Literature DB >> 34966244

Vascular plants occurrences in Dokdo Islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature.

Chin-Sung Chang1, Shin Young Kwon1, Hyun Tak Shin2, Su-Young Jung2, Hui Kim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The vascular flora of the Dokdo Islands has been reported, based on primary collections made in 2012 and 2013 and legacy botanical literature. The Dokdo Islands are the remotest islands of Korea, located in the East Sea approximately 87 km from Ulleungdo Islands. They comprise two main volcanic islands, Dongdo (east islands) and Seodo (west islands) and minor islets surrounding the two main islands. This research was conducted to document vascular plant species inhabiting Korea's most inaccessible islands. We present a georeferenced dataset of vascular plant species collected during field studies on the Dokdo Islands over the past seven decades. NEW INFORMATION: In the present inventory of the flora of Dokdo, there are listed 108 species belonging to 78 genera and 39 families, including 93 native species and 15 newly human-induced naturalised species for these Islands' flora. The Poaceae and Asteraceae families are the most diverse, with 22 and 15 taxa, respectively. Some of the previously-listed taxa were not found on Dokdo probably because they are rare and the limited time did not allow collectors to find rare species. The spread of introduced species, especially the invasive grass Bromuscatharticus Vahl., affects several native species of Dokdo flora. Chin-Sung Chang, Shin Young Kwon, Hyun Tak Shin, Su-Young Jung, Hui Kim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bromuscatharticus; Dokdo; biodiversity; flora; invasive species; islands; vascular plants

Year:  2021        PMID: 34966244      PMCID: PMC8712498          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e77695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Biodiversity researchers have identified critical gaps in spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage of biodiversity observations highlighting barriers to effective data collection, open access and analysis (Amano et al. 2016, Wetzel et al. 2018). To bridge these gaps, biodiversity data must suit the demands of multiple groups, including scientists, policy-makers and data contributors (Taylor et al. 2017). Several biodiversity data researchers have emphasised taking the lead in developing new measures. Options like open access publishing with conventional licences accessibility through major biodiversity platforms, such as GBIF, can be used (Faith et al. 2013). The next solution is offering data providers incentives, such as the option to publish in peer-reviewed data journals (Chavan and Penev 2011). Biodiversity data providers should become better data stewards, with a comprehensive understanding of metadata, best data management practices and plans for data archiving and preservation (Hartter et al. 2013, Penev et al. 2017). However, data stewardship takes time and resources and data providers cannot be data stewards without sufficient resources and support. The evolution of data stewardship culture causes biodiversity informatics challenges to emerge as data volume and precision increase. Biodiversity data scientists propose that data providers and stakeholders confront current challenges prividing them with detailed recommendations (Ariño et al. 2016). Geographical location and security level are the main factors causing spatial gaps (Ariño et al. 2016). As biodiversity information is closely related to the temporal and spatial variation in surveying effort, Wallacean shortfall is specifically critical in remote and inaccessible areas (Hortal et al. 2008, Boakes et al. 2010). Sampling certain places better than others is inevitable given the accessibility differences between localities (Rodrigues et al. 2010); therefore, distribution data tend to be heavily biased with historical collection patterns, collation and biodiversity data accumulation (Rodrigues et al. 2010, Meyer et al. 2015). To effectively bridge spatial gaps, it is essential to comprehend the causes for data shortage in some regions. In the case of Banco de Datos de Biodiversidad de Canaris (BIOTA-Canarias, Hortal et al. 2007), it stated that the lack of completeness or large gaps in their spatial coverage compromises their future utility. The previously collected data have limited utility because the data lack detail and geographical coverage is not exhaustive (Soberón et al. 2007). Biodiversity data scientists encourage exhaustive compilation of all available information with sufficient quality and detail (Hortal et al. 2008). The Dokdo Islands are the most inaccessible islands in Korea, located at 37°14'26.8"N and 131°52'10.4"E, belonging to an administrative district that includes the Ulleung Islands. Since the first botanical survey (Lee 1952), seventy years of sporadic observations have waited to be mobilised to accessible biodiversity data (Jung et al. 2014). This study produces an exhaustive and reliable list of vascular plants from the Dokdo Islands, based on reference herbarium specimens collected in the field and the occurrence data available in the papers (Kim and Lee 2021).

