| Literature DB >> 34960928 |
Jie Cao1, Wenru Liu1, Jun Mei1,2,3,4, Jing Xie1,2,3,4.
Abstract
This research was conducted to investigate the effect of active coatings composed of locust bean gum (LBG) and sodium alginate (SA) containing daphnetin emulsions (DEs) combined with modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the microbiological and physicochemical properties of turbot during 4 °C refrigerated storage for 32 days. The results revealed that LBG-SA-DE coatings together with high CO2 MAP (60% CO2/35% N2/5% O2) maintained the total viable count (TVC) of H2S-producing bacteria in 4-6 lg CFU/g, which is lower than the limit (7 lg CFU/g). In addition, LBG-SA-DE coatings together with high CO2 MAP (60% CO2/35% N2/5% O2) inhibited the production of odor compounds, including thiobarbituric acid (TBA), trimethylamine-nitrogen (TMA-N), K value, and total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N). The low-field NMR analysis (LF-NMR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated that LBG-SA-DE coatings together with high CO2 MAP (60% CO2/35% N2/5% O2) treatments could delay the release of water located in muscle fiber macromolecules or convert it into free water based on muscle fiber destruction, thus maintaining the water content and migration. The results of the sensory evaluation showed that turbot treated with LBG-SA-DE coatings together with MAP could maintain its freshness during refrigerated storage.Entities:
Keywords: active coating; modified atmosphere packaging; shelf life; total volatile basic nitrogen; turbot
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960928 PMCID: PMC8707299 DOI: 10.3390/polym13244376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Sample preparation with different daphnetin contents and modes of packaging.
| Sample | Daphnetin Content (g/L) | Modes of Packaging |
|---|---|---|
| CK | - | Air |
| 0D | - | Modified atmosphere |
| 0.16D | 0.16 | Modified atmosphere |
| 0.32D | 0.32 | Modified atmosphere |
| 0.64D | 0.64 | Modified atmosphere |
Figure 1Changes in TVC (a), Pseudomonas spp. counts (b), and H2S-producing bacteria counts (c) of turbots during refrigerated storage. Different superscript letters a–e indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Changes in the water distribution (a) and MRI (b) of turbots during refrigerated storage.
Figure 3Changes in the TBA of turbots during refrigerated storage. Different superscript letters a–d indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Changes in the TVB-N of turbots during refrigerated storage. Different superscript letters a–e indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Different superscript letters a–d indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Changes in the TMA value of turbots during refrigerated storage. Different superscript letters a–e indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Changes in the K value of turbots during refrigerated storage. Different superscript letters a–e indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7Changes in the sensory scores of turbot samples during refrigerated storage. Different superscript letters a–d indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).