| Literature DB >> 34960977 |
Jorge S S Neto1, Henrique F M de Queiroz1, Ricardo A A Aguiar1, Mariana D Banea1.
Abstract
The thermal stability of natural fiber composites is a relevant aspect to be considered since the processing temperature plays a critical role in the manufacturing process of composites. At higher temperatures, the natural fiber components (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) start to degrade and their major properties (mechanical and thermal) change. Different methods are used in the literature to determine the thermal properties of natural fiber composites as well as to help to understand and determine their suitability for a certain applications (e.g., Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and differential mechanical thermal analysis (DMA)). Weight loss percentage, the degradation temperature, glass transition temperature (Tg), and viscoelastic properties (storage modulus, loss modulus, and the damping factor) are the most common thermal properties determined by these methods. This paper provides an overview of the recent advances made regarding the thermal properties of natural and hybrid fiber composites in thermoset and thermoplastic polymeric matrices. First, the main factors that affect the thermal properties of natural and hybrid fiber composites (fiber and matrix type, the presence of fillers, fiber content and orientation, the treatment of the fibers, and manufacturing process) are briefly presented. Further, the methods used to determine the thermal properties of natural and hybrid composites are discussed. It is concluded that thermal analysis can provide useful information for the development of new materials and the optimization of the selection process of these materials for new applications. It is crucial to ensure that the natural fibers used in the composites can withstand the heat required during the fabrication process and retain their characteristics in service.Entities:
Keywords: differential mechanical thermal analysis (DMA); differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); natural fiber reinforced composite material; thermal analysis; thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960977 PMCID: PMC8705297 DOI: 10.3390/polym13244425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic of natural fibers classification.
Effect of treatments on the thermal properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites.
| Fiber | Matrix | Treatment | Thermal Properties | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flax | Epoxy | 5% and 10% of sodium bicarbonate | By increasing the concentration of sodium bicarbonate, negligible changes in the | [ |
| Mulberry (MF) | Polyester | Alkalization (5% ATMFC, 10% ATMFC and 15% ATMFC) | 10% ATMFC samples presented higher values of storage modulus and loss modulus compared to the other cases studied. | [ |
| Jute | Polyester | 5% of alkali treatment, poly (lactic acid)-coated and mixed treatment | The mixed and alkaline treatment improved the | [ |
| Buriti and ramie | Polyester | NaOH (2.5 and 10%) | The buriti fiber starts to degrade at 217 °C, while the ramie fiber at 247 °C. The alkalization treatment of these fibers negatively affected their properties when compared to the in natura and washed cases. | [ |
| Bamboo | Epoxy, polyester, and Vinyl ester | Chemical (10% NaOH) and physical (milling method) | The alkaline treatment enhanced the thermal stability of the composites. | [ |
| Curauá | Polyester | 10% of barium hydroxide Ba(OH)2 for 48 h at 25 °C, 14% of calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2 for 4 h at 70 °C, 10% of potassium hydroxide (KOH) for 1 h at 25 °C, 5% of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 2 h at 70 °C and 5% of silane (Trimethoxy(propyl) for 4 h at 25 °C | The chemical treatment increased the | [ |
| Kenaf | PLA | Acetylation (0.5, 1, 2 and 3 h) | The thermal stability was improved as treatment time was increased. | [ |
| Banana | PP | Untreated, alkaline and acetylated treatment | The acetylation treatment improved the thermal stability and raised up the crystallization temperature. | [ |
| Jute | PLA | 6% benzoyl peroxide acetone solution for about 30 min after alkali pre-treatment | Higher storage modulus and lower | [ |
| Kenaf | PU | Acetylation, blocked isocyanate, maleic anhydride and permanganate treatment | The acetylated treatment provided better values for storage modulus (E’) when compared to all other treatments. | [ |
| Banana + sisal | PLA | Untreated and benzoyl peroxide treatment | The peroxide treatment improved the thermal stability by delaying the thermal degradation. No significant changes in the | [ |
| Jute + curauá | Epoxy | Untreated, alkali, silane and mixed treatment | The chemical treatment improved both | [ |
| Bamboo | Epoxy, polyester and vinyl ester | Alkali (0 h-0%, 24 h-10 %, 48 h-5, 10, 15% and 72 h-10%) | The bamboo-epoxy composite treated with the 10% of NaOH for 48 h presented the highest thermal stability. | [ |
| Cotton | LDPE | Alkaline, silane, mixed treatment, maleic anhydride, and alkali–maleic anhydride | The mixed treated composite presented higher | [ |
| Jute | Epoxy | Enzyme treatment, ozone treatment and laser treatment | The laser treated composites presented higher | [ |
| Pine cone | ABS | Alkaline and bleaching (alkaline + H2O2) | The NaOH treatment increased the | [ |
| Ramie | PLA | Maleic anhydride (MA) | The thermal stability increased but the | [ |
Figure 2Schematic of the principal methods used to determine the thermal properties of composites. Reproduced with permission from [35].