General description

Purpose

This research focused on the digitisation of plant distribution data on Dokdo Islands acquired by botanists on occasional expeditions to the Islands between 1947 and 2018. These data offer a promising tool to help guide the biodiversity management and conservation of these highly inaccessible island ecosystems.

Project description

Title

Vascular plants occurrences in Dokdo Islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature.

Personnel

The datasets were digitised by Hui Kim (data manager), Su-Young Jung was the resource creator and Shin Young Kwon, Hyun Tak Shin and Chin-Sung Chang were the content providers. Chin-Sung Chang checked taxonomic changes and georeferencing. S.Y. Jung conducted the field works for two years, from April 2012 to September 2013, collaborating with members from Korea National Arboretum (Jung et al. 2014). S.Y. Jung did preliminary in situ identifications. S.Y. Jung, Hui Kim and Chin-Sung Chang conducted the final species identification.

Study area description

The small islands of Dokdo are volcanic rocks formed in the Cenozoic era, more specifically 4.6-2.5 million years ago, having a formation mechanism similar to underwater islands (Jo et al. 2021, Kim et al. 2013). The Dokdo Volcano rises roughly 2,100 m a.s.l. and has a diameter of more than 10 km (Song et al. 2017). The Islands have a butterfly wing shape, a relatively steep terrain, a peak elevation of 168 m a.s.l. and a surface area of 18.7 hectares (Fig. 1). The Dokdo Islands consist of two main islets, Seodo and Dongdo, with numerous surrounding rocks. Sedo has multiple berth and tracking routes access points and flora surveys and collections are possible over a comparatively large area. Since Dongdo is more difficult to access by boat, it is challenging to investigate the surface, except there are fewer primary species occurrence data in a few points. Dokdo Islands had a mean annual temperature of 13.8°C, mean annual precipitation of 589 mm, an absolute minimum temperature of -6.4°C and an absolute maximum temperature of 28.2°C. According to meteorologists, automatic weather systems underestimate the amount of snowfall, thereby resulting in missing data (Kim and Park 2017).

Sampling methods

Study extent

The Dokdo Islands are the most inaccessible islands in Korea, located at 37°14'26"N and 131°52'05"E, belonging to an administrative district that includes the Ulleung Islands.

Sampling description

The vascular plant occurrence data, treated in this study, were compiled using fieldwork from 2012 to 2013 and botanical legacy articles from 1947 to 2018. Herbarium surveys were conducted in two Herbaria, including SNUA (Seoul National University, College of Agriculture, herbarium acronym following Index Herbariorum) and KH (Korea National Arboretum). In addition to the authors’ collections, datasets on vascular plant occurrences in Dokdo Islands were digitised from several manuscripts in a heterogeneous format (Lee 1952, Lee and Joo 1958, Lee 1978, Sun et al. 2002, Hyun and Kwon 2006, Lee et al. 2007, Park and Lee 2008, Park et al. 2010, Song and Park 2012, Jung et al. 2014, Park et al. 2014, Kim and Lee 2016, Park et al. 2016, Park et al. 2017, Park et al. 2018, Table 1). References to the published literature, from which data were obtained for the occurrence data compilation, are presented in the bibliography section of the metadata.
Table 1.

Data sources for the dataset of vascular plants occurrences in Dokdo Islands.

Data sourceType of occurrence dataNumber of occurrencesField year
Lee 1952 Literature361947
Lee and Joo 1958 Literature231958
Lee 1978 Herbarium371978
Sun et al. 2002 Literature691996-1999
Hyun and Kwon 2006 Literature492006
Lee et al. 2007 Literature492007
Park and Lee 2008 Literature572008
Park et al. 2010 Literature582008-2009
Song and Park 2012 Literature602008-2011
Jung et al. 2014 Herbarrium/ Literature912012-2013
Park et al. 2014 Literature652013-2014
Kim and Lee 2016 Literature542015-2016
Park et al. 2016 Literature562016
Park et al. 2017 Literature662017
Park et al. 2018 Literature682017-2018
Total838

Quality control

The Dokdo Islands occurrence dataset was manually digitised from scanned documents of the original papers. The quality control processes of biodiversity data management were based on the principles of data quality by Chapman (2005) . Scientific names and locality names in the digitised datasets were retained exactly as in the original papers. The authors used the provisional checklist of vascular plants for the Korea Peninsula Flora to determine the accepted names (Chang et al. 2014). All scientific names were cross-checked and taxonomically updated using the taxonomic module of Botanical Research and Herbarium Management System (BRAHMS; Pouwer et al. 2008); more details on the digitisation steps, structure of the data and quality control measures are presented below.

