| Literature DB >> 34960874 |
Xiang He1,2, Ruyue Liu1,2, Huiqing Liu1, Ruixiao Wang1, Zhenhao Xi1,2, Yixiang Lin1, Jie Wang1.
Abstract
In order to replace traditional wound treatments such as sutures, tissue adhesives with strong wet tissue adhesion and biocompatibility have attracted more attention to the applications of non-invasive wound closure. Herein, inspired by tunicate adhesive protein, a series of 2,3,4-trihydroxybenzaldehyde (TBA)-modified chitosan hydrogels (CS-TBA-Fe) were prepared by easily mixing the solutions of chitosan-FeCl3 and TBA via the Schiff-base reaction and the coordination between Fe3+ and pyrogallol groups. The gelation time was greatly shortened to only several seconds after induced even trace Fe3+. The hydrogel (CS-TBA-Fe) exhibited ~12-fold enhanced wet tissue adhesion strength (60.3 kPa) over the commercial fibrin glue. Meanwhile, the hydrogel also showed robust adhesion to various substrates such as wood, PMMA, and aluminum. The swelling ratio and rheological property can be simply controlled by changing the concentrations of chitosan, TBA, and Fe3+. Moreover, the hydrogel displayed a rapid and highly efficient self-healing ability and an excellent antibacterial activity against E. coli. The overall results show that the CS-TBA-Fe hydrogel with enhanced wet adhesiveness will be a promising tissue adhesive material.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; facile preparation; hydrogel; tissue adhesive; tunicate-inspired
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960874 PMCID: PMC8708530 DOI: 10.3390/polym13244322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the formation of CS-TBA-Fe hydrogel by mixing CS-Fe and TBA solutions.
Figure 2Infrared spectra of chitosan and CS-TBA polymer.
Figure 3Gelation time of CS-TBA-Fe hydrogels varies with concentration of chitosan (A), TBA (B), and Fe3+ (C), and the photos of the mixtures of chitosan and TBA without Fe3+ (D).
Gelation time of CS-TBA hydrogels with different formula.
| CS-TBA Formula | Gelation Time |
|---|---|
| CS-TBA-Fe-1-25-0 | not gel |
| CS-TBA-Fe-2-15-0 | 10 h |
| CS-TBA-Fe-2-25-0 | 2 h 11 m |
| CS-TBA-Fe-3-25-0 | 21 m 31 s |
| CS-TBA-Fe-3-25-0 (0.2M HCl) | not gel |
Figure 4Swelling test of CS-TBA-Fe hydrogels with different curing time.
Figure 5Linear viscoelastic region of CS-TBA-Fe hydrogels (A), and the frequency sweep (B) and temperature sweep (C) tests with different curing time.
Figure 6Self-healing ability of CS-TBA-Fe hydrogels under variable external strain (1% and 500%).
Figure 7Adhesion strength of CS-TBA-Fe hydrogels with different structures on porcine skin (A) and comparison of the adhesion strengths in bonding various substrates (B).
Determination of the relative bacterial activity of E. coil.
| Sample | OD600 | Average | Bacterial Activity (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.0903 | 0.0789 | 0.0812 | 0.0835 | 10.6 |
| CS-TBA-Fe | 0.778 | 0.783 | 0.788 | 0.783 | |
Figure 8Digital images of surviving bacteria on chitosan, TBA, and CS-TBA-Fe (A) samples after being co-cultured with E. coli (A) and comparison of bactericidal activity of chitosan, TBA, and CS-TBA-Fe against E. coli (B).