Literature DB >> 34965276

Determinants of severity among hospitalised COVID-19 patients: Hospital-based case-control study, India, 2020.

Sanjay P Zodpey1, Himanshu Negandhi1, Vineet Kumar Kamal2, Tarun Bhatnagar2, Parasuraman Ganeshkumar2, Arvind Athavale3, Amiruddin Kadri4, Amit Patel5, A Bhagyalaxmi4, Deepak Khismatrao6, E Theranirajan7, Getrude Banumathi8, Krishna Singh3, P Parameshwari8, Prasita Kshirsagar9, Rita Saxena10, Sanjay G Deshpande11, Kadloor Satyanand6, Saurabh Hadke11, Simmi Dube10, Sudarshini Subramaniam7, Surabhi Madan5, Swapnali Kadam9, Tanu Anand12, Kathiresan Jeyashree2, Manickam Ponnaiah2, Manish Rana13, Manoj V Murhekar2, Dcs Reddy14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for the development of severe COVID-19 disease and death have been widely reported across several studies. Knowledge about the determinants of severe disease and mortality in the Indian context can guide early clinical management.
METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based case control study across nine sites in India to identify the determinants of severe and critical COVID-19 disease.
FINDINGS: We identified age above 60 years, duration before admission >5 days, chronic kidney disease, leucocytosis, prothrombin time > 14 sec, serum ferritin >250 ng/mL, d-dimer >0.5 ng/mL, pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L, fibrin degradation products >5 μg/mL, C-reactive protein >5 mg/L, lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L, interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL, NLR ≥3, and deranged liver function, renal function and serum electrolytes as significant factors associated with severe COVID-19 disease.
INTERPRETATION: We have identified a set of parameters that can help in characterising severe COVID-19 cases in India. These parameters are part of routinely available investigations within Indian hospital settings, both public and private. Study findings have the potential to inform clinical management protocols and identify patients at high risk of severe outcomes at an early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34965276      PMCID: PMC8716035          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

COVID-19 pandemic has caused over 2.4 million deaths and over 111 million cases worldwide by 24th February 2021 [1]. Due to widespread transmission, several countries were burdened with high case load and deaths. Critical care resources have been stretched across some countries [2, 3]. The fatalities reported by countries and regions also varied widely. While the available data on absolute number of deaths is fairly reliable, the calculation of mortality rates and comparing them across countries is difficult because countries widely differ in their screening and testing criteria. The analysis of 72,314 cases using data from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention [4], indicated most cases to be mild (81%; i.e., non-pneumonia and mild pneumonia), whereas 14% were severe (i.e., dyspnea, respiratory frequency ≥30/min, blood oxygen saturation ≤93%, the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio <300, and/or lung infiltrates >50% within 24 to 48 hours), and 5% were critical (i.e., respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction or failure). India rapidly scaled up hospital and critical care resources and a proactive public health response targeting surveillance, wearing masks, limiting movement in the early phase of the epidemic along with an intensive information dissemination campaign. The mortality attributed to COVID-19 in India was relatively low compared to the rest of the world. India had reported 1,19,71,624 cases and 1,61,552 deaths till 28 March 2021 with lowest case fatality ratio of 1.5% globally [5]. The determinants of severity can guide clinical management; proactively screening for their presence could prioritize COVID-19 patients for intensive care treatment and thereby allocate scarce medical resources appropriately. Risk factors for the development of severe disease and death have been widely reported across several studies [6], and vulnerable groups include older adults, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, hypertension, and cancer. Obesity and smoking were also associated with increased risks in some studies [6]. Lymphopenia is a predictor of disease progression [7]. Cytokine storm is also associated with disease severity [8]. Knowledge of characteristics of people at high risk of experiencing a poor outcome from the infection could help in care provision [9]. We conducted this study to identify the determinants of severe COVID-19 disease in India using a case-control study design.

Methods

Study design and setting

We did a hospital-based case-control study among laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients of age≥18 years, newly admitted to nine designated COVID-19 hospitals (both public and private), from six cities across India during September—November 2020. The study centres included BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad; Care Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS Hospital), Ahmedabad; Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal; Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal; Symbiosis Hospital and Research Centre, Pune; Rajiv Gandhi Medical College and CSMH, Kalwa, Thane; Madras Medical College, Chennai; Chengalpattu Medical College, Chengalpattu; and Datta Meghe Medical College, Wanadongari, Nagpur. Cases (severe disease, at admission) and controls (mild disease at admission) were defined as per the Government of India’s COVID-19 case management guidelines (version 5; issued on 03/07/2020) (S1 Table) [10]. The working definition of severe COVID-19 disease included death and/or development of severe disease requiring ICU admission and/or ventilator support.

