| Literature DB >> 34960790 |
Pedro V da Silva-Neto1,2, Jonatan C S de Carvalho1,3, Vinícius E Pimentel1,4, Malena M Pérez1, Diana M Toro1,2, Thais F C Fraga-Silva4, Carlos A Fuzo1, Camilla N S Oliveira1,4, Lilian C Rodrigues1, Jamille G M Argolo5, Ingryd Carmona-Garcia5, Nicola T Neto5, Camila O S Souza1,4, Talita M Fernandes5, Victor A F Bastos1, Augusto M Degiovani6, Leticia F Constant6, Fátima M Ostini6, Marley R Feitosa7, Rogerio S Parra7, Fernando C Vilar8, Gilberto G Gaspar8, José J R da Rocha7, Omar Feres7, Fabiani G Frantz1, Raquel F Gerlach9, Sandra R Maruyama10, Elisa M S Russo1, Angelina L Viana5, Ana P M Fernandes5, Isabel K F M Santos4, Vânia L D Bonato4, Antonio L Boechat2, Adriana Malheiro2, Ruxana T Sadikot11, Marcelo Dias-Baruffi1, Cristina R B Cardoso1, Lúcia H Faccioli1, Carlos A Sorgi2,3,4.
Abstract
Uncontrolled inflammatory responses play a critical role in coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In this context, because the triggering-receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) is considered an intrinsic amplifier of inflammatory signals, this study investigated the role of soluble TREM-1 (sTREM-1) as a biomarker of the severity and mortality of COVID-19. Based on their clinical scores, we enrolled COVID-19 positive patients (n = 237) classified into mild, moderate, severe, and critical groups. Clinical data and patient characteristics were obtained from medical records, and their plasma inflammatory mediator profiles were evaluated with immunoassays. Plasma levels of sTREM-1 were significantly higher among patients with severe disease compared to all other groups. Additionally, levels of sTREM-1 showed a significant positive correlation with other inflammatory parameters, such as IL-6, IL-10, IL-8, and neutrophil counts, and a significant negative correlation was observed with lymphocyte counts. Most interestingly, sTREM-1 was found to be a strong predictive biomarker of the severity of COVID-19 and was related to the worst outcome and death. Systemic levels of sTREM-1 were significantly correlated with the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-8, which can release TREM-1 from the surface of peripheral blood cells. Our findings indicated that quantification of sTREM-1 could be used as a predictive tool for disease outcome, thus improving the timing of clinical and pharmacological interventions in patients with COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; MMP-8; biomarker; inflammation; sTREM-1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960790 PMCID: PMC8708887 DOI: 10.3390/v13122521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Clinical and demographic data of COVID-19 patients enrolled in this study.
| Baseline Variable | Healthy Controls | All Patients | COVID-19 Care | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residential | Hospitalized | ||||
|
| |||||
| Age mean ± SD, (IQR) | 35 ± 14.7 | 57 ± 19 | 37 ± 12 | 63 ± 16.4 |
|
|
| |||||
| Male | 22 (44) | 84 (35.4) | 21 (35) | 63 (36) |
|
| Female | 28 (56) | 153 (64.6) | 39 (65) | 114 (64) | |
|
| |||||
| Hypertension | 7 (14) | 116 (48.9) | 4 (3.4) | 112 (96.6) |
|
| Cardiovascular diseases | 5 (18.5) | 22 (81.5) | 8 (36.4) | 14 (63.6) | a 0.7947 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 4 (5.8) | 65 (94.2) | 5 (7.7) | 60 (92.3) |
|
| History of smoking | 3 (10) | 27 (90) | 6 (22.2) | 21 (77.8) | a 0.2189 |
| History of stroke | - | 10 (4.2) | - | 10 (5.6) | - |
| Neurological diseases | - | 12 (5.0) | 2 (16.7) | 10 (83.3) | d 0.7353 |
| Cancer | - | 7 (2.9) | - | 7 (3.9) | - |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.5 ± 5.2 | 28.4 ± 7.0 | 27.2 ± 5.6 | 29.4 ± 7.3 |
|
|
| |||||
| Dyspnea | - | 137 (57.8) | 19 (31.6) | 118 (66.6) |
|
