Literature DB >> 34965511

Increasing Financial Payments From Industry to Medical Oncologists in the United States, 2014-2017.

Mohammed W Rahman1, Niti U Trivedi1, Peter B Bach1, Aaron P Mitchell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personal payments from the pharmaceutical industry to US physicians are common and are associated with changes in physicians' clinical practice and interpretation of clinical trial results. We assessed temporal trends in industry payments to oncologists, with particular emphasis on payments to authors of oncology clinical practice guideline and on payments related to immunotherapy drugs.
METHODS: We included US physicians with active National Plan and Provider Enumeration System records and demographic data available in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Compare system who had a specialty type of medical oncology or general internal medicine. Medical oncologists serving on NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Panels were identified manually. Industry payments, and the subset associated with PD-1/PD-L1 drugs, were identified in Open Payments, the federal repository of all transactions of financial value from industry to physicians and teaching hospitals, from 2014 to 2017.
RESULTS: There were 13,087 medical oncologists and 85,640 internists who received payments. The mean, annual, per-physician value of payments to oncologists increased from $3,811 in 2014 to $5,854 in 2017, and from $444 to $450 for internists; the median payment increased from $152 to $199 for oncologists and remained at $0 for internists. Oncologists who served on NCCN Guidelines Panels received a greater value in payments and experienced a greater relative increase: mean payments increased from $10,820 in 2014 to $18,977 in 2017, and median payments increased from $500 to $1,366. Among companies marketing PD-1/PD-L1 drugs, mean annual per-oncologist payments associated with PD-1/PD-L1 drugs increased from $28 to $773. Total per-oncologist payments from companies marketing PD-1/PD-L1 drugs experienced a 165% increase from 2014 to 2017, compared with a 31% increase among similar companies not marketing PD-1/PD-L1 drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmaceutical industry payments increased for US oncologists from 2014 to 2017 more than for general internists. The increase was greater among oncologists contributing to clinical practice guidelines and among pharmaceutical companies marketing PD-1/PD-L1 drugs. The increasing flow of money from industry to US oncologists supports ongoing concern regarding commercial interests in guideline development and clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34965511      PMCID: PMC9309756          DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   12.693


  35 in total

Review 1.  Association between physicians' interaction with pharmaceutical companies and their clinical practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hneine Brax; Racha Fadlallah; Lina Al-Khaled; Lara A Kahale; Hala Nas; Fadi El-Jardali; Elie A Akl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Relationship of Industry Payments to Prescribing Behavior: A Study of Degarelix and Denosumab.

Authors:  Jathin Bandari; Robert M Turner; Bruce L Jacobs; David Canes; Ali Moinzadeh; Benjamin J Davies
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-01

3.  Industry payments to dermatologists: updates from the 2016 open payment data.

Authors:  Emma Schlager; Hania Flaten; Chelsea St Claire; Elena Maxim; Cory Dunnick; Robert P Dellavalle
Journal:  Dermatol Online J       Date:  2018-06-13

4.  Forecasting unanticipated consequences of "The Sunshine Act": mostly cloudy.

Authors:  Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The Physician Payments Sunshine Act--Two Years of the Open Payments Program.

Authors:  Shantanu Agrawal; Douglas Brown
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Scope and nature of financial conflicts of interest between neurologists and industry: 2013-2016.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Robbins; Mark J Meyer; James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say?

Authors:  J Lexchin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Association of Industry Payments to Physicians With the Prescribing of Brand-name Statins in Massachusetts.

Authors:  James S Yeh; Jessica M Franklin; Jerry Avorn; Joan Landon; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  The Receipt of Industry Payments is Associated With Prescribing Promoted Alpha-blockers and Overactive Bladder Medications.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Ye Wang; Peter S Kirk; James M Dupree; Eric A Singer; Steven L Chang
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Evaluation of Sex Distribution of Industry Payments Among Radiation Oncologists.

Authors:  Julius K Weng; Luca F Valle; Gina E Nam; Fang-I Chu; Michael L Steinberg; Ann C Raldow
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-01-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Physician Payments from Pharmaceutical Companies Related to Cancer Drugs.

Authors:  Aaron P Mitchell; Akriti Mishra Meza; Niti U Trivedi; Peter B Bach; Mithat Gönen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.