Lessons From Heat Stroke for Understanding Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

We here provide an overview of the pathophysiological mechanisms during heat stroke and describe similar mechanisms found in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Both conditions are characterized by disturbed homeostasis in which inflammatory pathways play a central role. Splanchnic vasoconstriction, increased gut permeability, gut-related endotoxemia, systemic inflammatory response, central nervous system dysfunction, blood coagulation disorder, endothelial-cell injury, and mitochondrial dysfunction underlie heat stroke. These mechanisms have also been documented in ME/CFS. Moreover, initial transcriptomic studies suggest that similar gene expressions are altered in both heat stroke and ME/CFS. Finally, some predisposing factors for heat stroke, such as pre-existing inflammation or infection, overlap with those for ME/CFS. Notwithstanding important differences - and despite heat stroke being an acute condition - the overlaps between heat stroke and ME/CFS suggest common pathways in the physiological responses to very different forms of stressors, which are manifested in different clinical outcomes. The human studies and animal models of heat stroke provide an explanation for the self-perpetuation of homeostatic imbalance centered around intestinal wall injury, which could also inform the understanding of ME/CFS. Moreover, the studies of novel therapeutics for heat stroke might provide new avenues for the treatment of ME/CFS. Future research should be conducted to investigate the similarities between heat stroke and ME/CFS to help identify the potential treatments for ME/CFS.

Introduction

Heat stroke results from a failure of the body to maintain its normal core temperature when exposed to a high environmental temperature (i.e., “classic heat stroke”) or from strenuous exercise (i.e., “exertional heat stroke”) (1). There is no universally accepted definition of heat stroke. Based on the pathophysiology of heat stroke, Bouchama and Knochel (1) proposed to define heat stroke as “a form of hyperthermia associated with a systemic inflammatory response leading to a syndrome of multiorgan dysfunction in which encephalopathy predominates.” Heat stroke is often clinically defined as “a core body temperature that rises above 40°C and that is accompanied by hot, dry skin and central nervous system abnormalities such as delirium, convulsions, or coma” (1, 2). However, given the occurrence of multiple organ dysfunction in heat stroke victims, the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) recommended heatstroke clinical criteria to include “the presence of renal and hepatic complications and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)” (3). The JAAM criteria do not include temperature “because elderly people often do not present with high temperature even when they are already suffering from heat stroke” (3). Heat stroke can lead to organ damage or death, and the hospital mortality rate in classic heat stroke ranges from 10% to 65%, whereas that of exertional heat stroke is 3% to 5% (4). An average of 702 heat-related deaths occurred in the United States annually during 2004–2018 (5) (we assume representing mostly cases of classic heat stroke). “Prompt recognition and effective body cooling will in most cases rapidly reverse heat-induced organ dysfunction. However, body cooling alone may not suffice to effect a full recovery, and prompt administration of adjuvant treatments may be critical for survival” (4). Several novel treatments are currently being explored for heat stroke, notably to address gut permeability and to reduce systemic inflammatory markers (4).

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating multi-system disease of unclear etiology (6–10). The most common peri-onset events reported by patients are infection-related episodes, stressful incidents, and exposure to environmental toxins (11). “Impaired function, post-exertional malaise, and unrefreshing sleep” are considered to be the core symptoms (12, 13). Post-exertional malaise refers to an exacerbation of some or all of an individual's ME/CFS symptoms after physical or cognitive exertion, or orthostatic stress that leads to a reduction in functional ability. The severity of the symptoms varies, where “very severely affected patients experience profound weakness, almost constant pain, severe limitations to physical and mental activity, sensory hypersensitivity (light, touch, sound, smell, and certain foods), and hypersensitivity to medications” (14, 15). The illness can be completely incapacitating (16) and “at least one-quarter of ME/CFS patients are house- or bedbound at some point in their lives” (12). Patients with milder symptoms experience a significant reduction in their previous level of functioning (8). The illness progresses over time, shifting from an early hypermetabolic state to a hypometabolic state with low energy production (17). ME/CFS is often dismissed by physicians because standard urine and blood laboratory tests produce normal results, thereby multiplying patients' suffering (18). Deaths from ME/CFS are rare (19), however, the prevalence of the disease is estimated to be at least 1.5 million cases in the United States alone (20). There are currently no effective treatments for ME/CFS (21–25).

In the following sections, we provide an overview of key pathophysiological mechanisms in heat stroke, such as splanchnic vasoconstriction, increased gut permeability, gut-related endotoxemia, systemic inflammatory response, central nervous system dysfunction, blood coagulation disorder, endothelial-cell injury, and mitochondrial dysfunction - and relate these mechanisms to similar findings from ME/CFS research. In addition, we also describe the results of initial heat stress gene transcriptome studies and the parallel findings from ME/CFS studies. Finally, we summarize key predisposing factors for both illnesses.

The central thesis of this paper is that the lessons from the human studies and animal models of heat stroke can contribute to the understanding and treatment of ME/CFS. Although this thesis might seem unlikely given the important differences in the onset and clinical outcomes between these two conditions, it is derived from a broader hypothesis that supports the notion of common pathways in the physiological responses to very different forms of stressors and disease manifestations (26–30). The paper serves as an element of a wider enquiry into commonalities in the pathology of illnesses induced by physical, infectious, and/or emotional stressors including heat stroke, ME/CFS, prolonged critical illness (chronic intensive care unit [ICU]), post intensive care syndrome (PICS), cancer-related fatigue, post-viral fatigue, post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] syndrome (PACS), and long-COVID-19. The paper is in line with a history of research comparing ME/CFS with other conditions (including fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis) to derive lessons for understanding ME/CFS.

Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Since the 1990s, human and animal model studies have shown that endotoxemia of intestinal origin (i.e., the presence of endotoxins leaked from the intestines into circulation) may play an important role in the pathophysiological mechanisms of heat stroke (1, 2, 31–33). This evidence culminated in the dual pathway model of heat stroke, which proposes that heat stroke can be triggered by two sequential but independent pathways (31, 34): (i) the heat toxicity pathway, referring to cytotoxicity resulting directly from hyperthermia (e.g., protein denaturation, organ damage, and interruption of critical cellular processes because of heat), and (ii) the endotoxemia pathway (or heat sepsis pathway), involving splanchnic vasoconstriction, gut hyper-permeability (“leaky gut”), and endotoxemia culminating in systemic inflammation (or sepsis) (Figure 1). Whereas heat toxicity was traditionally considered the primary determinant of morbidity and mortality in heat stroke, it is now increasingly recognized that this pathway occurs only at temperatures above 42°C. Conversely, the endotoxemia pathway can provoke heat stroke at temperatures between 40 and 42°C (31, 33). In other words, the endotoxemia pathway precedes and acts largely independently of the heat toxicity pathway in the pathology of heat stroke (31). Moreover, the endotoxemia pathway is increasingly considered as the lead driver of severe organ damage and the main cause of death in patients suffering from heat stroke (35).

Figure 1

Pathophysiological mechanisms during heat stroke and similar mechanisms in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome ME/CFS [modified from (36)].

In the following paragraphs, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of the modern paradigm of heat stroke with a focus on the endotoxemia pathway. Moreover, we describe similar findings from ME/CFS. Our focus on the similarities between the two conditions does not intend to negate the disease-specific mechanisms. Instead, it intends to highlight possible lessons from heat stroke for understanding ME/CFS.

Splanchnic Vasoconstriction and Hypoxia

In Heat Stroke

The primary response of the cardiovascular system to an increase in the ambient heat or heat from exertion is an increase in the blood flow to the skin (i.e., cutaneous vasodilation) to dissipate the excess heat. The modern paradigm of heat stroke suggests that the maintenance of a constant blood pressure implies/requires a reduction in blood flow to internal organs (i.e., splanchnic vasoconstriction) (1, 32, 36–38). However, splanchnic hypo-perfusion is not unique to heat stroke and common to critical illnesses (i.e., severe injury or infection) (39, 40), and may thus be a response to severe stress in general. In any case, the resulting hypoxia has important consequences on the gut and brain during heat stroke (as shown below) and promotes liver damage. In addition, the strain on the cardiovascular system often results in syncope and orthostatic intolerance in heat stroke (36).

In ME/CFS

Akin to heat stroke, several new hypotheses of ME/CFS suggest that vasoconstriction and hypoxia are central to its pathology—respectively focused on the consequence of ß2 adrenergic and M3 acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies (41, 42), a potential reduction of ACE2 expression (43), and an abnormal immune response with a concomitant impact on endothelial function (44). In addition, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a common comorbidity of ME/CFS (45), which is a complex disorder of the vascular system also associated with gastrointestinal dysfunctions (46, 47). Impaired blood pressure variability and arrythmia have been observed in the patients with ME/CFS (48, 49).

In summary, vasoconstriction and hypoxia would appear to be common to both heat stroke in at least a subset of patients with ME/CFS—despite the difference in onset events of these two conditions. Research from critical illnesses (beyond heat stroke) suggests that splanchnic vasoconstriction is a general response to stressors. Vasoconstriction and hypoxia have far-reaching implications for organs and tissues.

Gut Permeability and Endotoxemia

Animal models of heat stroke have shown that ischemia resulting from reduced blood flow to the gut causes mucosal damage and a weakening of the tight junctions in the gut—likely via the action of oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS) (1, 4, 31–33, 35–38, 50, 51)—as well ATP depletion and local acidosis (50) induced by hypoxia. The result is a leaky gut characterized by a reduction of intestinal immunity and increased permeability of the intestines (1). This condition promotes gram-negative bacteria (i.e., lipopolysaccharides, LPS) that are normally contained in the gut to enter blood circulation (1, 4, 31–33, 35–38, 50, 52). Studies have shown that in the case of heat stroke, the liver is unable to effectively clear endotoxin (31), notably because of poor circulation in the venous system that returns blood from the digestive tract and spleen to the liver (37, 50). The resulting endotoxemia is assumed to trigger a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in heat stroke (as shown below) (4, 31–33, 35, 36, 53). Furthermore, findings from critical illness suggest that additional forms of intestinal injury play a role in driving critical illness, including the erosion of the mucus barrier, a shift in the composition and virulence of intestinal microbes, and the inability of the host epithelium to regulate its proliferative and apoptotic response (39, 54). These elements are thought to contribute to a vicious cycle of inflammation and intestinal injury. Moreover, the reduction in gut motility, the formation of toxic gut-derived lymph, and a decrease in the secretion of gastrointestinal hormones could contribute to multi-organ dysfunction in critical illness (55, 56).

