| Literature DB >> 34961181 |
Diana Ionela Stegăruș1, Ecaterina Lengyel2, George Florian Apostolescu3, Oana Romina Botoran1, Corneliu Tanase4.
Abstract
Three species of Stachys genus (S. byzantina, S. officinalis, S. sylvatica) were investigated in the present study in terms of aromatic profile and total polyphenol content, as well as antibacterial activity and antioxidant capacity. Gas chromatography coupled with flame ionization detection (GC/FID) was used for exploration of the herbal alcoholic extracts. Using statistical analysis, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and total phenolic chemical fingerprints were compared in order to describe differences and identify putative signature traits of the three Stachys species. The results showed that the analyzed Stachys extracts have a total polyphenol content being between 197 ± 0.27 mg GAE/g for S. sylvatica and 232 ± 43 mg GAE/g for S. officinalis. The antioxidant activity was between 444 ± 58 mM Trolox/g (S. sylvatica) and 602 ± 75 mM Trolox/g (S. officinalis). The volatile compounds identified were mostly sesquiterpenes, followed by monoterpenes and secondary compounds. The most abundant in all three species was germacrene D (21.9% 28-25.2%). The multivariate analysis demonstrated the potential of using plant tissue VOC profiles to discriminate between different Stachy species, with a total of 31 VOCs being identified from all three species. Although there were strong similarities among the three species' VOC profiles, distinctions can be made using chemometric analysis. The microbiological results showed an antimicrobial capacity of all three extracts, especially on Gram-positive bacteria. In addition to increasing consumers' understanding regarding the health benefits of these Stachy species, this investigation contributes to defining and preserving a precious genetic and cultural-historical biodiversity.Entities:
Keywords: S. byzantina; S. officinalis; S. sylvatica; antibacterial activity; antioxidant activity; polyphenols; volatile compounds
Year: 2021 PMID: 34961181 PMCID: PMC8709469 DOI: 10.3390/plants10122710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Total amount of phenolic compounds and radical scavenging activity in S. byzantina, S. officinalis and S. sylvatica.
| Plant Sample Extract | TPC (mg GAE/g) ± SD * | DPPH Scavenging Activity (%) ± SD * | DPPH (EC50) μg/mL ± SD * | TE (mM/g Dry Extract) ± SD * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 222 ± 0.34 | 63.8 ± 0.3 | 12.7 ± 0.01 | 556 ± 62 |
|
| 232 ± 0.43 | 65.2 ± 0.5 | 11.2 ± 0.01 | 602 ± 75 |
|
| 197 ± 0.27 | 53.1 ± 0.2 | 14.5 ±0.01 | 444 ± 58 |
* TPC—total polyphenol content; GAE—gallic acid equivalent; DPPH—2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; TE—Trolox equivalent; SD—standard deviation.
The profile of volatile compounds from the three Stachys species: S. byzantina, S. officinalis, S. sylvatica.
| Compound Name | Compound Classification | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Docosane | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.9 | FAD1 |
| Hexadecanoic acid | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | FAD2 |
| Tetradecanoic acid | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | FAD3 |
| Tricosane | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | FAD4 |
| Hexadecan-1-ol | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | FAD5 |
| 1-hexanol | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | GL1 |
| Decanoic acid | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | GL2 |
| 3-octanone | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.2 | O1 |
| 5-Amino-1-ethylprazole | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | O2 |
| Allylbenzene | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | O3 |
| Ninanal | 0.3 | 0 | 0.4 | O4 |
| 2-Thujene | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0 | MH1 |
| Camphene | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.8 | MH2 |
| Limonene | 10.8 | 15.7 | 19.5 | MH3 |
| α-Terpinene | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | MH4 |
| Β-Myrcene | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0 | MH5 |
| Β-Pinene | 15.2 | 10.5 | 14.3 | MH6 |
| Lavandulol | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.7 | OM1 |
| Linalool | 3.2 | 5.4 | 2.5 | OM2 |
| Linalool acetate | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | OM3 |
| Nerol | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.8 | OM4 |
| Nerolidol | 2.7 | 2.8 | 4.7 | OM5 |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 1.9 | 5.7 | 1.8 | OS1 |
| Germacrene D | 24.6 | 25.2 | 21.9 | SH1 |
| α-Copaene | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | SH2 |
| α-Humulene | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.1 | SH3 |
| β-Bourbonene | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2 | SH4 |
| β-Caryophyllene | 8.9 | 9.9 | 13.3 | SH5 |
| β-Copaene | 1.9 | 2.4 | 1.6 | SH6 |
| β-Cubenene | 10.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | SH7 |
| β-Farnesene | 0.2 | 1 | 0.5 | SH8 |
| β-Gurjunene | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.1 | SH9 |
| TOTAL (%) | 97.5 | 95.8 | 98.4 | |
| MH | 29.4 | 31.2 | 36.8 | |
| OM | 7.5 | 9.5 | 10.5 | |
| SH | 50.7 | 41.6 | 41.8 | |
| OS | 1.9 | 5.7 | 1.8 |
FAD—fatty acids and fatty acid-derived compounds; GL—green leaf volatiles; MH—monoterpene hydrocarbons; OM—oxygenated monoterpenes; SH—sesquiterpene hydrocarbons; OS—oxygenated sesquiterpenes; O—others.
Figure 12D-principal component analysis plot of the VOCs in the three Stachys species. FAD—fatty acids and fatty acid-derived compounds; GL—green leaf volatiles; MH—monoterpene hydrocarbons; OM—oxygenated monoterpenes; SH—sesquiterpene hydrocarbons; OS—oxygenated sesquiterpenes; O—others.
Figure 2Antibacterial activity of Stachys byzantina, S. officinalis and S. sylvatica extracts on S.A.: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), S.E.: Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), B.C.: Bacillus cereus (ATCC 9372), E.F.: Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 19433), E.C.: Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), P.A.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10145), En.C.: Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC 43560), P.M.: Proteus mirabilis (ATCC 29906).