| Literature DB >> 34960567 |
Mubarak Alotaibi1, Barmak Honarvar Shakibaei Asli1, Muhammad Khan1.
Abstract
Non-Invasive Inspection (NII) has become a fundamental tool in modern industrial maintenance strategies. Remote and online inspection features keep operators fully aware of the health of industrial assets whilst saving money, lives, production and the environment. This paper conducted crucial research to identify suitable sensing techniques for machine health diagnosis in an NII manner, mainly to detect machine shaft misalignment and gearbox tooth damage for different types of machines, even those installed in a hostile environment, using literature on several sensing tools and techniques. The researched tools are critically reviewed based on the published literature. However, in the absence of a formal definition of NII in the existing literature, we have categorised NII tools and methods into two distinct categories. Later, we describe the use of these tools as contact-based, such as vibration, alternative current (AC), voltage and flux analysis, and non-contact-based, such as laser, imaging, acoustic, thermographic and radar, under each category in detail. The unaddressed issues and challenges are discussed at the end of the paper. The conclusions suggest that one cannot single out an NII technique or method to perform health diagnostics for every machine efficiently. There are limitations with all of the reviewed tools and methods, but good results possible if the machine operational requirements and maintenance needs are considered. It has been noted that the sensors based on radar principles are particularly effective when monitoring assets, but further comprehensive research is required to explore the full potential of these sensors in the context of the NII of machine health. Hence it was identified that the radar sensing technique has excellent features, although it has not been comprehensively employed in machine health diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: diagnostics; machine health; maintenance routines; non-invasive inspection; radar sensors
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960567 PMCID: PMC8705398 DOI: 10.3390/s21248474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Non-Invasive definition (a) non-contact based and (b) contact based.
Figure 2General principle of radio transmission [53].
Figure 3Polarization mode dispersion (PMD) caused by multi paths [51].
Figure 4Vibration model [54].
Figure 5Identification results for: (a) number of devices, (b) frequency and (c) displacement resolution [54].
Figure 6Operational principle of radar.
Figure 7Vibration spectrum showing difference in multiple harmonics for each scattering matrix element [38].
Figure 8Result of vibration test using speakers [43].
Figure 9Ultrasonic principle [55].
Figure 10Block diagram of an ultrasonic tomography system [56].
Figure 11Pitch-catch ultrasonic measuring technique: The pulsers are labelled 1–8 from the inner bound to the outer bound, and the receivers are correspondingly labelled A to H. [57].
Figure 12Process of implementation [59].
Figure 13Result of combined communication signal and sensing [60].
Figure 14Image with and without white sheet paper. The squares a and b enclose different parts of the accelerometer and the squares c and d contain locations of the white paper with and without the black straight line. [61].
Figure 15Heterodyne principle. and (phase 1 and 2) are the wrapped phase functions and , correspond to the unwrapped phase function [62].
Figure 16Transfer the acoustic signal to image (CNN model) [69].
Figure 17Fault detection using CEEMDAN method [70].
Figure 18High level of noise position at 120 degrees [76].
Figure 19Comparison of a healthy and a non-healthy machine [79].
Figure 20Motor and bearing thermogram: (a) experimental setup and kinematic chain and (b) thermographic image [80].
Figure 21Different bearing faults: (a) inner race, (b) outer race, (c) ball fault and (d) healthy bearing [87].
Figure 22Four pairs of sensors [94].
Figure 23Theoretical and calculated torque [92].
Figure 24No fault detected [96].
Figure 25Fault detected [96].
Figure 26Localize analysis equation [104].
Figure 27Park analysis equation [104].
Figure 28(a) Denoised signal by standard LP denoising method, (b) Frequency domain plot of denoised signal by AHLP denoising method [111].
Figure 29MSSRS testing result (a) Waveform and power spectrum, (b) the TFD, (c) the classical SR result, (d) the MSTSR result, (e) the MSSRS result, and (f) the optimum result in the MSSRS [113].
Figure 30Comparative results between FFT, DWT and WPT methods [117].
Figure 31Wear debris size and credibility [122].
Suitability matrix of NII techniques for different applications.
| Technique | Key Characteristic | Limitations | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Wear debris [ |
Very accurate at establishing severity Low cost |
Cannot locate faults Interrupts operation |
Machine lubricant oil analysis |
| Vibration sensing [ |
Good response Withstand high temperatures High accuracy |
Contact-based Sensitive to machine noise |
Machine body and equipment measurement |
| Flux radiation or voltage and current [ |
Low cost Fast action Simple installation |
Suitable for motors but not fuel-powered engines Impacted by a change in the supply network Weakness in tracking load change Cannot quantify severity of damage |
Motor body and wiring |
|
| |||
| Ultrasonic sensing [ |
Insensitive to weather conditions Senses all materials Larger size provides better sensing |
Sensitive to temperature changes Struggles to read small object reflection |
Anti-collision Doors |
| Imaging camera
[ |
non-contact No harmful radiation Operates in real-time |
Heavy and large size Impacted by weather and dust High usage of data |
Image monitoring Machine vibration Car speed detection |
| Thermographic sensing [ |
No- harmful radiation Life-time operation Specify fault area |
Temperature interference from others surfaces |
Human body detection Machine and equipment heat |
| Radar sensing [ |
Insensitive to weather conditions Multiple objects at a time Easy installation Fast data acquisition Longer measuring range Detect different types of materials |
High cost No fault classification Signal spreads Hard to classify close objects |
Detect objects and motions Object speed and size Car’s sensors Autonomous car Door |
| Acoustic emission [ |
Non-contact High sensitivity Low cost Real-time monitoring |
Noise impact No fault classification |
Music ditemize Machine noise sensing |
| Laser sensing [ |
Non-contact Multiple object detection Long measuring range |
No fault classification Cost Eye risk Affected by the weather |
Machine vibration sensing |