Critically, normalization of the core temperature during heat stroke through cooling does not necessarily imply a reversion to normal gut permeability or the end of endotoxemia (1). Some researchers have thus suggested and tried to repair gut function to treat heat stroke (38). This includes the administration of nutritional supplements, such as glutamine and bovine colostrum with some promising results (33, 50, 57, 58). Additionally, the use of prebiotics and probiotics is being explored as an avenue for treatment (38, 50). Others have had success in limiting intestinal injury with the use of 4-phenylbutyrate to interrupt the endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis pathway of intestinal cells (59). Similarly, others have studied the use of xanthine oxidase inhibitor (allopurinol) to protect the integrity of tight cell-to-cell junctions in the gut of rat models (51). The inhibition of endotoxemia by pre-treatment with LPS-specific antibodies and corticosteroids to counteract LPS was shown to protect animals from lethal heat stress (31, 60). Readers are referred to the reviews for details on the results of human and animal studies (35, 38, 50, 61).

Echoing the endotoxemia model of heat stroke, ME/CFS researchers have hypothesized that the translocation of gut microbes or toxins from the gastrointestinal tract and the resulting inflammation is central to ME/CFS (62–66). Studies have found gut hyper-permeability (63) and gut inflammation (67) in ME/CFS as well as increased levels of the antibodies to LPS (IgM and IgA) in serum of patients with ME/CFS (the prevalence of patients with CFS with abnormally increased IgM and IgA levels: 40% and 66.7%) (68). Moreover, researchers have induced fatigue in mice through the administration of LPS (69). Finally, studies have shown that the normalization of leaky gut in ME/CFS by administration of natural anti-inflammatory and antioxidative substances is accompanied by a clinical improvement (70). Readers are referred to the reviews for a detailed discussion on the implication of gut permeability on the immune system and mitochondrial function in ME/CFS (7, 71).

It is worth noting that leaky gut is distinct from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although the former is believed to contribute to the latter (72). Leaky gut is related to changes in the permeability of the tight junctions in the gut barrier, which can be observed in the absence of symptoms (73). In research, changes in the gut barrier have been measured in urine using sugar probes of different molecular sizes, and in the circulation, using intestinal fatty acid binding protein (iFAB), and claudine-3 (74, 75). iFAB is an intracellular protein in the intestine wall and supports the transportation of fatty acid across the gut barrier. Claudine-3 is located between the tight junctions and functions as a “glue” to preserve the integrity of the gut barrier. Leaky gut is associated with diseases beyond the gut, such as diabetes (76) and autoimmune diseases (77, 78). Conversely, IBS is related to gut dysbiosis and is primarily associated with gastrointestinal discomfort (79). Whereas IBS is widely recognized as a clinical entity by the medical profession, leaky gut is largely considered the domain of alternative medicine (80).

In summary, gut hyper-permeability and endotoxemia would appear to be common to both heat stroke and at least a subset of patients with ME/CFS patients—despite the difference in onset events of these two conditions. These mechanisms have far-reaching implications on various physiological systems, including inflammation (as shown below). The results of human and animal experiments to repair gut function and mitigate endotoxemia in heat stroke might inform and provide new therapeutic avenues for ME/CFS.

Systemic Inflammatory Response

Bouchama and Knochel suggest that the inflammatory response during the initial “acute-phase of heat stress” is mediated primarily by interleukin-6 (IL-6) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines, which serve to protect against tissue injury and to promote repair. Indeed, IL-6 and other cytokines induced by exposure to heat stress appear to mediate fever, leukocytosis, increased synthesis of acute-phase proteins, muscle catabolism, stimulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and the activation of leukocytes and endothelial cells (1). However, an exaggeration of the acute-phase response can precipitate a maladaptive progression from heat stress to heat stroke. Specifically, leaky gut (as described above) hastens local inflammation toward the “exaggerated” systemic inflammatory response that underpins heat stroke (1). The field of exercise immunology has demonstrated that LPS leaking from the gut activates toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 on immune and intestinal epithelial cell membranes. This activation results in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, e.g., IL-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (31, 33, 35, 50). Moreover, the animal models of heat stroke have shown that, when LPS is present, NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasomes are activated and drive neuroinflammation (81). A vicious cycle centered around intestinal injury ensues in heat stroke involving the release of nitric oxide, the leakage of gut-related endotoxins, and increased production of inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, and IFN-γ) (35). Anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), and TNF receptors p55 and p75) are also elevated, but to a lesser degree (2). The mode of action of cytokines in a heat stroke remains to be fully understood (33, 36). However, the increase in inflammatory cytokine levels is associated with inflammation-associated injury and refractory immunosuppression (1, 36) and can induce fever when transported to the brain (1, 82). Mouse models indicate that glia cells are a likely source of cytokine and chemokine production (36, 83).