Sample size

Assuming an exposure rate of risk factors as 9% among controls (prevalence of hypertension in India) [11], anticipated Odds Ratio (OR) of 2.3 [12], at 5% level of significance and 90% power, we estimated a sample size of 244 cases and controls, each.

Selection of study participants

Cases and controls were identified from the admission records of study hospitals and those found to fulfil the eligibility criteria were selected consecutively until the desired sample size was achieved.

Data collection

We did face-to face interviews with the patients using a structured questionnaire to collect data on socio-demographic details, concurrent disease conditions and clinical symptomatology. For concurrent disease conditions questions were included about duration, severity and medication. If the patient was unable to respond, the close family members of the patient were interviewed. Data pertaining to clinical and laboratory variables were extracted from the hospital records using a data abstraction form. All information pertained to the duration between development of symptoms and the time of admission of the patients in the study hospitals.

Data analysis

Categorical and continuous variables were represented as frequency (percentage) and median (Interquartile range (IQR)), respectively. Between cases and controls, categorical variables were compared using Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test, whichever applicable. Non-normally distributed continuous variables (examined using Shapiro-Wilk test) were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The quantification of association was represented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using simple and multiple logistic regression analysis, respectively. Factors with p-value <0.25 in simple logistic regression analysis and/or clinical relevance, with the exclusion of those operating through a common clinical pathway or indicating similar pathology, were selected for the inclusion in the final model based on multiple logistic regression analysis, after checking for collinearity using variance inflation factor (VIF). Each factor was adjusted for relevant and measured confounders identified using directed acyclic graphs and -2 log likelihood ratio test. Data analysis was done using Stata V.15.1 software.

Ethical issues

Written informed consent was obtained from study participants. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Indian Institute of Public Health—Delhi. The protocol was also approved by the institutional ethics committees of all study sites.

Results

We included 244 patients with severe COVID-19 disease (Cases) and 245 with mild to moderate COVID-19 disease (Controls). Compared to the controls, a significantly higher proportion of cases were more than 60 years old, had lower monthly household income, less educated, and possessed a below poverty line (BPL) card. (Table 1).
Table 1

Background characteristics of cases and controls with COVID-19 in India, 2020.

CharacteristicsCasesControlsp-value
Nn/ Median%/IQRNn/ Median%/IQR
Age (years)24458.9(48.1–66.6)24545.7(31.9–56.0)
18–454518.511848.2<0.001
46–608534.88735.5
>6011446.74016.3
Gender244245
 Male16567.617571.40.361
 Female7932.47028.6
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2)24225.7(23.0–29.3)24525.5(23.0–28.1)
≤27.515664.517270.20.177
>27.58635.57329.8
Average monthly household income (INR)22320,000(10,000–40,000)23825,000(10,000–50,000)0.007
Years of education24410(5–12)24512(10–15) *<0.001
Possess BPL card2447932.42454317.5<0.001
Migrant2422811.62453514.30.372
Current smoker2414016.62444116.80.952
H/o BCG vaccination23615866.924219680.9<0.001

IQR–inter quartile range

IQR–inter quartile range The most common symptoms at admission were fever, shortness of breath, cough and myalgia. A significantly higher proportion of cases reported cough and presented with hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Cases also had a significantly higher proportion of multiple comorbidities compared to the controls. (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of cases and controls at the time of admission in India, 2020.

CharacteristicsCases (n = 244)Controls (n = 245)p-value
n%n%
Presenting symptoms
Temperature > 37.8 °C (100 °F)20182.419880.80.656
Cough16969.212852.2<0.001
Myalgia/ pain & aches in the body9338.110342.00.376
Sore throat5020.56325.70.171
Headache249.85723.7<0.001
Diarrhoea135.32610.60.031
Runny nose156.1218.60.305
Vomiting156.1156.10.991
Seizures62.410.40.056
Co-morbidities
Hypertension11948.75823.7<0.001
Diabetes mellitus9940.64819.6<0.001
Chronic Kidney Disease135.310.4<0.001
Cardiovascular disease83.341.60.239
Asthma41.641.60.995
Chronic lung disease31.231.20.996
Chronic Heart Disease41.620.80.408
Others3313.53715.10.618
Number of comorbidities
None7932.413755.9<0.001
Single7028.76426.1
Multiple9538.94417.9
A significantly higher proportion of cases compared to controls had abnormal laboratory parameters at the time of admission, except for blood group, creatinine kinase and vitamin D. (Table 3).
Table 3

Laboratory parameters of cases and controls with COVID-19 at the time of admission in India, 2020.