Step description

1. The content providers carefully reviewed individual floristic publications to manage the irregularity in the format of historical papers. All occurrence records were merged into a spreadsheet, which contained the original species names recorded at the location. In this digitisation stage, obvious typographic errors were corrected. Accepted taxon names and taxonomic classification derived from the local checklist (Chang et al. 2014) were included in the spreadsheet. The result of the above digitisation steps was 838 records with 25 columns containing occurrence data of 108 vascular plant taxa. 2. MS Access was used to create the BRAHMS database layout. All specimen and occurrence information were recorded in the BRAHMS database of the T.B. Lee Herbarium. 3. In the literature data, we frequently encountered several uncertain dates of field works, for instance, 13 July 2017; 26 September 2017; 17 April 2018; 19-20 June 2018; 18 September 2018, for 68 collections by Park et al. (2018). When the collection date was written as “several dates,” we transcribed the last dates of field works (day, month and year) and provided the full interval date in the eventDate field and the rest of the general information in the verbatimEventDate field. Park and Lee (2008) and Park et al. (2017) published the floristic list of Dokdo Islands with many vascular plant pictures. As these authors did not provide the collection information, the publication year was used as the year of events. 4. All occurrence records without coordination were georeferenced, either from the coordinates provided in the paper or from the geographic description of the localities. The coordinate uncertainty in metres for each occurrence was estimated employing the algorithm of Wieczorek et al. (2010). 5. Occurrence data in BRAHMS could be easily exported in various formats, including Darwin Core for uploading to the EABCN IPT. The Darwin Core standard was applied to the BRAHMS extract/query file structure to accommodate the relevant information extracted from the publications.

Geographic coverage

Description

Dokdo Islands, Ulleung-gun, Geongsangbuk-do, the Republic of Korea (approximately 37°14'26"N, 131°52'5"E)

Coordinates

37.225 and 37.255 Latitude; 131.823 and 131.9 Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage

All vascular plants were identified to infraspecific level. This dataset contains distribution information for 108 vascular plant species belonging to 39 families (Table 2).
Table 2.

Classification of species according to the criteria of Family, Habitat and Geographical origin is based on Chang et al. (2014).