Critically, normalization of the core temperature does not necessarily inhibit the systemic inflammatory response in heat stroke (1). Researchers have thus suggested and tried the modulation of the inflammatory response as a form of heat stroke treatment and prophylaxis, including with the administration of IL-1 receptor antagonists (81, 84), corticosteroids (60, 85), activated protein C (86), and the inhibition of nuclear factor-kB activity (1). Others have used oleoylethanolamide to inhibit LPS-induced TLR-4 stimulation of the immune response (50, 87). Blood purification therapy (53) and bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell therapy (88) to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines have been suggested or tested in clinical trials. Other clinical trials have tested the efficacy of antioxidants and anti-inflammatories, such as quercetin (89). One study found that parenteral administration of ascorbate attenuated heat stroke-induced systemic inflammation in mice (90). Readers are referred to the reviews for details on the results of human and animal heat stroke studies (35, 50).

Akin to heat stroke, researchers have found that chronic inflammation also underlies ME/CFS (91–95), including inflammation of the brain—hence the name myalgic encephalomyelitis (96, 97). Moreover, similarly to heat stroke, O&NS has been documented in ME/CFS (98) and the cytokine profile of patients with ME/CFS differs from healthy controls (99, 100). Researchers have also linked NLRP3 inflammasomes with inflammation in ME/CFS (101). Some researchers have theorized that the complex pathways between these elements (O&NS, cytokines, and inflammation) underpin the metabolic dysfunction characteristic of the disease (102), including by hindering mitochondrial (103) and hypothalamic function (104, 105). Significantly, researchers suggest “the possibility of a vicious cycle of immune-dysregulation and gut dysbiosis accompanied by poor physiological gut function” perpetuating a disease state in ME/CFS (7)—as is the case for heat stroke. Readers are referred to the numerous studies and reviews for a detailed discussion on the relationship between redox imbalance, cytokines, and inflammatory pathways in ME/CFS (7, 101, 106, 107).

In summary, inflammation associated with cytokines and O&NS is central to both heat stroke and ME/CFS—despite the difference in onset events of these two conditions. Moreover, a vicious inflammatory cycle involving altered gut-blood barrier function (leaky gut) may be a central element of both heat stroke and some patients with ME/CFS. The results of human and animal experiments to modulate the inflammatory response in heat stroke might inform and provide new therapeutic avenues for ME/CFS.

Central Nervous System Dysfunction

Delirium, convulsions, and coma are common symptoms in the clinical presentation of heat stroke. The mechanisms of central nervous system injury in heat stroke are not well understood but are likely due to the combination of ischemia, hypoxia, thermolysis (Tc > 42°C), and hemorrhage (108–110). The animal models of heat stroke identified ischemia resulting from decreased cerebral flow and increased intracranial pressure as causing extensive cerebral neuronal injury (36). Moreover, a decrease in brain blood supply and an increase in intracranial pressure are followed by a compromised blood-brain barrier and an increase in circulatory pyrogens (37). In other words, analogous to the consequences of hypo-perfusion in the gut, reduced blood flow to the brain can lead to hypoxia, inflammation, and hyper-permeability within the brain, facilitating protein and pathogen leakage from the systemic circulation into the brain (32, 36, 37, 111). The severity of this mechanism in heat stroke can lead to brain injury.

Central nervous system dysfunctions are present in ME/CFS, albeit in a different form. Brain fog and hypersensitivity to noise and light are common symptoms in patients with ME/CFS (8, 13). However, the mechanisms in ME/CFS are arguably even less well understood than in heat stroke. Brain imaging studies revealed significant neuroinflammation (112–114) and white matter abnormalities (115), which are confirmed by autopsies (116). As mentioned above, a new unifying hypothesis of ME/CFS suggests that vasoconstriction and hypoxia in muscle and brain underpin ME/CFS, including cognitive impairments (41, 42). Studies have shown reduced cerebral blood flow during tilt tests (117). Akin to heat stroke, some patients with ME/CFS present signs of increased intracranial pressure (118, 119), consistent with altered blood flow. Alternatively, others have hypothesized that ME/CFS is promoted by gut microbes or toxin translocation from the gastrointestinal tract into other tissues, including the brain (62). The central nervous system is generally an immune-privileged site (i.e., protected from the peripheral immune system) (120), but pathogens that reach the brain can cause devastating inflammation (121).

In summary, central nervous system dysfunctions are central to both heat stroke and ME/CFS, albeit in different forms and to different degrees. Neuroinflammation, decreased blood flow to the brain and increased intracranial pressure might be common to both heat stroke and some ME/CFS patients. The animal models of heat stroke may inform the understanding of central nervous system dysfunction in ME/CFS.

Coagulation Disorders and Endothelial-Cell Injury

Both the endotoxemia and the heat toxicity pathways are believed to contribute to coagulopathy dysfunction and endothelial-cell injury in heat stroke. First, intestine-derived endotoxins and cytokines activate vascular endothelial cells and coagulation factors to amplify the coagulation cascade (32, 35), which triggers vascular endothelial cell injury (122, 123). Moreover, the increase in core temperature directly leads to vascular endothelium damage (2), which in turn drives coagulation (32, 36). Bouchama and Knochel (1) describe a complex interplay among the cytotoxic effect of the heat and the inflammatory and coagulation responses of the host. Together these mechanisms result in a positive feedback loop, causing occlusion of the arterioles and capillaries (i.e., microvascular thrombosis) (32, 53, 90, 122). The vascular endothelial cell injury in heat stroke has been substantiated by evidence of differential expression of exosome lncRNAs and miRNAs (122).

