Literature DB >> 34965337

Third BNT162b2 Vaccination Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection.

Ital Nemet1, Limor Kliker1, Yaniv Lustig1, Neta Zuckerman1, Oran Erster1, Carmit Cohen2, Yitshak Kreiss2, Sharon Alroy-Preis3, Gili Regev-Yochay2, Ella Mendelson4, Michal Mandelboim4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34965337      PMCID: PMC8823651          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2119358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: On November 26, 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) named the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), first detected in South Africa, as a variant of concern.[1] By November 29, 2021, three days after the announcement by the WHO, cases of infection with the omicron variant had already been detected in many other countries. Whether the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech), which was previously shown to have 95% efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19),[2,3] will effectively neutralize infection with the omicron variant is unclear. We compared neutralization of omicron-infected cells in serum samples obtained from participants who had received two doses of vaccine with neutralization in samples obtained from participants who had received three doses. Microneutralization assays with wild-type virus and B.1.351 (beta), B.1.617.2 (delta), and omicron variant isolates were performed with the use of serum samples obtained from two groups of 20 health care workers. One group comprised participants who had received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine (mean, 165.6 days since receipt of the second dose), and the second group comprised those who had received three vaccine doses (mean, 25 days since receipt of the third dose) (Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org). Significance was assessed with the use of a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Receipt of three vaccine doses led to better neutralization of the wild-type virus and the three variants than receipt of two vaccine doses (Figure 1). The geometric mean titers of the wild-type virus and the beta, delta, and omicron variants were 16.56, 1.27, 8.00, and 1.11, respectively, after receipt of the second vaccine dose and 891.4, 152.2, 430.5, and 107.6, respectively, after receipt of the third dose. A significantly lower neutralization efficiency of the BNT162b2 vaccine against all the tested variants of concern (beta, delta, and omicron) than against the wild-type virus was observed in samples obtained from participants who had received two doses than in those obtained from participants who had received three doses (Figure 1B and 1D). The lower neutralization efficiency against the beta and omicron variants than against the wild-type virus was similar in samples obtained from participants who had received two doses and in those obtained from participants who had received three doses. The third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine efficiently neutralized infection with the omicron variant (geometric mean titer, 1.11 after the second dose vs. 107.6 after the third dose) (Figure 1A and 1C).
Figure 1

Neutralization Efficiency against Wild-Type Virus and the Beta, Delta, and Omicron Variants of Concern.

Serum samples were obtained from 20 health care workers who had received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine (Panels A and B) and from 20 who had received three doses (Panels C and D). Samples were tested by microneutralization against wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the B.1.351 (beta), B.1.617.2 (delta), and B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants of concern. Dashed lines in Panels A and C indicate the cutoff titer. Geometric mean titers (horizontal lines) with 95% confidence intervals (𝙸 bars) are presented, as well as the geometric mean titer value. Dots indicate individual serum samples. The factor reduction as compared with wild-type virus is shown for samples obtained from participants who had received two doses of vaccine (Panel B) and those obtained from participants who had received three doses (Panel D). For these analyses, the mean factor differences between wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and the variants of concern were calculated for each participant; the means of the individual values are shown here. Error bars in Panels B and D indicate the standard error.

We analyzed the neutralization efficiency of the BNT162b2 vaccine against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and the beta, delta, and omicron variants of concern. Limitations of the study include the small cohort tested and the fact that the test was only an in vitro assay. Nevertheless, we found low neutralization efficiency with two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine against the wild-type virus and the delta variant, assessed more than 5 months after receipt of the second dose, and no neutralization efficiency against the omicron variant. The importance of a third vaccine dose is clear, owing to the higher neutralization efficiency (by a factor of 100) against the omicron variant after the third dose than after the second dose; however, even with three vaccine doses, neutralization against the omicron variant was lower (by a factor of 4) than that against the delta variant. The durability of the effect of the third dose of vaccine against Covid-19 is yet to be determined.
  2 in total

1.  Infections, hospitalisations, and deaths averted via a nationwide vaccination campaign using the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in Israel: a retrospective surveillance study.