| Fever | - | 78 (32.9) | 1 (1.7) | 77 (43.5) |
|
| Myalgia | - | 52 (21.9) | - | 52 (29.4) | - |
| Diarrhea | - | 56 (23.6) | 22 (36.7) | 34 (19.21) |
|
| Cough | - | 161 (67.9) | 43 (71.7) | 118 (66.7) |
|
| Hyperactive delirium | - | 15 (6.3) | - | 15 (8.5) | - |
| Dysgeusia | - | 60 (25.3) | 40 (66.7) | 20 (11.3) |
|
| Anosmia | - | 67 (28.3) | 41 (68.3) | 26 (14.7) |
|
|
| |||||
| Erythrocytes × 109/L | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 4.4 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.8 |
|
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 14.5 ± 1.6 | 13.1 ± 2.6 | 14.5 ± 1.3 | 12.4 ± 2.6 |
|
| Leukocytes × 109/L | 7.5 ± 1.8 | 9.0 ± 5.6 | 7.3 ± 2.1 | 10.2 ± 6.0 |
|
| Neutrophils × 109/L | 4.2 ± 1.4 | 7.0 ± 5.0 | 4.1 ± 1.9 | 8.3 ± 5.0 |
|
| Lymphocytes × 109/L | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 1.0 ± 0.7 |
|
| RNL | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 5.6 ± 6.4 | 1.7 ± 1.0 | 7.3 ± 6.4 |
|
| Monocytes × 109/L | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | a,b,c,d >0.1 |
| Platelets × 109/L | 214 ± 51.8 | 244 ± 98.1 | 227 ±66.3 | 245 ± 105.8 | a,b,d >0.1 |
|
| |||||
| Infirmary | - | 95 (40) | - | 95 (53.7) | - |
| Intensive care unit (ICU) | - | 82 (34.6) | - | 82 (46.3) | - |
|
| |||||
| Hospitalization days, mean (IQR) | - | 9 (1–30) | - | 9 (1–30) | - |
|
| |||||
| Nasal-cannula oxygen | - | 65 (27.4) | - | 65 (36.7) | - |
| Oxygen masks/noninvasive | - | 30 (12.6) | - | 30 (16.9) | - |
| Invasive mechanical ventilation | - | 70 (29.5) | - | 70 (39.5) | - |
| Oxygen saturation mean ± SD (IQR) | 99 ± 2.4 | 93 ± 8.7 | 98 ± 1.8 | 91 ± 8.9 |
|
|
| |||||
| Glucocorticoid | - | 156 (61.6) | 10 (16.7) | 146 (82.5) |
|
| Azithromycin | - | 149 (68.6) | 18 (30.0) | 127 (71.7) |
|
| Ceftriaxone | - | 84 (33.7) | 0.4 (6.7) | 80 (45.2) |
|
| Oseltamivir | - | 80 (30.4) | 0.8 (13.3) | 72 (40.7) |
|
| Colchicine | - | 0.5 (2.1) | - | 0.5 (2.8) | - |
| Chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine | - | 18 (7.6) | - | 26 (14.7) | - |
| Anticoagulant | - | 34 (14.3) | - | 34 (19.2) | - |
| Ivermectin | - | 11 (4.6) | 11 (18.3) | - | - |
a Comparisons between healthy controls and COVID-19 patients; b healthy controls versus non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients; c healthy controls versus hospitalized COVID-19 patients; d non-hospitalized versus hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patient data were compared using the chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Mann–Whitney, nonparametric t-test was used for continuous variables. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Abbreviations: standard deviation (SD); data are median (IQR), n (%), or n/N.
Figure 1Elevated levels of sTREM-1 in patients with COVID-19. (A) The plasma concentration of sTREM-1 in COVID-19 patients under residential care (n = 60), hospital care (n = 177), or healthy controls (n = 50) were analyzed and compared. Data are presented as mean values plus ranges. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to perform multiple comparisons when the data followed a non-normal distribution. The differences between the groups are indicated by the p-value in the graph above the diagram. (B) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of sTREM-1 concentrations to predict disease among patients with COVID-19 in residential care (blue) and hospital care (red). The area under the curve (AUC) and the p-values for significant differences between patients with COVID-19 and controls are depicted in the graphic. (C) Relative frequency of sTREM-1 between patients under residential care (blue) and hospital care (red) with COVID-19. Mean, standard deviation, lower 95% CI, and upper 95% CI data for each group are presented in the table between graphics.