Critically, normalization of the core temperature does not necessarily deactivate the coagulation process (1). Researchers have thus suggested anticoagulation therapy (53) with some initial positive results (124). Others have found that dexmedetomidine protects endothelial glycocalyx and increases the survival of rats during heat stroke (125). Readers are referred to the reviews for details on the results of human and animal studies (35, 38, 50).

Akin to heat stroke, hyper-coagulation was also suggested to be a contributing factor in ME/CFS (126–128), but the findings have not been consistent across the studies (129). The lessor importance or absence of coagulation dysfunctions in ME/CFS compared with heat stroke may be explained by the fact that the “heat toxicity pathway,” one of the drivers of the “positive feedback loop” driving coagulopathy dysfunction in heat stroke, is absent in ME/CFS.

Studies have shown that endothelial function is impaired in ME/CFS, both in large vessels and in microcirculation (130, 131). As in heat stroke, these findings were substantiated by indirect evidence related to the expression of miRNAs relevant to endothelial function (132). A new hypothesis for ME/CFS suggests that endothelial senescence underpins ME/CFS by disrupting the intestinal and blood-brain barriers (62).

In summary, coagulopathy dysfunction and endothelial-cell injury may be common to both heat stroke and at least a subset of patients with ME/CFS, despite the difference in onset events of these two conditions. The results of human and animal experiments to address coagulation disorders and endothelial-cell injury in heat stroke might inform and provide new therapeutic avenues for ME/CFS.

Mitochondrial Dysfunction

There are only few studies that assess mitochondrial function in heat stroke. ATP depletion (36) as well mitochondrial swelling and vacuolization in the epithelial cells of the gut have been observed in the mice models of heat stroke (52). Moreover, animal studies have shown that apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells in heat stroke was the deleterious consequence of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced p53 translocation into mitochondria (133). Finally, it was shown in vitro that higher temperatures can directly affect the viscosity of mitochondria (134).

Akin to heat stroke, the immuno-inflammatory pathways associated with O&NS are thought to be one of the possible mechanisms driving mitochondrial dysfunction in ME/CFS (103, 107). [Alternatively, mitochondrial dysfunction could be caused by viral reactivation in ME/CFS (135, 136)]. Impaired energy production (97, 137) and reduced mitochondrial activity (138–140) are central to the pathology of ME/CFS (7). Researchers have observed mitochondrial fragmentation (135) and impaired pyruvate dehydrogenase function as well as lactate degradation deficiencies in ME/CFS (141). Moreover, irregularities in the metabolites of patients with ME/CFS (141, 142) suggest that patients experience a hypometabolic or “dauer” state (143) maintained by mitochondria; an evolutionary adaptation to protect the cells and hosts from harm (c.f., “cell danger response”) (30, 144, 145). Readers are referred to the reviews for a detailed discussion on the relationship between the immune system and mitochondrial function in ME/CFS (7, 71).

In summary, mitochondrial dysfunction may be common to both heat stroke and ME/CFS, despite the difference in onset events of these two conditions. Mitochondrial dysfunction can be driven by immuno-inflammatory and O&NS pathways. The animal models of heat stroke may inform the understanding of mitochondrial dysfunction in some cases of ME/CFS.

Altered Gene Transcription

A human transcriptome study performed by Bouchama et al. using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of healthy volunteers exposed to short but extreme environmental heat treatment found “downregulation of most of the genes involved in the respiratory chain […] with a predicted decrease in ATP production and increase in oxidative stress.” The findings suggested that the “shift to glycolysis as a source of energy” and “inhibition of mitochondrial respiration” were sustained at least an hour after the end of the heat treatment. In addition, there was a “downregulation of ubiquitin conjugation and proteasome genes with a predicted decrease of protein refolding, mono- and poly-ubiquitination, and antigen presentation” as well as “decreased expression of the major histocompatibility I and II complexes genes, suggesting reduced antigen presentation” that persisted at least an hour after the end of treatment. To be clear, the volunteers did not experience heat stroke (only heat stress), but nonetheless, the study showed an adaptive response of mitochondria to heat stress - namely, altered protein synthesis, and reduced expression of genes related to immune function - to persist at least an hour after the heat stress ended. The authors could not explain why cellular stress response to heat would involve a “switch to a less efficient form of metabolism”(146).

Transcriptome studies have generally found altered gene expression in patients with ME/CFS (147–154). Researchers, for example, identified changes in the expression of genes in peripheral immune cells related to inflammation and mitochondrial function (153) as well as to oxidative stress (149) and immune function (149, 150, 154). Others have found specific microRNA expression patterns associated with specific symptom severities (155). Readers are referred to the reviews for a detailed discussion on alterations in gene expression in ME/CFS (95).

In summary, initial gene transcriptome studies would appear to suggest overlaps in alterations of gene expressions between the two conditions. Specifically, alterations in genes related to mitochondrial and immune function may be common to both heat stroke and some patients with ME/CFS. Future transcriptome studies of heat stroke may inform the understanding of ME/CFS.

Predisposing Factors

Young children, the elderly, and patients with chronic diseases are most susceptible to classic heat stroke. Further intrinsic risk factors for classic heat stroke include underlying illness, cardiovascular insufficiency, concurrent infections, and an immune-compromised state (36).

