Qiting Huang1,2, Zelin Liang1,2, Junda Li1,2, Ying Bai3, Jingwei He4, Zhengmei Lin1,2. 1. Hospital of Stomatology, Guanghua School of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510055, China. 2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou 510055, China. 3. Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre for Functional Biomaterials, PCFM Lab, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China. 4. College of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.
Abstract
Resin composites that consist of polymeric resins and functional fillers are commonly used as restorative materials for dental caries. Various types of calcium phosphates (CaPs) are studied as remineralizing fillers in the formulation of dental resin composites, which are generally inhibitory to demineralization of teeth, but the performance of resin composites has not yet been investigated comprehensively with respect to the size of CaP particles. In this study, the same tricalcium phosphate (TCP) particles within two different size ranges, the as-received TCP particles (TCP) and those resulted from grinding (TCP-G), were tested to determine the size dependence of CaP fillers in dental resin composites. The buffering capability, mechanical properties, ion release, antibacterial performance, and remineralization effect of TCP/TCP-G-containing composites were experimentally characterized and compared against two other commercial dental materials. The integration of micrometer-sized TCP particles resulted in a similar buffering effect and Ca2+/PO4 3- release behaviors compared to the resin composite containing much smaller TCP-G particles. The flexural strength of the TCP-G resin composite was lower than that of the TCP composite after immersion in water for 30 days. However, the TCP-G composite facilitated crystal deposition toward better gap-closing performance at the dentin-composite interface. This study explored detailed insights about the size effect of CaP fillers, which is useful for the development of functional dental resin composites and their clinical translation.
Resin composites that consist of polymeric resins and functional fillers are commonly used as restorative materials for dental caries. Various types of calcium phosphates (CaPs) are studied as remineralizing fillers in the formulation of dental resin composites, which are generally inhibitory to demineralization of teeth, but the performance of resin composites has not yet been investigated comprehensively with respect to the size of CaP particles. In this study, the same tricalcium phosphate (TCP) particles within two different size ranges, the as-received TCP particles (TCP) and those resulted from grinding (TCP-G), were tested to determine the size dependence of CaP fillers in dental resin composites. The buffering capability, mechanical properties, ion release, antibacterial performance, and remineralization effect of TCP/TCP-G-containing composites were experimentally characterized and compared against two other commercial dental materials. The integration of micrometer-sized TCP particles resulted in a similar buffering effect and Ca2+/PO4 3- release behaviors compared to the resin composite containing much smaller TCP-G particles. The flexural strength of the TCP-G resin composite was lower than that of the TCP composite after immersion in water for 30 days. However, the TCP-G composite facilitated crystal deposition toward better gap-closing performance at the dentin-composite interface. This study explored detailed insights about the size effect of CaP fillers, which is useful for the development of functional dental resin composites and their clinical translation.
Dental caries is one
of the most common oral diseases. The cavity
restoration treatment costs ∼46 billion dollars per year in
the US.[1] Resin composites are the main
materials used in direct restorations at present, due to their adequate
esthetics and mechanical performance.[2,3] However, most
of the resin composites have limited service lives.[4] Two challenges remained critical to the development of
dental resin composites, secondary caries and bulk fracture. Secondary
caries is caused by cariogenic bacteria, such as Streptococcus
mutans (S. mutans),
which ferment carbohydrates and produce organic acids into the microgaps
at the composite–tooth interface,[3,5,6] dissolve the hard tissue, and shift the calcium phosphate
balance.[7] Therefore, a mechanically robust
composite with caries-inhibition capability is highly desirable for
dental restorations.Dental caries occurs when the extent of
bacterial acid demineralization
is greater than natural salivary remineralization in the mouth.[8] It has been acknowledged that the buffering capacity
of resin composites might contribute to compositional shift in the
overlying plaque toward lower cariogenicity and less susceptibility
to secondary caries.[9] Special requirement
for composite restoration is to quickly neutralize the local acids
and increase the cariogenic pH from 4 to 5.5 or above. Previous reports
showed that resin composites containing various types of calcium phosphates
(CaPs) are promising for combating caries, due to their capability
of neutralizing acid.[10,11] Furthermore, the compositional
Ca2+ and PO43– can be released
from the composites to remineralize the remnant of tooth lesions.[10,11] However, the CaP fillers are usually incompatible with the polymeric
resins, which leads to severe phase separation and mechanical instability.[12,13] For example, the biaxial flexural strength (FS) of a reported CaP