Figure 2sTREM-1 levels were correlated with inflammatory cytokine production, comorbidities, and clinical severity of COVID-19 patients. (A) Unsupervised hierarchical cluster heat map showing the expression of markers and clinical parameters (Sat O2, lymphocytes (Ly), neutrophil (NE) counts, BMI, hypertension (ASH), sTREM-1, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF levels) for different groups of patients, according to the disease score (control, mild, moderate, severe, and critical) data are colored by row normalized value for each sample. (B) The PCA graphic shows the clusterization of those subgroups of patients (95% confidence interval), including all markers exhibited in the heat map, except for the levels of sTREM-1, performed with the base R functions. The continuous variables were transformed to log2 scale, and in the case of the heat map and PCA, the data used were transformed to z-scores (centered and scaled). (C) Levels of sTREM-1 in patients with different severity forms of COVID-19: mild (n = 44), moderate (n = 45), severe (n = 72), and critical (n = 76), as well as control (CT line, n = 50). Median values are presented with ranges. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for multiple comparisons in data with non-normal distribution. The differences between each group are indicated by the p-value in the graphic above the diagram. (D) The color scale sidebar indicates the correlation coefficients (r), where red represents positive correlation, and blue represents negative correlation. The square size and color intensity are proportional to the correlation coefficients, p values were represented by * <0.05, ** <0.01, and *** <0.001. A network-based on Spearman’s correlation (p < 0.05) was constructed, analyzed, and graphically represented using the R packages.
Figure 3sTREM-1 levels in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 predicted mortality. (A) Adjusted predicted number of events for sTREM-1 levels. (B) Plasmatic levels of sTREM-1 of severe/critical patients were indicated for each individual on the day of hospital admission and after the outcome (dead or alive). The Mann–Whitney test was used for analyzing data with non-normal distribution, and differences between groups were established. (C) ROC and AUC assessing the discrimination capacity of sTREM-1 levels for mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. (D) High levels of sTREM-1 and adjusted incidence rate ratio for the predictive variable of deaths. * Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR).
Figure 4sTREM-1 was released from the surface of the peripheral blood leukocyte membrane, correlated with the expressionof MMP-8. (A) Sequential gating is shown: (I) SSC-A versus FSC-A; (II) leukocytes gated according to their side scatter and CD14 antibody staining patterns; (III) light scatter flow cytometry profile for cells based on forward scatter (FSC-A) related to size, and side scatters (SSC-A) related to granularity; (IV) gated according to their side scatter and CD16 antibody staining patterns. The percentage of CD14+ and CD14− CD16+ cells was evaluated for groups of COVID-19 patients, as well as the percentage of CD14+TREM-1+ and CD14−CD16+TREM-1+ in the cell surface. The amount of TREM-1 expression was obtained by quantification of MFI in CD14+ and CD14−CD16+ leukocytes. (B) MMP-8 quantification in subgroups of COVID-19 patients. Median values are presented with ranges. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for multiple comparisons in data with non-normal distribution. Differences between groups are indicated by the p-values in the graphics. (C) Spearman test correlation between MMP-8 and sTREM-1 levels. The correlation coefficients (r) and the p-value are indicated in the graphic.
Figure 5Schematic representation of the TREM-1/sTREM-1 pathway during the severity of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 activates innate immune receptors in infected cells and triggers the inflammatory transcription factor into the nucleus, where it induces several pro-inflammatory genes, including up-regulation of TREM-1. After binding to its ligand, TREM-1 associates with the adapter molecule DAP12, leading to a cascade of phosphorylation in a downstream kinase panel that, in turn, activates other transcription factors and amplifies the inflammatory response, as well as production of cytokines. It is speculated that high levels of circulating sTREM-1 were released from the surface of the peripheral blood leukocyte membrane related to MMP-8 activity. Therefore, individuals with high levels of sTREM-1 can indicate a dysregulated immune response (Created with BioRender.com, Agreement number: AZ238AM20F).