Literature DB >> 34964707

Bioinformatics analysis of candidate genes and potential therapeutic drugs targeting adipose tissue in obesity.

Yun Yu1, Yu-Han Zhang2, Liang Liu1, Ling-Ling Yu3, Jun-Pei Li1, Jing-An Rao1, Feng Hu1, Ling-Juan Zhu1, Hui-Hui Bao1, Xiao-Shu Cheng1.   

Abstract

Obesity is a complex medical condition that affects multiple organs in the body. However, the underlying mechanisms of obesity, as well as its treatment, are largely unexplored. The focus of this research was to use bioinformatics to discover possible treatment targets for obesity. To begin, the GSE133099 database was used to identify 364 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Then, DEGs were subjected to tissue-specific analyses and enrichment analyses, followed by the creation of a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and generation of a drug-gene interaction database to screen key genes and potential future drugs targeting obesity. Findings have illustrated that the tissue-specific expression of neurologic markers varied significantly (34.7%, 52/150). Among these genes, Lep, ApoE, Fyn, and FN1 were the key genes observed in the adipocyte samples from obese patients relative to the controls. Furthermore, nine potential therapeutic drugs (dasatinib, ocriplasmin, risperidone, gemfibrozil, ritonavir, fluvastatin, pravastatin, warfarin, atorvastatin) that target the key genes were also screened and selected. To conclude the key genes discovered (Lep, ApoE, Fyn, and FN1), as well as 9 candidate drugs, could be used as therapeutic targets in treating obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obesity; adipocyte; bioinformatics; biomarkers; drug-gene interaction; tissue-specific gene expression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34964707      PMCID: PMC8726706          DOI: 10.1080/21623945.2021.2013406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adipocyte        ISSN: 2162-3945            Impact factor:   4.534


Introduction

Obesity is a major global public health concern and is considered the most common and costly nutritional problem [1,2]. Affecting around 2.1 billion people worldwide, the number of people with obesity only continues to rise. Moreover, it is estimated that over 3 million people succumb to obesity-related diseases every year [3-5]. Obesity has been linked to high morbidity and mortality rates, with consequences leading to many diseases and comorbidities, such as liver disease, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, stroke, osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnoea, and cancer [6-9]. Obesity is characterized by increased mass in the adipose tissue, which is linked to the persistent activation of inflammatory pathways in both adipocytes and macrophages living in or invading the adipose tissues [10-12]. A previous study has revealed that the adipocyte’s p62 is a critical regulator of energy balance and adiposity in vivo [13]. Moreover, Trayhurn P. demonstrated that adipose hypoxia might be a causative factor for adipose dysfunction in obesity [14]. Despite the new knowledge and theories regarding adipose and obesity, current research methods fall short in providing personalized therapies for obese patients. As this condition may lead to multiple diseases if left untreated, urgent interventions are therefore highly imperative. Thus, specific therapeutic targets for obesity are needed to alleviate the consequences and curb the growing population of obese patients worldwide. With the development of molecular technology and bioinformatics, more and more highly differentially expressed candidates’ genes are screened. Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), an online dataset comprised of gene profiles produced primarily utilizing DNA microarray technology [15,16]. In this research, we analysed the DEGs that participate in obesity through microarray and bioinformatic analysis to screen for disease-associated genes, gain a new understanding concerning the mechanisms that underlie obesity, and contribute to the development of a more strategized approach for controlling obesity.

Materials & methods

Data acquisition and processing

The microarray dataset GSE133099 was acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The dataset was based on the GPL16791 platform comprising six obese and six healthy (control) adipocyte samples excised from a slice of subcutaneous tissue, and the six obese patients were all female, and the mean age was 55 (range 41–79) years with BMI >27 kg/m2. The R (version 4.0.2) was utilized to process and analyse raw data. The raw GSE133099 dataset was preprocessed using the same programme. DEGs involved in obesity were validated utilizing the criteria: FDR <0.05 and |log2 Fold Change| >1 [17]. Genes were further processed and plotted into volcano plots using ggplot2.