CharacteristicsCasesControlsp-value
Nn%Nn%
Blood group 239245
A5322.25622.90.795
B8535.6218.6
AB2510.58233.5
O7631.88635.1
Abnormal parameters
Leucocytosis (TWBC>11000 /mm3)24411547.12453514.3<0.001
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate >30 mm/hr24412952.92459538.780.002
Prothrombin time > 14 sec24414659.824410040.9<0.001
Activated partial thromboplastin time >40 sec2445120.92443715.160.099
Serum ferritin >250 ng/mL24419579.92458333.9<0.001
D-dimer >0.5 ng/mL24417170.12458333.9<0.001
Pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L2448936.5245176.9<0.001
Fibrin degradation product >5 μg/mL23716770.523310545.0<0.001
Serum triglyceride >150 mg/dL24410944.72458434.30.019
C-reactive protein >5 mg/L24421989.724512651.4<0.001
Lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L24323897.924522993.50.015
Creatinine kinase >200 U/L2445221.32374719.80.688
Interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL24414258.22457932.2<0.001
Fasting blood sugar >125 mg/dL24413153.72457028.6<0.001
Serum homocysteine >15 mcmol/L2447731.623813155.0<0.001
Serum calcium < = 8.5 mg/dL24312049.42376226.2<0.001
Vitamin D < = 5 ng/mL24472.923931.30.213
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ≥323920686.22389740.8<0.001
Deranged Liver Function Test24411752.02455120.8<0.001
Deranged Renal Function Test2449338.1245239.4<0.001
Deranged Serum electrolytes24410342.22453815.5<0.001

TWBC: Total White Blood Cell Count.

TWBC: Total White Blood Cell Count. On univariate analysis, age of 60 years and above, duration before admission more than five days, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, leucocytosis, elevated levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, prothrombin time, serum ferritin, d-dimer, pro-calcitonin, fibrin degradation products, c-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, interleukin-6, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and deranged liver function tests, renal function tests and serum electrolytes were associated with severe COVID-19 disease. After adjusting for known confounders, factors associated with severe COVID-19 were age above 60 years, duration before admission >5 days, pre-existing diabetes, chronic kidney disease, leucocytosis, prothrombin time > 14 sec, serum ferritin >250 ng/mL, d-dimer >0.5 ng/mL, pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L, fibrin degradation products >5 μg/mL, C-reactive protein >5 mg/L, lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L, interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL, NLR ≥3, and deranged liver function, renal function and serum electrolytes. (Table 4).
Table 4

Factors associated with severity among hospitalised COVID-19 patients, India, 2020.