However, the predisposing factors for exertional heat stroke—which affects young and apparently healthy and active individuals—are less clear. Similar to classic heat stroke, researchers have suggested that prior bouts of illness, infection or inflammation, preexisting barrier dysfunction, and a compromised immune system may increase the risk of exertional heat stroke (50, 156, 157). Specifically, prolonged stress exposure and/or suboptimal dietary intake - which suppress the immune system and alter the microbiome of the host, thus depleting its immune and epithelial barrier functions - are thought to be the determining factors in the susceptibility to exertional heat stroke (31, 50). Accordingly, some researchers have suggested that stress and lifestyle factors set the stage for a single event that promotes LPS translocation (such as exertion) to overwhelm the suppressed immune system (31). In the central circulation, LPS can be bound to LPS-specific antibodies, monocytes, or high-density lipoprotein and transported to the liver for removal by the reticuloendothelial system (31, 34). Immune suppression compromises LPS removal by monocytes and LPS-specific antibodies, leading to an increase in the concentration of LPS in the circulation (34, 158) and thus susceptibility to endotoxemia.

In terms of prior infection, a hypothesis derived from exercise immunology research suggests that the immune system is suppressed temporarily immediately post-intense exercise, which provides a window for dormant viruses to be reactivated to cause an infection (c.f. “open window theory”) (159). More specifically, a group of researchers has shown that the increased incidence of illness in response to excessive exercise is not due to immunosuppression per se, but rather to an altered focus of the immune function: an upregulation of humoral immunity and suppression of cell-mediated immunity (160).

Regarding gender bias, a review of 22 studies found that the overall risk for heat illnesses was 2.64 times higher in men than in women, but the authors suggest this could relate to sex-associated behavioral differences rather than physiology (161). Indeed, women are disadvantaged in terms of thermoregulation because of the smaller body surface area (BSA) to mass ratio, a higher percentage of body fat, and lower maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) (158). A study showed that greater heat intolerance in women relative to men is largely explained by VO2max (162). A review of 24 studies of gender differences in the armed forces suggest that being a female was associated with a greater risk of exertional heat illnesses, but men experienced a slightly higher incidence of exertional heat stroke (163)—perhaps also because of behavioral differences.

Failure to increase the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of heat stroke (146). HSPs play a central role in the maintenance of endothelial and epithelial barrier function (164, 165). Conditions associated with a low level of expression of HSPs, for instance, aging, lack of acclimatization to heat, and certain genetic polymorphisms, may favor the progression from heat stress to heat stroke (1). Initial studies have shown that selective pharmacologic induction of the expression of HSPs (e.g., with alpha-lipoic acid) can protect cells from apoptosis and inflammatory responses induced by heat stroke (166).

Finally, Bouchama and Knochel suggest that “genetic factors may determine the susceptibility to heat stroke; candidate susceptibility genes include those that encode cytokines, coagulation proteins, and heat-shock proteins involved in the adaptation to heat stress” (1). Specifically, TLR4 polymorphisms may be a genetic factor predisposing to mortality during the systemic inflammatory response to heat stroke (36). However, the importance of genetic factors as a risk for heat stroke remains unresolved.

Akin to exertional heat stroke, the predisposing factors for ME/CFS are not clear. Certainly, existing inflammation or infection is likely a risk factor (167). Echoing the “open window theory” of exercise immunology, it has long been suggested that ME/CFS results from bacterial or viral reactivation in the context of a suppressed immune system (168, 169), particularly the reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) (170, 171). Cumulative life stress is considered a predisposing factor for ME/CFS (172), which is also thought to alter gut permeability and thus immune function (173). As in heat stroke, the microbiome disturbances and dysbiosis are associated with ME/CFS pathology (147, 174–179). Gender is a risk factor for ME/CFS: the female-to-male ratio ranges from 2:1 to 6:1 (12).

Moreover, the studies have shown that ME/CFS is characterized by impaired HSPs production (180) which, combined with O&NS and low-grade inflammation, could explain muscle dysfunction and exercise intolerance (181, 182). Akin to heat stroke, it has been suggested (but not yet trialed) to incorporate the upregulation of HSP into future treatments for ME/CFS (183).

Finally, research suggests there may be a genetic element in the pathogenesis of ME/CFS, such as polymorphism in genes related to immunomodulatory response (184, 185), hormone action (184, 186), and metabolic kynurenic pathways (187). However, genetic associations are not consistent (188) and studies have had quality-control issues (188, 189).

In summary, there are important similarities in predisposing factors for heat stroke and ME/CFS. Pre-existing inflammation or infection may make individuals susceptible to the conditions. Viral reactivation may also play a role in both conditions. Both are associated with immune suppression. Parallel hypotheses suggest that cumulative stress and associated degradation of microbiome health could set the stage for increased susceptibility for both conditions. There is a female predominance in ME/CFS; physiological differences may make women intrinsically more susceptible to exertional heat illnesses than men. In addition, insufficient expression of HSPs has been identified as a factor in both conditions. Finally, genetics are thought to be a risk factor for both conditions, but studies are inconclusive.

