Ultrathin WS2 films are promising functional materials for electronic and optoelectronic devices. Therefore, their synthesis over a large area, allowing control over their thickness and structure, is an essential task. In this work, we investigated the influence of atomic layer deposition (ALD)-grown WO3 seed-film thickness on the structural and electrical properties of WS2 nanosheets obtained via a sulfurization technique. Transmission electron microscopy indicated that the thinnest (1.9 nm) film contains rather big (up to 50 nm) WS2 grains in the amorphous matrix. The signs of incomplete sulfurization, namely, oxysulfide phase presence, were found by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy analysis. The increase in the seed-film thickness of up to 4.7 nm resulted in a visible grain size decrease down to 15-20 nm, which was accompanied by defect suppression. The observed structural evolution affected the film resistivity, which was found to decrease from ∼106 to 103 (μΩ·cm) within the investigated thickness range. These results show that the thickness of the ALD-grown seed layer may strongly affect the resultant WS2 structure and properties. Most valuably, it was shown that the growth of the thinnest WS2 film (3-4 monolayers) is most challenging due to the amorphous intergrain phase formation, and further investigations focused on preventing the intergrain phase formation should be conducted.
Ultrathin WS2 films are promising functional materials for electronic and optoelectronic devices. Therefore, their synthesis over a large area, allowing control over their thickness and structure, is an essential task. In this work, we investigated the influence of atomic layer deposition (ALD)-grown WO3 seed-film thickness on the structural and electrical properties of WS2 nanosheets obtained via a sulfurization technique. Transmission electron microscopy indicated that the thinnest (1.9 nm) film contains rather big (up to 50 nm) WS2 grains in the amorphous matrix. The signs of incomplete sulfurization, namely, oxysulfide phase presence, were found by X-ray photoemission spectroscopy analysis. The increase in the seed-film thickness of up to 4.7 nm resulted in a visible grain size decrease down to 15-20 nm, which was accompanied by defect suppression. The observed structural evolution affected the film resistivity, which was found to decrease from ∼106 to 103 (μΩ·cm) within the investigated thickness range. These results show that the thickness of the ALD-grown seed layer may strongly affect the resultant WS2 structure and properties. Most valuably, it was shown that the growth of the thinnest WS2 film (3-4 monolayers) is most challenging due to the amorphous intergrain phase formation, and further investigations focused on preventing the intergrain phase formation should be conducted.
Tungsten
disulfide is a representative of the class of two-dimensional
(2D) transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), which are characterized
by a layered structure with adjacent layers bonded with van der Waals
forces.[1−3] 2H-WS2 is a semiconductor with the band
gap varying from 1.3 to 2.1 eV, depending on the number of layers.[4] In addition to this, an indirect-to-direct band
gap transition occurs on decreasing the thickness down to a single
monolayer. Theoretical calculations predict that WS2 should
possess the highest carrier mobility among other semiconducting 2D
TMDs due to the reduced effective carrier mass.[5,6] Relatively
high mobility and tunable band gap in the visible optical range make
this material promising for use in electronic and optoelectronic devices.[7,8] Moreover, it also demonstrated good catalytic,[9,10] gas-sensing,[11,12] and chemical-sensitive properties.[13] Each
of these applications requires a specific film structure. While the
large-area films with a terrace-terminated structure and a given number
of monolayers are most relevant for optoelectronic applications, an
edge-terminated film structure with a large number of dangling bonds
is desirable for catalysis applications.[14,15] In this regard, the controllable WS2 synthesis with a
given structure over a large area is an essential task for practical
applications. Bulk crystal exfoliation cannot satisfy this requirement
since it does not provide precise control over the thickness and material
properties[16] as well as not scalable to
industrial standards. In contrast, chemical vapor deposition (CVD)[17] and direct atomic layer deposition (ALD)[18,19] easily provide wafer-scale coverage with a precise thickness control.
