| Literature DB >> 34960994 |
Gregor Lavrič1, Aleksandra Zamljen2, Janja Juhant Grkman1, Edita Jasiukaitytė-Grojzdek2, Miha Grilc2, Blaž Likozar2, Diana Gregor-Svetec3, Urška Vrabič-Brodnjak3.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to isolate lignin from organosolv, beech tree (Fagus sylvatica), and Japanese knotweed (Reynoutria japonica), to use it for paper surface and to replace part of the non-renewable product resources with bio-based ones. A total of nine coated samples with different lignin formulations and starch were compounded, prepared, and evaluated. The basic (grammage, thickness, specific density), mechanical (elongation at break, tensile, burst and tear indices), and barrier properties (contact angle, water penetration, water vapour permeability, kit test) of the coated papers were investigated. The analysis showed no significant difference in tensile properties between uncoated and coated samples. Furthermore, the decrease in water vapour transmission rate and the lower contact angle for coated samples were nevertheless confirmed. The novel coating materials show promising products with very good barrier properties. Finally, the correlation between structural, morphological, and (other) natural lignin-based factors was revealed, highlighting the importance of parameters such as the equivalence ratio of aliphatic and phenolic hydroxyl groups or the average molecular weight. Tuning functionality by design could optimise performance in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Japanese knotweed invasive species; barrier properties; beech wood biomass; mechanical properties; molecular weight distribution; nuclear magnetic resonance; size exclusion chromatography
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960994 PMCID: PMC8703786 DOI: 10.3390/polym13244443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Sample names and corresponding surface coating formulations with measured pH (for dissolution of lignin), pH of coating, and viscosity (Brookfield Industries Laboratories Inc., Thomaston, CT, USA).
| Sample | Coating Agent | Weight Percentage * (%) | pH Value (Dissolution of Lignin) (25 °C) | pH Value of Coating (25 °C) | Viscosity 100 rpm (mPa∙s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | Basic, non-coated paper | / | / | / | / |
| Sample 2 | Starch | 30% | / | 7.84 | 170 |
| Sample 3 | Starch + lignin B | 30% + 10% | / | 7.38 | 270 |
| Sample 4 | Starch + lignin B | 30% + 15% | / | 7.10 | 600 |
| Sample 5 | Starch + lignin B,pH | 30% + 10% | 10.27 | 9.24 | 220 |
| Sample 6 | Starch + lignin B,pH | 30% + 15% | 9.90 | 8.95 | 340 |
| Sample 7 | Starch + lignin F | 3 0% + 10% | 10.60 | 8.00 | 145 |
| Sample 8 | Starch + lignin F | 30% + 15% | 10.75 | 8.70 | 250 |
| Sample 9 | Starch + lignin J | 30% + 10% | 10.25 | 8.80 | 115 |
| Sample 10 | Starch + lignin J | 30% + 15% | 10.70 | 9.95 | 275 |
* relative to water/B Lignin from beech wood/B,pH lignin from beech wood, pH adjustment/F lignin obtained from Fraunhofer/J lignin from Japanese knotweed.
Structural characteristics and molecular weights of lignin samples determined with NMR and SEC.
| Analysis | Characteristic | Units | Beech Wood Lignin | Beech Wood Lignin (Commercial) | Japanese Knotweed Lignin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31P NMR | Aliphatic OH | (mmol/g) | 1.06 | 1.51 | 2.96 |
| Phenolic OH | 3.95 | 3.36 | 2.40 | ||
| aliphatic OH/phenolic OH | 0.27 | 0.45 | 1.23 | ||
| Total OH | 5.06 | 4.97 | 5.50 | ||
| 2D HSQC | β-O-4 | per 100 C9 | 0.38 | 1.87 | 19.5 |
| β-5 | - | 1.6 | 5.5 | ||
| β-β | 3.9 | 6.1 | 4.6 | ||
| S/G | 4.1 | 3.1 | 0.9 | ||
| SEC | Mw | Da | 2450 | 3350 | 3600 |
| PDI | 1.87 | 2.17 | 2.42 |
Figure 1Quantitative 31P NMR spectra of lignin samples.
Figure 2Molecular weight distributions of lignin samples applied in paper coatings.
Results of basic, tensile, and barrier properties of coated papers (mean values and standard deviation).
| Sample | Grammage | Thickness | Specific Density | Burst Index | Tear Index | Tensile Index | Elongation | Contact Angle | Porosity | WVTR | KIT Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | 70.5 ± 0.07 | 55.3 ± 1.6 | 1.27 | 2.64 | 4.06 | 2.21 | 5.87 ± 0.02 | 89.25 ± 3.43 | 2.00 ± 0.14 | 550 (549.9 ± 6.2) | <1 |
| Sample 2 | 73.7 ± 0.11 | 60.5 ± 1.4 | 1.22 | 2.51 | 4.56 | 2.21 | 5.41 ± 0.16 | 36.66 ± 2.30 | 0.00 ± 0.03 | 150 (151.9 ± 0.15) | 8 |
| Sample 3 | 73.5 ± 0.09 | 65.7 ± 1.5 | 1.12 | 2.50 | 4.00 | 2.39 | 5.67 ± 0.05 | 37.10 ± 1.53 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 120 (117.6 ± 0.00) | 11 |
| Sample 4 | 74.9 ± 0.13 | 65.0 ± 1.9 | 1.15 | 2.45 | 3.77 | 2.41 | 5.31 ± 0.12 | 43.01 ± 2.21 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 130 (125 ± 7.4) | 8 |
| Sample 5 | 73.8 ± 0.10 | 62.7 ± 1.9 | 1.17 | 2.57 | 3.92 | 2.50 | 6.19 ± 0.03 | 32.32 ± 1.09 | 0.00 ± 0.02 | 120 (115.6 ± 7.4) | 11 |
| Sample 6 | 73.2 ± 0.11 | 61.3 ± 1.6 | 1.14 | 2.49 | 3.95 | 2.26 | 5.39 ± 0.11 | 27.19 ± 1.64 | 0.00 ± 0.03 | 120 (123.6 ± 2.0) | 8 |
| Sample 7 | 74.1 ± 0.16 | 63.3 ± 0.8 | 1.17 | 2.50 | 4.11 | 2.20 | 5.06 ± 0.09 | 32.24 ± 2.02 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 140 (137 ± 4.4) | 8 |
| Sample 8 | 74.7 ± 0.09 | 62.3 ± 1.2 | 1.20 | 2.42 | 4.11 | 2.26 | 5.04 ± 0.10 | 35.71 ± 1.19 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 100 (101.1 ± 8.7) | 6 |
| Sample 9 | 72.5 ± 0.15 | 66.2 ± 1.5 | 1.10 | 2.56 | 4.74 | 2.32 | 6.17 ± 0.01 | 36.19 ± 2.32 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 80 (81.5 ± 4.1) | 8 |
| Sample 10 | 73.7 ± 0.12 | 67.8 ± 1.0 | 1.09 | 2.53 | 4.49 | 2.30 | 5.85 ± 0.08 | 34.73 ± 2.62 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 100 (97.0 ± 4.2) | 6 |
Figure 3Change in signal intensity (%) during water penetration of analysed papers.