Literature DB >> 34965890

Selinexor in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

Kyaw Z Thein1,2, Sarina A Piha-Paul3, Apostolia Tsimberidou3, Daniel D Karp3, Filip Janku3, Siqing Fu3, Vivek Subbiah3, David S Hong3, Timothy A Yap3, Jatin Shah4, Denái R Milton5, Lacey McQuinn3, Jing Gong3, Yanyan Tran3, Brett W Carter6, Rivka Colen7, Funda Meric-Bernstam3, Aung Naing3.   

Abstract

Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), was demonstrated to hinder the DNA damage repair (DDR) system by reducing DDR proteins while enhancing the killing of cancer cells by DDR-based therapeutics in vivo studies. In this single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study, selinexor with carboplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (DC), irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI), irinotecan, and capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), were employed as separate parallel arms. Eligible patients have relapsed/ metastatic refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or addition of selinexor to systemic therapy was appropriate. Nineteen patients were treated in the 5 arms. Tumor types included were colorectal (n  = 3), breast (n  = 3), neuroendocrine (n  = 2), ovarian (n  = 2), and pancreas cancers (n  = 2). All patients developed one treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most prevalent TRAE were thrombocytopenia (84%), nausea (68%), leukopenia (68%), neutropenia (63%), and fatigue (58%). The common grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (26%), and hyponatremia (21%). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 3 separate arms. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. Although no patients achieved complete or partial response (CR or PR), seven patients attained stable disease (SD). Disease control rate (DCR) was 14%. The combination of oral selinexor with different standard chemotherapies showed limited clinical activity despite toxicity and DLT prevented further dose escalation. Optimizing supportive care, the utility of growth factors, and aggressive measures on antiemetics strategies remain tangible.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495 ). Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX); Carboplatin; Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; FOLFIRI; Irinotecan; Selinexor (KPT 330)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34965890      PMCID: PMC8715578          DOI: 10.1186/s40164-021-00251-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 2162-3619


To the editor, Selinexor (KPT-330) is an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) and was shown to hinder the DNA damage repair (DDR) system by diminishing DDR proteins expression while enhancing the killing of cancer cells by DDR-based therapeutics in vivo preclinical models [1-3]. Previous early phase studies demonstrated the modest activity of single agent selinexor in patients with solid tumors [4-6]. In vivo studies of selinexor in combination with different chemotherapeutics demonstrated synergistic activity [3, 7, 8]. An open-label, multi-arm phase 1b study utilizing selinexor in combination with different standard chemotherapies was conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination. Herein, we report results from 5 closed separate arms of the study. Eligible patients were adult (age  ≥ 18 years) patients with histologically documented, relapsed/metastatic refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or adding selinexor to systemic therapy was appropriate. The primary aim was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of selinexor when given in combination with different standard chemotherapies and the secondary aim was to determine the preliminary antitumor activity [DCR (CR  +  PR  +  SD  ≥ 6 months), and progression-free survival (PFS)]. Nineteen patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors were enrolled between July 2015 and January 2017. The demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients enrolled are summarized in Table 1. No patients are currently in the study where the majority of patients withdrew from the study due to progression of disease while 5 patients withdrew due to clinically intolerable treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). All patients experienced at least one TEAE and TRAE (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Table S2). The commonest TRAE were thrombocytopenia (84%), nausea (68%), leukopenia (68%), neutropenia (63%), fatigue (58%), vomiting (53%), and anemia (53%). The most prevalent grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (26%), hyponatremia (21%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (16%). Three patients experienced DLTs; a patient dosed at selinexor 60 mg twice weekly (BIW) with DC reported grade 3 leukopenia and grade 4 neutropenia; a patient receiving selinexor at 40 mg once weekly (QW) with FOLFIRI reported grade 3 febrile neutropenia (FN); and a patient receiving selinexor at 40 mg QW with XELOX reported grade 3 diarrhea. Four patients were reported to have serious adverse events (SAEs). One patient receiving selinexor with DC had an SAE from treatment-related grade 3 FN. Two patients in the combination of selinexor with FOLFIRI had SAEs; one patient had treatment-related grade 3 FN while the other had treatment-unrelated grade 2 pancreatitis. One patient receiving selinexor with XELOX had an SAE from treatment-related grade 3 diarrhea and treatment-unrelated grade 3 dyspnea and skin infection. No patients died during the study.
Table 1

