Literature DB >> 34965416

Assessing kinetics and recruitment of DNA repair factors using high content screens.

Barbara Martinez-Pastor1, Giorgia G Silveira2, Thomas L Clarke2, Dudley Chung3, Yuchao Gu4, Claudia Cosentino5, Lance S Davidow6, Gadea Mata7, Sylvana Hassanieh5, Jayme Salsman3, Alberto Ciccia8, Narkhyun Bae9, Mark T Bedford10, Diego Megias7, Lee L Rubin6, Alejo Efeyan11, Graham Dellaire12, Raul Mostoslavsky13.   

Abstract

Repair of genetic damage is coordinated in the context of chromatin, so cells dynamically modulate accessibility at DNA breaks for the recruitment of DNA damage response (DDR) factors. The identification of chromatin factors with roles in DDR has mostly relied on loss-of-function screens while lacking robust high-throughput systems to study DNA repair. In this study, we have developed two high-throughput systems that allow the study of DNA repair kinetics and the recruitment of factors to double-strand breaks in a 384-well plate format. Using a customized gain-of-function open-reading frame library ("ChromORFeome" library), we identify chromatin factors with putative roles in the DDR. Among these, we find the PHF20 factor is excluded from DNA breaks, affecting DNA repair by competing with 53BP1 recruitment. Adaptable for genetic perturbations, small-molecule screens, and large-scale analysis of DNA repair, these resources can aid our understanding and manipulation of DNA repair.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage foci; DNA repair; GOF; PHF20; chromatin accessibility; high throughput; laser microirradiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34965416      PMCID: PMC8763642          DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


  73 in total

Review 1.  The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective.

Authors:  B B Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The DNA damage response: ten years after.

Authors:  J Wade Harper; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins.

Authors:  Carsten Doil; Niels Mailand; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Patrice Menard; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Rainer Pepperkok; Jan Ellenberg; Stephanie Panier; Daniel Durocher; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 promotes 53BP1 recruitment by removing L3MBTL1 from DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Klara Acs; Martijn S Luijsterburg; Leena Ackermann; Florian A Salomons; Thorsten Hoppe; Nico P Dantuma
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage.

Authors:  Danny M Chou; Britt Adamson; Noah E Dephoure; Xu Tan; Amanda C Nottke; Kristen E Hurov; Steven P Gygi; Monica P Colaiácovo; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Yentram Huyen; Omar Zgheib; Richard A Ditullio; Vassilis G Gorgoulis; Panayotis Zacharatos; Tom J Petty; Emily A Sheston; Hestia S Mellert; Elena S Stavridi; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Petra Beli; Natalia Lukashchuk; Sebastian A Wagner; Brian T Weinert; Jesper V Olsen; Linda Baskcomb; Matthias Mann; Stephen P Jackson; Chunaram Choudhary
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  The TIP60 Complex Regulates Bivalent Chromatin Recognition by 53BP1 through Direct H4K20me Binding and H2AK15 Acetylation.

Authors:  Karine Jacquet; Amélie Fradet-Turcotte; Nikita Avvakumov; Jean-Philippe Lambert; Céline Roques; Raj K Pandita; Eric Paquet; Pauline Herst; Anne-Claude Gingras; Tej K Pandita; Gaëlle Legube; Yannick Doyon; Daniel Durocher; Jacques Côté
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  A genome-wide homologous recombination screen identifies the RNA-binding protein RBMX as a component of the DNA-damage response.

Authors:  Britt Adamson; Agata Smogorzewska; Frederic D Sigoillot; Randall W King; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  A public genome-scale lentiviral expression library of human ORFs.

Authors:  Xiaoping Yang; Jesse S Boehm; Xinping Yang; Kourosh Salehi-Ashtiani; Tong Hao; Yun Shen; Rakela Lubonja; Sapana R Thomas; Ozan Alkan; Tashfeen Bhimdi; Thomas M Green; Cory M Johannessen; Serena J Silver; Cindy Nguyen; Ryan R Murray; Haley Hieronymus; Dawit Balcha; Changyu Fan; Chenwei Lin; Lila Ghamsari; Marc Vidal; William C Hahn; David E Hill; David E Root
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Glioma: Molecular Players and Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Semer Maksoud
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 2.  DNA repair as a shared hallmark in cancer and ageing.

Authors:  Thomas L Clarke; Raul Mostoslavsky
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 7.449

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.