Gene ontology and pathway of DEGs

Obesity-related GO terms and pathways were obtained through the web-based platform DAVID (ver. 6.8) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) [18]. Gene enrichment was analysed using GO [19] and KEGG [20] analysis to predict the potential biological value of DEGs. P value of <0.05 was defined as significant.

Tissue-specific gene expression analysis

The information about gene functions can be obtained from tissue-specific genes. The BioGPS database (http://biogps.org/#goto=welcome) was utilized to screen for tissue-specific DEGs [21]. Transcripts that were extremely tissue-specific and mapped to a single tissue were considered for inclusion if the median expression of the transcript is more than 10 times that of all other tissues.

PPI network construction and analysis

STRING (https://string-db.org/) database was utilized to create the PPI networks [22]. A confidence score of ≥ 0.4 was adjusted as the cut-off for this program. The Cytoscape software (version 3.7.2) and the CytoHubba plugin (version 0.1) were then utilized for visualizing and identifying the PPI network. Next, the 20 highest-ranking hub genes were determined by employing three calculation methods, Degree, Stress, and EcCentricity, based on a filtering algorithm. This is followed by the construction of a Venn diagram to validate the significance of principal genes in obesity and look for the intersecting genes between the tissue-specific genes and hub genes as key genes.

Screening of candidate drugs

The drug-gene interaction database (DGIdb, http://www.dgidb.org/) is an online resource that presents drug-gene interactions from different sources such as databases and web resources [23,24]. Drug candidates that were selected from the detected drug-gene interactions were all approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Lastly, drugs with more than two dataset sources and/or PubMed references supportive of the drug-gene interaction were considered as candidate drugs.

Results

Differential expression analysis

The microarray data from 6 obese patients and 6 normal subjects were gathered and analysed for this study. A total of 364 obesity-specific DEGs were recognized with criteria of FDR at <0.05 and |log2 Fold Change| >1 (Figure 1). The 11 considerably expressed genes between the 2 cohorts were retrieved utilizing thresholds at |log2 (FC)| >3 and FDR <0.001 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the obesity and control cohorts. Volcano plot of GSE133099 and 11 substantially expressed genes were detected. Black, green, and red dots represent unchanged, downregulated, and upregulated genes, in that order

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the obesity and control cohorts. Volcano plot of GSE133099 and 11 substantially expressed genes were detected. Black, green, and red dots represent unchanged, downregulated, and upregulated genes, in that order

Enrichment analysis of DEGs

GO functional analysis was separated into 3 cohorts, including Molecular function (MF), Cellular Component (CC), and Biological Process (BP). Based on the analysis, DEGs were primarily enriched in ‘Integrin binding’, ‘Proteinaceous extracellular matrix’, and ‘Extracellular matrix organization’ with Sanger Box (Table 1 and Figure 2). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis further revealed that the genes are primarily enriched in ‘ECM-receptor interaction’, ‘Protein digestion and absorption’, and ‘Focal adhesion’ (Table 2 and Figure 3).
Table 1.

