| Literature DB >> 34961289 |
Tanzina Akter1, Md Atikur Rahman1, Akhi Moni1, Md Aminul Islam Apu1, Atqiya Fariha1, Md Abdul Hannan1,2, Md Jamal Uddin1,3.
Abstract
Kidney diseases are regarded as one of the major public health issues in the world. The objectives of this study were: (i) to investigate the causative factors involved in kidney disease and the therapeutic aspects of Moringa oleifera, as well as (ii) the effectiveness of M. oleifera in the anti-inflammation and antioxidant processes of the kidney while minimizing all potential side effects. In addition, we proposed a hypothesis to improve M. oleifera based drug development. This study was updated by searching the key words M. oleifera on kidney diseases and M. oleifera on oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis in online research databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar. The following validation checking and scrutiny analysis of the recently published articles were used to explore this study. The recent existing research has found that M. oleifera has a plethora of health benefits. Individual medicinal properties of M. oleifera leaf extract, seed powder, stem extract, and the whole extract (ethanol/methanol) can up-increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione (GSH), while decreasing the activity of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and COX-2. In our study, we have investigated the properties of this plant against kidney diseases based on existing knowledge with an updated review of literature. Considering the effectiveness of M. oleifera, this study would be useful for further research into the pharmacological potential and therapeutic insights of M. oleifera, as well as prospects of Moringa-based effective medicine development for human benefits.Entities:
Keywords: Moringa oleifera; anti-aging; antioxidant; fibrosis; inflammation; kidney disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 34961289 PMCID: PMC8706354 DOI: 10.3390/plants10122818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the systematic review.
Figure 2Renoprotective effects of M. oleifera against oxidative stress. Stress stimuli (streptozotocin, CoCl2, methotrexate, tilmicosin, TiO2NPs, acetaminophen (APAP), glycerol, and Salmonella) increased malondialdehyde (MDA), lipid peroxidation products (LPP), total protein carbonyl content (TPCC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and nitric oxide (NO) production via triggering reactive oxygen species (ROS), H2O2, glutathione disulfide (GSSG), and lactoperoxidase (LPO). Oxidative stress emerged as a result of these events. MO—induced models, on the other hand, increased the expression of catalase (CAT); superoxide dismutase (SOD); glutathione peroxidase (GPx); glutathione (GSH), total antioxidant capacity (TAC); delta-amino levulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD), and G-6-Pase, which then activates glutathione (GSH). These stressors inhibit the expression of oxidative stress suppressive factors. ROS, H2O2, GSSG, and LPO, all related to oxidative stress, were decreased by GSH. GSH is also capable of reducing oxidative stress.
Figure 3Renoprotective effects of M. oleifera against inflammation. The expression of C-reactive protein (CRP), which activates NF-kB in the cytosol, is linked to stress factors. TNF-, Il-6, Il-1B, iNOS, and COX-2 are all activated when NF-kB enters the nucleus and binds to DNA. All of these elements have been linked to the development of inflammation. NO is activated even more by iNOS. NO is thought to be a pro-inflammatory mediator that causes inflammation. In the cytosol, M. oleifera suppressed the expression of CRP and NF-kB. It also boosted cortisol, adrenaline, NK, and Treg cells, which helped reduce inflammation. Anti-inflammatory hormones Cortisol and Adrenaline Both NK cells and Treg cells are anti-inflammatory regulators.
Summary on the protective effects of M. oleifera against kidney diseases.
| Sl. | Experimental Model | Treatment Dose of | Major Research Outcomes | Molecular Markers | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | STZ-induced nephrotoxic male Wister rats | 250 mg/kg b wt for 6 weeks | Amelioration of oxidative stress and inflammation | ↓MDA and ROS | [ |
| 2 | 150 mg/kg/day for 5 weeks | Oxidative stress and inflammation | ↓LDL | [ | |
| 3 | Ischemia-reperfusion induced Wistar rats | 200 mg/kg for 7 days; 400 mg/kg, 7 days by flank incision | Oxidative stress | ↓MDA, ↑PC, ↓AOPP, ↓NO, | [ |
| 4 | CoCl2-induced rats | Orally received 400 mg/kg bw/day for 6 weeks | Oxidative stress | ↓MDA, ↓H2O2, ↓8-OHdG, | [ |
| 5 | Gentamicin (GENT) induced Wistar rats | Orally treated with 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg/day for 28 days | Oxidative stress | ↓K+ level, ↓plasma creatinine, | [ |
