Literature DB >> 34963034

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: Prospective, multicenter, cohort trial.

Nozomu Kobayashi1, Yoji Takeuchi2, Ken Ohata3, Masahiro Igarashi4, Masayoshi Yamada5, Shinya Kodashima6, Kinichi Hotta7, Keita Harada8, Hiroaki Ikematsu9, Toshio Uraoka10,11, Naoto Sakamoto12, Hisashi Doyama13, Takashi Abe14,15, Atsushi Katagiri16, Shinichiro Hori17, Tomoki Michida2,18, Takehito Yamaguchi19,20, Masakatsu Fukuzawa21, Shinsuke Kiriyama22, Kazutoshi Fukase23,24, Yoshitaka Murakami25, Hideki Ishikawa26, Yutaka Saito5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the gold standard for the treatment of noninvasive large colorectal lesions, despite challenges associated with nonlifting lesions and a high rate of local recurrence. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers the possibility of overcoming these EMR limitations. However, a higher risk of complications and longer procedure time prevented its dissemination. As ESD now provides more stable results because of standardized techniques compared with those used earlier, this study aimed to quantify the rates of en bloc and curative resections, as well as ESD complications, in the present situation.
METHODS: A multicenter, large-scale, prospective cohort trial of ESD was conducted at 20 institutions in Japan. Consecutive patients scheduled for ESD were enrolled from February 2013 to January 2015.
RESULTS: ESD was performed for 1883 patients (1965 lesions). The mean procedure time was 80.6 min; en bloc and curative resections were achieved in 1759 (97.0%) and 1640 (90.4%) lesions, respectively, in epithelial lesions ≥20 mm. Intra- and postprocedural perforations occurred in 51 (2.6%) and 12 (0.6%) lesions, respectively, and emergency surgery for adverse events was performed in nine patients (0.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: This trial conducted after the standardization of the ESD technique throughout Japan revealed a higher curability, shorter procedure time, and lower risk of complications than those reported previously. Considering that the target lesions of ESD are more advanced than those of EMR, ESD can be a first-line treatment for large colorectal lesions with acceptable risk and procedure time. (Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000010136).
© 2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; colorectal neoplasia; endoscopic mucosal resection; endoscopic submucosal dissection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34963034     DOI: 10.1111/den.14223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  3 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a multi-loop traction device for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection performed by trainees: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ryuhei Jinushi; Tomoaki Tashima; Rie Terada; Kazuya Miyaguchi; Hiromune Katsuda; Tomoya Ogawa; Yuya Nakano; Yoichi Saito; Akashi Fujita; Yuki Tanisaka; Masafumi Mizuide; Yumi Mashimo; Tomonori Kawasaki; Shomei Ryozawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Long-term prognosis of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer according to submucosal invasion: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Eun Ran Kim; Bong Min Ko; Jongbeom Shin; Hyun Joo Jang; Dong Hoon Baek; Dong-Hoon Yang; Bo-In Lee; Kwang Bum Cho; Jin Woong Cho; Sung-Ae Jung; Su Jin Hong
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Colonic tumor in a diverticulum removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection: Two-step strategy using multi-loop traction devices.

Authors:  Yuki Okubo; Takashi Kanesaka; Yoji Takeuchi
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.337

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.