Stages of thermal degradation of natural fiber reinforced composites.
| Fiber Type | Matrix | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sisal, Sisal + Ramie, | Epoxy | 30–150 °C: evaporation of humidity retained in the fibers | 240–420 °C: pyrolysis process. | - | [ |
| Bamboo | Epoxy, polyester, vinyl ester | 30–155 °C: evaporation of moisture. | 199–399 °C: the decomposition of cellulosic components (cellulose and hemicellulose). | 364–499 °C: the decomposition of lignin. | [ |
| Sugar Palm | Phenolic | 30–200 °C: corresponds to vaporization of water molecules | 200–300 °C: the thermal degradation of the hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. | 300–400 °C: the loss of small groups and water bonds in the chains of the chemical structures. | [ |
| Ramie and Buriti | Polyester | 61 °C (Ramie)–69 °C (Buriti): is attributed to the water evaporating. | 289 °C (Ramie)–292 °C (Buriti): The decomposition of amorphous constituents, such as hemicellulose. | 368 °C (Ramie)–341 °C (Buriti): Thermal decomposition of cellulose. | [ |
| Benzoxazine resin | - | 200–300 °C: The decomposition of hemicellulose and cellulose. | 350–500 °C: The decomposition of lignin. | [ | |
| Fique | Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) and Epoxy | 60–100 °C: The evaporation of superficial water. | 250–350 °C: The decomposition of hemicellulose. | 350–600 °C: The decomposition of α-cellulose. | [ |
| Coir fiber | PLA | 25–150 °C: attributed to the evaporation of water. | 190 °C and 290 °C: corresponds to the hemicellulose degradation. | 290 °C and 360 °C: the thermal degradation of cellulose. The degradation of lignin occurred between 280 °C and 500 °C | [ |
| Kenaf and Rice husk | PLA | 30–150 °C: The evaporation of the moisture absorbed in fibers. | 230–350 °C: The degradation of the cellulosic substances of hemicelluloses, cellulose and lignin. | - | [ |
| Sisal filler | Polyurethane (PU) | - | 297 °C: the hemicellulose degradation. | 365 °C: corresponded to cellulose degradation | [ |
| Polypropylene (PP) | - | 223–290 °C: the hemicellulose degradation. | 290–380 °C: | [ |
Figure 3(a) TG and (b) DTG curves of Fique fibers at heating rates of 10 °C/min. Reproduced with permission from [145].
Figure 4(a) TG curve of neat Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) and (b) DTG curve of Linear Low-Density Polyethylene nonwoven Fique Fiber natural composite (LLDPE/FF). Reproduced with permission from [145].
Figure 5(a) TG and (b) DTG curves of neat Epoxy resin (EP) and Fique biocomposite based Epoxy (EP/FF). Reproduced with permission from [145].
Figure 6(a) TGA (b) mass reduction and (c) DTG curves of banana/PLA based composites fabricated using three processing techniques (DIM, EIM and ECM). Reproduced with permission from [156].
Thermal properties of natural fiber composites obtained from TGA analysis.
