 (48.3%) |
|
| ||
| Stage I | 2 (0.5%) | 21 (11.7%) |
| Stage II | 129 (31.8%) | 56 (31.1%) |
| Stage III | 140 (34.5%) | 44 (24.4%) |
| Stage IV | 133 (32.8%) | 57 (31.7%) |
| unknown | 2 (0.5%) | 2 (1.1%) |
Figure 2Identification of OS-related DEFRGs in the TCGA cohort. (A) Venn plot showing common genes from differential analysis and univariate Cox analysis. (B) Heat map of OS-related DEFRGs. (C) Forest plots showing OS-related DEFRGs (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Comprehensive networks of 23 OS-related DEFRGs. (A) PPI network (B) Correlation network of 23 OS-related DEFRGs. (C) Regulatory network of TFs and DEFRGs (green nodes: DEFRGs with low risk; red nodes: DEFRGs with high risk, only nodes with correlation coefficient > 0.4 and P < 0.05 were selected).
Figure 4Construction of the prognostic model. (A, B). Lasso-Cox analysis of 23 OS-related DEFRGs. (C) Forest plot showing the eight genes in the prognostic risk model.
Figure 5Survival analysis of the TCGA cohort prognostic signature. (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve. (B) time-dependent ROC curve. (C) The distribution and median value of the risk scores. (D) OS-related scatter plot. (E) PCA plot. (F) t-SNE plot.
Figure 6Validation of gene signature in patients with MIBC in the FAHWMU cohort (n = 110). (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve. (B) time-dependent ROC curve. (C) The distribution and median value of the risk scores. (D) OS-related scatter plot. (E) PCA plot. (F) t-SNE plot.
Figure 7Forest plots showing key clinical factors under the signature. (A) Univariate Cox regression analysis of the TCGA cohort. (B) Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the TCGA cohort.
Figure 8Enrichment analyses of the signature. (A) GO enrichment plot of the TCGA cohort. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment plot of the TCGA cohort.
Figure 9ssGSEA analyses of the signature. (A, B) The block diagram showing the scores of 16 immune cells (A) and 13 immune-related functions (B) of the TCGA cohort. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns, no significance.