Significantly enriched GO terms in obesity-related DEGs

CategoryTermGenesFDR
BPExtracellular matrix organizationITGB1, EGFL6, HPSE2, ELN, FN1, MFAP5, CCDC80, COL1A2, COL5A1, LOX, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, COL6A3, ITGA5, RECK0.003150327
Extracellular fibril organizationMFAP5, CST3, MFAP4, COL5A1, LTBP20.033994008
CCProteinaceous extracellular matrixWNT2B, HPSE2, ELN, LTBP2, PRELP, FBLN2, ADAMTS10, GLG1, WISP2, PTPRZ1, CHL1, TIMP2, ADAMTS9, WNT3, CRTAP, FN1, MMP13, COL1A2, COL5A1, LOX, CILP, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, MGP, COL6A3, CHI3L1, MMP19, CD248, GPLD12.65E-13
CCExtracellular exosomeSCARB2, CLIC6, ITGB1, HSP90AB1, GALNT16, GDA, PROS1, DNHD1, PTPRJ, SLC2A5, WISP2, SCPEP1, UCHL1, ISLR, LAMP1, CHL1, GLIPR2, NCS1, TIMP2, QSOX1, PTGDS, EDIL3, CACNA2D1, IL18, RENBP, PSMA6, ALDH1A3, COL6A2, CMPK1, COL6A3, CHI3L1, DNASE2, MFGE8, GPLD1, RHOQ, ANGPTL1, PLBD2, ASAH1, SLC22A5, C1S, NPR3, SEMA3G, PRELP, LTBP2, SLC1A4, LIN7A, PDHB, SDSL, NDRG2, FBLN2, GNS, THBS4, ACACA, GLG1, CST3, CLEC3B, SCIN, PDLIM2, PSAP, SH3BP4, ST3GAL6, IGFBP6, MAP4, APOE, SIAE, WNT3, GSTM3, FN1, DSTN, CDC42BPB, TUBB4B, ASS1, RAB11A, PTPRD, MFAP4, BST1, FMNL1, COL1A2, COL5A1, TCN2, MAN2B2, GLB1, CILP, FAM151A, XPNPEP2, MGP, APOC1, CD248, NUCB29.44E-08
Extracellular regionLY6K, ADAMDEC1, CSF2, WNT2B, ELN, PROS1, ANTXR2, CHRDL1, LFNG, ISLR, GLIPR2, TMSB4X, TIMP2, QSOX1, PTGDS, IGFBP5, IL18, MR1, MMP13, LOX, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, COL6A3, HHIPL1, MMP19, MFGE8, HBEGF, ITIH5, NOTCH3, COLEC10, C1S, NXPH4, PRELP, SEMA3E, FBLN2, THBS4, SCUBE2, CST3, CLEC3B, FRZB, PSAP, PENK, FAM180A, IGFBP6, APOE, C11ORF45, PLTP, WNT3, ANGPT4, NMB, FN1, PRSS35, BMP6, MFAP5, MFAP4, COL1A2, COL5A1, TCN2, LEP, APOC11.38E-07
Extracellular matrixFN1, PRELP, LTBP2, TUBB4B, FBLN2, ADAMTS10, THBS4, MFAP4, CLEC3B, MMP13, COL1A2, COL5A1, CILP, COL6A2, MGP, TIMP2, MMP19, COL6A3, APOE, MFGE8, EDIL3, ADAMTS91.60E-06
Extracellular vesicleLFNG, OLFML3, COL6A2, COL6A3, PRELP, APOE, MFGE8, TUBB4B, EDIL3, FBLN26.09E-06
Extracellular spaceCSF2, WNT2B, PROS1, WISP2, TIMP2, QSOX1, PTGDS, ADAMTS9, EGFL6, METRN, IL18, MMP13, LOX, COL6A2, COL6A3, CHI3L1, MFGE8, GPLD1, ANGPTL1, HBEGF, ASAH1, GCNT1, SEMA3G, PRELP, LTBP2, SEMA3E, THBS4, CST3, CLEC3B, FRZB, PSAP, IGFBP6, APOE, SIAE, PLTP, WNT3, ANGPT4, CRTAP, FN1, SULF1, BMP6, COL1A2, TCN2, GLB1, CILP, VNN3, LEP, NUCB2, CCL261.51E-05
Lysosomal lumenSCARB2, ASAH1, TCN2, GLB1, MAN2B2, PSAP, PRELP, GNS, PLBD20.003123445
Collagen trimerCOLEC10, MMP13, COL1A2, COL5A1, LOX, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, COL6A30.00478510818157352
Endoplasmic reticulum lumenCRTAP, STS, COL1A2, ERAP2, COL5A1, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, CERCAM, P3H2, COL6A3, WNT30.010883682
MFIntegrin bindingADAMDEC1, ADAM32, MMP8, MMP9, ADAM18, ADAMTS3, KEL, MMP16, FAP, MMP26, CLCA1, TLL1, CLCA44.65E-04
 Extracellular matrix structural constituentOAS1, OAS2, OAS3, OASL4.65E-04
Figure 2.

Biological functions based on Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of obesity-related DEGs

Table 2.