| Fiber | Matrix | Thermal Properties | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermoset matrices | |||
| Bamboo | Epoxy, Polyester and Vinyl ester | The incorporation of bamboo fiber did not present a substantial improvement in the initial onset degradation temperature ( | [ |
| Fique | Linear Low-Density Polyethylene (LLDP) and Epoxy resin (EP) | The incorporation of the fique fiber in LLDP matrix decreased the | [ |
| Buriti and ramie | Polyester | The maximum peak of degradation temperature ( | [ |
| Sisal, sisal + | Epoxy | The hybridization increased the thermal stability of the composites when compared to the pure sisal composites. | [ |
| Banana, jute | Epoxy | The thermal diffusivity and specific heat capacity of jute/banana hybrid composite decreased with increasing the fiber content. | [ |
| Sugar Palm | Phenolic | The chemical treatment negatively affected the thermal stability of the composite. | [ |
| Sisal and kenaf | Polyester | The thermal stability of hybrid composites was superior when compared to the neat fiber case | [ |
| Sugar palm fiber (SPF) and roselle fiber (RF) | Polyurethane | The sugar palm fiber (SP) improved thermal stability of hybrid composite. The roselle (25 wt%) + sugar palm (75 wt%) composite showed higher thermal stability when compared to RFT composite. | [ |
| Jute, jute + sisal and jute + curauá | Epoxy and Polyester | [ | |
| Kenaf + | Phenolic | The treatment increased the maximum degradation temperature ( | [ |
| Curauá | Polyester | The addition of the fiber and chemical treatment of fibers with NaOH improved the thermal stability of the composites. | [ |
| Mulberry | Polyester | The thermal stability of the composites increased by increasing the NaOH concentration. | [ |
| Jute + | Epoxy | The hybridization of the composites increased the maximum degradation temperature when compared to the pure Oil palm composite. | [ |
| Date palm fibers (DPF) | Epoxy | DPF improves the thermal stability of the composite. | [ |
| Thermoplastic matrices | |||
| Banana | ABS, high impact polystyrene (HIPS) and HDPE | The addition of natural fiber to the thermoplastic matrix showed an increased thermal stability when compared to the pure resin. | [ |
| Date palm | PVC and HDPE | The chemical treatment improved the | [ |
| Basalt + Cissus quadrangularis | PLA | The addition of basalt fiber increased the thermal stability of the composite. | [ |
| Jute | PLA | The configuration 2J5P-2 (2 layers of jute and 5 layers of PLA) of composite showed an increase in | [ |
| Wood powder | Polypropylene (PP) | The incorporation of wood powder presented maximum temperature (482.3 °C) for 45 wt% when compared to pure PP composite (475.3 °C). | [ |
| Flax + Basalt | PLA | The hybridization of the composite showed an increase in | [ |
| Banana | PLA | The presence of banana fibers in PLA matrix led to a reduction in degradation temperature as compared to neat PLA, which was attributed to the low thermal stability of banana fibers that possibly enhanced deformation of the crystalline structure of PLA at higher temperatures. | [ |
| Jute + Maleic anhydride (MAPP) | Polypropylene (PP) | The incorporation of MAPP did not have significant influence on the thermal stability of the composites. | [ |
| Kenaf + epoxidized jatropha oil (EJO) | PLA | The incorporation of EJO (5 wt%) slightly increased the thermal stability ( | [ |
| Sisal | Polyurethane (PU) | The chemical treatment improved the thermal stability when compared with untreated composite. | [ |
| Polypropylene (PP) | The addition of fiber lowered the thermal stability when compared with pure PP matrix. | [ | |
Figure 7DSC curves of epoxy sisal based composites as a function of hybridization (S-Sisal; S + R-Sisal + ramie; S + C-Sisal + curauá and S + G-sisal + glass fiber), Reproduced with permission from Pereira et al. [107].
Thermal properties of natural and hybrid composites obtained from DSC analysis.