composite only exhibited half of that of its corresponding unfilled
resin.[13] Therefore, how to improve the
mechanical performance of the Ca2+/PO43–-releasing restoratives became a major challenge in CaP filler selection,
in addition to the anti-demineralizing/remineralizing capabilities.CaP-containing dental composites have been actively developed and
investigated regarding their mechanical properties,[14,15] Ca2+/PO43–-release capability,[14,16] buffering ability,[17] enamel remineralization
effect,[16,18] antibacterial activity, and so forth.[16−18] Among all the reported CaP fillers, nano-CaP particulates have drawn
much attention, due to their significant specific surface area (ratio
of surface area/volume). For instance, dicalcium phosphate anhydrous
(DCPA) and tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) nanoparticles were synthesized
and incorporated into dental resins, respectively.[15,19,20] Although these dental composites exhibited
both stress-bearing and Ca2+/PO43–-releasing capabilities, mechanical reinforcement was only attributed
to the additional nano-silica-fused whiskers in the composites, which
was prohibitory to photopolymerization of the resins. However, amorphous
calcium phosphate (NACP)-containing composites can be photopolymerized
and Ca2+/PO43– release was
also evident, but silanized glass particles were also required for
higher mechanical properties.[14] Meanwhile,
it is worth noting that the incorporated nanoparticles tend to reduce
their surface energy via agglomeration, resulting in variation of
mechanical properties and buffering capability.[21] Domingo et al. demonstrated that micrometer-sized hydroxyapatite
(HA) fillers provided higher FS than nanoparticulate HAs.[22] In another study, the FS of DCPA-containing
composites reduced with decreasing filler size.[15] Overall, how does the size of particulate fillers influence
the comprehensive characteristics of dental materials, including mechanical
properties, buffering effect, and remineralization of the CaP-containing
resin composites? The conclusions from the current publications remain
controversial. Therefore, more detailed and systematic assessments
are highly desirable for future restorative applications of CaP composites.Herein, commercialized CaP particles (tricalcium phosphate, TCP)
were ground into smaller particles (TCP-G). The TCP and TCP-G powders
were mixed with a commonly used resin formulation to achieve CaP dental
composites with different sized fillers but without the addition of
any other reinforcement materials (whiskers or glass particles). The
buffering capability, mechanical properties, ion-release ability,
antibacterial activity, and remineralization effect of these resin
composites were extensively characterized, compared to a commercial
resin composite (SonicFill 2) and glass ionomer cement (GIC). Overall,
the size dependence of the CaP fillers was comprehensively evaluated
in this study, which might provide an adequate experimental basis
for future application of such remineralizing dental composites.
Materials
and Methods
Alkalinity of Different Fillers
TCP (Kermel, Tianjin,
China), β-TCP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), TTCP (Macklin,
Shanghai, China), and bioactive glass SM520 (BAG, Schott AG, Standort
Landshut, Germany) were weighed 0.05 g each and placed in a 15 mL
centrifuge tube, respectively. A total of 13 mL of deionized water
or HCl (pH = 4) was added into each tube. The tubes were agitated
for 1 h and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The pH of the
supernatant was measured using a pH meter (S400-K, Mettler Toledo,
USA).
Grinding and Size Measurement of TCP Particles
The
as-received TCP powder was ground using a freezing ball mill (JXFSTPRP-CL,
Jingxin, Shanghai, China; frequency = 60 Hz) for 30 min at −10
°C; the ground TCP particles were denoted as TCP-G. Both TCP
and TCP-G particles were observed using a laser confocal microscope
(LSM700, Carl Zeiss, Germany). The size and distribution of both TCP
and TCP-G particles were determined using dynamic light scattering
(DLS). The TCP and TCP-G particles were dispersed in anhydrous ethanol
at 0.1 mg/mL. Then, the particle size was measured using a Brookhaven
Zeta BI-PALS zeta-sizer at 25 °C. Alkalinity of the TCP/TCP-G
powder was measured as described above. The Ca2+/PO43– concentrations of the supernatant were
examined using a microplate reader (SynergyH1, BioTek, USA) using
a calcium colorimetric assay kit (MAK022, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and
a phosphate colorimetric assay kit (MAK030, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), respectively.
Preparation of Resin Composites
Bisphenylglycidyl dimethacrylate
(Bis-GMA) and N,N′-dimethyl
aminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) were purchased from Aladdin (Aladdin
Biochemical Technology, Shanghai, China). Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate
(TEGDMA) and camphoroquinone (CQ) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(St Louis, MO, USA). Bis-GMA and TEGDMA were mixed at mass ratio =
1:1; then, 0.7% DMAEMA and 0.7% CQ were added as photoinitiators (the
resulting resin composite is denoted as the BT resin). The TCP and
TCP-G particles were mixed with BT resin to form TCP- and TCP-G-containing
resin composite, respectively, at a weight fraction of 15%. Both composites
were carefully blended until the particles were homogeneously distributed
in the BT resins. GIC (Fuji IX, GC, Japan) and a commercial resin
composite (SonicFill 2, Kerr, USA; denoted as SF) were used as the
control groups.