Significantly enriched pathways in obesity-related DEGs

Pathway IDNameGenesP-Value
hsa04512ECM-receptor interactionITGB1, COL1A2, COL5A1, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, FN1, COL6A3, ITGA5, THBS42.86E-05
hsa04510Focal adhesionITGB1, FN1, THBS4, COL1A2, CCND2, COL5A1, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, ERBB2, COL6A3, FYN, ITGA53.94E-04
hsa04974Protein digestion and absorptionCOL1A2, COL5A1, XPNPEP2, COL4A4, ELN, COL6A2, COL4A3, COL6A30.001138329
hsa04151PI3K-Akt signalling pathwayITGB1, ANGPT4, CSF1R, HSP90AB1, FN1, THBS4, COL1A2, CCND2, COL5A1, PPP2R2C, COL4A4, COL6A2, COL4A3, COL6A3, ITGA50.004374222
hsa04142LysosomeSCARB2, ASAH1, LAMP1, GLB1, PSAP, DNASE2, ABCB9, GNS0.00686595
hsa05205Proteoglycans in cancerITGB1, WNT2B, HPSE2, ERBB2, FN1, TWIST1, ITPR3, ITGA5, WNT3, HBEGF0.011432848
hsa05204Chemical carcinogenesisSULT1A1, GSTM3, ALDH1A3, ADH4, GSTM5, SULT1A20.015821
hsa04924Renin secretionEDNRA, PDE3A, ITPR3, CACNA1C, KCNJ20.030065163
hsa05146AmoebiasisCSF2, COL1A2, COL5A1, COL4A4, COL4A3, FN10.045859559
hsa00531Glycosaminoglycan degradationHPSE2, GLB1, GNS0.047121568
Figure 3.

KEGG pathway analysis of obesity-related DEGs

Significantly enriched GO terms in obesity-related DEGs Significantly enriched pathways in obesity-related DEGs Biological functions based on Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of obesity-related DEGs KEGG pathway analysis of obesity-related DEGs

DEGs specificity in tissue expression

Utilizing BioGPS, we identified an aggregate of 150 DEGs that were expressed preferentially in specific tissues. The expression of tissue-specific markers of the neurologic system varied significantly (34.7%, 52/150), followed by the immune system (34%, 51/150), genital system (25.3%, 38/150), respiratory system (18.7%, 28/150), digestive system (18%, 27/150), circulatory system (17.3%, 26/150), skeletal muscle system (17.3%, 25/150), endocrine system (16%, 24/150), urinary system (9.3%, 14/150), and the haematological system (8%, 12/150) (Table 3).
Table 3.

