| Literature DB >> 34961268 |
Edina Simon1, Vanda Éva Molnár2, Domonkos Lajtos1, Dina Bibi1, Béla Tóthmérész3, Szilárd Szabó2.
Abstract
We used the Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI), the amount of PM5 and PM10, and the elemental analysis of leaves to explore the sensitivity of tree species to air pollution. We assessed the tolerance of Robinia pseudoacacia, Acer saccharinum, Tilia × europaea, Acer platanoides, Fraxinus excelsior, Betula pendula, Celtis occidentalis, and Platanus × acerifolia to the amount of dust, APTI, and the elemental concentration of leaves. Leaves were collected in Debrecen (Hungary), which has a high intensity of vehicular traffic. The highest amount of PM (both PM10 and PM5) was found on the leaves of A. saccharinum and B. pendula. Our results demonstrated that A. saccharinum was moderately tolerant, while P. acerifolia was intermediate, based on the APTI value. There was a significant difference in the parameters of APTI and the elemental concentration of leaves among species. We found that tree leaves are reliable bioindicators of air pollution in urban areas. Based on the value of APTI, A. saccharinum and P. acerifolia, and based on PM, A. saccharinum and B. pendula are recommended as pollutant-accumulator species, while other studied species with lower APTI values are useful bioindicators of air pollution. The results support landscape engineers and urban developers in finding the best tree species that are tolerant to pollution and in using those as proxies of urban environmental health.Entities:
Keywords: ICP-OES; air pollution; environmental health; metals; plants; urbanisation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34961268 PMCID: PMC8709473 DOI: 10.3390/plants10122797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Average amount of particulate matter (±standard error) of aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10 μm (PM10) and smaller than 5 μm (PM5) on the surface of studied tree species. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 2Sensitivity of tree species based on APTI values (mean ± standard error). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 3Parameters of APTI values (ascorbic acid content (a), pH of the leaf (b), total chlorophyll content (c), and relative water content (d)) of leaves (mean ± standard error). Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 4Discriminant score plots of the species based on the elemental concentration of tree species leaves.
Elemental concentration of leaves in studied species (mean ± standard error).
| Elements | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al, mg kg−1 | 12.3 ± 1.1 | 21.3 ± 2.6 | 48.7 ± 3.6 | 34.0 ± 4.7 | 15.8 ± 0.9 | 12.6 ± 2.3 | 24.6 ± 2.2 | 23.6 ± 2.8 |
| Ba, mg kg−1 | 26.8 ± 8.7 | 5.9 ± 0.8 | 10.8 ± 2.1 | 9.6 ± 1.1 | 10.8 ± 3.7 | 14.6 ± 2.0 | 30.8 ± 9.3 | 7.2 ± 1.4 |
| Ca, g kg−1 | 23.2 ± 1.5 | 12.5 ± 1.3 | 22.4 ± 2.8 | 16.9 ± 0.8 | 17.8 ± 4.0 | 12.4 ± 0.7 | 46.2 ± 2.9 | 14.1 ± 1.2 |
| Cu, mg kg−1 | 5.1 ± 0.7 | 8.6 ± 1.6 | 6.8 ± 0.9 | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 9.5 ± 1.1 | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 6.2 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.2 |
| Fe, mg kg−1 | 72.2 ± 3.1 | 69. 7 ± 0.7 | 101.2 ± 2.8 | 92.0 ± 10.0 | 62.7 ± 8.8 | 46.2 ± 2.8 | 86.4 ± 6.6 | 55.5 ± 1.9 |
| K, g kg−1 | 5.9 ± 1.5 | 6.8 ± 0.7 | 4.4 ± 0.3 | 6.6 ± 2.9 | 9.0 ± 0.5 | 8.7 ± 0.6 | 4.3 ± 1.9 | 6.5 ± 1.4 |
| Li, mg kg−1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| Mg, g kg−1 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 0.5 |
| Mn, mg kg−1 | 24.2 ± 3.8 | 160.1 ± 91.8 | 29.0 ± 4.5 | 41.3 ± 4.9 | 67.0 ± 20.3 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 31.5 ± 9.6 | 27.5 ±7.4 |
| Na, g kg−1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 36.6 ± 6.6 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| Ni, mg kg−1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 1.7 |
| P, g kg−1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| Pb, mg kg−1 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
| S, g kg−1 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
| Sr, mg kg−1 | 43.5 ± 8.2 | 40.8 ± 2.3 | 64.6 ± 3.2 | 111.6 ± 30.2 | 39.0 ± 1.7 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 39.0 ± 4.5 | 39.6 ± 12.5 |
| Zn, mg kg−1 | 36.4 ± 3.1 | 43.5 ± 6.7 | 42.7 ± 3.7 | 26.9 ± 2.9 | 99.2 ± 25.3 | 67.2 ± 6.0 | 41.5 ± 0.9 | 31.1 ± 0.8 |
Figure 5Sampling sites in Debrecen, Hungary.