Currently, the superior WS2 layers containing the big crystalline
domains up to several hundreds of μm were obtained by CVD.[20] However, the CVD technique is quite challenging
and is strongly dependent on the precursors’ chemistry and
process parameters. The direct ALD synthesis of WS2 allows
only obtaining small crystalline domains of several nm due to the
limited process temperature;[18] however,
the interesting ability to control the film structure has been demonstrated.[19] Another indirect WS2 synthesis technique,
namely, seed-film sulfurization, was suggested.[21] The size of crystal domains in films produced by this method
is significantly lower than that, for example, in films produced by
the CVD method.[22] However, due to its relative
simplicity and a high degree of controllability, this method remains
relevant.[23−28]Since the thickness significantly influences both the optical
and
electrical properties of the WS2 films, a lot of attention
is usually paid to the precise control of the number of its monolayers.[21] The purpose of earlier studies was to show the
possibility of obtaining a given number of WS2 monolayers
by changing the thickness of seed films. In subsequent studies, considering
tungsten seed films as an example, it was shown that the thickness
of the initial film not only determines the number of monolayers but
affects the structure of WS2 films.[27] In particular, sulfurization at 800 °C of sputtered
tungsten films with a different thicknesses (1–28 nm) was used
to obtain WS2.[27] A thinner W
seed layer resulted in a discontinuous WS2 formation. Instead,
agglomeration of nanosize grains in a combination of triangles and
flakes was visible. Thicker films had a lamellar structure and contained
plenty of nanorods embedded. At the same time, the data on the effect
of the thickness of ALD-grown WO3 seed films on the structure
and properties of WS2 is scarce.One of the most
suitable methods to obtain the WO3 seed-film
is ALD since it is governed by the chemical saturation concept, which
results in perfect reproducibility, wafer-scale uniformity, and conformality
over three-dimensional (3D) structures. The question of the effect
of the thickness of ALD seed WO3 films requires separate
consideration since these films differ in their microstructure and
impurity content from films obtained by other methods. This work investigates
the influence of the ALD-grown WO3 seed-film thickness
on the structure and electrical properties of WS2 films
and thus partially fills this gap in knowledge. The sulfurization
technique with the preliminary WO3 hydrogen reduction was
chosen as the method for the fabrication of WS2 films.
The ability to fabricate a continuous WS2 film with a thickness
down to three monolayers was demonstrated previously, while the thickness
was limited by the chosen ALD process.[22] In the current work, the films with the thickness in the range between
∼1.9 and ∼4.7 nm, which corresponds to 2–8 WS2 monolayers, were formed and systematically investigated.
According to the literature data, such films can be used in field-effect
transistors[21,26] and possess a high photoelectric
response,[29,30] which reflects the interest in the WS2 within this thickness range.
Experimental Section
WO3 seed films were grown in a commercially available
hot-wall PICOSUN R200adv ALD reactor. Bis(cyclopentadienyl)tungsten
dihydride (WH2(Cp)2) and O3 were
used as the precursor and reactant (oxygen source), respectively.
The precursor feed and active oxygen exposure times were fixed at
2.0 and 12 s, respectively, which corresponds to the saturated ALD
growth. The deposition temperature (Tdep) was fixed at 300 °C. The other details of the utilized ALD
process can be found elsewhere.[31] Sapphire
pieces of 20 × 10 mm2 in size were used as substrates.
They were cleaned (piranha solution and deionized water) and subsequently
annealed in a tube furnace in air for 1 h at 1000 °C prior to
WO3 growth. Several identical series of samples were fabricated.
Each one of them contained seed films grown during 20, 30, 40, and
50 cycles of ALD processes.The oxide film reduction, as well
as its sulfurization, was carried
out in a three-zone tube furnace HZS-1200 (Carbolite Gero) equipped
with a 32 mm outer diameter quartz tube. After loading the samples,
the tube was purged for 1 h with a 5% H2/Ar mixture (99.9999%)
to obtain a controllable gas atmosphere (total gas flow was fixed
at 150 sccm). The reduction temperature was 600 °C, while the
process dwell-time was fixed at 60 min (H2/Ar flow was
set to be 10 sccm during the whole process). After the process termination,
the H2/Ar flow rate was increased to 50 sccm, and the tube
was cooled down to room temperature before subsequent sulfurization
(no atmosphere break took place). For the sulfurization process, a
crucible containing 500 mg of sulfur flakes (99.98% purity, Sigma-Aldrich)
was located upstream from the sample in a tube. Sulfur flakes were
loaded in a boat placed at the end of the heated section of the split-tube
three-zone furnace (all zones were maintained at the same temperature).