Patients baseline demographics and disease characteristics

CharacteristicSelinexor 60 mg QW/BIW  +  carboplatin 6 AUC Q3W (N  = 6)Selinexor 60 mg QW/BIW  +  doxorubicin 60 mg/m2  +  cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 Q3W (N  = 4)Selinexor 40 mg QW  +  FOLFIRIa (N  = 3)Selinexor 60 mg QW  + irinotecan 125 mg/m2 D1 and 8 Q3W (N  = 3)Selinexor 40 mg QW  +  XELOXb (N  = 3)All patients (N  = 19)
Age at consent (years)
 Median range56.1 (31.2–76.1)61.7 (23.6–64.9)49.9 (38.1–70.7)67.8 (57.9–72.3)65.9 (51.8–72.8)60.6 (23.6–76.1)
Gender, N (%)
 Male1 (17)2 (50)1 (33)1 (33)2 (67)7 (37)
 Female5 (83)2 (50)2 (67)2 (67)1 (33)12 (63)
Race/ethnicity, N (%)
 White4 (67)4 (100)3 (100)1 (33)3 (100)15 (79)
 Hispanic000000
 Black1 (17)001 (33)02 (11)
 Asian1 (17)001 (33)02 (11)
ECOG performance status, N (%)
 01 (17)01 (33)2 (67)1 (33)5 (26)
 15 (83)4 (100)2 (67)1 (33)2 (67)14 (74)
Primary tumor, N (%)
 Ovarian02 (50)0002 (11)
 Breast3 (50)00003 (16)
 Colorectal cancer001 (33)1 (33)1 (33)3 (16)
 Endometrial/fallopian000000
 Lung1 (17)00001 (5)
 Neuroendocrine001 (33)1 (33)02 (11)
 Pancreas001 (33)01 (33)2 (11)
 Esophageal000000
 Head and neck/salivary gland1 (17)001 (33)02 (11)
 Liver/cholangiocarcinoma00001 (33)1 (5)
 Sarcoma01 (25)0001 (5)
 Prostate01 (25)0001 (5)
 Others1 (17)00001 (5)
Prior lines of systemic therapies, N (%)
 0–11 (17)00001 (5)
 2–34 (67)3 (75)2 (67)2 (67)2 (67)13 (68)
 4–51 (17)1 (25)1 (33)01 (33)4 (21)
 > 50001 (33)01 (5)
 Median range2.5 (1.0–4.0)2.0 (2.0–4.0)3.0 (3.0–5.0)3.0 (2.0–6.0)3.0 (2.0–4.0)3.0 (1.0–6.0)

N number; ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; QW once weekly; BIW twice weekly; AUC area under curve; mg/m milligrams per square meter; D1 and 8 on days 1, and 8 of each cycle; Q3W every 3 week; FOLFIRI irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid; XELOX capecitabine and oxaliplatin

aFOLFIRI—irinotecan of 180 mg/m2, 5-FU continuous infusion of 2400 mg/m2, 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and leucovorin of 400 mg/m2 on days 1, and 15

bXELOX—capecitabine was dosed at 900 mg/m2 orally (PO) divided into 2 doses on days 1–14, along with oxaliplatin of 130 mg/m2 IV Q3W

Table 2

Summary of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) in all grades of severity