FactorsUnadjusted OR (95% CI)p-valueAdjusted OR (95% CI)
Age > = 60 years4.5 (2.9–6.8)<0.001 -
Male gender0.8 (0.6–1.2)0.361-
BMI >27.51.3 (0.9–1.9)0.1771.1 (0.7–1.8) a
Duration before admission >5 days1.5 (1.1–2.2)0.0271.5 (1.0–2.2) b
Asthma1.0 (0.2–4.0)0.995-
Chronic lung disease1.0 (0.2–5.0)0.996-
Diabetes mellitus2.8 (1.9–4.2)<0.0011.8 (1.1–2.9) c
Chronic Heart Disease2.0 (0.4–11.1)0.418-
Cardiovascular disease2.0 (0.6–6.9)0.249-
Hypertension3.1 (2.1–4.5)<0.0011.5 (0.9–2.3) e
Chronic Kidney Disease13.7 (1.8–105.8)0.0128.7 (1.1–71.6) d
Leucocytosis5.3 (3.5–8.3)<0.0015.2 (3.3–8.2) f
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate >30 mm/hr1.8 (1.2–2.5)0.0021.4 (0.9–2.0) g
Prothrombin time > 14 sec2.1 (1.5–3.1)<0.0011.9 (1.3–2.9) h
Activated partial thromboplastin time >40 sec1.5 (0.9–2.3)0.1001.2 (0.7–2.0) h
Serum ferritin >250 ng/mL7.8 (5.1–11.7)<0.0016.2 (4.0–9.7) i
D-dimer >0.5 ng/mL4.6 (3.1–6.7)<0.0013.8 (2.6–5.6) j
Pro-calcitonin >0.15 μg/L7.7 (4.1–13.4)<0.0015.5 (3.1–9.9) k
Fibrin degradation products >5 μg/mL2.9 (1.9–4.2)<0.0013.1 (2.1–4.6) l
C-reactive protein >5 mg/L8.3 (5.1–13.4)<0.0016.7 (4.0–11.1) m
Lactate dehydrogenase >150 U/L3.3 (1.2–9.2)0.0214.6 (1.5–14.2) n
Creatinine kinase >200 U/L1.1 (0.7–1.7)0.688-
Interleukin-6 >25 pg/mL2.9 (2.0–4.2)<0.0012.4 (1.6–3.8) o
Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio ≥39.1 (5.8–14.2)<0.0015.2 (3.1–8.9) p
Deranged Liver Function Test3.5 (2.3–5.2)<0.0012.8 (1.8–4.3) q
Deranged Renal Function Test5.9 (3.6–9.8)<0.0013.8 (2.2–6.4) r
Deranged Serum electrolytes4.0 (2.6–6.1)<0.0012.3 (1.4–3.7) s

Adjusted for:

a—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test;

b—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease;

c—age, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test;

d—age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease;

e—age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, renal function test;

f—diabetes, chronic kidney disease;

g—diabetes, chronic kidney disease, renal function test;

h—liver function test, renal function test;

i—serum electrolytes, liver function test, renal function test;

j—liver function test, prothrombin time;

k—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate;

l—chronic kidney disease, prothrombin time;

m—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate;

n—liver function test, leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein;

o—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein;

p—age, body mass index, leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase;

q—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, renal function test;

r—age, diabetes, hypertension;

s—chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test

Adjusted for: a—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test; b—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease; c—age, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test; d—age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease; e—age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, renal function test; f—diabetes, chronic kidney disease; g—diabetes, chronic kidney disease, renal function test; h—liver function test, renal function test; i—serum electrolytes, liver function test, renal function test; j—liver function test, prothrombin time; k—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; l—chronic kidney disease, prothrombin time; m—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; n—liver function test, leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein; o—leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein; p—age, body mass index, leucocytosis, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase; q—age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, renal function test; r—age, diabetes, hypertension; s—chronic kidney disease, liver function test, renal function test