The H2/Ar flow rate was reduced down to 10 sccm when the
temperature reached 350 °C. This flow rate was maintained until
the end of the process. The heating rate was set to be 10 °C/min
during the entire processes time. The sample remained for 30 min at
the target temperature (900 °C). Then, the heating system was
switched off, allowing the furnace to cool down.The films’
morphology was examined by atomic force microscopy
(AFM, NT-MDT Ntegra) and Solver tools in a semicontact mode using
a silicon tip with a radius < 10 nm (HA-NC, SCANSENS). Images were
taken over a 5 × 5 μm2 area. The details of
the film crystal structure were studied by transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) (JEOL JEM-2100) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Raman
spectroscopy was used to obtain insights into the detailed film structure.
A LabRAM Evolution (HORIBA Scientific) instrument with a 532 nm laser
source with 1 cm–1 spectral resolution was used
to perform the spectral measurements. A diffraction grating of 1800
lines/mm and a x100 objective lens (numerical aperture = 0.90) were
utilized in these experiments. The laser spot diameter was 0.45 μm.
In addition to this, WS2 films were characterized by Raman
spectroscopy with 473 nm laser excitation acquired with a Ntegra Spectra
II confocal Raman and SNOM microscope (NT-MDT) with a spectral resolution
better than 1 cm–1. The laser intensity was kept
under 0.5 mW to ensure that laser-induced heating did not introduce
artifacts. Measurements were performed in a temperature-controlled
room at standard conditions. The 520 cm–1 phonon
mode from the silicon wafer was used for calibration. All peaks were
fitted with Lorentzian functions. The films’ chemical state
and composition were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS) in the Theta Probe tool (Thermo Scientific) under high-vacuum
conditions with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (1486,6 eV).Electrical measurements were carried out by the transfer length
method (TLM) on the prepared line-type structures. Ti (5 nm)/Au (50
nm) bilayers formed on WS2 by electron-beam evaporation
served as metal contacts. Contact pads were defined by the lift-off
procedure. They were separated by various distances to provide the
WS2 channels with different lengths from 4 to 37 μm.
WS2 channel widths were also different: 50, 75, and 100
μm. Rectangular WS2 regions were previously formed
using etching in O2 + CHF3 plasma and standard
lithography methods. After the formation of contact pads, the samples
were annealed for 30 min at 350 °C in vacuum (10–6 mbar) to reduce the resistance. Before and after annealing, the
elemental composition of the films was investigated by XPS. The ratio
of atomic concentrations of sulfur and tungsten decreased by about
5% after annealing, but in both cases, it remained greater than the
stoichiometric value. No WS2 film transfer was carried
out, i.e., the experiment was carried out on the primary sapphire
substrates.
Results and Discussion
As Figure S1 demonstrates, the WO3 seed-film thickness influences
the morphology of the resulting
WS2 films. In the thinnest film, corresponding to 20 ALD
cycles (Figure S1a), the grain structure
is clearly distinguishable. The estimated grain size is several tens
of nanometers. The dark spots in some places are probably holes in
the film. Increasing the number of ALD cycles to 30 (Figure S1b) results in the disappearance of the grain structure
and higher surface uniformity. Further increase in the number of cycles
leads to the reoccurrence of a grained structure (Figure S1c,d), but with a significantly smaller lateral grain
size than that in the case of the thinnest film. Such morphology shift
manifests itself in nonmonotonous dependence of the root-mean-square
(RMS) values from thickness. Calculated RMS values are given in Table . Overall, it should
be noted that the films under investigation have smooth surfaces,
and RMS values are significantly lower than the ones previously reported
for WS2 films (about 5 nm), fabricated using the same method.[22] A RMS value of ≈0.2 nm is typical for
monolayer WS2 films.[32] For comparison, Figure S1e shows an AFM image of a sapphire substrate.
Terraces are visible on the surface of the substrate after annealing.
Consequently, the morphology observed in Figure S1a–d is not related to the substrate relief.