Discussion

We suggest that the research on heat stroke might provide important lessons for understanding and treating ME/CFS. First, the findings from heat stroke confirm the possibility of systemic inflammation that is not associated with an exogenous pathogen (but rather with endogenous toxins). Heat stroke is primarily an inflammatory response following an external stressor (i.e., an increase in ambient temperature or over-exertion during exercise). This insight is likely important for the broader acceptance of ME/CFS as a disease that does not necessarily result from an exogenous pathogen.

Second, the findings from heat stroke describe a sequence and causality between physiological disturbances in various body systems, including the cardiovascular, gastro-intestinal, immune, and central nervous systems. The sequential pathway from splanchnic vasoconstriction to hypoxia, redox imbalance, and gut hyper-permeability (or intestinal injury) has been consistently documented in both classic and exertional heat stroke. The resulting endotoxemia, cytokine production, systemic inflammation, and decreased cerebral flow are now understood to underlie mitochondrial, central nervous system, and multi-organ dysfunction in heat stroke. This knowledge of the sequence and causality across systems is likely relevant for understanding ME/CFS because of the overlaps in anomalies across the two illnesses.

Third, heat stroke provides a model for disease perpetuation. The heat stroke literature describes a “vicious cycle” centered around intestinal injury involving the release of nitric oxide, the leakage of endotoxins, and the increased production of inflammatory cytokines. This model may also be relevant for understanding the perpetuation of disease state in ME/CFS, as these elements have also been documented in ME/CFS. However, the prevalence of endotoxemia in ME/CFS requires further study to estimate for what share of patients with ME/CFS a similar “vicious cycle” might apply.

Fourth, heat stroke research—combined with the findings from critical illness in general—suggests that intestinal injury resulting from splanchnic hypo-perfusion is a common stress response. This insight could help to understand how a variety of triggers [i.e., physical, infectious, and/or emotional stressor(s)] can result in homeostatic imbalance by initiating intestinal injury. Incidentally, intestinal permeability and microbial translocation are hypothesized to contribute to the pathology in multiple sclerosis (190), rheumatoid arthritis (191), fibromyalgia (192), and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (193)—diseases for which previous studies have described shared pathophysiological mechanisms with ME/CFS (194–198). The endotoxemia and inflammatory pathways described in these diseases echo the patterns observed in heat stroke. A comparative assessment of the overlaps (and differences) between these illnesses would surely provide an important contribution toward resolving these diseases.

Fifth, the results of therapeutic studies for heat stroke in animals and people may indicate promising avenues for the treatment of ME/CFS. Heat stroke researchers have tested the use of pharmacological agents and supplements to repair the immune and barrier function of the gut, mitigate endotoxemia, and modulate the inflammatory response. By building on these findings, researchers may identify therapeutic avenues with potential for ME/CFS. The treatment of heat stroke is incomplete and remains an active area of research; a collaboration between ME/CFS and heat stroke researchers would likely benefit both fields.

The findings from heat stroke may provide lessons for understanding both the early and late stages of ME/CFS. Much of heat stroke literature describes the mechanisms occurring within the first 72 h of illness following heat stress. Specifically, adaptive mechanisms intended to deal with stressors are “exaggerated” in certain individuals, thereby overwhelming the homeostasis of the body. Similar exaggerated adaptative responses to external stressors and overwhelmed homeostasis may explain the early stage of ME/CFS. Conversely, the detailed findings from heat stroke regarding the mechanisms that prevent a reversion to a normal homeostatic state even once the stressor is removed (c.f. endotoxemia, O&NS, and pro-inflammatory cytokines) may help to understand the late stages of ME/CFS in at least a subset of patients with ME/CFS.

The existence of overlaps between heat stroke and ME/CFS might initially appear unlikely because heat stroke is a critical illness requiring intensive care, whereas ME/CFS is a chronic illness that debilitates patients for months and years. Moreover, the lack of a disease-specific biomarker and heterogeneity in the clinical symptoms of patients with ME/CFS (resulting in misclassification/misdiagnosis) - combined with the small sample size of many existing studies, pose a challenge in the assessment of overlaps between the two conditions. Yet our suggestion of overlaps between ME/CFS and heat stroke is in line with earlier hypotheses of common pathways in the physiological responses to very different forms of stressors (26–30). A difference in the severity of the vasoconstriction and “endotoxemia pathway” (i.e., intestinal injury) between the two illnesses might explain the difference in the critical/chronic natures of the illnesses. Whereas in heat stroke the vasoconstriction and “endotoxemia pathway” are so severe that they lead to brain injury and “heat sepsis,” the same mechanisms may be less severe but underpin brain fog and chronic inflammation in some patients with ME/CFS. Speculatively, at least a subgroup of patients with ME/CFS might be thought of experiencing a series of mild exertional heat strokes or a milder but chronic form of the pathological mechanisms witnessed in exertional heat stroke. Accordingly, post-exertional malaise - a key symptom of ME/CFS according to Canadian Consensus Criteria - could be the manifestation of accentuation of these mechanisms following exertion. Additional research is required to assess the relative severity of the pathophysiological mechanisms described above within heat stroke and ME/CFS, and identify a subgroup of patients where this hypothesis and the above lessons may be most applicable.