Tissue-specific genes identified using BioGPS

SystemGenes
NeurologicEGFL6, ALDH1A3, MFAP4, IGFBP6, TSPAN13, GALNT17, PTGDS, CERCAM, MEF2C, SLC4A3, NDRG4, LTBP2, LTBP3, LMOD1, PENK, CHRDL1, UCHL1, PEG10, PPP2R2C, OLFML3, ITPR3, SGCE, CLIC6, PLTP, PURA, NPTX1, CHI3L1, CLIP2, TAGLN, CDR2L, SCRN1, CDC42BPB, THBS4, FBLN2, METRN, NDRG2, SCARB2, PEA15, SASH1, RBP1, FEZ1, C1S, PTPRD, PSD3, FN1, DYNC1LI2, UBE2QL1, PROS1, CD99L2, PTPRZ1, CHL1, PDE4D
ImmuneTSPAN13, MEF2C, OSTM1, LTBP3, P3H2, ADCY7, ERAP2, CHRDL1, UCHL1, GYPC, ITPR3, SAMHD1, CLIC6, MCUB, GLB1, PDLIM1, CSF1R, APOC1, ELOVL6, CLIP2, RASSF5, SH3TC1, COL6A3, RAB6B, UNC13C, BST1, NUCB2, MZF1, NPR3, SFT2D1, SCRN1, GNS, NLRP1, NDRG2, SCARB2, SULT1A1, BCL7A, MAFB, CCND2, PBXIP1, CCNL1, MCM2, NKTR, SCPEP1, PDLIM2, MYL4, FYN, RGS2, REXO2, DDX39B, SMURF2
GenitalEGFL6, MFAP5, MFAP4, PALLD, CD248, LMOD1, PENK, CHRDL1, PEG10, CALD1, TEX26, OLFML3, ITPR3, PLTP, CSF1R, SLC2A5, CHI3L1, FRZB, TAGLN, CLEC3B, EMX2, COL6A3, LEP, PAEP, COL5A1, FBLN2, NOTCH3, TIMP2, RBP1, CCIN, C15orf48, C1S, PDLIM2, GSTM3, EDNRA, RGS2, GPNMB, TWIST1
RespiratoryEGFL6, ALDH1A3, MFAP4, TSPAN13, COL6A2, CCN5, ELN, SFTPA2, SFTPA1, LTBP3, ITPR3, PDLIM1, APOC1, ELOVL6, FRZB, BNC1, CLEC3B, NPR3, TCEAL9, COL5A1, TIMP2, FEZ1, C1, PDLIM2, PRELP, EDNRA, GPNMB, SMURF2
DigestiveALDH1A3, IGFBP6, TSPAN13, PALLD, LTBP3, LMOD1, CILP, PEG10, SLC2A5, APOC1, SH3BP4, PNKD, COL6A3, APOE, ADAMDEC1, SULT1A1, RBP1, C15orf48, CASQ2, C1S, MYL4, RAB11A, FN1, PROS1, XPNPEP2, ADH7, ASS1
CirculatoryCCDC80, MFAP5, MFAP4, IGFBP6, PTGDS, LOX, SLC4A3, NDRG4, LTBP2, UCHL1, APOC1, TAGLN, SH3TC1, CLEC3B, MGP, ID3, COL1A2, SULF1, NEK7, COL5A1, FBLN2, MAFB, CASQ2, MYL4, FN1, GPNMB
Skeletal muscleMFGE8, ALDH1A3, CCDC80, MFAP5, IGFBP6, FKBP9, CCN5, ITGB1, CD248, LOX, ELN, LTBP2, CILP, CHRDL1, OLFML3, SGCE, ELOVL6, SH3BP4, TAGLN, RECK, NPR3, COL1A2, SULF1, PTGFRN, MEDAG
EndocrineTSPAN13, LTBP3, CA3, CHRDL1, UCHL1, ITPR3, CLIC6, PDLIM1, ASAH1, CLEC3B, COL6A3, MGP, NUCB2, ID3, CDC42BPB, TCEAL9, COL1A2, COL5A1, METRN, RBP1, MAFB, MCM2, SCPEP1, ISLR
UrinaryPALLD, ALDH1A3, PTGDS, NDRG4, LTBP3, LMOD1, P3H2, NOX4, TAGLN, PGAP1, GNS, SYT17, XPNPEP2, ASS1
HaematologicalMFAP4, OSTM1, UCHL1, ITPR3, MCUB, SLC2A5, CHI3L1, CLIP2, PNKD, SFT2D1, MCM2, KCNJ2
Tissue-specific genes identified using BioGPS

Key gene identification and analysis

Using the Cytohubba plugin, the top 20 connected proteins from the PPI network were gathered together with the rank of each hub gene. From this list, common hub genes were identified (Figure 4). Then, the Venn diagram shows the intersecting genes between common hub genes and tissue-specific genes, referred to as the key genes (Figure 5).
Figure 4.

Common hub genes based on Degree, Stress, and EcCentricity algorithm

Figure 5.

Venn diagram showing the key genes involved in obese adipocyte samples

Common hub genes based on Degree, Stress, and EcCentricity algorithm Venn diagram showing the key genes involved in obese adipocyte samples

Candidate drugs screening

In the present study, nine FDA-approved medications that possibly target the protein products of the four key genes were identified using DGIdb. Results show that the promising targets for potential anti-obesity drugs include the APOE (55.6%, 5/9), LEP (22.2%, 2/9), FYN, and FN1 (11.1%, 1/9) genes (Table 4).
Table 4.