Table 1
Thickness and RMS of WS2 Films
number of ALD cycles
20
30
40
50
WS2 film thickness (nm)
1.9
2.8
3.7
4.7
RMS (nm)
0.28
0.23
0.49
0.35
To measure the thickness, films’ fragments were transferred
onto SiO2/Si substrates after soaking in a 5% KOH solution. Figure S2 provides the AFM profiles recorded
across the edges of these fragments. These measurements show that
film thickness increases linearly with the increasing number of WO3 ALD cycles. Measured thickness values are given in Table .Taking into
account the fact that separate grains in a film might
comprise a different number of monolayers and that the interlayer
spacing in bulk WS2 is 0.625 nm, the number of monolayers
should be considered to increase from 2–3 to 6–8, with
the WS2 film thickness increasing from 1.9 to 4.7 nm.For Raman spectroscopy measurements, two different excitation wavelengths
were used: 473 and 532 nm. The former is close to the resonance peak,
corresponding to the interband transitions in WS2, and
the latter corresponds to the B exciton peak resonance.[33] When the 473 nm irradiation is used, the peaks
corresponding to the first-order vibrational modes E2′(Γ)
and A1′(Γ) prevail in Raman spectra (Figure a). It is well known
that the difference in these peak positions determines the number
of monolayers in thin TMD films.[34] Recorded
spectra make it possible to precisely determine the peak positions
and, therefore, the number of monolayers without peak decomposition.
This is especially important for WS2 films since the position
of each separate peak in this material depends weakly on the number
of monolayers.[21] The red shift of the E2′(Γ) peak and the blue shift of the A1′(Γ) peak are observed with increasing thickness of
films. Thus, the difference in their positions (Δf) increases, as shown in Figure b. According to the previous research,[33] a Δf value slightly above 63 cm–1 corresponds to three monolayers, and a value slightly
above 64 cm–1 corresponds to four monolayers of
WS2. Since the samples studied in previous work[33] were obtained by mechanical exfoliation, it
is not correct to directly compare the Δf values
from previous work with those of the samples investigated in this
work. However, the observed trend of the changing value of Δf coincides. Noteworthily, the full width at half-maximum
(FWHM) of the A1′(Γ) peak was 3.9–4.0
(cm–1), and it remained almost constant with a change
in the film thickness change from 1.9 to 3.7 nm and increased to 4.5
cm–1 for a 5 nm-thick film.
Figure 1
Raman spectra of WS2 films obtained with 473 nm excitation
(a). Difference in the positions of the A1′(Γ)
and E2′(Γ) peaks and the ratio of the intensities
of these peaks as a function of the thickness of WS2 films
(b). Lines serve as a guide to the eye.
Raman spectra of WS2 films obtained with 473 nm excitation
(a). Difference in the positions of the A1′(Γ)
and E2′(Γ) peaks and the ratio of the intensities
of these peaks as a function of the thickness of WS2 films
(b). Lines serve as a guide to the eye.Excitation with 532 nm wavelength revealed overtones and combination
peaks in all Raman spectra (Figure a). Moreover, a peak corresponding to the vibrational
mode LA(M), a first-order Raman-active mode representing the longitudinal
acoustic (LA) phonons at the edge of the Brillouin zone (the M point),
is clearly seen at 173 cm–1. According to the momentum
conservation rule, LA(M) is a zone-edge mode and cannot be observed
by conventional Raman measurements in a perfect WS2 sample.
However, in a WS2 sample with defects, the momentum conservation
condition can be satisfied by the phonon scattering from a defect,
enabling the observation of zone-edge modes by conventional Raman
measurement.[35] It was shown previously
that radiation-induced defects affect this peak intensity in MoS2.[36] LA(M) peak intensity evolution
was observed by varying the synthesis conditions of monolayer WS2 films,[35] as well as by changing
the MoS2 sulfurization temperature.[37] Therefore, it is possible to estimate the extent of defects
in films by the relative magnitude of this peak.
Figure 2
Raman spectra of WS2 films obtained with 532 nm excitation
(a). Ratio of the intensities of peaks LA(M) and A1′(Γ)
as a function of the thickness of WS2 films (b).
Raman spectra of WS2 films obtained with 532 nm excitation
(a). Ratio of the intensities of peaks LA(M) and A1′(Γ)
as a function of the thickness of WS2 films (b).The ratios of peak intensities I(LA(M))/I(A1′(Γ)) were calculated,
and the dependence
of this ratio on the thickness was plotted, assuming that the shape
of the lines in the spectra of films of different thicknesses does
not change. Within the margin of error, this dependence is linear.