Authors:  Eric J Haas; John M McLaughlin; Farid Khan; Frederick J Angulo; Emilia Anis; Marc Lipsitch; Shepherd R Singer; Gabriel Mircus; Nati Brooks; Meir Smaja; Kaijie Pan; Jo Southern; David L Swerdlow; Luis Jodar; Yeheskel Levy; Sharon Alroy-Preis
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 25.071

  2 in total
  152 in total

1.  Urban monitoring, evaluation and application of COVID-19 listed vaccine effectiveness: a health code blockchain study.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Chaoqun Li; Hongyan Li; Zheheng Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Hesitancy for receiving regular SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in UK healthcare workers: a cross-sectional analysis from the UK-REACH study.

Authors:  Neyme Veli; Christopher A Martin; Katherine Woolf; Joshua Nazareth; Daniel Pan; Amani Al-Oraibi; Rebecca F Baggaley; Luke Bryant; Laura B Nellums; Laura J Gray; Kamlesh Khunti; Manish Pareek
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 11.150

3.  Clinical outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant and BA.1/BA.1.1 or BA.2 subvariant infection in Southern California.

Authors:  Joseph A Lewnard; Vennis X Hong; Manish M Patel; Rebecca Kahn; Marc Lipsitch; Sara Y Tartof
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 87.241

4.  Maternal and Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Neutralization after Antenatal mRNA Vaccination.

Authors:  Amihai Rottenstreich; Olesya Vorontsov; Or Alfi; Gila Zarbiv; Esther Oiknine-Djian; Roy Zigron; Geffen Kleinstern; Michal Mandelboim; Shay Porat; Dana G Wolf
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 20.999

5.  Proper Selection of In Vitro Cell Model Affects the Characterization of the Neutralizing Antibody Response against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Elena Criscuolo; Benedetta Giuliani; Davide Ferrari; Roberto Ferrarese; Roberta A Diotti; Massimo Clementi; Nicasio Mancini; Nicola Clementi
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 5.818

6.  Early introduction and rise of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant in highly vaccinated university populations.

Authors:  Brittany A Petros; Jacquelyn Turcinovic; Nicole L Welch; Laura F White; Eric D Kolaczyk; Matthew R Bauer; Michael Cleary; Sabrina T Dobbins; Lynn Doucette-Stamm; Mitch Gore; Parvathy Nair; Tien G Nguyen; Scott Rose; Bradford P Taylor; Daniel Tsang; Erik Wendlandt; Michele Hope; Judy T Platt; Karen R Jacobson; Tara Bouton; Seyho Yune; Jared R Auclair; Lena Landaverde; Catherine M Klapperich; Davidson H Hamer; William P Hanage; Bronwyn L MacInnis; Pardis C Sabeti; John H Connor; Michael Springer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 20.999

7.  A Cross-Sectional Study of Untoward Reactions Following Homologous and Heterologous COVID-19 Booster Immunizations in Recipients Seventeen Years of Age and Older.

Authors:  Manuela Tamburro; Giancarlo Ripabelli; Antonio D'Amico; Roberta De Dona; Mariagrazia Iafigliola; Albino Parente; Nicandro Samprati; Arturo Santagata; Carmen Adesso; Anna Natale; Michela Anna Di Palma; Fabio Cannizzaro; Michela Lucia Sammarco
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2022-06-25

Review 8.  Origin, virological features, immune evasion and intervention of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron sublineages.

Authors:  Shuai Xia; Lijue Wang; Yun Zhu; Lu Lu; Shibo Jiang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 9.  Pathogenic Mechanism and Multi-omics Analysis of Oral Manifestations in COVID-19.

Authors:  Ming Hao; Dongxu Wang; Qianyun Xia; Shaoning Kan; Lu Chang; Huimin Liu; Zhijing Yang; Weiwei Liu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 8.786

10.  The Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Adapting Because of Selective Pressures.

Authors:  Georgina I López-Cortés; Miryam Palacios-Pérez; Hannya F Veledíaz; Margarita Hernández-Aguilar; Gerardo R López-Hernández; Gabriel S Zamudio; Marco V José
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.