N (%)Selinexor 60 mg QW/BIW  +  carboplatin 6 AUC Q3W (N  = 6)Selinexor 60 mg QW/BIW  +  doxorubicin 60 mg/m2  +  cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 Q3W (N  = 4)Selinexor 40 mg QW  +  FOLFIRIa (N  = 3)Selinexor 60 mg QW  +  irinotecan 125 mg/m2 D1 and 8 Q3W (N  = 3)Selinexor 40 mg QW  +  XELOXb (N  = 3)All patients (N  = 19)
All gradesGrade 3/4All gradesGrade 3/4All gradesGrade 3/4All gradesGrade 3/4All gradesGrade 3/4All gradesGrade 3/4
Anemia5 (83)2 (33)2 (50)01 (33)01 (33)01 (33)1 (33)10 (53)3 (16)
Leukopenia4 (75)1 (17)3 (75)3 (75)3 (100)01 (33)02 (67)1 (33)13 (68)5 (26)
Neutropenia4 (75)2 (33)3 (75)3 (75)2 (67)1 (33)2 (67)1 (33)1 (33)1 (33)12 (63)8 (42)
Thrombocytopenia6 (100)3 (50)3 (75)02 (67)02 (67)03 (100)016 (84)3 (16)
Constipation000000000000
Diarrhea2 (33)000001 (33)01 (33)1 (33)4 (21)1 (5)
Nausea4 (75)04 (100)01 (33)01 (33)03 (100)013 (68)0
Vomiting4 (75)03 (75)0001 (33)02 (67)010 (53)0
Elevated AST/ALT00001 (33)01 (33)0002 (11)0
Mucositis000000000000
Fatigue4 (75)02 (50)01 (33)03 (100)1 (33)1 (33)011 (58)1 (5)
Anorexia1 (17)000001 (33)02 (67)04 (21)0
Hyponatremia3 (50)2 (33)001 (33)1 (33)1 (33)01 (33)1 (33)6 (32)4 (21)
Hypomagnesemia1 (17)00000001 (33)02 (11)0
Hypoalbuminemia000000000000
Dyspnea000000001 (33)01 (5)0
Cough000000000000
Elevated CPK1 (17)0000000001 (5)0
Infection or infestation000000000000
Elevated lipase1 (17)1 (17)000000001 (5)1 (5)

aFOLFIRI—irinotecan of 180 mg/m2, 5-FU continuous infusion of 2400 mg/m2, 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and leucovorin of 400 mg/m2 on days 1, and 15

bXELOX—capecitabine was dosed at 900 mg/m2 orally (PO) divided into 2 doses on days 1–14, along with oxaliplatin of 130 mg/m2 IV Q3W

QW once weekly; BIW twice weekly; AUC area under curve; mg/m milligrams per square meter; D1 and 8 on days 1, and 8 of each cycle; Q3W every 3 weeks; ALT alanine aminotransferase; AST aspartate aminotransferase; CPK creatine phosphokinase; FOLFIRI irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid; 5-FU 5-fluorouracil; XELOX capecitabine and oxaliplatin

Patients baseline demographics and disease characteristics N number; ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; QW once weekly; BIW twice weekly; AUC area under curve; mg/m milligrams per square meter; D1 and 8 on days 1, and 8 of each cycle; Q3W every 3 week; FOLFIRI irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid; XELOX capecitabine and oxaliplatin aFOLFIRI—irinotecan of 180 mg/m2, 5-FU continuous infusion of 2400 mg/m2, 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and leucovorin of 400 mg/m2 on days 1, and 15 bXELOX—capecitabine was dosed at 900 mg/m2 orally (PO) divided into 2 doses on days 1–14, along with oxaliplatin of 130 mg/m2 IV Q3W Summary of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) in all grades of severity aFOLFIRI—irinotecan of 180 mg/m2, 5-FU continuous infusion of 2400 mg/m2, 5-FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and leucovorin of 400 mg/m2 on days 1, and 15 bXELOX—capecitabine was dosed at 900 mg/m2 orally (PO) divided into 2 doses on days 1–14, along with oxaliplatin of 130 mg/m2 IV Q3W QW once weekly; BIW twice weekly; AUC area under curve; mg/m milligrams per square meter; D1 and 8 on days 1, and 8 of each cycle; Q3W every 3 weeks; ALT alanine aminotransferase; AST aspartate aminotransferase; CPK creatine phosphokinase; FOLFIRI irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid; 5-FU 5-fluorouracil; XELOX capecitabine and oxaliplatin All patients enrolled had measurable disease, but 5 patients had not completed their first restaging scans due to earlier withdrawal of consent and toxicity. Fourteen patients were considered efficacy evaluable patients (Additional file 1: Figure S1). No patients had objective responses, however, 7 patients had SD. Of the 7 SD patients, 2 received selinexor with DC (ovarian cancer), 2 received selinexor with FOLFIRI [colorectal cancer (CRC); neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas], 2 received selinexor with XELOX (CRC; cholangiocarcinoma), and 1 received selinexor with irinotecan (CRC). All had progressed on multiple prior lines of therapy including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, cisplatin  +  gemcitabine, FOLFRINOX, temozolomide, everolimus, octreotide, capecitabine, sunitinib, and ziv-aflibercept. The median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 20 weeks (range, 6–29 weeks). Two patients who received selinexor with XELOX experienced disease control resulting in a DCR of 14%. A patient with CRC who progressed on prior 4 lines of therapies, had stable disease with TTF of 26 weeks. Another patient with cholangiocarcinoma who progressed on prior 3 lines of therapies including cisplatin  +  gemcitabine, FOLFRINOX, had stable disease with TTF of 29 weeks. The median PFS for all patients was 2.0 months (95% CI 1.2, 2.8) while the median OS for all patients was 5.2 months (95% CI 4.0, 11.2) (Additional file 1: Figure S2). In conclusion, selinexor in combination with standard chemotherapy showed limited clinical activity with some toxicity. Although RP2D of selinexor was 40 mg QW in combination with XELOX or FOLFIRI, the study arms were not pursued for dose expansion due to toxicities and lack of response. Optimizing supportive care, proper use of growth factors, and aggressive measures on antiemetics strategies are important to mitigate TRAE. Additional file 1: Table S1. Summary of treatment-emergent adverse events in the phase I safety population. Table S2. Summary of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in all grades of severity. Figure S1. Waterfall plot of maximum change in tumor measurements (per RECIST v1.1) for evaluable patients. Figure S2. Kaplan-Meier plot showing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all treated patients.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical translation of nuclear export inhibitors in cancer.