Mechanical Characterization
Five
groups of dental composites,
including the 15% TCP- and 15% TCP-G-containing BT resins, BT resin
alone, GIC, and SF, were subjected to a three-point bending mechanical
test (span = 20 mm) using a universal testing machine (AG-I 10KN,
Shimadzu, Japan) at crosshead speed = 1.00 mm/min, and the load cell
capacity was 250 N. The FS and flexural modulus (FM) were obtained
according to the ISO 4049: 2009 standard. Prior to the mechanical
tests, 16 specimens per group were prepared using a customized 2 mm ×
2 mm × 25 mm split mold. Each photocurable sample was irradiated
under a visible light-curing unit (Elipar S10, 3M ESPE, Germany) at
an averaged irradiance of 1800 mW/cm2 for 2 min (1 min
each side). While the GIC samples were fabricated by following the
manufacturer’s introduction in the same mold. The setting time
of the GIC specimen was over 48 h so that the sample was completely
cured before the mechanical tests. Eight specimens in each group were
subjected to mechanical tests under dry conditions. The other eight
specimens in each group were first immersed in 30 mL of deionized
water at 37 °C for 30 days; deionized water was replaced every
week.
Long-Term Buffering Effect and Ion Release
The 15%
TCP, 15% TCP-G, and GIC composites were fabricated into disc-shaped
samples (thickness = 2 mm, diameter = 9 mm, n = 3)
and then polished with dry 600-, 2000-, and 5000-grit SiC papers to
remove edge defects, respectively. Each sample was first exposed to
1700 μL of HCl or lactic acid solution (pH = 4) in 24-well plates
at 37 °C. The pH values of the solutions were measured at 1,
2, 3, 24, 48, and 72 h. Then, solutions were replaced after pH measurement
every day until either 30 days or when the obtained pH value reached
a steady state. For the ion-release assessment, each specimen was
stored in an individual plastic container with 1700 μL of deionized
water or HCl solution (pH = 4) at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, the soaking
solution was collected and replaced with the same volume of fresh
deionized water or HCl solution (pH = 4). The Ca2+ and
PO43– concentrations of the soaking solutions
were measured using a microplate reader (SynergyH1, BioTek, USA) using
a calcium colorimetric assay kit (MAK022, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and
a phosphate colorimetric assay kit (MAK030, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), respectively.
The 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G groups were tested for 12 days, and the
GIC group was examined for 30 days. The experiments were implemented
in triplicate.
Antibacterial Test
The prepared
disc-shaped samples
(thickness = 2 mm, diameter = 7 mm, n = 4), including
15% TCP- and 15% TCP-G-containing resin composites, pristine BT resin,
GIC, and SF, were sterilized by ultraviolet light before bacteria
incubation. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans, UA159) were cultured in brain heart infusion
medium overnight. The inoculum was adjusted to 1 × 107 colony-forming unit counts (cfu/mL). Each sterilized specimen was
placed in a 48-well plate, and 400 μL of bacterial suspension
was added. After 24 h of anaerobic incubation at 37 °C, bacterial
suspension from all wells was mixed with a pipette, and 200 μL
of the blended bacteria suspension was then transferred to a 96-well
plate; the absorbance was measured at wavelength = 630 nm using a
microplate reader.
Remineralization Effect
To investigate
the remineralization
capability of the dental composites, artificial saliva (pH = 6.8,
Solarbio Life Science, Beijing, China) was used, which was a multi-ionic
solution consisting of deionized water, sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium
chloride (KCl), ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), and so forth.
The acidic artificial saliva was prepared by buffering artificial
saliva with lactic acid (Macklin, Shanghai, China) to pH = 4. Wisdom
teeth, devoid of any lesions and/or restorations, were obtained from
18- to 28-year-old healthy patients who underwent routine extractions
at the Hospital of Stomatology. All experiments followed the protocol
guidelines by the Hospital of Stomatology Ethics Committee. Written
consent was obtained from all patients. The teeth were disinfected
in 0.5% chloramine and used within 6 months post-extraction. Teeth
were vertically sectioned in both “x”
and “y” directions, parallel to the
long axis of the tooth, in a cutting machine (WYQ-50S, Weiyee, Guangzhou,
China) yielding rectangular sticks with a cross-sectional area ∼4
mm2. The sticks were obtained by sectioned perpendicularly
to the long axis of each tooth and then trimmed by a fine diamond
bur to 5 mm length. Four groups, including 15% TCP, 15% TCP-G, GIC,
and SF, were tested.Two different treatments were employed
to investigate the remineralization effect. In one approach, dentin
sticks were used directly without any surface treatments. Each testing
composite specimen was placed as close as possible to the undemineralized
dentin stick and fixed with an adhesive (Single Bond Universal, 3M
ESPE, USA) and a flow resin (Beautifil Flow Plus F00, Shofu Inc.,
Japan). The tooth–composite specimens were immersed in 400
μL of acidic artificial saliva at 37 °C for 3 days; the
artificial saliva was changed every day. In the other approach, the
surface of each dentin stick was pre-demineralized with 37% phosphoric
acid gel for 15 s and then rinsed with distilled water. The composite
specimen was placed and fixed next to the demineralized dentin stick
as close as possible. The tooth–composite specimens were immersed
in 400 μL of artificial saliva at 37 °C for 10 days.After immersion, specimens were dehydrated with gradient ethanol;
then, the surface without an adhesive and flow resin was sputter-coated
with gold prior to scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi,
Japan).
