| Literature DB >> 34966492 |
M Raj1, Sps Gill2, A Rajput2, K S Singh2, K S Verma2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bicondylar tibial plateau fractures account for 10-30% of tibial plateau fractures. Despite recent advancements in the management of unstable bicondylar tibial plateau fractures, the outcomes are often poor. The present study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of internal fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with the dual plating using two incisions.Entities:
Keywords: Rasmussen’s criteria; Schatzker type V and VI; oxford knee score; radiological outcome; unstable bicondylar tibial plateau fracture
Year: 2021 PMID: 34966492 PMCID: PMC8667239 DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2111.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malays Orthop J ISSN: 1985-2533
Patient demographic details
| S.No. | Variable | Demography |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Total number of Patients | 30 |
| 2 | Mean Age (in years) Range | 35.6 (19-65) |
| 3 | Male : Female | 26/4 |
| 4 | Mode of Injury | |
| Traffic Injury | 26 | |
| Fall | 4 | |
| 5 | Side Involvement | |
| Left | 11 | |
| Right | 9 | |
| 6 | Fracture Type (Schatzker) | |
| Type V | 5 | |
| Type VI | 25 | |
| 7 | Associated Fracture | 7 |
| 8 | Duration of follow-up (in months) | 22.4 (14 ⁓ 48) |
Fig. 1:Radiographic measurements of MPTA and PPTA angle.
Fig. 2:(a) Radiograph showing bicondylar tibial plateau fracture. (b) Post-operative radiograph showing fixation with dual plating. (c) Six months post-operative radiograph showing union. (d) Clinical pictures showing good range of movement.
Perioperative and post-operative patient details
| S.No. | Variable | Parameter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Primary/Staged | 25/5 |
| 2 | Pre-surgical stay (in days) | 8.9 (4 ⁓ 16) |
| 3 | Duration of surgery (in minutes) | 80.67±7.28 (60 ⁓ 180) |
| 4 | Blood loss (in ml) | 144.6 (80 ⁓ 340) |
| 5 | Duration of hospital stay (in days) | 12.7 (10 ⁓ 30) |
| 6 | Weight-bearing (in weeks) | 13.8 (10 ⁓ 24) |
| 7 | Primary bone grafting | 4 |
Post-operative functional scores and radiological outcome of patients
| S.No. | Variable | Parameter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Range of Motion | |
| ≥ 120° | 23 | |
| ≤ 120° | 7 | |
| 2 | Oxford Knee Score (OKS) | 43.24 (34 - 45) |
| 3 | Rasmussen’s functional score (RFS) | 23.75 (19 - 28) |
| 4 | Post-operative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) (At final follow-up) | 84.3 (82 - 91) |
| 5 | Post-operative Proximal posterior tibial angle (PPTA) | 6.2 (4 - 11) |
| 6 | Rasmussen’s radiological score (RRS) | 7.86 (6 - 10) |
Post-operative complications
| S.No. | Variable | Complication |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Infection | |
| a) Superficial | 3 | |
| b) Deep | 1 | |
| 2 | Radiological Malunion | |
| a) Articular Depression | 1 | |
| b) Malalignment | 1 | |
| c) Secondary loss of reduction | 0 | |
| d) Failure of Implant/ Loosening of Screw | 0 | |
| 3 | Stiffness | 1 |
Comparison between the present study and other studies
| Present study | Cho KY | Prasad | Oh CW | Citak | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of study | Prospective | Retrospective | Retrospective | Prospective | Retrospective |
| Total number of patients | 30 | 10 | 40 | 23 | 10 |
| Mean age (in years) | 35.6 | 51.6 | 40 | 54 | 51.2 |
| Mean follow-up duration (in weeks) | 22.4 | 33.7 | 48 | 25 | 27.8 |
| Weight bearing (in weeks) | 13.8 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 12 |
| Range of Motion | 1.5° - 130° | 0° - 122.5° | 1.75° - 128.5° | 0° - 123° | 0° - 119° |
| Knee score | RFS – 23.75 | OKS | |||
| OKS – 43.24 | AKSFS – 85 | Excellent -30 | RFS -26 | RFS -22.9 | |
| Good -10 | |||||
| Wound complications | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Malalignment | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Secondary loss of reduction | 0, | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Healing Time (in weeks) | 18 | 16 | 14 | 19 | 14 |
| Mean MPTA (at final visit) | 84.3° | 90.5° | 84.05° | Not measured | 86.3° |
| Mean PPTA (at final visit) | 6.2° | 4.4° | 8.25° | Not measured | 5.5° |
Abbreviations - RFS: Rasmussen’s functional score, OKS: Oxford knee score, AKSFS: American knee society function score, MPTA: Medial proximal tibial angle, PPTA: Posterior proximal tibial angle