Literature DB >> 34961859

A retrospective study of positive and negative determinants of gamete storage in transgender and gender-diverse patients.

Chloë Rogers1, Mike Webberley1, Roxana Mateescu1, Yasmeen El Rakhawy1, Anaïs Daly-Gourdialsing1, Helen Webberley1.   

Abstract

Background: GenderGP is a novel, online telemedicine service for transgender and gender-diverse individuals. As part of the service, people are offered fertility counseling in regard to gamete storage. Aims: This study aims to formally categorize the reasons that transgender and gender-diverse people do and not store gametes prior to hormonal treatments. We hope to use this data and subsequent research to inform healthcare policy, improve the healthcare experience for transgender and gender-diverse people, and inform legislation for permanent change in UK healthcare.
Methods: Data sets (electronic medical records) from June 2015 - April 2020 were derived from the GenderGP patient database. All patients starting treatment with GenderGP and undergoing routine fertility counseling were included in the study.
Results: Of 3667 patients aged 10-85, 2722 (74.2%) were aged 18-45. 151 (5.4%) patients stored gametes. 678 (18.5%) patients wanted to store: 268 (39.5%) could not afford gamete storage, 84 (12.4%) had no local services, 307 (45.3%) did not want to delay hormone treatment. 2085 patients did not want to undertake gamete storage, 480 (23.0%) hoped to adopt, 1605 (77.1%) did not want children. All ages showed similar patterns. Discussion: Financial barriers mean many transgender and gender-diverse people cannot access fertility healthcare. Many participants suffered low self-esteem and struggled to envisage an accepting healthcare system, making them less likely to seek advice. Many patients favored adoption over gamete storage. Younger patients (<18) often had very definite views on gamete storage. Many older patients without children would consider gamete storage and adoption, once their transition is complete.
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility preservation; NHS; gamete storage; gender-diverse; transgender

Year:  2021        PMID: 34961859      PMCID: PMC8040686          DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1848693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Transgend Health        ISSN: 2689-5269


  15 in total

1.  Trans people's experiences with assisted reproduction services: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S James-Abra; L A Tarasoff; D Green; R Epstein; S Anderson; S Marvel; L S Steele; L E Ross
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Fertility preservation options in transgender people: A review.

Authors:  Natnita Mattawanon; Jessica B Spencer; David A Schirmer; Vin Tangpricha
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Fertility Preservation for Transgender Adolescents.

Authors:  Diane Chen; Lisa Simons; Emilie K Johnson; Barbara A Lockart; Courtney Finlayson
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  A combined regimen of cyproterone acetate and testosterone enanthate as a potentially highly effective male contraceptive.

Authors:  M C Meriggiola; W J Bremner; C A Paulsen; A Valdiserri; L Incorvaia; R Motta; A Pavani; M Capelli; C Flamigni
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Attitudes Toward Fertility and Reproductive Health Among Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Adolescents.

Authors:  Diane Chen; Margaret Matson; Kathryn Macapagal; Emilie K Johnson; Ilina Rosoklija; Courtney Finlayson; Celia B Fisher; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Factors Affecting Fertility Decision-Making Among Transgender Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Diane Chen; Moira A Kyweluk; Afiya Sajwani; Elisa J Gordon; Emilie K Johnson; Courtney A Finlayson; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.151

7.  Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising.

Authors:  Florence Ashley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  A nationwide UK survey of female fertility preservation prior to cancer treatment.

Authors:  Yazan Abdallah; Jonathan Briggs; Joshua Jones; Gregory Horne; Cheryl Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.767

9.  Healthcare experiences of gender diverse Australians: a mixed-methods, self-report survey.

Authors:  Damien W Riggs; Katrina Coleman; Clemence Due
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Fertility preservation decision making amongst Australian transgender and non-binary adults.

Authors:  Damien W Riggs; Clare Bartholomaeus
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.