Statistical Analysis
The experimental results were
analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance
level of 0.05 with SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,
Version 20.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Subsequent multiple comparisons
were made with the use of Turkey’s post hoc analysis.
Results
Physical
Properties of the Fillers
All the TCP, β-TCP,
TTCP, and BAG fillers/particles exhibited a significant buffering
capability after soaking in either deionized water or HCl solution
(pH = 4) for 1 h (Figure A). The buffering capacity of TCP particles was the most significant,
while the pH only resulted in 7–9 after immersing β-TCP
for 1 h. Therefore, the TCP particles were chosen and used in the
following experiments.
Figure 1
(A) Alkalinity (pH values) of different particulate fillers
when
immersed in deionized water and HCl (pH = 4), respectively. Different
upper or lower case letters indicate statistical differences between
groups immersed in deionized water or HCl (p <
0.05). Representative micrographs of TCP particles (B) before and
(C) after grinding using laser confocal microscopy. (D) Size distribution
of TCP and TCP-G particles, characterized by DLS analysis. Concentrations
of (E) Ca2+ and (F) PO43– in
the solutions after immersing TCP and TCP-G in deionized water and
HCl (pH = 4) for 1 h, respectively.
(A) Alkalinity (pH values) of different particulate fillers
when
immersed in deionized water and HCl (pH = 4), respectively. Different
upper or lower case letters indicate statistical differences between
groups immersed in deionized water or HCl (p <
0.05). Representative micrographs of TCP particles (B) before and
(C) after grinding using laser confocal microscopy. (D) Size distribution
of TCP and TCP-G particles, characterized by DLS analysis. Concentrations
of (E) Ca2+ and (F) PO43– in
the solutions after immersing TCP and TCP-G in deionized water and
HCl (pH = 4) for 1 h, respectively.To prepare CaP fillers with different sizes, the commercially available
TCP particles were ground using a freezing ball mill. It was noted
that the size of the particles was significantly reduced after grinding
(Figure B,C). DLS
analysis (Figure D)
showed that the size of TCP particles before grinding distributed
mainly in the micrometer range (median diameter = 2107.2 nm, ranging
from 1032 to 4303 nm), while the TCP-G particles were much smaller
than the TCP particles and with much narrower size distribution (median
diameter = 570.9 nm, ranging from 270 to 1208 nm).The pH values
of both TCP- and TCP-G-soaked solutions reached above
11 in both water and HCl (Figure A). Interestingly, the TCP/TCP-G particles showed different
Ca2+/PO43– ion-releasing profiles
when immersed in water or HCl (Figure E,F). When exposed to deionized water (pH ∼
7), the TCP particles released more Ca2+ than that released
from TCP-G. Conversely, the PO43– concentration
in TCP-soaked water was much less than that in TCP-G/water. However,
the releasing profile followed the same trend when immersed in the
acidic solution, the Ca2+/PO43– concentrations were higher in TCP/HCl solution rather than the TCP-G/HCl
solution after 1 h immersion.
Mechanical Properties
Considering the results of short-term
buffering effect and flexural properties using different dosages of
TCP particles in BT resin composites (weight fraction = 5, 10, and
15%, Figure S1), the most significant increase
in the pH value was evident using the 15% TCP composite after immersion
within 3 days, while the FSs of the 15% TCP composite were significantly
lower than that of the BT resin; a weight fraction of 15% was selected
as the concentration of TCP and TCP-G in the resin composites for
the following experiments.The FSs and FMs were characterized
using three-point bending mechanical assessments. Regardless of the
dry state or after 30 days of immersion in deionized water, the incorporation
of TCP particles into the BT resin significantly decreased the FSs
of the resin composites but exhibited little impact on the change
in the FMs (p > 0.05) (Figure ). Interestingly, the FS of the 15% TCP-G
resin composite was greater than that of the 15% TCP composite under
dry conditions. However, the bending strength of the 15% TCP-G resin
composite decreased dramatically after immersion in water for 30 days,
which was lower than those of the BT resin and 15% TCP resin composite
(p < 0.05). The GIC composite exhibited the smallest
FS but the greatest FM among all dental composites. Relatively better
mechanical performance was reached using the commercialized SF resin
composite, which showed the greatest FS and the second-highest FM
under both dry and wet conditions.