Discussion

We identified older age, co-morbidities (diabetes, chronic kidney disease) and laboratory parameters (leucocyte count, prothrombin time, serum ferritin, d-dimer, pro-calcitonin, fibrin degradation products, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, liver function, renal function and serum electrolytes) as determinants of severe disease at the time of admission among COVID-19 patients. Diabetes has been recognized as important in the prediction of severe disease of COVID-19. Diabetes in patients with COVID-19 was associated with a two-fold increase in mortality and severity of COVID-19, compared to non-diabetics in a meta-analysis [13]. Jain et al., studied the predictive symptoms and comorbidities for severe COVID-19 and intensive care unit admission. They concluded that elderly patients with comorbidities are more vulnerable to severe disease [14]. A systematic review by Del Sole et al included 12 studies with 2794 patients where 596 patients with severe disease. They reported patients with severe disease were older in age and had diabetes than patients with non-severe disease [15]. Del Sole identified that increased procalcitonin (OR: 8.21, 95% CI 4.48–15.07), increased D-Dimer (OR: 5.67, 95% CI 1.45–22.16) and thrombocytopenia (OR: 3.61, 95% CI 2.62–4.97) predicted severe infection [15]. A meta-analysis by Coomes and Haghbayan [16] reported that IL-6 levels are significantly elevated and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. A study in a north Indian tertiary care centre used retrospective data to conclude that more than half of patients admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection had an abnormal liver function which was found to be associated with raised levels of inflammatory markers [17]. These patients had significantly higher proportions of patients with abnormal liver function were elderly and males and were at higher risk of progressing to severe disease. Organ specific manifestations, which include the liver and the kidney along with their possible mechanism of injury have been available in literature [18]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published studies indicate that COVID-19 incidence was higher in people receiving maintenance dialysis than in those with CKD not requiring kidney replacement therapy or those who were kidney or pancreas/kidney transplant recipients [19]. In patients with COVID-19, acute Kidney Injury (AKI) may have an inflammatory etiology mediated by a cytokine storm [20]. CKD and COVID-19 may have a higher incidence of death than people with CKD without COVID-19. [19] Elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase were suggested to be associated right from the early studies on COVID-19 severity. Work by Wang and Wang reported that compared to survival cases, patients who died during hospitalization had higher plasma levels of D-dimer, creatinine, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, lactate, and lower percentage of lymphocytes (LYM [%]), platelet count and albumin levels [21]. Similarly, a multicentre retrospective cohort study from Wuhan to develop and validate a prognostic nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 included age (Hazard Ratio for per year increment: 1.05), severity at admission (Hazard Ratio for per rank increment: 2.91), dyspnea (Hazard Ratio: 2.18), cardiovascular disease (Hazard Ratio: 3.25), and levels of lactate dehydrogenase (Hazard Ratio: 4.53), total bilirubin (Hazard Ratio: 2.56), blood glucose (Hazard Ratio: 2.56), and urea (Hazard Ratio: 2.14) [22]. Other parameters that we found to be associated with severe Covid-19 at admission such as leucocytosis, prothrombin time, serum ferritin, fibrin degradation products, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and serum electrolytes operate through a clinical pathway or indicate pathology similar to others described above. Our study had certain limitations. There is potential for selection bias in this hospital-based study. The cases were poorer and less educated than the controls, which indicates a difference in the source population to which cases and controls belonged to. The location and type of participating hospitals could have influenced the selection of study participants. Misclassification of case-control status is unlikely as we used the standardized criteria for classification of severe cases across the study sites. There is a likelihood of misclassification of laboratory parameters, albeit minimal, on account of testing by different laboratories across the study sites. However, all laboratories were assured to have quality control mechanisms in place.

Conclusions

We have identified a set of parameters characterizing severe Covid-19 that are part of routinely available investigations within Indian hospital settings, both public and private. Knowledge of these risk factors has the potential to triage COVID-19 patients at the time of admission in terms of severity of disease and adequate management of the same.

Definition of severe and mild disease as per Government of India’s COVID-19 case management guidelines.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  18 in total

1.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; E Kemper; T R Holford; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  COVID-19 associated variations in liver function parameters: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ram Krishan Saini; Neha Saini; Sant Ram; Shiv Lal Soni; Vikas Suri; Pankaj Malhotra; Jyotdeep Kaur; Indu Verma; Sadhna Sharma; Deepy Zohmangaihi
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Predictive symptoms and comorbidities for severe COVID-19 and intensive care unit admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vageesh Jain; Jin-Min Yuan
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Is diabetes mellitus associated with mortality and severity of COVID-19? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ashish Kumar; Anil Arora; Praveen Sharma; Shrihari Anil Anikhindi; Naresh Bansal; Vikas Singla; Shivam Khare; Abhishyant Srivastava
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-05-06

5.  Covid-19: risk factors for severe disease and death.

Authors:  Rachel E Jordan; Peymane Adab; K K Cheng
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-26

6.  Lymphopenia predicts disease severity of COVID-19: a descriptive and predictive study.

Authors:  Li Tan; Qi Wang; Duanyang Zhang; Jinya Ding; Qianchuan Huang; Yi-Quan Tang; Qiongshu Wang; Hongming Miao
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-03-27

7.  Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Ya Zheng; Xi Gou; Ke Pu; Zhaofeng Chen; Qinghong Guo; Rui Ji; Haojia Wang; Yuping Wang; Yongning Zhou
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Critical care crisis and some recommendations during the COVID-19 epidemic in China.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xie; Zhaohui Tong; Xiangdong Guan; Bin Du; Haibo Qiu; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 41.787

9.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Zunyou Wu; Jennifer M McGoogan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Barthel's Index: A Better Predictor for COVID-19 Mortality Than Comorbidities.

Authors:  João Cordeiro da Costa; Maria Conceição Manso; Susana Gregório; Márcia Leite; João Moreira Pinto
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2022-06-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.