| Literature DB >> 34961247 |
Natale Badalamenti1, Sabino Russi2, Maurizio Bruno1,3, Viviana Maresca4, Alessandro Vaglica1, Vincenzo Ilardi1, Anna Zanfardino4, Michela Di Napoli4, Mario Varcamonti4, Piergiorgio Cianciullo4, Giovanni Calice2, Simona Laurino2, Geppino Falco4, Adriana Basile4.
Abstract
The peculiar aspect that emerges from the study of Orchidaceae is the presence of various molecules, which are particularly interesting for pharmaceutical chemistry due to their wide range of biological resources. The aim of our study was to investigate the properties of two dihydrophenanthrenes, isolated, for the first time, from Himantoglossum robertianum (Loisel.) P. Delforge (Orchidaceae) bulbs and roots. Chemical and spectroscopic study of the bulbs and roots of Himantoglossumrobertianum (Loisel.) P. Delforge resulted in the isolation of two known dihydrophenanthrenes-loroglossol and hircinol-never isolated from this plant species. The structures were evaluated based on 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and two-dimensional spectra, and by comparison with the literature. These two molecules have been tested for their possible antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiproliferative, and proapoptotic activities. In particular, it has been shown that these molecules cause an increase in the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) in polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN); show antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, and have anti-proliferative effects on gastric cancer cell lines, inducing apoptosis effects. Therefore, these two molecules could be considered promising candidates for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical preparations.Entities:
Keywords: Himantoglossum robertianum; NMR; anti-proliferative activity; antimicrobial activity; antioxidant enzymes; dihydrophenanthrenes; proapoptotic activity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34961247 PMCID: PMC8708532 DOI: 10.3390/plants10122776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Structures of loroglossol (1) and hircinol (2).
Figure 21H-NMR spectrum (400 MHz, CDCl3) of loroglossol.
Figure 313C-NMR spectrum (100 MHz, CDCl3) of loroglossol.
Figure 4HMBC spectrum showing correlations in loroglossol.
Figure 5The 1H-NMR spectrum (400 MHz, CDCl3) of hircinol.
Figure 613C-NMR spectrum (100 MHz, (CD3)2CO) of hircinol.
Figure 7Effect of the loroglossol and hircinol on activities of antioxidant enzymes in polymorphonuclear cells. (A) Superoxide dismutase; (B) catalase; (C) glutathione peroxidase. Data were presented as mean and standard error and they were analyzed with a paired t-test. Bars not accompanied by the same letter were significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 8Antibacterial activity of loroglossol and hircinol evaluated by colony count assay, against E. coli DH5α and S. aureus ATCC 6538P at different concentrations. Untreated cells represent positive control while bacterial cells with dimethyl sulfoxide represent the negative one. Each bar is the average of three different experiments (p value is <0.05).
Figure 9Effect of loroglossol and hircinol on cell proliferation. AGS and KATO-III cells were treated for 24 h (A) and for 48 h (B). Cell proliferation was determined by MTS assay. Data were expressed as % of vehicle control viability. Data were presented as mean and standard error of three individual experiments and analyzed with one sample-t test. ** p < 0.005; *** p ≤ 0.0001.
Comparison of relative viability between the two gastric cancer cell lines.
| Time | Dose | Loroglossol | Hircinol | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGS | KATO-III | AGS | KATO-III | ||||
| 24 h | 3.9–4.1 × 10−4 M | 61.4 ± 2.4 | 66.9 ± 2.8 | 0.18 | 39.4 ± 0.8 | 56.3 ± 0.9 | 0.0002 |
| 9.8–10 × 10−4 M | 37.5 ± 0.4 | 58.6 ± 1.6 | <0.0001 | 42.9 ± 0.9 | 48.4 ± 0.2 | 0.02 | |
| 48 h | 3.9–4.1 × 10−4 M | 37.2 ± 4.1 | 53.7 ± 3.6 | 0.02 | 31.8 ± 0.2 | 44.2 ± 1.1 | 0.006 |
| 9.8–10 × 10−4 M | 25.8 ± 0.6 | 32.1 ± 0.9 | 0.0005 | 34.3 ± 0.8 | 44.5 ± 0.3 | 0.002 | |
Statistical significant assessed by t-test.
Figure 10Loroglossol and hircinol induced apoptosis in GC cells. AGS and KATO-III cells were treated with 100 µg/mL (3.9–4.1 × 10−4 M) for 48 h. The amount of live, apoptotic and necrotic cells was determined by flow cytometry. The relative counts were estimated in comparison to the vehicle controls. Data were presented as mean and standard error of three individual experiments and were analyzed with one-sample t-test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005.