Figure 2
Flexural mechanical properties of the
dental composites. (A) FSs
and (B) FMs of BT resin alone, 15% TCP, and 15% TCP-G resin composites,
the commercial GIC, and SF composites, at the dry state (black bars)
and after 30 days of immersion in deionized water (red bars), respectively.
Different lowercase letters indicate statistically differences between
groups without immersion (p < 0.05). Different
uppercase letters indicate statistical differences between groups
after immersion (p < 0.05). * indicates no significant
statistical differences between values before and after immersion
(p > 0.05).
Flexural mechanical properties of the
dental composites. (A) FSs
and (B) FMs of BT resin alone, 15% TCP, and 15% TCP-G resin composites,
the commercial GIC, and SF composites, at the dry state (black bars)
and after 30 days of immersion in deionized water (red bars), respectively.
Different lowercase letters indicate statistically differences between
groups without immersion (p < 0.05). Different
uppercase letters indicate statistical differences between groups
after immersion (p < 0.05). * indicates no significant
statistical differences between values before and after immersion
(p > 0.05).
Long-Term Buffering Capability and Ion Release
The
buffering capabilities of both 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G resin composites
were stronger than that of GIC within 3 days, when immersed in HCl
and lactic acid (both pH = 4), respectively (Figure ). After the first 3 days, the immersion
solution was replaced every day, it was noticed that the buffering
capability of both TCP- and TCP-G-containing composites decreased
rapidly. Meanwhile, the GIC continuously elevated the pH in both acidic
solutions at pH > 5.5 and lasted for at least 30 days.
Figure 3
Buffering capacity
of 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G resin composites and
GIC specimens. (A) Specimens were immersed in HCl solution (pH = 4)
for 72 h and then (B) immersed for a much longer term with HCl solution
being changed every day. (C) Specimens were immersed in lactic acid
solution (pH = 4) for 72 h and then (D) immersed for a much longer
term with lactic acid solution being changed every day. “Blank”
denotes the acidic solutions alone without specimen immersion.
Buffering capacity
of 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G resin composites and
GIC specimens. (A) Specimens were immersed in HCl solution (pH = 4)
for 72 h and then (B) immersed for a much longer term with HCl solution
being changed every day. (C) Specimens were immersed in lactic acid
solution (pH = 4) for 72 h and then (D) immersed for a much longer
term with lactic acid solution being changed every day. “Blank”
denotes the acidic solutions alone without specimen immersion.The released Ca2+ and PO43– from 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G integrated resin
composites were assessed
and presented by daily concentrations and cumulative release, respectively
(Figure ). The daily
release of Ca2+ had burst to a peak value after two days
and then kept decreasing during the first week until reaching a minimal
and steady release state (Figure A,E). No significant difference was identified between
the cumulative Ca2+ release profiles from TCP and TCP-G
composites when immersed in acidic solution (HCl, pH = 4, Figure B). When immersed
in deionized water, the cumulative Ca2+ released from the
15% TCP composite was slightly more than that released from 15% TCP-G
(Figure F). Unlike
Ca2+, PO43– was hardly released
from the resin composites. When immersed in acidic HCl solution, the
daily release of PO43– reached a peak
concentration after 6 days and then decreased to a steady state (Figure C). The cumulative
PO43– release from the 15% TCP-G composite
was slightly lower than that from 15% TCP (Figure D,H). In contrast to the TCP-containing resin
composites, GIC released little-to-no Ca2+ and PO43– during 3 days of HCl immersion (pH = 4).
Figure 4
Ca2+ and PO43– release
of 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G resin composites and GIC specimens. (A) Daily
measurement of Ca2+ concentration in HCl (pH = 4). (B)
Cumulative Ca ion release in HCl (pH = 4) within 12 days. (C) Daily
measurement of PO43– concentration in
HCl (pH = 4). (D) Cumulative PO43– release
in HCl (pH = 4) within 12 days. (E) Daily measurement of Ca2+ concentration in deionized water. (F) Cumulative Ca ion release
in deionized water within 12 days. (G) Daily measurement of PO43– concentration in deionized water. (H)
Cumulative PO43– release in deionized
water within 12 days.
Ca2+ and PO43– release
of 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G resin composites and GIC specimens. (A) Daily
measurement of Ca2+ concentration in HCl (pH = 4). (B)
Cumulative Ca ion release in HCl (pH = 4) within 12 days. (C) Daily
measurement of PO43– concentration in
HCl (pH = 4). (D) Cumulative PO43– release
in HCl (pH = 4) within 12 days. (E) Daily measurement of Ca2+ concentration in deionized water. (F) Cumulative Ca ion release
in deionized water within 12 days. (G) Daily measurement of PO43– concentration in deionized water. (H)
Cumulative PO43– release in deionized
water within 12 days.