Authors:  William T Senapedis; Erkan Baloglu; Yosef Landesman
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 2.  Atomic basis of CRM1-cargo recognition, release and inhibition.

Authors:  Ho Yee Joyce Fung; Yuh Min Chook
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Phase IB Study of Selinexor, a First-in-Class Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, in Patients With Advanced Refractory Bone or Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Mrinal M Gounder; Alona Zer; William D Tap; Samer Salah; Mark A Dickson; Abha A Gupta; Mary Louise Keohan; Herbert H Loong; Sandra P D'Angelo; Stephanie Baker; Mercedes Condy; Kjirsten Nyquist-Schultz; Lanier Tanner; Joseph P Erinjeri; Francis H Jasmine; Sharon Friedlander; Robert Carlson; Thaddeus J Unger; Jean-Richard Saint-Martin; Tami Rashal; Joel Ellis; Michael Kauffman; Sharon Shacham; Gary K Schwartz; Albiruni Ryan Abdul Razak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Phase 2 study of the Exportin 1 inhibitor selinexor in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies.

Authors:  I B Vergote; B Lund; U Peen; Z Umajuridze; M Mau-Sorensen; A Kranich; E Van Nieuwenhuysen; C Haslund; T Nottrup; S N Han; N Concin; T J Unger; Y Chai; N Au; T Rashal; A Joshi; M Crochiere; Y Landesman; J Shah; S Shacham; M Kauffman; M R Mirza
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Selinexor (KPT-330) demonstrates anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Natalia Paez Arango; Erkan Yuca; Ming Zhao; Kurt W Evans; Stephen Scott; Charissa Kim; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Filip Janku; Naoto T Ueno; Debu Tripathy; Argun Akcakanat; Aung Naing; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Selinexor reduces the expression of DNA damage repair proteins and sensitizes cancer cells to DNA damaging agents.

Authors:  Trinayan Kashyap; Christian Argueta; Thaddeus Unger; Boris Klebanov; Sophia Debler; William Senapedis; Marsha L Crochiere; Margaret S Lee; Michael Kauffman; Sharon Shacham; Yosef Landesman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-07-20

7.  A Phase II Trial of Selinexor (KPT-330) for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Shafique; Roohi Ismail-Khan; Martine Extermann; Dan Sullivan; Dawn Goodridge; David Boulware; Deanna Hogue; Hatem Soliman; Hung Khong; Hyo S Han
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-04-17

8.  XPO1 inhibition by selinexor induces potent cytotoxicity against high grade bladder malignancies.

Authors:  Han Bit Baek; Alan P Lombard; Stephen J Libertini; Aleida Fernandez-Rubio; Ruth Vinall; Regina Gandour-Edwards; Rachel Nakagawa; Kathleen Vidallo; Kristine Nishida; Salma Siddiqui; Hiromi Wettersten; Yosef Landesman; Robert H Weiss; Paramita M Ghosh; Maria Mudryj
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-10-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.