Nine FDA-approved drugs potentially targeting the four key genes

Target GeneDrugInteraction Types*Score
FYNdasatinibinhibitor|multitarget8
FN1ocriplasmincleavage3
LEPrisperidoneNA7
LEPgemfibrozilNA3
APOEritonavirNA3
APOEfluvastatinNA3
APOEpravastatinNA3
APOEwarfarinNA3
APOEatorvastatinNA5

*Score: The number of database sources and/or PubMed references supporting the drug-gene interaction.

Nine FDA-approved drugs potentially targeting the four key genes *Score: The number of database sources and/or PubMed references supporting the drug-gene interaction.

Discussion

Obesity is a growing health problem worldwide, with cases tripling in developing countries [25]. Epidemiological data from the Framingham Heart Study has demonstrated that obesity is contagious, with the probability of obesity increases with a family history of the disease [26]. Moreover, obesity is also considered a significant risk factor for a variety of chronic diseases. Previous studies have indicated that brown adipocytes have a responsibility of balancing heat production and energy metabolism and are crucial for suppressing metabolic diseases and weight gain, both in mice and in humans [27,28]. To present, weight reduction research has mostly concentrated on diets, exercise, food supplementation, medications, and even surgical weight loss, which has the propensity to have negative health consequences [29,30]. Since obesity is a risk variable for numerous diseases, this calls for the urgency of developing a personalized approach to clinical management to avoid or hinder the development of obesity complications. As a prediction tool, the bioinformatics tool (BioGPS, David and PPI network) and the drug-gene interaction database (DGIdb) database was utilized to confirm the potential genes and therapeutic drugs. However, the bioinformatics tool and the DGIdb itself also has several limitations (Predicting the potential core genes and drugs only). In the present study, 6 obese adipocytes samples and 6 normal adipocytes samples were included. The results indicated that 150 obesity-specific DEGs are involved in the body’s multiple organ systems. DEGs enrichment analysis illustrated that they were predominantly implicated in the extracellular matrix organization, proteinaceous extracellular matrix, and integrin binding. Four key genes (Lep, ApoE, Fyn, and FN1) were screened and analysed to identify potential therapeutic agents for obesity. Fyn is an SRC family kinase (SFK) that comprises 11 members. It has been previously reported that Fyn performs a function in different biological functions including cell growth, metabolism, and adipogenesis [31,32]. Several studies showed that Fyn is correlated with the regulation of insulin signalling and metabolic diseases [33,34]. In this study, we also identified Fyn as one of the key genes with a potential role in the immune system. Yamada et al. found that mice lacking Fyn kinase had an increased metabolism of fatty acids, consumed more energy, and were thinner than mice with functional Fyn kinases [35]. Alternatively, the selective lack or suppression of Fyn might eradicate inflammation during pro-inflammatory processes and autoimmune [36]. Fibronectin 1 (FN1), on the other hand, is presented in the extracellular matrix and performs a key function in maintaining cell morphology, differentiation, migration, and growth [37]. Berger et al. demonstrated that FN1 is one of the adipocyte-specific dysregulated genes in obese adipose tissues [38]. Similar findings were implied by Yang et al. when they found that FN1 is strongly associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance (IR) [39]. Leptin (LEP) is another key gene that codes for a hormone that is predominantly produced and secreted by adipose tissues and functions mainly by regulating food intake, energy expenditure, and lipid metabolism by binding with the LEP receptor (LEPR) [40,41]. LEP is associated with insulin signalling, as well as with inflammatory and immune response [42]. The DNA location of Lnc-Leptin interfaces directly with LEP in mature adipocytes to sustain protein expression in vitro and in vivo, hence supporting adipogenesis [43]. In addition, previous studies have indicated that the concentration of LEP in the blood increases with improved adipose tissue mass [44,45]. Our study also showed that LEP is tightly linked with the genital system, consistent with research conducted by Sun et al. [46]. APOE is a gene situated in chromosome 19q13.2. This gene has three isoforms namely APOE epsilon2 (APOE2), APOE epsilon3 (APOE3) and APOE epsilon4 (APOE4) [47]. The APOE gene product, APOE, is an apolipoprotein that is known to bind lipids and participates in cholesterol metabolism [48]. Previous studies show that the ApoE e2 allele is associated with insulin resistance and increases the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [49-51]. With the use of the DGIdb database, nine candidate drugs targeting obese-related complications were identified. Among them, lipid-modifying drugs (Gemfibrozil, fluvastatin, pravastatin, and atorvastatin) have functionally significant values in improving insulin function in the body and in ameliorating insulin resistance [52]. Although previous studies have demonstrated that the treatment of insulin resistance benefits the bodyweight, relevant clinical studies about bodyweight with nine of the candidate drugs are rare. Prospective clinical trials and the specific molecular mechanisms are warranted to prove its efficacy in obese is required.