Antibacterial Performance
The antibacterial capability
of the BT resins with or without the TCP/TCP-G fillers was evaluated
by S. mutans incubation and assessed
by the optical density (OD) measurement at a wavelength of ∼630
nm, with resin composites immersed in the culture media, and compared
to GIC/SF. It was noted that only the GIC extract exhibited an inhibitory
effect on the growth/proliferation of S. mutans (Figure ). Otherwise,
all the TCP- and TCP-G-containing composites, BT resin alone, and
the SF had little impact on the bacterial proliferation.
Figure 5
ODs of S. mutans when incubated
with different composites immersing in the culture medium, including
BT resin alone, 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G resin composites, the commercial
GIC, and SF composites. Blank denotes the culture medium alone.
ODs of S. mutans when incubated
with different composites immersing in the culture medium, including
BT resin alone, 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G resin composites, the commercial
GIC, and SF composites. Blank denotes the culture medium alone.
Remineralization
The remineralization
effect was examined
by specimens that underwent two different pretreatments with in-process
variations (illustrated in Figure A). First, each composite specimen was placed next
to an un-demineralized dentin stick without any surface treatments.
The attached specimens were then immersed in acidic artificial saliva
at 37 °C for 3 days. The tooth–composite interface was
observed using SEM. The mineral precipitate was identified at the
small gap between the dentin stick and TCP/TCP-G resin composites,
as well as the dentin/GIC interface. At the interface between dentin
and 15% TCP-G composite, a large number of crystals were observed
on both sides with almost full surface coverage, which led to a closure
of the gap (Figure C), while mineral precipitate or particulate fillers were scattered
and isolated at the dentin/15% TCP and dentin/GIC interfaces (Figure B,D). Mineral deposition
was hardly identified at the dentin/SF interface (Figure E).
Figure 6
Remineralization effect
at dentin–composite interfaces.
(A) Schematic illustration of the in vitro remineralization assessments.
Scheme A: specimens without pretreatment were immersed in acidic artificial
saliva for 3 days with the solution being changed every day; scheme
B: specimens etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel were immersed in
artificial saliva for 10 days. Representative SEM images of specimens
of undemineralized dentin in contact with (B) 15% TCP, (C) 15% TCP-G,
(D) GIC, and (E) SF composites in acidic artificial saliva for 3 days,
when scheme A was followed.
Remineralization effect
at dentin–composite interfaces.
(A) Schematic illustration of the in vitro remineralization assessments.
Scheme A: specimens without pretreatment were immersed in acidic artificial
saliva for 3 days with the solution being changed every day; scheme
B: specimens etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel were immersed in
artificial saliva for 10 days. Representative SEM images of specimens
of undemineralized dentin in contact with (B) 15% TCP, (C) 15% TCP-G,
(D) GIC, and (E) SF composites in acidic artificial saliva for 3 days,
when scheme A was followed.Alternatively, the surface of each dentin stick was pre-demineralized
with 37% phosphoric acid gel. The composite specimen was then placed
and fixed next to the demineralized dentin stick. The tooth–composite
specimens were immersed in artificial saliva (neutral pH) for 10 days.
No precipitation was identified at the interfaces between demineralized
dentin and 15% TCP resin composite; a few needle-like particles were
found at the dentin/15% TCP-G interface (Figure S3A,B).
Discussion
A common dental resin
composite often consists of three components,
namely, the mixture of resin monomers, photoinitiators, and inorganic
fillers. In this study, a frequently used formulation of BT resin
was employed,[23,24] which comprised Bis-GMA and TEGDMA
as the resin monomers and DMAEMA and CQ as the photoinitiator system.
Although enormous inorganic fillers have been integrated and studied
as in dental composites, remineralizing CaP fillers have drawn much
more attention due to their inhibitory nature against demineralization,
as well as potential of remineralization at the composite–tooth
interface.[3] Herein, CaP fillers were incorporated
into the BT resin and compared to the commercialized GIC and SF. Different
types of filling materials, TCP, β-TCP, TTCP, and BAG, were
tested alone for alkalinity, respectively. Figure A shows that the TCP particles, including
TCP and TCP-G, were the most alkaline, which therefore were chosen
to be the major fillers for preparation of resin composites. After
grinding, the alkalinity of TCP-G particles was similar to that of
TCP.Early dental resin composites labeled “microfill”
composites denote those filled with large particles sizing from 10
to 50 μm. However, nanoparticulate fillers termed “nanofill”
have brought much more concerns during the last decade. Previous reports
have been mostly focusing on the new material compositions of the
nanofillers; the size dependence of the filler particles has not been
thoroughly discussed. Therefore, the main idea of this work was to
understand the major differences between CaP fillers with different
sizes as remineralizing fillers in BT resin comprehensively. To obtain
TCP particles with different sizes, the commercially available TCP
particles were either used directly in the resin composite (TCP fillers)
or ground to smaller particles before use (TCP-G fillers). It was
noted that the average size of the TCP-G particles was only 1/4 of
that of the TCP particles. Over 90% of the TCP-G particles were smaller
than 1 μm with much smaller dispersity compared to the TCP particles.