Number SPECIES FAMILY HABIT Geographic Origin
1Tetragoniatetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze Aizoaceae HerbNative
2Achyranthesbidentata Blume Amaranthaceae HerbNative
3AchyranthesbidentataBlumevar.japonica Miq. Amaranthaceae HerbNative
4Cnidiumjaponicum Miq. Apiaceae HerbNative
5Oenanthejavanica (Blume) DC. Apiaceae HerbNative
6Metaplexisjaponica (Thunb.) Makino Apocynaceae HerbNative
7Artemisiacodonocephala Diels Asteraceae HerbNative
8Artemisiaindica Willd. Asteraceae HerbNative
9Artemisiajaponica Thunb. Asteraceae HerbNative
10Artemisiakoidzumii Nakai Asteraceae HerbNative
11Artemisiamontana (Nakai) Pamp. Asteraceae HerbNative
12Artemisiascoparia Waldst. & Kit. Asteraceae HerbNative
13Asterspathulifolius Maxim. Asteraceae HerbNative
14Dendranthemanaktongense (Nakai) Tzvelev Asteraceae HerbNative
15Farfugiumjaponicum (L.) Kitam. Asteraceae HerbNative
16Seneciovulgaris L. Asteraceae HerbIntroduced
17Sonchusasper (L.) Hill Asteraceae HerbNative
18Sonchusbrachyotus DC. Asteraceae HerbNative
19Sonchusoleraceus L. Asteraceae HerbNative
20Taraxacumplatycarpum Dahlst. Asteraceae HerbNative
21Youngiajaponica (L.) DC. Asteraceae HerbNative
22Arabisserrata Franch. & Sav. Brassicaceae HerbNative
23Arabisstelleri DC. Brassicaceae HerbNative
24Brassicajuncea (L.) Czern. Brassicaceae HerbIntroduced
25Capsellabursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. Brassicaceae HerbNative
26Lepidiumvirginicum L. Brassicaceae HerbIntroduced
27Raphanussativus L. Brassicaceae HerbIntroduced
28Campanulapunctata Lam. Campanulaceae HerbNative
29Loniceramorrowii A.Gray Caprifoliaceae ShrubNative
30Dianthuslongicalyx Miq. Caryophyllaceae HerbNative
31Gypsophilaoldhamiana Miq. Caryophyllaceae HerbNative
32Saginajaponica (Sw.) Ohwi Caryophyllaceae HerbNative
33Saginamaxima A.Gray Caryophyllaceae HerbNative
34Stellariaaquatica (L.) Scop. Caryophyllaceae HerbNative
35Stellariamedia (L.) Vill. Caryophyllaceae HerbNative
36Stellarianeglecta Weihe Caryophyllaceae HerbNative
37Euonymushamiltonianus Wall. Celastraceae ShrubNative
38Euonymusjaponicus Thunb. Celastraceae ShrubNative
39Atriplexgmelinii C.A.Mey. ex Bong. Chenopodiaceae HerbNative
40Atriplexsubcordata Kitag. Chenopodiaceae HerbNative
41Chenopodiumalbum L. Chenopodiaceae HerbNative
42Chenopodiumgiganteum D.Don Chenopodiaceae HerbNative
43Chenopodiumglaucum L. Chenopodiaceae HerbIntroduced
44Chenopodiumstenophyllum (Makino) Koidz. Chenopodiaceae HerbNative
45Hypericumerectum Thunb. Clusiaceae HerbNative
46Commelinacommunis L. Commelinaceae HerbNative
47Calystegiasoldanella (L.) R.Br. Convolvulaceae HerbNative
48Ipomoeapurpurea (L.) Roth Convolvulaceae HerbIntroduced
49Phedimusmiddendorffianus (Maxim.) 't Hart Crassulaceae HerbNative
50Sedumjaponicum Siebold ex Miq. Crassulaceae HerbNative
51Sedumkamtschaticum Fisch. & C.A.Mey. Crassulaceae HerbNative
52Sedumoryzifolium Makino Crassulaceae HerbNative
53Cucumismelo L. Cucurbitaceae HerbIntroduced
54Cyperusmicroiria Steud. Cyperaceae HerbNative
55Cyrtomiumfalcatum (L.f.) C.Presl Dryopteridaceae HerbNative
56Elaeagnusmacrophylla Thunb. Elaeagnaceae LianaNative
57Machilusthunbergii Siebold & Zucc. ex Meisn. Lauraceae TreeNative
58Alliumfistulosum L. Liliaceae HerbIntroduced
59Alliummacrostemon Bunge Liliaceae HerbNative
60Asparaguscochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr. Liliaceae HerbNative
61Asparagusschoberioides Kunth Liliaceae HerbNative
62Liliumlancifolium Thunb. Liliaceae HerbNative
63Liriopemuscari (Decne.) L.H.Bailey Liliaceae HerbNative
64Maianthemumdilatatum (A.W.Wood) A.Nelson & J.F.Macbr. Liliaceae HerbNative
65Hibiscussyriacus L. Malvaceae ShrubIntroduced
66Cocculusorbiculatus (L.) DC. Menispermaceae LianaNative
67Orobanchecoerulescens Stephan Orobanchaceae HerbNative
68Oxaliscorniculata L. Oxalidaceae HerbNative
69Oxalisstricta L. Oxalidaceae HerbNative
70CorydalisheterocarpaSiebold & Zucc.var.japonica (Franch. & Sav.) Ohwi Papaveraceae HerbNative
71Pinusthunbergii Parl. Pinaceae TreeNative
72Plantagoasiatica L. Plantaginaceae HerbNative
73Bromuscatharticus Vahl Poaceae HerbIntroduced
74Cleistogeneshackelii (Honda) Honda Poaceae HerbNative
75Digitariaciliaris (Retz.) Koeler Poaceae HerbNative
76Digitariaradicosa (J.Presl) Miq. Poaceae HerbNative
77Digitariaviolascens Link Poaceae HerbNative
78Echinochloacrus-galli (L.) P.Beauv. Poaceae HerbNative
79Echinochloaoryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch Poaceae HerbNative
80Eleusineindica (L.) Gaertn. Poaceae HerbNative
81Elymuskamoji (Ohwi) S.L.Chen Poaceae HerbNative
82Festucaovina L. Poaceae HerbNative
83Festucarubra L. Poaceae HerbNative
84Imperatacylindrica (L.) Raeusch. Poaceae HerbNative
85Miscanthussinensis Andersson Poaceae HerbNative
86Pennisetumglaucum (L.) R.Br. Poaceae HerbNative
87Phragmitesjaponicus Steud. Poaceae HerbNative
88Poaannua L. Poaceae HerbNative
89Poapratensis L. Poaceae HerbNative
90Puccinellianipponica Ohwi Poaceae HerbNative
91Setariafaberi R.A.W.Herrm. Poaceae HerbNative
92Setariapumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. Poaceae HerbIntroduced
93Setariaviridis (L.) P.Beauv. Poaceae HerbIntroduced
94Zoysiajaponica Steud. Poaceae HerbNative
95Fallopiasachalinensis (F.Schmidt) Ronse Decr. Polygonaceae HerbNative
96Persicarialongiseta (Bruijn) Kitag. Polygonaceae HerbNative
97Polygonumaviculare L. Polygonaceae HerbNative
98Rumexcrispus L. Polygonaceae HerbIntroduced
99Rumexjaponicus Houtt. Polygonaceae HerbNative
100Portulacaoleracea L. Portulacaceae HerbNative
101Lysimachiamauritiana Lam. Primulaceae HerbNative
102Ranunculussilerifolius H.Lév. Ranunculaceae HerbNative
103Rubusphoenicolasius Maxim. Rosaceae ShrubNative
104Lycopersiconesculentum Mill. Solanaceae HerbIntroduced
105Solanumamericanum Mill. Solanaceae HerbIntroduced
106Camelliajaponica L. Theaceae ShrubNative
107Violakusanoana Makino Violaceae HerbNative
108Ampelopsisglandulosa(Wall.)Momiy.var.heterophylla (Thunb.) Momiy. Vitaceae LianaNative