Limitation

First, the study employed a relatively small sample size; hence, future research will be warranted to validate these findings using larger sample sizes and other databases. Second, to better understand the functions of these key genes, more large-scale validation studies and elucidation of the molecular processes of obesity ought to be conducted. Third, obese-related comorbidities should be considered well. Fourth, future studies are warranted to validate these potential candidate drugs for obese therapy and explore the underlying mechanisms.

Conclusion

In summary, this research demonstrates that FYN, FN1, LEP, and APOE are closely related to the occurrence and progression of obesity. These four genes and their associated signalling pathways and candidate drugs are excellent potential candidates for targeted anti-obesity therapy. Additional investigations involving multi-centre and large populations sizes are warranted to verify these findings.
  52 in total

1.  Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China.

Authors:  Wenying Yang; Juming Lu; Jianping Weng; Weiping Jia; Linong Ji; Jianzhong Xiao; Zhongyan Shan; Jie Liu; Haoming Tian; Qiuhe Ji; Dalong Zhu; Jiapu Ge; Lixiang Lin; Li Chen; Xiaohui Guo; Zhigang Zhao; Qiang Li; Zhiguang Zhou; Guangliang Shan; Jiang He
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Fyn-dependent regulation of energy expenditure and body weight is mediated by tyrosine phosphorylation of LKB1.

Authors:  Eijiro Yamada; Jeffrey E Pessin; Irwin J Kurland; Gary J Schwartz; Claire C Bastie
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Human E apoprotein heterogeneity. Cysteine-arginine interchanges in the amino acid sequence of the apo-E isoforms.

Authors:  K H Weisgraber; S C Rall; R W Mahley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1981-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Pathways commonly dysregulated in mouse and human obese adipose tissue: FAT/CD36 modulates differentiation and lipogenesis.

Authors:  E Berger; S Héraud; A Mojallal; C Lequeux; M Weiss-Gayet; O Damour; A Géloën
Journal:  Adipocyte       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 5.  Fyn, a Src family tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  M D Resh
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.085

6.  NBR1 is a critical step in the repression of thermogenesis of p62-deficient adipocytes through PPARγ.

Authors:  Jianfeng Huang; Juan F Linares; Angeles Duran; Wenmin Xia; Alan R Saltiel; Timo D Müller; Maria T Diaz-Meco; Jorge Moscat
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--10 years on.

Authors:  Tanya Barrett; Dennis B Troup; Stephen E Wilhite; Pierre Ledoux; Carlos Evangelista; Irene F Kim; Maxim Tomashevsky; Kimberly A Marshall; Katherine H Phillippy; Patti M Sherman; Rolf N Muertter; Michelle Holko; Oluwabukunmi Ayanbule; Andrey Yefanov; Alexandra Soboleva
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Silencing of LINC01116 suppresses the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma by up-regulating microRNA-136 to inhibit FN1.

Authors:  Zhifeng Chen; Qian Tao; Bin Qiao; Leitao Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Analysis of Transcriptome, Selected Intracellular Signaling Pathways, Proliferation and Apoptosis of LNCaP Cells Exposed to High Leptin Concentrations.

Authors:  Marta Szyszka; Lukasz Paschke; Marianna Tyczewska; Karol Jopek; Piotr Celichowski; Paulina Milecka; Gulnara Sultanova; Ewelina Stelcer; Agnieszka Malinska; Ludwik K Malendowicz; Marcin Rucinski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Identification and validation of potential mRNA- microRNA- long-noncoding RNA (mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA) prognostic signature for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Chen Zhang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.