| Literature DB >> 34966242 |
Ralph Renger1, Jessica Renger2, Marc D Basson3, Richard N Van Eck3, Jirina Renger4, Eric Souvannasacd3, Gary Hart3.
Abstract
This article shares lessons learned in applying system evaluation theory (SET) to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTR) funded by the National Institutes of Health. After describing how CTR support cores are intended to work interdependently as a system, the case is made for SET as the best fit for evaluating this evaluand. The article then details how the evaluation was also challenged to facilitate a CTR culture shift, helping support cores to move from working autonomously to working together and understanding how the cores' individual operating processes impact each other. This was achieved by incorporating the Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) building block approach to implement SET. Each of the seven HSEEP building blocks is examined for alignment with each of SET's three steps and the ability to systematically support the goal of moving CTR cores toward working interdependently. The implications of using HSEEP to support SET implementation for future evaluations are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: homeland security exercise and evaluation; mixed methods; system evaluation theory; systems; systems evaluation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34966242 PMCID: PMC8713723 DOI: 10.1177/1098214020986619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Eval ISSN: 1098-2140