| 6 | Nickel-induced Wistar rats | 5% | Oxidative stress | ↓plasma creatinine, ↓urea, and | [ |
| 7 | Methotrexate (MTX)-induced Mice | 300 mg/kg body weight, orally for 7 days | Oxidative stress | ↓urea and ↓creatinine, ↓total protein, ↓MDA, | [ |
| 8 | Tilmicosin (Til) induced Sprague Dawley rats | 400 or 800 mg/kg bw, by oral gavage for 7 days | Oxidative stress, | ↓H2O2, ↓MDA, ↑SOD, ↑GPx, | [ |
| 9 | Hg-induced Male Wistar rats | 1.798 mg/kg p.o three times per week for 21 days | Oxidative stress | ↓MDA level, ↑SOD, and ↑CAT | [ |
| 10 | TiO2NPs induce male albino rats | Daily oral dose of 400 mg/kg b w for 60 days | Oxidative stress | ↓MDA, ↑SOD, ↑GSH, ↑GST,↑GPx, ↑Total thiol and ↑HO-1, ↑Nrf2 | [ |
| 11 | NaF induced | 6.1 mg/L for 8 weeks | Oxidative stress | ↓MDA, ↑SOD, ↑CAT, ↑GSH, | [ |
| 12 | Gentamicin-induced (80 mg/kg) Rabbit | 150 mg/kg body for 10 days, 300 mg/kg wt. for 10 days | Oxidative stress | ↓Serum urea and creatinine levels, | [ |
| 13 | Lead treated Male Wistar rats | 500 mg/kg for 7 days | Oxidative stress | ↓ROS, ↓LPP, ↓TPCC, ↓metal content, | [ |
| 15 | Beryllium-induced rats | 150 mg/kg daily for 5 weeks | Oxidative stress | ↓LPO, ↑GSH, ↑antioxidant enzymes activities, ↑G-6-Pase activity | [ |
| 16 | Arsenic-induced toxicity in rats | 500 mg/kg, orally, once daily | Oxidative stress | ↑ALAD, ↑GSH,↓ROS, ↑SOD, | [ |
| 17 | Heat stress (HS)-induced rabbits | 100, 200, and 300 mg, 6 weeks | Inflammation | ↑cortisol, ↑adrenaline, ↑leptin, | [ |
| 18 | ML-induced male Sprague Dawley rats | Orally 800 mg/kg bw 800 mg/kg bw | Oxidative stress, | ↓Total bilirubin, ↓direct bilirubin, ↓indirect bilirubin, ↓urea, and | [ |
| 20 | Seabream ( | 10% | Inflammation | ↓TGF-β and ↓TNF-α | [ |
| 21 | APAP-treated mice | 100 mg/kg of bw, | Oxidative stress, | ↑SOD, ↑CAT and ↑GPx, ↓MDA, | [ |
| 22 | Iodide injected Rabbit | 50 mg/kg body weight, orally once daily for 27 sequential days | Oxidative stress | ↓MDA, ↑GSH, ↓NO, ↓lipid peroxidation, ↓ROS | [ |
| 23 | Glycerol induced rat | 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg for 7 days | Oxidative stress | ↑SOD, ↑GST, ↑GPX, ↑GSH | [ |
| 24 | Salmonella-induced mice | 14, 42 and 84 mg/kg/day for 28 days | Oxidative stress | ↑HO-1, ↑SOD-2 | [ |
| 25 | STZ-induced rats | 250 mg/kg and SRC. 42 days | Oxidative stress | ↓LDL, ↑HDL, ↓CHOL, ↑ORAC | [ |
| 26 | TGF-β-treated rat kidney fibroblast cells | 10, 50, and 100 µg/mL | Fibrosis | ↓Type I collagen, fibronectin, and PAI-1 | [ |
| 27 | Gentamicin-induced Wistar rats | 28 days at graded doses of 100, 200 and 400 mg/kg | Nephrotoxicity | ↓Creatinine and MDA | [ |
MDA, Malondialdehyde; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL-6, interleukin-6; STZ, streptozotocin (C8H15N3O7); GSH: glutathione; CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GPx, Glutathione peroxidase; IL-1β, Interleukin 1 beta; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; iNOS, Inducible nitric oxide synthase; AOPP, advanced oxidation protein products; PC, protein carbonyls; NO, nitricoxide; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; 8-OHdG, 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine; MPO, myeloperoxidase; CRP, C-reactive protein; MTX, methotrexate; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; LPP, lipid perioxidation products; TPCC, total protein carbonyl content; ALAD, delta-amino levulinic acid dehydratase; BUN, Blood urea nitrogen; KIM-1, transmembrane tubular protein; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; CHOL, Cholesterol; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity; and APAP, acetaminophen. ↑, increased; ↓, decreased.
Figure 4Protective mechanisms of M. oleifera against kidney injury. M. oleifera increased the production of catalase (CAT); superoxide dismutase (SOD); glutathione peroxidase (GPx); glutathione (GSH); total antioxidant capacity (TAC); delta-amino levulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD); and G-6-Pase, which facilitated oxidative stress reduction by activating glutathione (GSH), a non-protein thiol that suppresses free radicals. GSH suppresses the oxidative stress situation. M. oleifera also suppressed oxidative stressors caused by ROS, H2O2, GSSG, and LPO by inhibiting MDA, LPP, TPCC, BUN, Creatinine, and NO. Bcl-2 was similarly produced by stress stimuli and was linked to the suppression of necrosis, induced by M. oleifera. M. oleifera inhibited the expression of Caspase-9, a protein involved in the formation of caspases. Following NF-kB, stress stimuli also increased CRP expression. NF-kB then moved from the cytosol to the nucleus, bound to DNA, and activated inflammation-related proteins. M. oleifera inhibited the mechanism by which inflammation factors were produced, hence, reducing inflammation. M. oleifera has been linked to a reduction in the progression of kidney disease.