As Figure b illustrates,
in thinner WS2 films, the peak intensity relation I(LA(M))/I(A1′(Γ))
increases. This leads to the conclusion that thinner WS2 films have higher defect densities.The structure of WS2 films was investigated in more
detail by TEM. Plan-view TEM images and selected area electron diffraction
(SAED) patterns for the films with different thicknesses are provided
in Figure a,c,e,g. Figure b,d,f,h illustrates
the high-resolution TEM images from the same films. According to Figure a, the thinnest 1.9
nm-thick film consists of 10–50 nm grains. It can be seen in Figure b that the material
in the intergrain regions is amorphous. The distance between grains
is several nanometers. According to Figure c, the 2.8 nm-thick film consists of approximately
10 nm grains. As in the thinner film, crystal grains are separated
by the amorphous phase, and the distance between them is also several
nanometers. Increasing the film thickness to 3.7 nm results in an
increase in the size of crystal grains to 10–20 nm (Figure e). The boundaries
of grains become sharp, and the amorphous phase is only sparsely observed
in triangular intergrain joints (Figure f). Further increase in the film thickness
to 4.7 nm does not change the situation qualitatively (Figure g,h), and the grain size continues
to increase. The size of the observed grains varies between 15 and
25 nm approximately.
Figure 3
Plan-view TEM images of WS2 films with thicknesses
of
1.9 nm (a, b), 2.8 nm (c, d), 3.7 nm (e, f), and 4.7 nm (g, h). Insets
show SAED patterns.
Figure 4
XPS W 4f and S 2p spectra
of WS2 films with thicknesses
of 1.9 nm (a, b) and 3.7 nm (c, d).
Plan-view TEM images of WS2 films with thicknesses
of
1.9 nm (a, b), 2.8 nm (c, d), 3.7 nm (e, f), and 4.7 nm (g, h). Insets
show SAED patterns.XPS W 4f and S 2p spectra
of WS2 films with thicknesses
of 1.9 nm (a, b) and 3.7 nm (c, d).Observed grain size can be compared to the ones reported earlier.
In previous research, the grain size in WS2 films fabricated
using the same method was about 20 nm.[22] In another work, 2.8 nm-thick WS2 films, also fabricated
using sulfurization with preliminary reduction, consisted of the grains
with 5 nm size approximately.[26]SAED
patterns for all samples introduce bright circles, corresponding
to the (101) and (110) WS2 plane reflections. The basal
(001) plane reflection is absent, which confirms that WS2 planes are mostly oriented parallel to the film surface. The blurry
SAED pattern of the 1.9 nm-thick film is due to the relative lack
of crystal grains in the analysis area and their slight relative disorientation
in plane. Overall, TEM measurements showed a nonmonotonous change
in the average crystallite size in films with varying thicknesses
within the investigated range. The largest crystallites are found
in thinnest films and the smallest in 2.8 nm-thick films. Apparently,
the smallest crystallite size is the reason why 2.8 nm-thick films
are the smoothest according to AFM data. Noteworthily, TEM results
correspond perfectly with the surface morphology observed by AFM in
the whole range of the WS2 thickness.XPS elemental
composition and chemical state analysis also revealed
notable differences for the films of different thicknesses. For each
film, core level spectra W 4f, W 4d, S 2p, and S 2s were recorded.
In elem ental composition XPS analysis, Scofield’s factors
for bulk material are employed in calculations, which might lead to
distorted results in thin films if electron kinetic energies for elements
under investigation differ significantly. Hence, relative atomic concentrations
[S]/[W] were calculated from W 4d and S 2s spectra, as their binding
energies (BEs) are very close. Below are the spectra of WS2 samples obtained after vacuum annealing. Therefore, they can be
correlated with the measured electrical properties.In Figure , W 4f
and S 2p spectra for 1.9 and 3.7 nm-thick films are presented. The
absence of the spectra from 2.8- and 4.7 nm-thick films spectra is
explained by their similarity to those recorded for the 3.7 nm-thick
film. For all films, the W 4f spectrum was decomposed into two doublets.
A more intense one with a BE of 32.4 eV typical for the WS2 material corresponds to the W4+ state.[13,26] Second, a much weaker W6+ state doublet with a BE of
35.8 eV corresponds to the WO3. In addition, a W5p3/2 line with a BE of 37.8 eV is found in W 4f spectra. In
W 4f spectra of the 1.9 nm-thick film, W4+ doublet lines
are slightly broader and the intensity of the W6+ doublet
is more than two times higher than that of the 3.7 nm-thick film.