Traits coverage

Data coverage of traits

PLEASE FILL IN TRAIT INFORMATION HERE

Temporal coverage

Notes

Sampling was conducted on several occasions in the period between 1947 and 2018.

Usage licence

Usage licence

Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)

IP rights notes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.

Data resources

Data package title

Vascular plant occurrences in Dokdo Islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature.

Resource link

https://www.gbif.org/dataset/37663a11-6c27-4b72-a3bc-75c9dab75a83

Alternative identifiers

http://61.82.48.86:8080/ipt-2.4.2/resource?r=dokdo_flora

Number of data sets

1

Data set 1.

Data set name

Vascular plant occurrences in Dokdo Islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature.

Data format

Darwin Core Archive

Number of columns

37

Download URL

https://www.gbif.org/dataset/37663a11-6c27-4b72-a3bc-75c9dab75a83

Description

The present project was focused on digitising the data on plant distribution on Dokdo Islands, collected between 1947 and 2018 by botanists taking part in occasional expeditions to the Islands. These data are expected to contribute to the biodiversity management and conservation of these highly inaccessible island ecosystems.

Additional information

During the seventy years’ observation period (1947-2018), 108 taxa from 39 families were observed. Almost all were flowering plants (only one fern species and one conifer species were recorded), mostly (98%). This paper includes 91 specimens and 747 occurrence data of vascular plants recorded in Dokdo Islands regarding 108 taxa identified to infraspecific level. The confirmed species comprise 75 dicots and 31 monocots, one gymnosperm and a non-seed plant (Pteridophytes) species. Most species are native, including (L.f.) C.Presl, Miq., (Pall.) Kuntze, (F.Schmidt) Ronse Decr., Lam., Makino, (Franch. & Sav.) Ohwi and Stephan (Fig. 2). The data collected during the last seven decades indicate continuous expansion of invasive species and increase in their richness (Fig. 3). For instance, Vahl, (L.) Hill., L., (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. and Mill. are the most rapidly expanding aliens in the last decade, threatening native flora (Table 2, Fig. 3). Park et al. (2017) identified increased human visitation as a major predictor of the spatial distribution of invasive species in the flora of Dokdo Islands, assuming a positive relationship between human activities and alien plant species richness. The major threatening species, especially the invasive grass, Vahl., affects several native species. Regarding the colonisation status, 14% of total species richness were invasive species and 86% were native to the Korean Peninsula and adjacent islands.
Figure 3.

Species richness (histogram, left) and percentage of invasive species (line, right) in Dokdo Islands.

Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
occurrenceIDAn identifier for the Occurrence (as opposed to a particular digital record of the occurrence). In the absence of a persistent global unique identifier, construct one from a combination of identifiers in the record that will most closely make the occurrenceID globally unique.
recordedByA list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations responsible for recording the original Occurrence. The primary collector or observer, especially the one who applies a personal identifier (recordNumber), should be listed first.
typeThe nature or genre of the resource.
basisOfRecordThe specific nature of the data record.
institutionCodeThe name (or acronym) in use by the institution having custody of the object(s) or information referred to in the record.
recordNumberAn identifier given to the Occurrence at the time it was recorded. Often serves as a link between field notes and an Occurrence record, such as a specimen collector's number.
dayThe integer day of the month on which the Event occurred.
monthThe integer month in which the Event occurred.
yearThe four-digit year in which the Event occurred, according to the Common Era Calendar.
eventDateThe date-time or interval during which an Event occurred. For occurrences, this is the date-time when the event was recorded. Not suitable for a time in a geological context.
verbatimEventDateThe verbatim original representation of the date and time information for an Event.
countryThe name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs.
countryCodeThe standard code for the country in which the Location occurs.
stateProvinceThe name of the next smaller administrative region than country (state, province, canton, department, region etc.) in which the Location occurs.
countyThe full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than stateProvince (county, shire, department etc.) in which the Location occurs.
localityThe specific description of the place. Less specific geographic information can be provided in other geographic terms (higherGeography, continent, country, stateProvince, county, municipality, waterBody, island, islandGroup). This term may contain information modified from the original to correct perceived errors or standardise the description.
decimalLatitudeThe geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are north of the Equator, negative values are south of it. Legal values lie between -90 and 90, inclusive.
decimalLongitudeThe geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are east of the Greenwich Meridian, negative values are west of it. Legal values lie between -180 and 180, inclusive.
geodeticDatumThe ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude are based.
coordinateUncertaintyInMetersThe horizontal distance (in metres) from the given decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude describing the smallest circle containing the whole of the Location. Leave the value empty if the uncertainty is unknown, cannot be estimated or is not applicable (because there are no coordinates). Zero is not a valid value for this term.
georeferencedByA list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who determined the georeference (spatial representation) for the Location.
identifiedByA list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who assigned the Taxon to the subject.
scientificNameThe full scientific name, with authorship and date information, if known. When forming part of an Identification, this should be the name in lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined. This term should not contain identification qualifications, which should instead be supplied in the IdentificationQualifier term.
kingdomThe full scientific name of the kingdom in which the taxon is classified.
phylumThe full scientific name of the phylum or division in which the taxon is classified.
classThe full scientific name of the class in which the taxon is classified.
orderThe full scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified.
familyThe full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified.
taxonomicStatusThe status of the use of the scientificName as a label for a taxon. Requires taxonomic opinion to define the scope of a taxon. Rules of priority then are used to define the taxonomic status of the nomenclature contained in that scope, combined with the expert's opinion. It must be linked to a specific taxonomic reference that defines the concept.
acceptedNameUsageThe full name, with authorship and date information, if known, of the currently accepted taxon.
vernacularNameA common or vernacular name.
genusThe full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified.
specificEpithetThe name of the first or species epithet of the scientificName.
scientificNameAuthorshipThe authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode.
infraspecificEpithetThe name of the lowest or terminal infraspecific epithet of the scientificName, excluding any rank designation.
taxonRankThe taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName.
nomenclaturalCodeThe nomenclatural code (or codes in the case of an ambiregnal name) under which the scientificName is constructed.
  6 in total

1.  Limitations of biodiversity databases: case study on seed-plant diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands.

Authors:  Joaquín Hortal; Jorge M Lobo; Alberto Jiménez-Valverde
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  Biodiversity hotspot for marine invertebrates around the Dokdo, East Sea, Korea: Ecological checklist revisited.

Authors:  Sung Joon Song; Jinsoon Park; Jongseong Ryu; Hyun Soo Rho; Won Kim; Jong Seong Khim
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Boakes; Philip J K McGowan; Richard A Fuller; Ding Chang-qing; Natalie E Clark; Kim O'Connor; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science.

Authors:  Vishwas Chavan; Lyubomir Penev
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions.

Authors:  Carsten Meyer; Holger Kreft; Robert Guralnick; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Spatially explicit data: stewardship and ethical challenges in science.

Authors:  Joel Hartter; Sadie J Ryan; Catrina A Mackenzie; John N Parker; Carly A Strasser
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.