| Fiber | Matrix | Thermal Properties | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermoset Matrices | |||
| Curauá | Polyester | The chemical treatments used increased the | [ |
| Jute + ZrO2 | Polyester | The presence of the nanofiller increased the | [ |
| Jute+ ramie | Epoxy | Alkalization and mixed (alkalization + silane) treatment increased the thermal properties. | [ |
| Caranan | Epoxy | The endothermic peak shows a large amount of water retained in the fiber. | [ |
| Jute + sisal | Epoxy | The addition of natural fiber produced an increase of thermal properties ( | [ |
| Hemp+ eggshell | Epoxy | The incorporation of filler reduced the exothermic peak of the composite. | [ |
| Flax + Pineapple + Micro Cellulose (CMF) | Epoxy | The addition of CMF improved the endothermic peak and enthalpy when compared to the unmodified composite. | [ |
| Kenaf + Sisal | Bio-Epoxy | UV aging increased the | [ |
| Jute + coir | Epoxy | The endothermic peak showed water loss between 60–120 °C. | [ |
| Flax + TiO2 | Epoxy | The addition of 0.7% of nanofiller increased the | [ |
| Thermoplastic matrices | |||
| Cotton | Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) | The mixed (alkali–silane) treated composite presented higher values for | [ |
| Bamboo | Polypropylene (PP) | The incorporation of natural fiber and nanofiller (TiO2) improved the crystallization temperature ( | [ |
| Pine cone ( | ABS | The chemical treatment (NaOH) increased the | [ |
| Wood powder | Polypropylene (PP) | The addition of wood powder (15 wt% and 30 wt%) showed no significant change for the melting temperature ( | [ |
| Bamboo | PLA | The alkalinization treatment of bamboo fiber increases thermal stability ( | [ |
| Date palm | PVC and HDPE | The chemical treatment (H2O2+ HNO3) increased the | [ |
| Kenaf fiber; | PLA | No change in | [ |
| Coir fibers | PLA | Addition of coir fibers increased the | [ |
| Coir fibers | PLA | Addition of coir fibers in PLA matrix does not affect the | [ |
| Basalt + | PLA | The PBC2 (PLA + 12 wt% of basalt + 0.5 wt% of | [ |
Figure 8DMA test results of banana fiber/PLA composites (a) Storage modulus (E′) and (b) Loss modulus (E″), (c) Tan delta vs. temperature. Reproduced with permission from [156].
Thermal properties of natural composites obtained from DMA analysis.
| Fiber | Matrix | Thermal Properties | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermoset Matrices | |||
| Jute + sisal | Epoxy | The hybridization increased the storage modulus ( | [ |
| Kenaf | Polyurethane (PU) | The acetylated treatment presented better values for storage modulus ( | [ |
| Pineapple + kenaf | Phenolic | The treated pineapple fiber increased the | [ |
| Mulberry | Polyester | 10% of NaOH treatment increased the storage modulus ( | [ |
| Aloevera /Hemp/Flax | Epoxy | The hybridization and chemical treatment (BaSO4) increased the storage modulus ( | [ |
| Kenaf + Nanofiller | Epoxy | The incorporation of nanofiller improved the | [ |
| Kenaf (KKK), Sisal (SSS) and Kenaf + Sisal (KSK and SKS) | Bio-Epoxy | The incorporation of fibers (sisal and kenaf) did not affect the | [ |
| Jute + Nanoclay | Epoxy | The nanoclay modified jute composites presented higher | [ |
| Bamboo + | Epoxy | The addition of the nanofiller improved the storage modulus, loss modulus and | [ |
| Ramie + Buriti | Polyester | The ramie reinforced composite treated with 2% de NaOH presented higher storage modulus and loss modulus compared to the other treated cases. | [ |
| Jute + | Epoxy | High oil palm to jute fiber ratio lowered the storage modulus. Loss modulus presented an increasing trend as a function of increasing jute fiber content. | [ |
| Bamboo + Kenaf | Epoxy | The complex and storage modulus of bamboo composite are higher compared to kenaf composite. Hybrid composites value lie between bamboo and kenaf composites. | [ |
| Date palm + Bamboo | Epoxy | The hybridization of the composite presents an increase of storage modulus ( | [ |
| Buriti | Epoxy | The addition of buriti fiber improved the storage modulus ( | [ |
| Thermoplastic matrices | |||
| Flax + Basalt | PLA | The addition of natural fiber increased the storage modulus ( | [ |
| Date palm | PVC and HDPE | The chemical treatments increased the properties of | [ |
| Sisal | PLA | The sisal fiber with 15% weight fraction increased the thermal properties with maximum storage ( | [ |
| Bamboo, wood and coconut | PLA | The addition of natural fibers increased the crystalline degree of PLA matrix. Also, increased the storage modulus ( | [ |
| sugar palm fiber (SPF)- and kenaf fiber (KF)- | Polypropylene (PP) | The hybrid composite with the best ratio (PP/SPF/KF), T-SP5K5, showed a loss modulus ( | [ |
| Ramie | PLA | The chemical treatments (NaOH and Silane) showed maximum storage modulus ( | [ |
| Coir + pineapple leaf | PLA | The hybridization of the composite showed an increase of storage modulus ( | [ |
| PP | The incorporation of nanofiller increased the storage modulus ( | [ | |
| Kenaf | PLA | The randomly oriented (ROFRPC) composite showed highest storage modulus ( | [ |
| Basalt (BF) | PLA | The addition of BF improved the storage modulus ( | [ |