S 2p spectra were fitted with a single doublet, and the BE value for
S 2p3/2 was about 162 eV. The spectrum corresponding to
the 1.9 nm-thick film is shifted toward a lower BE by 0.3 eV and is
slightly broader in comparison to that of the 3.7 nm-thick film doublet.In addition, it should be noted that according to the data obtained
by Raman spectroscopy, XPS, and TEM, there were no signs of the presence
of other phases in addition to amorphous and 2H-WS2, in
particular, 1T-WS2.In Figure , W 4d
and S 2s spectra for 1.9 and 3.7 nm-thick films are also presented.
W 4d spectra were fitted with a single doublet with a BE of 244.2
eV for the W 4d5/2 line and a spin–orbit split value
of 12.4 eV in both cases. In the case of the 1.9 nm-thick film, this
doublet is slightly broadened in comparison to the 3.7 nm-thick film.
The S 2s spectrum was fitted with a single line for the 3.7 nm-thick
film with a BE value of ∼ 226 eV. In the case of a 1.9 nm-thick
film, a second peak with a BE of 228.6 appears. In addition, a higher
intensity peak is found to be shifted toward a lower BE by 0.2 eV
and to be slightly broadened in comparison to this peak for the 3.7
nm-thick film. A similar peak centered at 228.5 eV was earlier observed
in the S 2s spectra of MoS2 films.[38,39] It is attributed to oxysulfides or S–H states.[38] In the case of this study, the appearance of
the 228.6 eV peak is accompanied by an increased W 4f doublet intensity,
corresponding to the W6+ state. This is also most possibly
due to oxysulfide formation in the film. It should be noted that the
presence of oxysulfide seems to be distinctive for the films with
the highest amount of amorphous phase observed in TEM, and that leads
to the conclusion that this amorphous phase contains an oxysulfide
component.
Figure 5
XPS W 4d and S 2s spectra of WS2 films with thicknesses
of 1.9 nm (a, b) and 3.7 nm (c, d).
XPS W 4d and S 2s spectra of WS2 films with thicknesses
of 1.9 nm (a, b) and 3.7 nm (c, d).In the bulk material, the oxysulfide phase is metastable. When
heated, a WS2 compound should be formed in sulfur vapor.
However, the oxysulfide phase can probably be stabilized with a small
film thickness. In the previous work,[40] the stability of oxysulfide domains during sulfurization in the
temperature range of 800–1000 °C is noted.The calculated
relative atomic concentrations x = [S]/[W] for 1.9,
2.8, 3.7, and 4.7 nm-thick films are 2.0, 2.1,
2.2, and 2.2, respectively. The XPS results show that in films with
a thickness of 2.8 nm or more, the sulfur concentration exceeds the
stoichiometric one. The reason for this may lie in the features of
the sulfurization process used. The decrease in the x value for thinner films is probably due to the presence of an oxysulfide
phase. In this phase, the ratio of the atomic concentrations of sulfur
and tungsten can be less than 2. These results show that utilization
of WO3 films grown with a different number of ALD cycles
and further sulfurized at the same conditions lead to the formation
of significantly different WS2 films in terms of the crystalline
structure, morphology, and chemical composition. These differences
should also manifest themselves in film’s electrical properties.Electrical characteristic measurement results for WS2 films employing the TLM method are provided in Figure , as well as in Table . Figure S3 shows the DC current–voltage (IV) characteristics
for 1.9 and 3.7 nm-thick films. In Figure , the measured resistance value relation
dependencies on the channel length are presented for WS2 with different thicknesses. In Table , the calculated values of contact resistance and contact
resistivity are listed. Calculated sheet resistance values are shown
in each of Figure . From these values, the film resistivity (ρ) was calculated.
In Figure , the plot
of ρ dependency on WS2 film thickness is presented
(the solid red line serves as a guide to the eye). From the plot,
it is evident that the ρ value changes weakly for 3.7 and 4.7
nm-thick films. However, it increases abruptly with a decrease in
thickness to 1.9 nm.