It is also worth mentioning that to minimize the variances caused
by filler preparation, both TCP and TCP-G fillers were integrated
directly in the BT resin without surface pretreatments (e.g., silane
coupling).Various aspects of material performance were examined
to verify
the size dependence of the TCP fillers, including the mechanical properties,
antibacterial behavior, buffering effect, and remineralization. First,
mechanical robustness is important for dental composites in load-bearing
restorations. FS reflects how much bite force materials can resist,
while FM reflects the ability of materials to resist deformation under
stress. The FM values of either BT resin alone or TCP-containing resin
composites are all much lower than the commercial GIC and SF, and
the differences between various compositions/sizes of the TCP fillers
were negligible. Since the TCP particles were not premodified, the
weak interfacial interaction between the resin and TCP fillers would
lead to phase separation. Therefore, mechanical property reduction
of the resin composites was expected and confirmed by the experimental
results (Figure ).
The results also showed that the TCP-G particles improved the FS of
the resin composite (15% TCP-G) compared to the same but much larger
particulate fillers (15% TCP) at the dry state, which was consistent
with previous studies.[14,20] However, the FS of TCP-containing
composites, especially the 15% TCP-G, decreased significantly after
30 days of immersion. The weakening effect of using smaller CaP fillers
was minimal at the dry state but became significant after immersing
in water for a relatively long period. This interesting phenomenon
might explain why the controversial results on mechanical properties
were reported after CaP integration in previous studies. The filler/resin
interface often served as pathways for ion and water diffusion; smaller
particles would possibly lead to exposure of larger interfacial areas
and thus resulted in lower FS after long-term immersion. The resin
composites with CaP fillers alone are usually weak in mechanical properties,
especially when smaller fillers are used to improve the remineralization
capability, more attention should be paid to reinforcement of the
mechanical properties after long-term immersion. It is quite desirable
to explore additional filling strategies to obtain dental composites
with higher stress-bearing capabilities, such as the integration of
reinforcing fillers.Acidogenic bacteria in dental plaque, such
as S.
mutans, can metabolize carbohydrates to acids. In
this study, we found that neither 15% TCP nor 15% TCP-G resin composites
exhibited considerable impact on the growth of S. mutans (Figure ). It was
reported that composites containing NACP can moderately reduce bacteria
growth,[17] probably due to the alkalinity
of the CaP fillers. Conversely, Zhou et al. and Bhadila et al. found
that there was no significant difference between the NACP-containing
composites and their corresponding control groups using various characterizations
of antibacterial performance (live/dead staining, colony counting,
MTT metabolic assay, lactic acid/polysaccharide production evaluations,
etc.),[16,18] suggesting that the addition of CaP fillers
cannot endow the material with an antibacterial property. Our results
agreed with the later conclusion that the integrated TCP particles
made little contribution to the antibacterial effect, and similar
results were also evident and reported by some other research studies.[9,25]S. mutans and many other species
of oral bacteria generate acids to induce tooth demineralization;
once such demineralization is too severe to be reversed by natural
salivary buffering in the mouth, caries occurs. Studies have reported
that there is a critical pH value ∼5.5, below which demineralization
dominates, leading to a net mineral dissolution.[26] Therefore, it would be highly desirable for the local pH
to remain greater than 5.5 to inhibit secondary caries at the restoration–tooth
interface. The CaP fillers in resin composites have been proven to
possess buffering and remineralization capability.[11,17] When TCP-containing composites were immersed in acidic HCl or lactic
acid solution (pH = 4 or 5), they enable the pH value rapidly elevate
to ∼7 within 24 h (Figure S1A–D). The neutralizing capability increased with more integrated TCP
fillers, which was manifested by the higher pH that was reached at
each time point. Since most previous studies paid little attention
to the buffering performance of the CaP fillers, it was surprising
to realize that no significant difference was evident for the particle-size
dependence between 15% TCP and 15% TCP-G composites within 3 days
or even longer immersion time in acids (Figure ). Additionally, it was worth noting that
even though the buffering effect of TCP-containing composites were
superior to that of the GIC within the first 3 days, the buffering
capability of GIC was more stable in long-term, in line with the literature
studies shown in refs (27) and (28). However,
the TCP-containing composites may be able to achieve long-term maintenance
of buffering and ion-release performance through recharging.[29]There are two advantages of remineralizing
materials, one is to
increase the pH to a safe range and the other is to promote remineralization