Heat stroke is not known to provoke ME/CFS. However, the patients surviving life threatening illnesses can develop PICS, i.e., “the cognitive, psychiatric, and/or physical disability after treatment in ICUs,” including ICU-acquired weakness (199, 200). PICS resembles ME/CFS and remains unresolved. It has been suggested that the persistence of endocrine disturbances observed during critical illness could also explain PICS (201). The similarities and differences between PICS and ME/CFS require further study. Auto-immunity—an important factor in ME/CFS pathology (91, 93, 197)—remains largely unexplored in heat stroke. However, auto-immunity has been associated with inflammatory cytokines and leaky gut (77, 78), which are present in heat stroke.

Neuroendocrine functions during heat stroke remain largely unexplored (31). However, it would seem plausible that the biphasic neuroendocrine pattern found in other critical illnesses might also exist in heat stroke. Specifically, an acute phase (in the first few hours or days) characterized by increased release of pituitary hormones, followed in some critical care patients by a prolonged phase (after a few days) characterized by the suppression of the release of pituitary hormones (202, 203). We have previously described the relevance of the mechanisms during the prolonged phase for ME/CFS (28)—notably the suppression of the pituitary gland's pulsatile secretion of tropic hormones (204), and a “vicious circle” between inflammation, O&NS, and low thyroid hormone function (205, 206). A compilation of the relevant findings from heat stroke described above (i.e., on the vascular, gastro-intestinal, immune, and nervous systems) and the relevant findings from critical illnesses described previously (i.e., neuroendocrine dysfunctions) might provide important insights into the mechanisms that prevent recovery in ME/CFS (28).

Finally, the lessons-learned from heat stroke for ME/CFS may also be relevant for the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Many patients with COVID-19 continue to experience a variety of debilitating symptoms despite successfully clearing the virus—termed “post COVID-19 syndrome” or “long COVID-19” —that resemble ME/CFS (207–215). Moreover, the patients with ME/CFS and COVID-19 recovery patients share “molecular signatures” (216), which suggest overlaps in immune and metabolic dysregulation (101).

Conclusion

There may be overlaps in the pathophysiological mechanisms in heat stroke and ME/CFS, including splanchnic vasoconstriction, increased gut permeability, gut-related endotoxemia, systemic inflammatory response, central nervous system dysfunction, blood coagulation disorder, endothelial-cell injury, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Moreover, the pathophysiological mechanisms involved may be self-perpetuating in both conditions. Indeed, normalizing body temperature does not necessarily reverse the multiorgan dysfunction in heat stroke; similarly, ME/CFS persists even after the onset event (i.e., physical, infectious, and/or emotional stressor) has ended. A vicious cycle centered around intestinal injury involving the release of nitric oxide, the leakage of endotoxins, and increased production of inflammatory cytokines are central to heat stroke and have also been observed in some patients with ME/CFS. Moreover, initial gene transcriptome studies show that the alterations in gene expression related to mitochondrial and immune function may be common to both conditions. Finally, predisposing factors for heat stroke and ME/CFS appear to partly overlap, including prior inflammation and the altered gut microbiome. Genetics may contribute to the predisposition of individuals in both illnesses, but the existing evidence is inconclusive. Neuroendocrine functions during heat stroke remain largely unexplored. The lack of a disease-specific biomarker and heterogeneity in the clinical symptoms of patients with ME/CFS—combined with the small sample size of many existing studies—pose a challenge in the assessment of overlaps between these illnesses.

A full description of therapeutic trials for heat stroke and their relevance for ME/CFS is beyond the scope of the paper. However, therapeutic approaches to repair the immune and barrier function of the gut, mitigate endotoxemia, modulate the inflammatory response, and induce the expression of HSPs have been suggested or trialed for both conditions.

We suggest that lessons from the human studies and animal models of heat stroke might contribute to the understanding of ME/CFS. Specifically, the human studies and animal models of heat stroke confirm the possibility of systemic inflammation that is not associated with an exogenous pathogen. Moreover, they describe a sequence and causality between physiological disturbances in various body systems and provide an explanation for the self-perpetuation of the disease state that might also inform the understanding of ME/CFS. These studies—combined with the studies from critical illness in general—could help to understand how a variety of triggers (i.e., physical, infectious, and/or emotional stressor) might lead to homeostatic imbalance by initiating intestinal hyper-permeability (or intestinal injury). Moreover, given the similarities described above, an exhaustive analysis of the treatments already tried for heat stroke might help identify which ones could be redeployed to treat ME/CFS. Additional research is required to identify a subgroup of patients with ME/CFS where these lessons may be most applicable.

The existence of possible overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms between heat stroke and ME/CFS could further provide support for a broader hypothesis that the maladaptive mechanisms that prevent recovery in ME/CFS may be common to conditions induced by physical, infectious, and/or emotional stressors, such as heat stroke, prolonged critical illness (chronic ICU), PICS, cancer-related fatigue, post-viral fatigue, PACS, and long-COVID-19. We thus suggest that collaborative efforts should be sought among the researcher community across these conditions to better understand these conditions and identify treatments mitigating the functional disability that they induce.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

DS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

Open Medicine Foundation (JB) is acknowledged for support. NS acknowledges funding from the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (Reference Grant: PPN/ULM/2020/1/00069/U/00001) and FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal (Ref. Grant: UIDB/00006/2020).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.