Figure 6
Electrical resistance as a function of channel length
for WS2 films with thicknesses of 1.9 nm (a), 2.8 nm (b),
3.7 nm
(c), and 4.7 nm (d).
Table 2
Contact Resistance and Contact Resistivity
of the Investigated Structures
WS2 film thickness (nm)
1.9
2.8
3.7
4.7
Rc (Ω)
1 × 109
2.3 × 106
3.0 × 106
3.8 × 107
ρc (Ω·cm2)
1.7 × 102
4.2
6.1
8.7
Figure 7
Resistivity as a function
of the WS2 film thickness.
Electrical resistance as a function of channel length
for WS2 films with thicknesses of 1.9 nm (a), 2.8 nm (b),
3.7 nm
(c), and 4.7 nm (d).Resistivity as a function
of the WS2 film thickness.A lot of work is dedicated to the
research on the influence of
TMD film structure on its electrical properties.[18,41] In particular, a strong influence of the intercrystallite interface
was put forward.[40−42] The decreasing crystallite size should lead to increased
charge carrier scattering and, consequently, increased resistance.
However, among the samples under investigation, the film with the
largest crystallites has the highest specific resistance. This might
be attributed to the stronger influence of the amorphous phase, containing
oxysulfides, at the intercrystallite interface. Analysis of the literature
data shows that the conductivity of molybdenum and tungsten oxysulfides
can vary widely. Thus, MoSO compounds are characterized by high conductivity
at a relatively low oxygen concentration, due to the presence of Mo5+ states.[43] Due to this, they are
successfully used in electrocatalysis.[44] On the other hand, at a high oxygen concentration, when the metal
is mainly in an oxidation state of 6+, the conductivity values are
10–6 Ω–1·cm–1.[43] Therefore, the presence of an oxysulfide
phase with a high concentration of oxygen should increase the value
of the electrical resistance.
Conclusions
In this study, the structure
and electrical properties of WS2 films obtained via sulfurization
technique were investigated
as a function of the thickness of the ALD-grown WO3 seed
film. According to Raman spectroscopy data, defect concentration in
films decreased monotonously with increasing thickness of the WO3 seed layer and, accordingly, the thickness of WS2 in the range of 1.9–4.7 nm. TEM and AFM measurements showed
that the largest crystalline grains could be found in the thinnest
1.9 nm-thick film corresponding to 2–3 monolayers of WS2 and the smallest in the 2.8 nm-thick film. However, a decrease
in the grain size, contrary to the expectation, does not lead to poorer
electrical properties. Instead, the thinnest films demonstrated enhanced
film resistivity. The origin of this phenomenon was found by a combination
of XPS and TEM analysis. In relatively thin 1.9 and 2.8 nm-thick films,
an amorphous phase was observed in the intergrain space. XPS investigation
revealed that this amorphous phase contains tungsten oxysulfide. The
presence of the amorphous phase between crystalline grains increases
film resistivity significantly, while its disappearance leads to a
significant improvement of the resistivity despite the smaller grains.
Moreover, it was found that the further increase in the WO3 seed layer thickness provides a monotonic increase in the crystal
grain size and, eventually, resistivity improvement. These results
show that the thickness of the ALD-grown seed layer may strongly affect
the resultant WS2 structure and properties. Moreover, because
WS2 films thinner than four monolayers with a quality crystal
structure may be useful for electronic applications, further detailed
investigation focused on preventing the formation of the amorphous
intergrain phase is required. In addition, the larger grain size in
these films, revealed by TEM, might endow them with even superior
properties.
Authors: Arend M van der Zande; Pinshane Y Huang; Daniel A Chenet; Timothy C Berkelbach; YuMeng You; Gwan-Hyoung Lee; Tony F Heinz; David R Reichman; David A Muller; James C Hone Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2013-05-05 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Humberto R Gutiérrez; Nestor Perea-López; Ana Laura Elías; Ayse Berkdemir; Bei Wang; Ruitao Lv; Florentino López-Urías; Vincent H Crespi; Humberto Terrones; Mauricio Terrones Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Ivan V Zabrosaev; Maxim G Kozodaev; Roman I Romanov; Anna G Chernikova; Prabhash Mishra; Natalia V Doroshina; Aleksey V Arsenin; Valentyn S Volkov; Alexandra A Koroleva; Andrey M Markeev Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2022-09-20 Impact factor: 5.719