by releasing Ca2+ and PO43–. In this study, the assessment of Ca2+ and PO43– release was quite different from the previous
reports, in which the cumulative ion release was measured in a large
amount of immersion solution.[16,18] Practically, liquid
in the mouth remains at a small amount and changes quickly. Therefore,
a small volume of solution was applied for just immersing each resin
composite and changed every day to better simulate the daily intake
of acidic diet in this study. It was noted that the release of Ca2+ and PO43– was neither in line
with the trend of buffering capacity nor the intrinsic ratio of Ca2+ and PO43– in TCP molecules
([Ca2+]:[PO43–] = 3:2). In
general, the concentration of Ca2+ was much greater than
that of PO43– in either acidic solution
(Figure A–D)
or deionized water (Figure E–H). The release of Ca2+ had increased
significantly on the second day and then suddenly decreased to a steady
state, while the release of PO43– reached
the peak value later than that of Ca2+. This phenomenon
was still observed even after the specimen surface area/solution volume
was changed (Figure S2). These findings
were experimentally demonstrated and noticed for the first time, its
clinical relevance still needs to be explored. It is speculated that
there was an individual equilibrium state for either Ca2+ or PO43– in the solution, but the release
of Ca2+ is more likely to play a critical role in solution
buffering. The mechanism for ionic balance of released Ca2+ and PO43– also needs to be studied
in the future. Furthermore, in most of the cases, the 15% TCP composites
released more Ca2+ and PO43– than the 15% TCP-G, probably due to the larger local concentration
difference at the particle–liquid interface.Finally,
to determine the remineralization effect of the dental
composites without interference from other materials, the close-packed
dentin–composite interface was prepared in the characterization
with no additional adhesives, but the experiments were implemented
by following two different approaches, that is, schemes A and B in Figure A. The rationale
of scheme A was to simulate daily intake of acidic diet, while scheme
B was to simulate the interface between the base material and demineralized
dentin after treatment of caries. The 15% TCP-G composite in scheme
A showed superior performance in gap-closing among all groups, implicating
that TCP-G may effectively help in closing gaps that were formed by
bonding failure (Figure B–E), while in a neutral environment, neither 15% TCP nor
15% TCP-G composite showed particle deposition within the gaps (Figure S3). Resin composites containing CaP fillers
have been considered to serve as a base to remineralize remnants of
caries, due to their Ca2+ and PO43– release.[20] In clinical practice, there
should be much less liquid between the material and dentin compared
to our in vitro analogy model; thus, the release of Ca2+ and PO43– would be even further limited.
Our results from scheme B in Figure A led to doubt about the viability of using the TCP-containing
composites as the base materials. For further verification, detection
of calcium and phosphorus contents on dentin surfaces shall be conducted
in future studies.
Conclusions
In the present study,
two types of TCP particles, including the
commercially available micrometer-sized particles (TCP) and the much
smaller particles resulted after ball mill grinding (TCP-G), were
integrated into BT resin so that the size dependence of these CaP
fillers was evaluated by comparison between these two resin composites
regarding their buffering capability, mechanical properties, ion release,
antibacterial performance, and remineralization effect. It was realized
that both TCP and TCP-G at the same composition (15 wt %) in the composites
exhibited a similar buffering capacity and no significant antibacterial
activity. The integrated TCP particles were slightly beneficial for
Ca2+/PO43– release. Smaller
particles (TCP-G) had a greater reducing effect on the long-term bending
performance. Under the attack of acidic solution, the 15% TCP-G resin
composite was more effective in promoting remineralization and gap-closing
than the TCP particle containing the composite.
Authors: Enas Tawfik Enan; Amal A Ashour; Sakeenabi Basha; Nayef H Felemban; Sanaa M F Gad El-Rab Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Tryfon Beazoglou; Stephen Eklund; Dennis Heffley; Jonathan Meiers; L Jackson Brown; Howard Bailit Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Ling Zhang; Michael D Weir; Laurence C Chow; Joseph M Antonucci; Jihua Chen; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Jaime Aparecido Cury; Branca Heloisa de Oliveira; Ana Paula Pires dos Santos; Livia Maria Andaló Tenuta Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Wen Zhou; Xian Peng; Xuedong Zhou; Michael D Weir; Mary Anne S Melo; Franklin R Tay; Satoshi Imazato; Thomas W Oates; Lei Cheng; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Lei Cheng; Michael D Weir; Hockin H K Xu; Joseph M Antonucci; Nancy J Lin; Sheng Lin-Gibson; Sarah M Xu; Xuedong Zhou Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2012-05-07 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Ghalia Bhadila; Hanan Filemban; Xiaohong Wang; Mary Ann S Melo; Dwayne D Arola; Franklin R Tay; Thomas W Oates; Michael D Weir; Jirun Sun; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 8.947